Successful obturator nerve repairing: Intraoperative sural nerve graft harvesting in endometrium cancer patient

Femoral and obturator neuropathies

The femoral and obturator nerves both arise from the L2, L3, and L4 spinal nerve roots and descend into the pelvis before emerging in the lower limbs. The femoral nerve's primary function is knee extension and hip flexion, along with some sensory innervation to the leg. The obturator nerve's primary function is thigh adduction and sensory innervation to a small area of the medial thigh. Each may be injured by a variety of potential causes, many of them iatrogenic. Here, we review the anatomy of the femoral and obturator nerves and the clinical features and potential etiologies of femoral and obturator neuropathies. Their necessary investigations, including electrodiagnostic studies and imaging, their prognosis, and potential treatments, are discussed in this chapter.

Obturator Nerve Injury in Robotic Pelvic Surgery: Scenarios and Management Strategies

BACKGROUND

Obturator nerve injury (ONI) is an uncommon complication of pelvic surgery, usually reported in 0.2-5.7% of cases undergoing surgical treatment of urological and gynecological malignancies involving pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND).

OBJECTIVE

To describe how an ONI may occur during robotic pelvic surgery and the corresponding management strategies.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We retrospectively analyzed video content on intraoperative ONI provided by robotic surgeons from high-volume centers.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

ONI was identified during PLND and managed according to the type of nerve injury.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The management approach varies with the type of injury. Crush injury frequently occurs at an advanced stage of PLND. For a crush injury to the obturator nerve caused by a clip, management only requires its safe removal. Three situations can occur if the nerve is transected: (1) transection with feasible approximation and tension-free nerve anastomosis; (2) transection with challenging approximation requiring certain strategies for proper nerve anastomosis; and (3) transection with a hidden proximal nerve ending that may initially appear intact, but is clearly injured when revealed by further dissection. Each case has different management strategies with a common aim of prompt repair of the anatomic disruption to restore proper nerve conduction.

CONCLUSIONS

ONI is a preventable complication that requires proper identification of the anatomy and high-risk areas when performing pelvic lymph node dissection. Prompt intraoperative recognition and repair using the management strategies described offer patients the best chance of recovery without sequelae.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We describe the different ways in which the obturator nerve in the pelvic area can be damaged during urological or gynecological surgeries. This is a preventable complication and we describe how it can be avoided and different management options, depending on the type of nerve injury.

Incidental damage of obturator nerve during laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer - Demonstration of a successful repairing procedure

OBJECTIVE

In order to highlight the importance of intraoperative complications and their management, we demonstrate a video of an iatrogenic left obturator nerve lesion during a pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging. The repair was promptly performed using an intracorporeal laparoscopic suture for an end-to-end tension-free nerve anastomosis.

DESIGN

Stepwise demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage.

SETTING

A 70-year-old woman with a stage IB grade I endometrial adenocarcinoma was submitted to a surgical laparoscopic staging with total hysterectomy(TH), bilateral adnexectomy(BA), and bilateral pelvic and lomboaortic lymphadenectomy. After an uneventful retroperitoneal lomboaortic lymphadenectomy, the left paravesical space was dissected until the obturator fossae and a left pelvic lymphadenectomy followed, during which the left obturator nerve was accidentally transected with LigaSure™.

INTERVENTIONS

A careful inspection revealed an almost complete transection (80%) of the nerve, with both proximal and distal cut ends identifiable and no fraying of the edges. The thickness of the non-sectioned nervous portion was less than 3 mm, but a tension-free reattachment of both edges seemed manageable. The edges were oriented towards each other and a single stitch suture was placed using a 5-0 prolene, providing an epineural end-to-end coaptation. To reinforce the suture, a Fibrin sealant Tissucol® was applied. The contralateral pelvic lymphadenectomy was then performed, followed by TH and BA. The pieces were removed through the vagina using an endobag. The patient was discharged on the second postoperative day. During the follow-up, there were no signs of diminished adductor function, and neither there was any other detectable residual neuropathy or neurologic deficit involving the left thigh.

CONCLUSION

It is crucial to identify intraoperative complications and to develop abilities to manage them. This video proves that it is possible to repair a transected obturator nerve using laparoscopy, when performed by an experienced onco-gynecologist, with extremely good functional results.

A systematic review of nerve grafting, end-to-end repair, and nerve transfer for obturator nerve injuries

OBJECTIVE

Obturator nerve injury can occur as a complication of gynecologic surgeries, occurring most frequently in patients with endometriosis and genitourinary malignancies. The resulting injury causes paresthesia and major weakness in adduction and atrophy of the adductor group of lower extremity muscles. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of end-to-end repair, nerve grafting, and nerve transfer in improving motor function in patients with obturator nerve injury.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, and Embase libraries were searched from May 1994 to August 2020 according to the PRISMA guidelines for articles that present functional outcomes after obturator nerve injury in patients treated with nerve grafting, end-to-end repair, or nerve transfer.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients from 22 studies were included in the study, 15 of whom were treated with end-to-end repair (60%), nine with nerve grafting (36%), and one with nerve transfer (4%). Of the 15 patients with transection data, two had incomplete (13%) and 13 had complete (87%) nerve transections. The patients underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy (n=24) and radical cystectomy (n=1) operations. The mean Medical Research Council (MRC) score was 2.95±1.7 immediately after treatment and 4.77±0.6 at the final follow-up. All patients achieved good outcomes (MRC ≥3) at the final follow-up. The mean MRC score for end-to-end repair (n=15), nerve grafting (n=9), and nerve transfer (n=1) was 4.8±0.6, 4.7±0.8, and 5, respectively. Patients with end-to-end repair had higher immediate post-operative strength than those treated with nerve grafting (p=0.03) and tended to achieve full functional recovery after shorter periods of time (rho=-0.65, p=0.049). Other parameters did not correlate with MRC.

CONCLUSION

End-to-end repair, nerve grafting, and nerve transfer are equally effective in restoring function in patients with obturator nerve injury. However, patients treated with end-to-end repair had higher immediate post-operative strength than those treated with nerve grafting.

Surgical Interventions for Lumbosacral Plexus Injuries: A Systematic Review

Background:

Nerve reconstruction techniques for lumbosacral plexus (LSP) injuries vary. There are no clear treatment guidelines available, and summative evaluations of the literature discussing these surgeries are lacking. For these reasons, this investigation aimed to systematically review and consolidate all available literature discussing surgical interventions for LSP injuries and cohesively present patient-reported and objective postoperative outcomes.

Methods:

The authors conducted a systematic review using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global (via Proquest.com), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. After title and abstract screening, identified articles were read in full and selected for inclusion based on prespecified criteria.

Results:

Our literature search identified 8683 potential citations, and after duplicate removal, abstract screening, and full-text review, 62 studies remained meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. Outcomes were extracted according to the location of injury and type of surgical repair. Injuries were classified into isolated femoral nerve injuries, isolated obturator nerve injuries, isolated sciatic nerve injuries, and multilevel LSP injuries. Surgical treatment was further classified into exploration with neurolysis, direct repair, nerve grafting, and nerve transfer surgery.

Conclusions:

Although results vary based on the location of the injury and the surgical technique used, nerve grafts and transfers demonstrated reasonable success in improving functional and pain outcomes. Overall, isolated femoral and obturator nerve injuries had the best outcomes reported with surgical treatment. Furthermore, incomplete sciatic nerve and multilevel LSP injuries had more reported surgical options and better outcomes than complete sciatic nerve injuries.

How to dissect the pelvic nerves: from microanatomy to surgical rules. An evidence-based clinical review

Background: Advanced gynaecological procedures often include extensive pelvic dissections, with the nervous structures involved in the disease. Nerve-sparing and preservation is a key factor in reducing postoperative morbidity. Objectives: The goal of this review is to describe in detail the structure of the pelvic nerves and to gather information from other surgical specialties to give recommendations for safe nerve dissection applied in different gynaecological subspecialties. Materials and methods: An extensive literature review was carried out in PubMed and Google Scholar. The search included articles concerning peripheral nerve anatomy, mechanisms of injury and different dissection techniques, with the most exhaustive being analysed for the review. Articles from different fields of medicine like orthopaedics, plastic surgery, maxillofacial surgery dealing with peripheral nerve injuries and repair have been reviewed. Results: The following review demonstrates the in-depth anatomy and mechanism of injury of the peripheral nerves, describes the different techniques for neurolysis and proposes some directions for safe nerve dissection. Conclusion: When performing complex gynaecological surgeries, the surgeon should avoid unnecessary nerve handling, apply nerve-sparing techniques whenever possible and use the new devices to preserve the nervous structures. Advanced gynaecological surgeries should be performed in specialised centres by expert surgeons with comprehensive knowledge in neuropelveology. What is new? To our knowledge, this is the first article focused on peripheral nerves that collects data from such a wide range of specialties in order to propose the most comprehensive recommendations that could be applied in pelvic surgery.

Obturator nerve injury in a chemo and radio-resistant patient with a locally-advanced cervical cancer after two previous uterine artery embolizations for severe vaginal bleeding: Case report and review of literature

Chemo and radiotherapy are actually the gold standard of treatment for locally-advanced cervical cancer. We report a case report showing a repaired (video 1) right obturator nerve after an incidental injury during a right internal iliac artery closure with 10 mm titanium clip for severe pelvic bleeding in a patient with locally-advanced cervical cancer. A 52 year-old postmenopausal woman with a chemo and radio-resistant locally-advanced squamous cervical cancer was admitted at our department for severe vaginal bleeding after two previous uterine artery embolizations. As a consequence of the increasing vaginal bleeding, and after a MRI-scan, an open surgical treatment was decided with a type C radical hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. During dissection of obturator, paravescical and pararectal spaces and removal of metastatic pelvic lymphnodes, a severe blood loss that required a right internal iliac artery closure with 10 mm titanium clip was observed. A right obturator nerve incidental injury during this time occurred. After an immediate grasping of the two sides of the lesion, the obturator nerve was succesfully repaired using 4-0 Prolene interrupted sutures (Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson, New Jersey, USA). The patient was regularly discharged four days after the surgical procedure without neurological deficit, paresthesia or side effects. In conclusion obturator nerve repair is an emergency procedure for treatment of patients with advanced cervical cancer, but it should be reserved for oncologic surgeons trained in extensive oncological procedures and repair of nerve and vascular injuries potentially associated with high mortality rate.

Correction of iatrogenic injury of the obturator nerve during pelvic laparoscopic lymphadenectomy by the use of sural nerve grafts

•

Intraoperative injury of the obturator nerve is not an infrequent complication of gynecological surgeries.

•

This injury can occur in association with pelvic lymphadenectomy for uterine or cervical cancer.

•

This manuscript demonstrates an alternative technique for the obturator nerve repair, when primary end to end anastomosis is not possible.