Personalized modeling to improve pseudo-CT images for magnetic resonance imaging-guided adaptive radiotherapy

Efficient segmentation using domain adaptation for MRI-guided and CBCT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Delineation of regions of interest (ROIs) is important for adaptive radiotherapy (ART) but it is also time consuming and labor intensive.

AIM

This study aims to develop efficient segmentation methods for magnetic resonance imaging-guided ART (MRIgART) and cone-beam computed tomography-guided ART (CBCTgART).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MRIgART and CBCTgART studies enrolled 242 prostate cancer patients and 530 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, respectively. A public dataset of CBCT from 35 pancreatic cancer patients was adopted to test the framework. We designed two domain adaption methods to learn and adapt the features from planning computed tomography (pCT) to MRI or CBCT modalities. The pCT was transformed to synthetic MRI (sMRI) for MRIgART, while CBCT was transformed to synthetic CT (sCT) for CBCTgART. Generalized segmentation models were trained with large popular data in which the inputs were sMRI for MRIgART and pCT for CBCTgART. Finally, the personalized models for each patient were established by fine-tuning the generalized model with the contours on pCT of that patient. The proposed method was compared with deformable image registration (DIR), a regular deep learning (DL) model trained on the same modality (DL-regular), and a generalized model in our framework (DL-generalized).

RESULTS

The proposed method achieved better or comparable performance. For MRIgART of the prostate cancer patients, the mean dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of four ROIs was 87.2%, 83.75%, 85.36%, and 92.20% for the DIR, DL-regular, DL-generalized, and proposed method, respectively. For CBCTgART of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, the mean DSC of two target volumes were 90.81% and 91.18%, 75.17% and 58.30%, for the DIR, DL-regular, DL-generalized, and the proposed method, respectively. For CBCTgART of the pancreatic cancer patients, the mean DSC of two ROIs were 61.94% and 61.44%, 63.94% and 81.56%, for the DIR, DL-regular, DL-generalized, and the proposed method, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The proposed method utilizing personalized modeling improved the segmentation accuracy of ART.

Quantitative assessment of adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer using deep learning: Bladder dose as a decision criterion

BACKGROUND

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) can incorporate anatomical variations in a reoptimized treatment plan for fractionated radiotherapy. An automatic solution to objectively determine whether ART should be performed immediately after the daily image acquisition is highly desirable.

PURPOSE

We investigate a quantitative criterion for whether ART should be performed in prostate cancer radiotherapy by synthesizing pseudo-CT (sCT) images and evaluating dosimetric impact on treatment planning using deep learning approaches.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Planning CT (pCT) and daily cone-beam CT (CBCT) data sets of 74 patients are used to train (60 patients) and evaluate (14 patients) a cycle adversarial generative network (CycleGAN) that performs the task of synthesizing high-quality sCT from daily CBCT. Automatic delineation (AD) of the bladder is performed on the sCT using the U-net. The combination of sCT and AD allows us to perform dose calculations based on the up-to-date bladder anatomy to determine whether the original treatment plan (ori-plan) is still applicable. For positive cases that the patients' anatomical changes and the associated dose calculations warrant re-planning, we made rapid plan revisions (re-plan) based on the ori-plan.

RESULTS

The mean absolute error within the region-of-interests (i.e., body, bladder, fat, muscle) between the sCT and pCT are 41.2, 25.1, 26.5, and 29.0HU, respectively. Taking the calculated results of pCT doses as the standard, for PTV, the gamma passing rates of sCT doses at 1 mm/1%, 2 mm/2% are 87.92%, 98.78%, respectively. The Dice coefficients of the AD-contours are 0.93 on pCT and 0.91 on sCT. According to the result of dose calculation, we found when the bladder volume underwent a substantial change (79.7%), the bladder dose is still within the safe limit, suggesting it is insufficient to solely use the bladder volume change as a criterion to determine whether adaptive treatment needs to be done. After AD-contours of the bladder using sCT, there are two cases whose bladder doseD mean > 4000 cGy ${{\mathrm{D}}}_{{\mathrm{mean}}} > 4000{\mathrm{\ cGy}}$ . For the two cases, we perform re-planning to reduce the bladder dose toD mean = 3841 cGy ${{\mathrm{D}}}_{{\mathrm{mean}}} = 3841{\mathrm{\ cGy}}$ ,D mean = 3580 cGy ${{\mathrm{D}}}_{{\mathrm{mean}}} = 3580{\mathrm{\ cGy\ }}$ under the condition that the PTV meets the prescribed dose.

CONCLUSION

We provide a dose accurate adaptive workflow for prostate cancer patients by using deep learning approaches, and implement ART that adapts to bladder dose. Of note, the specific replanning criterion for whether ART needs to be performed can adapt to different centers' choices based on their experience and daily observations.

A more effective CT synthesizer using transformers for cone-beam CT-guided adaptive radiotherapy

Purpose

The challenge of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is its low image quality, which limits its application for adaptive radiotherapy (ART). Despite recent substantial improvement in CBCT imaging using the deep learning method, the image quality still needs to be improved for effective ART application. Spurred by the advantages of transformers, which employs multi-head attention mechanisms to capture long-range contextual relations between image pixels, we proposed a novel transformer-based network (called TransCBCT) to generate synthetic CT (sCT) from CBCT. This study aimed to further improve the accuracy and efficiency of ART.

Materials and methods

In this study, 91 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were enrolled. We constructed a transformer-based hierarchical encoder–decoder structure with skip connection, called TransCBCT. The network also employed several convolutional layers to capture local context. The proposed TransCBCT was trained and validated on 6,144 paired CBCT/deformed CT images from 76 patients and tested on 1,026 paired images from 15 patients. The performance of the proposed TransCBCT was compared with a widely recognized style transferring deep learning method, the cycle-consistent adversarial network (CycleGAN). We evaluated the image quality and clinical value (application in auto-segmentation and dose calculation) for ART need.

Results

TransCBCT had superior performance in generating sCT from CBCT. The mean absolute error of TransCBCT was 28.8 ± 16.7 HU, compared to 66.5 ± 13.2 for raw CBCT, and 34.3 ± 17.3 for CycleGAN. It can preserve the structure of raw CBCT and reduce artifacts. When applied in auto-segmentation, the Dice similarity coefficients of bladder and rectum between auto-segmentation and oncologist manual contours were 0.92 and 0.84 for TransCBCT, respectively, compared to 0.90 and 0.83 for CycleGAN. When applied in dose calculation, the gamma passing rate (1%/1 mm criterion) was 97.5% ± 1.1% for TransCBCT, compared to 96.9% ± 1.8% for CycleGAN.

Conclusions

The proposed TransCBCT can effectively generate sCT for CBCT. It has the potential to improve radiotherapy accuracy.

Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy

Radiotherapy is a discipline closely integrated with computer science. Artificial intelligence (AI) has developed rapidly over the past few years. With the explosive growth of medical big data, AI promises to revolutionize the field of radiotherapy through highly automated workflow, enhanced quality assurance, improved regional balances of expert experiences, and individualized treatment guided by multi-omics. In addition to independent researchers, the increasing number of large databases, biobanks, and open challenges significantly facilitated AI studies on radiation oncology. This article reviews the latest research, clinical applications, and challenges of AI in each part of radiotherapy including image processing, contouring, planning, quality assurance, motion management, and outcome prediction. By summarizing cutting-edge findings and challenges, we aim to inspire researchers to explore more future possibilities and accelerate the arrival of AI radiotherapy.