Unilateral Radiation Therapy for Tonsillar Cancer: Treatment Outcomes in the Era of Human Papillomavirus, Positron-Emission Tomography, and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

Painful Realities: Navigating the Complexities of Head and Neck Cancer Pain

BACKGROUND

Head and neck cancer (HNC) and its treatments can cause significant pain, which can profoundly impact patients' quality of life and treatment outcomes. Understanding the full scope of HNC pain is essential for effective management and improved patient care.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to comprehensively analyze the multifaceted nature of pain experienced by individuals with HNC, including its various etiologies and management strategies.

RESULTS

HNC pain can arise from tumor extent, treatment-related toxicity, or comorbid conditions. The pathophysiology involves complex interactions between nociceptive, neuropathic, and inflammatory mechanisms. Optimal pain control requires a multimodal patient-tailored approach utilizing both pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies.

CONCLUSION

Enhancing our understanding of HNC pain and optimizing its management is imperative for improving the overall well-being and treatment outcomes of affected individuals. Future research should focus on understanding detailed pain mechanisms, with the goal of developing personalized pain management strategies and exploring novel therapeutic targets. By implementing comprehensive approaches to HNC pain management, healthcare providers can better support patients through their cancer treatment journey.

Unilateral Neck Treatment with either Surgery and/or Radiotherapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma for the Tonsil

INTRODUCTION

Strategies for treatment of tonsil carcinoma are under active investigation. Limiting surgical and radiation treatment volumes to the primary tumor and ipsilateral neck in appropriately selected patients are one such approach. Here, we present our institutional experience with treatment through ipsilateral surgical or radiotherapeutic neck management.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database of patients with tonsil carcinoma treated from 2012 to 2020. Patients were included for analysis if they received definitive radiation therapy (RT), definitive surgery (S), or surgery with postoperative radiation therapy (S-PORT) and whose treatment volumes were limited to the primary tumor and involved/elective ipsilateral neck. Patients who received radiation and/or surgery to the contralateral neck (including those with bilateral nodal involvement), as well as patients with metastatic disease, were excluded. Clinical factors including T- and N-stage (AJCC 7th edition), and HPV status (by p16 and/or HPV DNA PCR) were recorded, as were pathologic factors (when applicable) including margin status, extracapsular extension (ECE), lymphovascular invasion (LVSI), and perineural invasion (PNI). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional control (LRC) at 2 years were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

In total, 71 patients were treated with unilateral neck approaches: S (n = 49), RT (n = 10), and S+PORT (n = 12). Among these patients, 32, 36, and 3 had T1, T2, and T3 disease, respectively. N-stage was N0, N1, N2a, N2b, and N3 in 22, 20, 5, 23, and 1 patient(s), respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered in 12 patients. From those with recorded risk factors, 86% were HPV positive, 20% had LVSI, 7% had PNI, 13% had ECE, and 5% had positive margins. From a median follow-up of 27 months, local, regional, and distant failures occurred in 5, 6, and 5 patients, respectively. No contralateral neck failures were recorded. At 2 years, OS, PFS, and LRC were 92% (95% CI 85-99%), 85% (95% CI 75-95%), and 88% (95% CI 80-98%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with early T-stage tonsil carcinoma, treatment of the primary tumor and ipsilateral neck is associated with acceptable OS, PFS, and LRC. In this population, the risk of contralateral neck failure is likely very low regardless of primary treatment modality. Additional prospective studies are needed to determine the impact of limiting treatment extent, either surgical or radiotherapeutic, to the unilateral neck.

Unilateral radiotherapy for tonsillar cancer with multiple ipsilateral neck lymph nodes

PURPOSE

For tonsillar cancer with multiple ipsilateral neck lymph nodes, the safety and efficacy of unilateral radiotherapy (RT) have long been a topic of debate. We performed retrospective analyses of patients having ipsilateral neck lymph nodes treated with unilateral RT in two tertiary referral hospitals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study accrued 29 patients who were diagnosed as well-lateralized tonsillar cancer with multiple ipsilateral neck lymph nodes and underwent unilateral RT from March 2000 to March 2020. Patients underwent treatment with one of the following options or a combination of them: induction chemotherapy, surgery, RT, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy. We analyzed the recurrence pattern and survival with special attention to contralateral neck failure. Also, treatment-related toxicities were compared with a 1:1 matched cohort of those who received bilateral RT, using propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 68 months, no contralateral neck failure was observed. Five-year actuarial locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were 85.6%, 91.8%, and 92.7%, respectively. Both the acute and chronic grade 2 xerostomia occurred in 10.3% of the patients. When the toxicity for unilateral RT was compared to that of bilateral RT using a propensity score-matched cohort, a significantly lower rate of acute xerostomia was observed in unilateral RT group (55.1% vs. 82.7%, p=0.002), primarily at grade 2 level (10.3% vs. 51.7%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest that unilateral RT can be safely performed in well-lateralized tonsillar cancer patients with multiple ipsilateral neck lymph nodes.

Radiation Therapy for HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is a distinct disease from other head and neck tumors. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on the critical decisions in its curative treatment, including both definitive and postoperative radiation therapy (RT) management.

METHODS

ASTRO convened a task force to address 5 key questions on the use of RT for management of HPV-associated OPSCC. These questions included indications for definitive and postoperative RT and chemoradiation; dose-fractionation regimens and treatment volumes; preferred RT techniques and normal tissue considerations; and posttreatment management decisions. The task force did not address indications for primary surgery versus RT. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

Concurrent cisplatin is recommended for patients receiving definitive RT with T3-4 disease and/or 1 node >3 cm, or multiple nodes. For similar patients who are ineligible for cisplatin, concurrent cetuximab, carboplatin/5-fluorouracil, or taxane-based systemic therapy are conditionally recommended. In the postoperative setting, RT with concurrent cisplatin (either schedule) is recommended for positive surgical margins or extranodal extension. Postoperative RT alone is recommended for pT3-4 disease, >2 nodes, or a single node >3 cm. Observation is conditionally recommended for pT1-2 disease and a single node ≤3 cm without other risk factors. For patients treated with definitive RT with concurrent systemic therapy, 7000 cGy in 33 to 35 fractions is recommended, and for patients receiving postoperative RT without positive surgical margins and extranodal extension, 5600 to 6000 cGy is recommended. For all patients receiving RT, intensity modulated RT over 3-dimensional techniques with reduction in dose to critical organs at risk (including salivary and swallowing structures) is recommended. Reassessment with positron emission tomography-computed tomography is recommended approximately 3 months after definitive RT/chemoradiation, and neck dissection is recommended for convincing evidence of residual disease; for equivocal positron emission tomography-computed tomography findings, either neck dissection or repeat imaging is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

The role and practice of RT continues to evolve for HPV-associated OPSCC, and these guidelines inform best clinical practice based on the available evidence.

Revisiting Feeding Tube Utilization in Oropharynx Cancer: 6-Year Prospective Registry Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Patients treated for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) have historically demonstrated high feeding tube rates for decreased oral intake and malnutrition. We re-examined feeding tube practices in these patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospective cohort from 2015 to 2021.

SETTING

Single-institution NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center.

METHODS

With IRB approval, patients with new oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer or (unknown primary with neck metastasis) were enrolled. Baseline swallowing was assessed via videofluoroscopy and Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSSHN). G-tubes or nasogastric tubes (NGT) were placed for weight loss before, during, or after treatment. Prophylactic NGT were placed during transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Tube duration was censored at last disease-free follow-up. Multivariate regression was performed for G-tube placement (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval [CI]) and removal (Cox hazard ratio, hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI]).

RESULTS

Of 924 patients, most had stage I to II (81%), p16+ (89%), node-positive (88%) disease. Median follow-up was 2.6 years (interquartile range 1.5-3.9). Most (91%) received radiation/chemoradiation, and 16% received TORS. G-tube rate was 27% (5% after TORS). G-tube risk was increased with chemoradiation (OR 2.78 [1.87-4.22]) and decreased with TORS (OR 0.31 [0.15-0.57]) and PSSHN-Diet score ≥60 (OR 0.26 [0.15-0.45]). G-tube removal probability over time was lower for T3 to T4 tumors (HR 0.52 [0.38-0.71]) and higher for PSSHN-Diet score ≥60 (HR 1.65 [1.03-2.66]).

CONCLUSIONS

In this modern cohort of patients treated for OPC, 27% received G-tubes-50% less than institutional rates 10 years ago. Patients with preserved baseline swallowing and/or those eligible for TORS may have lower G-tube risk and duration.

Lessons and Opportunities for Biomarker-Driven Radiation Personalization in Head and Neck Cancer

Head and neck cancer is notoriously challenging to treat in part because it constitutes an anatomically and biologically diverse group of cancers with heterogeneous prognoses. While treatment can be associated with significant late toxicities, recurrence is often difficult to salvage with poor survival rates and functional morbidity.^1,2 Thus, achieving tumor control and cure at the initial diagnosis is the highest priority. Given the differing outcome expectations (even within a specific sub-site like oropharyngeal carcinoma), there has been growing interest in personalizing treatment: de-escalation in selected cancers to decrease the risk of late toxicity without compromising oncologic outcomes, and intensification for more aggressive cancers to improve oncologic outcomes without causing undue toxicity. This risk stratification is increasingly accomplished using biomarkers, which can represent molecular, clinicopathologic, and/or radiologic data. In this review, we will focus on biomarker-driven radiotherapy dose personalization with emphasis on oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This radiation personalization is largely performed on the population level by identifying patients with good prognosis via traditional clinicopathologic factors, although there are emerging studies supporting inter-tumor and intra-tumor level personalization via imaging and molecular biomarkers.

Low contralateral neck recurrence risk with ipsilateral neck radiotherapy in N2b tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To characterize factors including nodal burden, pre-treatment imaging, and other patient factors which may influence the role of ipsilateral neck radiotherapy (IRT) in tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with multiple involved ipsilateral nodes.

METHODS

Patients with cT1-2N0-2bM0 (AJCC 7th edition) tonsillar SCC treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT) at Duke University Medical Center from 1/1/1990-10/1/2019 were identified. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared between those that received bilateral neck RT (BRT) versus IRT. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method. A subset analysis of patients with N2b disease was performed. Patterns of recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

120 patients with cT1-2N0-2b tonsillar SCC were identified, including 71 with N2b disease (BRT: n = 30; IRT: n = 41). Median follow-up was 80 months (range: 7-209). No N2b patients who received IRT had > 1 cm of soft palate/base of tongue extension. N2b patients treated with IRT had a median of 3 (range 2-9) involved lymph nodes, with median largest nodal dimension of 2.8 cm (range 1.3-4.8 cm). 93 % of N2b patients who received IRT had staging by PET/CT, and 100 % received IMRT. For N2b patients treated with IRT, there were no contralateral neck recurrences, and 10 year RFS was 95 % (95 % CI 82 %-98 %).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients treated with IRT for well-lateralized N2b tonsillar SCC, we observed high rates of local control with no observed contralateral neck recurrence. These data suggest that BRT is not universally necessary for patients with multiple involved ipsilateral nodes, particularly in the setting of baseline staging with PET/CT.