Dose-Volume Tolerance of the Brain and Predictors of Radiation Necrosis After 3-Fraction Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: A Large Single-Institutional Analysis

Phase 1/2 Dose Escalation Trial of 3-Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Resection Cavities from Large Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

We performed a dose escalation trial of hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 3-fraction SRS for brain metastases resection cavities.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Following surgical resection of a brain metastasis, patients were enrolled by SRS treatment volume onto 2 arms: arm 1 = 4.2-14.1 cm3, approximating a 2 to 3 cm diameter sphere, and arm 2 = 14.2-33.5 cm3 or a 3 to 4 cm sphere equivalent. Dose escalation levels were 24, 27, 30, and 33 Gy in 3 consecutive-day fractions, with 6 patients at each dose level in a 6 + 6 trial design. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as either acute (within 30 days of SRS) grade 3 to 5 central nervous system toxicity and/or late grade 3 to 5 radiation necrosis occurring at any subsequent timepoint. The MTD was defined as the highest dose where 0 to 1 out of 6 or 0 to 3 out of 12 had a dose-limiting toxicity.

RESULTS

From 2009 to 2014, 48 evaluable patients were enrolled. One (2%) patient had acute G3 toxicity; dose escalation proceeded to 33 Gy. No MTD was reached. Overall, 14 (29%) of 48 patients had G1-4 late radiation necrosis; G1 in 4 (8%), G2 in 6 (13%), G3 in 2 (4%), and G4 in 2 (4%). At the 33 Gy dose level, any grade necrosis was 58% in all 12 patients, 83% in the 6 patients on the larger volume arm 2; no G3-4 necrosis occurred in smaller arm 1 targets. With a median overall survival of 24 months (95% CI, 18-35), the 1-year cumulative incidence rates were: 10% (95% CI, 3.8-21) for local progression, 48% (95% CI, 33-61) for distant intracranial progression, and 13% (95% CI, 5-24) for radiation necrosis. Nodular meningeal disease occurred in 15% (7 of 48) of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Grade 3 to 4 toxicity was 8% and no MTD was reached with dose escalation to 33 Gy in 3 fractions. However, with a 58% incidence of G1-4 radiation necrosis at the 33 Gy level and 33% G3-4 necrosis at 30 Gy on arm 2, a 3-fraction dose of 27-30 Gy for targets 2 to 3 cm and 27 Gy for targets 3 to 4 cm may provide the optimal balance between toxicity and tumor control. A dose of 33 Gy is reserved for cavities <3 cm where tumor control may benefit from higher doses.

Boswellia Serrata for Cerebral Radiation Necrosis After Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

Radiation necrosis (RN) is a dose-limiting toxicity of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. Oral corticosteroids are not optimal for long-term management, given multiple side effects. Boswellia serrata (BS) is an over-the-counter supplement traditionally known for its anti-inflammatory properties and has recently been shown to reduce cerebral edema. We evaluated the response rates of BS in a series of patients with RN after SRS for brain metastases.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We identified patients who developed any grade RN after SRS and received BS for ≥2 months at a target dose of 4050 to 4500 mg daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), including complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), defined as ≥30% decrease in edema volume on T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging from baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients received BS, of which 94 patients with adequate follow-up were included. The median SRS dose was 24 Gy in 3 fractions, and 44%, 47%, and 9% of patients had grade 1, 2, and 3 RN, respectively. The best response was CR in 12% and PR in 48%, while 28% had stable edema and 12% had progression of edema. The overall ORR was 59.6% (95% CI, 48.9%-69.6%). ORR was 62%, 63%, and 33% for grade 1, 2, and 3 RN, respectively. The median duration of response in patients with CR or PR was 13.9 months (IQR, 9-23). Among 69 patients (73%) who never received steroids, received prior steroids only, or had a stable or decreasing steroid requirement of ≤4 mg per day of dexamethasone for at least >1 week prior to starting Boswellia, the ORR was 63.8%. Fourteen percent of patients had National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 1, and 2% had grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity. A total of 67% of patients remained on BS at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that BS is a safe and feasible treatment option for grade 1 to 3 RN after SRS. Further prospective studies comparing BS with a placebo are warranted.

ACROPath Oligometastases: The American College of Radiation Oncology Clinical Pathway

Radiation oncology is among the most data-driven specialties in medicine. Recently, a wealth of peer-reviewed data has been published supporting the treatment of oligometastatic malignancies, demonstrating improved survival with metastasis-directed therapy, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), when combined with appropriate patient selection and treatment. However, there are currently few, if any, established guidelines that synthesize the abundance of data specific to radiotherapy into a single, easily accessed resource for clinicians. ACROPath® is a major initiative of the American College of Radiation Oncology (ACRO) that aims to present aggregated clinical pathway data in a highly usable format that is readily accessible to clinicians at the point of care in real time. The oligometastases pathway is the first published algorithm in this collection, with additional pathways anticipated in future publications. Clinical radiation oncologists with expertise in the treatment and management of oligometastatic disease were recruited from across ACRO's diverse membership, including both academic and private practice physicians, to ensure a broad-based experience and insight. Individual participants were assigned subsections of the pathway for guideline development, and then, each subsection was presented to the full group for evaluation and consensus development based on published data. Rather than presenting an unstructured set of treatment options, as is common in other treatment guidelines, this initiative aimed to categorize appropriate treatments based on published clinical evidence in a hierarchy further ranked by efficacy, toxicity, and cost. Based on these strata, treatment recommendations were collated and grouped into three rank categories (gold, silver, or bronze) to denote the degree of applicability. The team assembled an interactive document that will eventually be available online, and it is summarized in detail here. Recommendations are grouped both by the anatomic site of metastasis and by the primary tumor type, recognizing that original histology might impact the treatment differently in different anatomic locations. After a review of available published clinical evidence, the committee reached a consensus on all recommendations presented, categorizing each option as gold, silver, or bronze to guide clinicians appropriately. This first iteration of ACROPath® Oligometastases represents one of the few comprehensive clinical decision support tools available for managing patients with limited metastatic disease. It presents available data in a highly accessible, easily used reference, which will be formally reviewed and updated by the committee as frequently as emerging data requires, likely at six- to 12-month intervals.

Fractionated Stereotactic Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Large Brain Metastases: Comprehensive Analyses of Dose-Volume Predictors of Radiation-Induced Brain Necrosis

BACKGROUND

The objective was to explore dosimetric predictors of brain necrosis (BN) in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT).

METHODS

After excluding collinearities carefully, multivariate logistic models were developed for comprehensive analyses of dosimetric predictors in patients who received first-line fractionated SRT for brain metastases (BMs). The normal brain volume receiving an xx Gy biological dose in 2 Gy fractions (VxxEQD2) was calculated from the retrieved dose-volume parameters.

RESULTS

Thirty Gy/3 fractions (fr) SRT was delivered to 34 patients with 75 BMs (median target volume, 3.2 cc), 35 Gy/5 fr to 30 patients with 57 BMs (6.4 cc), 37.5 Gy/5 fr to 28 patients with 47 BMs (20.2 cc), and 40 Gy/10 fr to 20 patients with 37 BMs (24.3 cc), according to protocols, depending on the total target volume (p < 0.001). After excluding the three-fraction groups, the incidence of symptomatic BN was significantly higher in patients with a larger V50EQD2 (adjusted odds ratio: 1.07, p < 0.02), V55EQD2 (1.08, p < 0.01), or V60EQD2 (1.09, p < 0.01) in the remaining five- and ten-fraction groups. The incidence of BN was also significantly higher in cases with V55EQD2 > 30 cc or V60EQD2 > 20 cc (p < 0.05). These doses correspond to 28 or 30 Gy/5 fr and 37 or 40 Gy/10 fr, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In five- or ten-fraction SRT, larger V55EQD2 or V60EQD2 are BN risk predictors. These biologically high doses may affect BN incidence. Thus, the planning target volume margin should be minimized as much as possible.

Single versus multiple fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for medium-sized brain metastases (4-14 cc in volume): reducing or fractionating the radiosurgery dose?

Background and purpose

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases (BM) and resection cavities is a widely used and effective treatment modality. Based on target lesion size and anatomical location, single fraction SRS (SF-SRS) or multiple fraction SRS (MF-SRS) are applied. Current clinical recommendations conditionally recommend either reduced dose SF-SRS or MF-SRS for medium-sized BM (2-2.9 cm in diameter). Despite excellent local control rates, SRS carries the risk of radionecrosis (RN). The purpose of this study was to assess the 12-months local control (LC) rate and 12-months RN rate of this specific patient population.

Materials and methods

This single-center retrospective study included 54 patients with medium-sized intact BM (n=28) or resection cavities (n=30) treated with either SF-SRS or MF-SRS. Follow-up MRI was used to determine LC and RN using a modification of the "Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System" (BT-RADS) scoring system.

Results

The 12-month LC rate following treatment of intact BM was 66.7% for SF-SRS and 60.0% for MF-SRS (p=1.000). For resection cavities, the 12-month LC rate was 92.9%% after SF-SRS and 46.2% after MF-SRS (p=0.013). For intact BM, RN rate was 17.6% for SF-SRS and 20.0% for MF-SRS (p=1.000). For resection cavities, RN rate was 28.6% for SF-SRS and 20.0% for MF-SRS (p=1.000).

Conclusion

Patients with intact BM showed no statistically significant differences in 12-months LC and RN rate following SF-SRS or MF-SRS. In patients with resection cavities the 12-months LC rate was significantly better following SF-SRS, with no increase in the RNFS.

Novel radiotherapeutic strategies in the management of brain metastases: Challenging the dogma

The role of radiation therapy in the management of brain metastasis is evolving. Advancements in machine learning techniques have improved our ability to both detect brain metastasis and our ability to contour substructures of the brain as critical organs at risk. Advanced imaging with PET tracers and magnetic resonance imaging-based artificial intelligence models can now predict tumor control and differentiate tumor progression from radiation necrosis. These advancements will help to optimize dose and fractionation for each patient's lesion based on tumor size, histology, systemic therapy, medical comorbidities/patient genetics, and tumor molecular features. This review will discuss the current state of brain directed radiation for brain metastasis. We will also discuss future directions to improve the precision of stereotactic radiosurgery and optimize whole brain radiation techniques to improve local tumor control and prevent cognitive decline without forming necrosis.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Women Older than 65 with Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the second most common cause of brain metastases (BM). Despite increasing incidence of BM in older women, there are limited data on the optimal management of BM in this age group. In this study, we assessed the survival outcomes and treatment patterns of older breast cancer patients ≥65 years old with BM compared to younger patients at our institution.

METHODS

An IRB-approved single-institutional retrospective review of biopsy-proven breast cancer patients with BM treated with 1- to 5-fraction stereotactic radiation therapy (SRS) from 2015 to 2020 was performed. Primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) defined as the time interval between the end of SRS to the date of the first CNS progression. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) from the end of SRS and radiation treatment patterns. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard regression method were used for survival analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 112 metastatic breast cancer patients with BMs were included of which 24 were ≥65 years old and 88 were <65 years old. Median age at RT was 72 years (range 65-84) compared to 52 years (31-64) in younger patients. There were significantly higher number of older women with ER/PR positive disease (75% vs. 49%, p = 0.036), while younger patients were more frequently triple negative (32% vs. 12%, p = 0.074) and HER2 positive (42% vs. 29%, p = 0.3). Treatment-related adverse events were similar in both groups. Overall, 14.3% patients had any grade radiation necrosis (RN) (older vs. young: 8.3% vs. 16%, p = 0.5) while 5.4% had grade 3 or higher RN (0% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.7). Median OS after RT was poorer in older patients compared to younger patients (9.5 months vs. 14.5 months, p = 0.037), while intracranial PFS from RT was similar between the two groups (9.7 months vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.580). On univariate analysis, significant predictors of OS were age ≥65 years old (hazard risk, HR = 1.70, p = 0.048), KPS ≤ 80 (HR = 2.24, p < 0.001), HER2 positive disease (HR = 0.46, p < 0.001), isolated CNS metastatic disease (HR = 0.29, p < 0.001), number of brain metastases treated with RT (HR = 1.06, p = 0.028), and fractionated SRS (HR = 0.53, p = 0.013). On multivariable analysis, KPS ≤ 80, HER2 negativity and higher number of brain metastases predicted for poorer survival, while age was not a significant factor for OS after adjusting for other variables. Patients who received systemic therapy after SRS had a significantly improved OS on univariate and multivariable analysis (HR = 0.32, p < 0.001). Number of brain metastases treated was the only factor predictive of worse PFS (HR = 1.06, p = 0.041), which implies a 6% additive risk of progression for every additional metastasis treated.

CONCLUSIONS

Although older women had poorer OS than younger women, OS was similar after adjusting for KPS, extracranial progression, and systemic therapy; and there was no difference in rates of intracranial PFS, neurological deaths, and LMD in the different age groups. This study suggests that age alone may not play an independent role in treatment-selection and that outcomes for breast cancer patients with BMs and personalized decision-making including other clinical factors should be considered. Future studies are warranted to assess neurocognitive outcomes and other radiation treatment toxicities in older patients.