Underlay mesh repair for spontaneous lumbar hernia

Sublay repair for primary superior lumbar hernia with the Kugel patch

Background

A superior lumbar hernia is a posterior ventral hernia that is rarely encountered in the clinical setting. However, no standard operative strategy exists for superior lumbar hernia repair at present.

Methods

Twelve patients with primary superior lumbar hernia who underwent sublay repair via the retroperitoneal space with the Kugel patch between December 2008 and June 2019 were included in this study. The demographic, peri‐operative and post‐operative data of the patients were collected to analyse the effectiveness of this technique.

Results

All patients underwent an uneventful operation. The median operative time was 60 min, and the median blood loss was 35 mL. The median hernia defect area was 16 cm². Five medium‐sized Kugel patches (11 cm × 14 cm) and seven large‐sized Kugel patches (14 cm × 17 cm) were used for the repairs. The median visual analogue scale score on post‐operative day 1 was 3. The median time to removal of drainage was 3 days. The median duration of the hospital stay was 3 days. No serious post‐operative complications, including seroma, haematoma, incision or mesh infection, recurrence and chronic pain, occurred during the follow‐up period.

Conclusion

Sublay repair for primary superior lumbar hernia with the Kugel patch shows benefits including a reliable repair, minimal invasiveness and few post‐operative complications.

Primary lumbar hernia: A rare case report and a review of the literature

Primary lumbar hernia is a rarely encountered hernia. Surgical correction is the standard treatment for lumbar hernia, and either an open or laparoscopic procedure can be performed with equivalent success. However, open repairs are most commonly performed. Here, we present a case of a primary lumbar hernia that was successfully treated laparoscopically and discuss surgical modalities of treatment reported in the literature. There are two laparoscopic approaches: transabdominal and extraperitoneal. The main advantage of the laparoscopic approach is that it helps the surgeon to precisely locate and evaluate the characteristics of the defect. It also has a lower morbidity rate, shorter length of hospital stay, less postoperative pain, and an earlier return to daily routine activities than the open approach. In the present study, a patient with a superior lumbar hernia was treated laparoscopically by the transabdominal approach. Laparoscopic repair in such cases is feasible and achieves a good result when done by an experienced laparoscopic hernia surgeon.

Primary superior lumbar hernia: a rare cause of lumbar swelling

BACKGROUND

Superior lumbar hernia is a rare posterolateral abdominal wall defect and herniation of abdominal contents through the superior lumbar triangle. A lumbar hernia is an unusual defect and only 300 cases of primary lumbar hernias have been reported since the first case report in 1731. To date, most clinicians are usually unfamiliar with the presentation of lumbar hernias, and the diagnosis is often done in a wrong way.

CASE REPORT

A 55-year-old female patient presented with complaints of right flank pain and swelling on the right lumbar region. On abdominal examination, there was round protruding swelling immediately beneath the 12th rib of the right upper flank area. The swelling was palpable and bowel sound was heard over it. The swelling was easily reducible and protruded when the patient was coughing or straining. The opposite side of the lumbar region was normal, and chest examination was clear and normal. The hematological and urine analysis laboratory findings were normal.

DISCUSSION

The ultrasound finding revealed the bowel contents within the hernial sac. With the diagnosis of primary acquired superior lumbar hernia, the patient underwent open surgery. The defect was reduced back and repaired using a retro-muscular or sublay prolene mesh (15 cm by 7.5 cm). The patient was discharged at post-operative day four and followed-up for four months.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the diagnosis of lumbar hernias should be considered in all patients presented with complaints of flank pain and swelling in the flank area. In the absence of obvious swelling in the flank region, ultrasound investigation might not establish the diagnosis of lumbar hernias. Hence, ultrasound would be the option to confirm the diagnosis when the swelling is palpable.

Incisional Hernia After Minimally Invasive Lateral Retroperitoneal Surgery: Case Series and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal (lateral-MIS) approaches to the spine involve traversing the lateral abdominal wall musculature and fascia. Incisional hernia is an uncommon approach-related complication.

OBJECTIVE

To review the incidence, treatment, and preventative measures of incisional hernia after lateral-MIS approaches.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of cases performed by a single surgeon from 2011 to 2016. All patients who underwent lateral-MIS approaches at this institution were included. Patients with a postoperative diagnosis of lateral hernia on physical exam and corroborating advanced imaging findings were included in this study. Cases of flank bulge due to peripheral nerve injury were excluded.

RESULTS

Three-hundred three patients underwent lateral-MIS approaches to the spine. Three (1%) patients with incisional hernia were identified. Two patients presented with a clinically symptomatic incisional hernia, while 1 patient was diagnosed incidentally after a routine abdominal magnetic resonance imaging for an unrelated reason. No patients suffered bowel entrapment or strangulation.

CONCLUSION

Incisional hernia after lateral-MIS approaches is rare. Patients with incisional hernias may be susceptible to bowel incarceration and ischemia, though the incidence of this is probably low. Meticulous closure of the fascia is critical to avoiding this complication.

Pitfalls and clinical recommendations for the primary lumbar hernia based on a systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

The lumbar abdominal wall hernia is a rare hernia in which abdominal contents protrude through a defect in the dorsal abdominal wall, which can be of iatrogenic, congenital, or traumatic origin. Two anatomical locations are known: the superior and the inferior lumbar triangle. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a clear overview of the existing literature and make practical clinical recommendations for proper diagnosis and treatment of the primary lumbar hernia.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search in PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE was performed, and all studies reporting on primary lumbar hernias were included. No exclusion based on study design was performed. Data regarding incarceration, recurrence, complications, and surgical management were extracted.

RESULTS

Out of 670 eligible articles, 14 were included and additional single case reports were analysed separately. The average quality of the included articles was 4.7 on the MINORS index (0-16). Risk factors are related to increased intra-abdominal pressure. CT scanning should be performed during pre-operative workup. Available evidence favours laparoscopic mesh reinforcement, saving open repair for larger defects. Incarceration was observed in 30.8% of the cases and 2.0% had a recurrence after surgical repair. Hematomas and seromas are common complications, but surgical site infections are relatively rare.

CONCLUSION

The high risks of incarceration in lumbar hernias demand a relatively fast elective repair. The use of a mesh is recommended, but the surgical approach should be tailored to individual patient characteristics and risk factors.

Primary Jean Louis Petit and Grynfeltt-Lesshaft concomitant hernias: A case report

•

Primary lumbar hernia.

•

Concomitant lumbar hernias : Jean Louis Petit and Grynfeltt-Lesshaft.

•

Misdiagnosis hernia.

•

Surgical approach.

Introduction

Posterior abdominal wall hernias are rare, mainly post traumatic or post-operative. This case is particular first by its mechanism, it is a primary lumbar hernia and secondly it is a concomitant hernia of the Jean Louis Petit triangle and the Grynfeltt triangle.

Presentation of case

The patient was a 67 years old man, a former farmer. He complaint of a painful tumefaction on his back evolving for the last 2 years. After clinical examination, a diagnosis of lumbar hernia was retained. The CT scan which is the gold standard was not performed due to financial limitations. An hernioplasty with a porcine collagen mesh was done, in per operative we found a Jean Louis Petit hernia and a Grynfeltt-Lesshaft hernia. Any post-operative complications.

Discussion

Lumbar hernia is not a common diagnosis, and most of time is misdiagnosed. Acquired primary lumbar hernia can be due to profession involving lumbar constraints leading to the weakness of muscles. This was the case of our patient. Another particularity was the double hernia, the upper and lower lumbar triangles. We already know the impact of his profession and may be 20 years of this leaded to the double hernia? An hernioplasty in open surgery was proposed for multiples reasons: the age of the patient, the weakness of the muscle, a large exploration of the hernia, to reinforce the posterior lumbar wall and to prevent a recidivism.

Conclusion

Jean Louis Petit and Grynfeltt-Lesshaft hernias are very uncommon. Few cases have been reported.

Grynfelt-Lesshaft hernia a case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar hernia account for less than 2% of al abdominal hernias, been the Grynfelt-Lesshaft's hernia (GLH) more frequent than the others. With approximately 300 cases published in the literature, the general surgeon may have the chance of treat it ones in their professional life.

CASE REPORT

A 42-years old male with human immunodeficiency virus and Diabetes Mellitus presented to the outpatient clinic with a GLH. Preoperative classified as a type "A" lumbar hernia an open approach was scheduled. We performed a Sandwich technique with a sublay and onlay ULTRAPRO(®) mesh fixed with PDS(®) II suture without complications and discharged the patient 24-h after. After six months, the patient denied any complication.

DISCUSSION

Primary (spontaneous) lumbar hernias represent 50-60% of all GLH. The preoperative classification of a lumbar hernia is mandatory to propose the best surgical approach. According to the classification of Moreno-Egea A et al., the best technique for our patient was an open approach. The Sandwich technique has demonstrated good outcomes in the management of the GLH.

CONCLUSION

The surgical approach should be according to the classification proposed and to the experience of the surgeon. The Sandwich technique has good outcomes.

Lumbar (Petit's) hernia: A rare entity

Lumbar hernias are rare and diagnostically challenging for surgeons. We present the case of a middle-aged patient who presented with swelling in the left back. Subcutaneous lipoma was included in the differential diagnosis. Following diagnostic studies, computed tomography confirmed left lumbar hernia. Elective surgery was performed, and the results revealed Petit's hernia. The hernia was repaired with mesh.

Lumbar hernia: a diagnostic dilemma

Lumbar hernia is one of the rare cases that most surgeons are not exposed to. Hence the diagnosis can be easily missed. This leads to delay in the treatment causing increased morbidity. We report a case of lumbar hernia in a middle-aged woman. It was misdiagnosed as lipoma by another surgeon. It was a case of primary acquired lumbar hernia in the superior lumbar triangle. Clinical and MRI findings were correlated to reach the diagnosis. We also highlight the types, the process of diagnosis and the surgical repair of lumbar hernias. We wish to alert our fellow surgeons to keep the differential diagnosis of the lumbar hernia in mind before diagnosing any lumbar swelling as lipoma.

Lumbar hernia after breast reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar hernia is a rare complication that can occur after breast reconstruction using a latissimus dorsi flap. The defect occurs within the superior lumbar triangle and may result in visceral incarceration.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We report a 61-year-old female who presented with a left sided lumbar bulge and pain 7 years following a modified radical mastectomy and latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction. Computed tomography demonstrated a lumbar hernia with incarcerated colon. The patient underwent a successful laparoscopic repair with prosthetic mesh underlay.

DISCUSSION

Lumbar hernias may be congenital, secondary to trauma or prior surgery. Imaging studies assist in excluding soft tissue tumors, infections, hematoma or abdominal wall denervation atrophy, which may also present as a lumbar bulge. Repair may be performed in an open, laparoscopic or retroperitoneoscopic approach.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic lumbar hernia repair with mesh is a safe and feasible way to manage an uncommon complication after breast reconstruction with a latissimus flap.