Gastric perforation by a foreign body presenting as a pancreatic pseudotumour

Foreign Glass Bodies in Pleura and Pancreas: Systematic Review for Entry Hypotheses and Treatment Options in an Unresolved Case

BACKGROUND

Foreign bodies within the pleura and pancreas are infrequent, and the approaches to their treatment still a subject of debate. There is limited knowledge particularly regarding glass foreign bodies.

METHODS

We present a case involving large glass splinters in the pleura and pancreas, with an unknown entry point. In addition, a systematic review was conducted to explore entry hypotheses and management options.

RESULTS

In addition to our case, our review uncovered eight incidents of intrapleural glass, and another eight cases of glass in other intrathoracic areas. The fragments entered the body through impalement (81%), migrated through the diaphragm after impalement (6%), or caused transesophageal perforation (19%) following ingestion. Eight instances of glass inside the abdominal cavity were documented, with seven resulting from impalement injuries and one from transintestinal migration. There were no recorded instances of glass being discovered within the pancreas. Among the 41 nonglass intrapancreatic foreign bodies found, sewing needles (34%) and fish bones (46%) were the most common; following ingestion, they had migrated through either a transgastric or transduodenal perforation. In all these cases, how the foreign bodies were introduced was often poorly recalled by the patient. Many nonglass foreign bodies tend to become encapsulated by fibrous tissue, rendering them inert, though this is less common with glass. Glass has been reported to migrate through various tissues and cavities, sometimes with a significant delay spanning even decades. There are cases of intrapleural migration of glass causing hemothorax, pneumothorax, and heart and major blood vessels injury. For intrapleural glass fragment management, thoracoscopy proved to be effective in 5 reported cases, in addition to our patient. Most intrapancreatic nonglass foreign bodies tend to trigger pancreatitis and abscess formation, necessitating management ranging from laparoscopic procedures to subtotal pancreatectomy. There have been only four documented cases of intrapancreatic needles that remained asymptomatic with conservative management. There is no direct guidance from the existing literature regarding management of intrapancreatic glass foreign bodies. Consequently, our patient is under observation with regular follow-ups and has remained asymptomatic for the past 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Glass foreign bodies in the pleura are rare, and our report of an intrapancreatic glass fragment is the first of its kind. Impalement is the most likely method of introduction. As glass has significant migration and an ensuing complication potential, preventive removal of intrapleural loose glass should be considered. However, intrapancreatic glass fragment management remains uncertain.

Pancreatitis from posterior gastric wall perforation by ingested metallic wire-case report and review of literature

Gastric and duodenal perforation from ingested organic and inorganic foreign bodies, such as sewing needles, toothpick, metallic wires, fish and chicken bone, are uncommon incidents as most foreign bodies pass in the faeces. The perforated foreign body can at times migrate and either penetrate causing traumatic injury or incite inflammation with formation of abscesses or pseudo-tumours in the adjacent organs such as the liver and pancreas. We report one such case of pancreatitis in a child resulting from a metallic wire perforating the posterior gastric wall and penetrating the pancreas. The findings were detected on CT and the foreign body was extracted endoscopically. We also present review of literature on similar case reports.

An ingested metallic wire migrating from stomach to pancreas treated by laparoscopic surgery: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Foreign bodies inside the pancreas are rare and usually occur after the ingestion of sharp objects such as a fish bone, a sewing needle, or a toothpick. Furthermore, an ingested metallic wire migrating from stomach to pancreas is very rare.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a 36-year-old woman who was admitted to our hospital with "3-day history of dull progressive epigastric pain." Computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a linear, high-density body between the stomach wall and the pancreas. During the operation, a linear, hard, metallic wire was found in the adhesive tissue between the gastric antrum and the pancreatic body. The operation was uneventful, and the patient recovered well.

CONCLUSION

The case of a foreign body inside the pancreas caused by a metallic wire is very rare. Radiological examinations play a vital role in the diagnosis of metallic wire ingestion. Metallic wire ingestion can be treated with laparoscopic surgery, both technically and safely.

Gastric Perforation by Ingested Rabbit Bone Fragment

The majority of accidentally ingested foreign bodies is excreted from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract without any complications. Sometimes sharp foreign bodies – like chicken and fish bones – can lead to intestinal perforation and may present insidiously with a wide range of symptoms and, consequently, different diagnoses. We report the case of a 59-year-old woman presenting with fever and a 1-month history of vague abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) showed the presence of a hyperdense linear image close to the gastric antrum surrounded by a fluid collection and free peritoneal air. At laparotomy, a 4-cm rabbit bone fragment covered in inflamed tissue was detected next to a gastric wall perforation. Rabbit bone fragment ingestion, even if rarely reported, should not be underestimated as a possible cause of GI tract perforation.

Successful endoscopic management of gastric perforation caused by ingesting a sharp chicken bone

•

We discuss a case of gastric perforation caused by a sharp chicken bone ingestion.

•

Early diagnosis lead to successful minimally invasive management using an endoscopic approach.

•

High degree of suspicion is important in diagnosing foreign body related gastrointestinal complications as the clinical presentation can be elusive.

•

Early diagnosis can allow the utilization of less invasive therapeutic interventions, subsequently leading to faster recovery.

•

In the right context, therapeutic endoscopy can help to avoid more aggressive surgical interventions.

Introduction

Gastrointestinal perforation related to foreign body ingestion is uncommon. Surgical interventions aiming at removal of the offending agent and restoration of bowel continuity are sought when perforations occur.

Presentation of case A 68 year old male presented with epigastric abdominal pain and anorexia for 2 days. On examination, he was febrile and had localized epigastric tenderness. Laboratory investigations revealed marked leucocytosis with no other abnormalities. Computed tomography revealed the presence of a foreign body penetrating through the full thickness of the gastric wall with its tip lying adjacent to the pancreatic head. Endoscopic trial to extract the foreign body was successfully carried out. The gastric defect was sealed by applying an endoscopic metallic clip.

Discussion

Gastric perforations secondary to foreign body ingestion usually follow an elusive clinical course and are rarely diagnosed early in its course. Early diagnosis allows for the utilization of minimally invasive management. Unfortunately, Most reported cases were diagnosed after intra-abdominal processes, such as abscesses, have ensued.

Conclusion

This case illustrates the importance of early diagnosis of foreign body related gastrointestinal perforations and emphasizes the role of therapeutic endoscopy.