Conservative management of esophageal perforation after a fall

An interventional radiology technique to treat pharyngeal or esophageal perforation associated with mediastinal abscess in children

PURPOSE

Pharyngeal or esophageal perforation with mediastinal abscess is notably dangerous in children and can be very difficult to treat. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of the transnasal placement of a mediastinal drainage catheter and a nasojejunal feeding tube, with or without gastric decompression, in the treatment of the above perforations in children.

METHODS

We placed transnasal mediastinal drainage catheters and nasojejunal feeding tubes in 14 pediatric patients. Patients with esophageal perforation also underwent the placement of a gastric decompression tube. Four of these patients additionally received chest drainage tubes.

RESULTS

The fistula healed after a median of 66 days (range, 5-404 days). Corrosive esophagitis occurred in two patients with pharyngeal perforations. One of these patients underwent surgical treatment 2 months after fistula healing, and the other underwent repeated balloon dilatation procedures for cicatricial restenosis. Four months after the fistula had healed, the patients with esophageal perforations were all free from recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The use of interventional radiology to place a transnasal mediastinal drainage catheter, a nasojejunal feeding tube, and a gastric decompression tube is a safe, easy, inexpensive, and efficacious way to treat pharyngeal or esophageal perforation complicated by mediastinal abscess in children.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Comparative analysis of traumatic esophageal injury in pediatric and adult populations

PURPOSE

Distribution and outcomes of traumatic injury of the esophagus (TIE) in pediatric versus adult populations are unknown. Our study sought to perform a descriptive analysis of TIE in children and adults.

METHODS

We reviewed the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) for the years 2010-2015. Demographics, characteristics, and outcomes of pediatric (age < 16 years) and adult TIE patients were described and compared.

RESULTS

Among 526,850 pediatric and 3,838,895 adult trauma patients, 90 pediatric (0.02%) and 1,411 (0.04%) adult TIE patients were identified. Demographics and esophageal injury severity did not differ. Children were more likely to sustain blunt trauma (63% versus 37%), with the most common mechanism being transportation-related accidents, were less-severely injured (median ISS 14 versus 22), and had fewer associated injuries (79% versus 95%) and complications (30% versus 51%) (all p < 0.001). Children had shorter hospitalizations (median 5 versus 10 days) and were more likely to be discharged home (84% versus 64%) (both p = 0.01). In-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between children and adults (10% versus 19%, p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

TIE in the pediatric population has unique characteristics compared to adults: it is more likely to be a result of blunt trauma, has lower injury burden, and has more favorable clinical outcomes.

Epidemiology of Traumatic Esophageal Injury: An Analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank

Existing literature on traumatic injury of the esophagus (TIE) is limited. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of TIE. We reviewed the National Trauma Data Bank for the years 2010–2015. We described the demographics, characteristics, and outcomes of adult (age ≥16 years) TIE patients and also compared those factors in blunt versus penetrating TIE. The association between TIE and mortality was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Thousand four hundred eleven adult TIE patients were identified (37 per 100,000 trauma patients, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 35, 39). TIE patients were younger (38 vs 52 years), more likely to be male (81% vs 62%), and more severely injured (Injury Severity Score ≥ 25: 45% vs 7%) than patients without TIE (all P < 0.001). TIE was observed 16 times more frequently with penetrating injuries (257 per 100,000, 95% CI: 240, 270) than with blunt injuries (16 per 100,000, 95% CI: 15, 18). Inhospital TIE mortality was 19 per cent. TIE patients had greater risk of mortality than other trauma patients, after adjusting for age, gender, and Injury Severity Score (odds ratio = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1, 1.7). Mortality in blunt and penetrating TIE did not differ. Although extremely rare, TIE is independently associated with a marked increase in mortality, even after adjusting for other risk factors.

Esophageal Perforation in a Cervical Fracture Patient With Progressed Ankylosing Spondylitis: Case Report and Review of the Literature

STUDY DESIGN

Case report and review of relevant literature.

OBJECTIVE

To report a rare complication of esophageal perforation in cervical fracture patient with progressive ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and review of relevant literature.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Esophageal perforation in cervical fracture is extremely rare. This complication has never been reported in AS patients. Key points in the early diagnosis and management of this severe complication along with the cervical fracture were presented in detail in this case report.

METHODS

A 61-year-old male with AS, who sustained C6 fracture and dislocation after a vehicle accident. Initial treatment strategy was combined anterior-posterior fixation and fusion. Although esophageal perforation in the dorsal wall of esophagus was detected in anterior surgery. After thorough debridement, the esophageal lesion was closed by resorbable interrupted sutures. Surgical incision was washed by saline and hydrogen peroxide without primary closure. Cervical fracture was treated by long level posterior fixation alone. After surgery, the anterior surgical incision was irrigated with normal saline twice a day and closed 3 weeks later.

RESULTS

Esophageal perforation was healed completely and neurologic results were improved significantly after surgery. Union of the fracture and segmental stability of cervical spine was confirmed radiologically at 1-year follow up.

CONCLUSION

Esophageal perforation in cervical fracture patient with progressed AS is an extremely rare and potentially life-threatening complication. Surgical debridement and drainage with intensive care are essential for good outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.

Cervical esophageal rupture after blunt trauma resulting from a car accident

Traumatic perforation of the cervical esophagus due to blunt trauma is a very rare condition which continues to be associated with significant mortality rates. The symptoms and signs of this injury are often masked by or ascribed to more common blunt thoracic injuries. This paper presents a case of cervical esophageal perforation secondary to blunt trauma resulting from a car accident. The injury was diagnosed early by computed tomography examination, and the patient underwent prompt and successful surgical repair performed to prevent the development of descending mediastinitis.

Pneumomediastinum in blunt chest trauma: a case report and review of the literature

Blunt trauma is the most common mechanism of injury in patients with pneumomediastinum and may occur in up to 10% of patients with severe blunt thoracic and cervical trauma. In this case report we present a 24-year-old man with pneumomediastinum due to blunt chest trauma after jumping from a bridge into a river. He complained of persistent retrosternal pain with exacerbation during deep inspiration. Physical examination showed only a slight tenderness of the sternum and the extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (e-FAST) was normal. Pneumomediastinum was suspected by chest X-ray and confirmed by computed tomography, which showed a lung contusion as probable cause of the pneumomediastinum due to the "Mackling effect." Sonographic findings consistent with pneumomediastinum, like the "air gap" sign, are helpful for quick bedside diagnosis, but the diagnostic criteria are not yet as well established as for pneumothorax. This present case shows that despite minimal findings in physical examination and a normal e-FAST a pneumomediastinum is still possible in a patient with chest pain after blunt chest trauma. Therefore, pneumomediastinum should always be considered to prevent missing major aerodigestive injuries, which can be associated with a high mortality rate.