Neglected dorsolateral dislocation of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: A case report

Dorsal Dislocation of the First and Second Metatarsophalangeal Joint: A Case Report and Literature Review

Dorsal dislocation of the toes is an infrequent injury that can result in severe pain and deformity. Timely diagnosis and appropriate management are paramount for optimizing patient outcomes. This case report illustrates a 53-year-old male patient who suffered dorsal dislocation of the first and second metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints due to a crush injury. We present the clinical manifestation, radiographic findings, and management approach for this unique isolated first and second ray MTP joint dorsal dislocation, without any associated fractures. This case report underscores several critical observations: firstly, hallux dorsal dislocation can potentially coincide with other injuries; secondly, it can stem from crushing trauma to the big toe; and thirdly, successful closed reduction, when followed by effective immobilization and early rehabilitation, can yield outstanding outcomes. Additionally, the report emphasizes the importance of pursuing another closed reduction attempt under general anesthesia, if the initial attempt in the emergency room proves unsuccessful, before contemplating open reduction.

Concomitant old complex fracture–dislocation of the first metatarsophalangeal, Lisfranc, and naviculocuneiform joints

Old simultaneous complex fracture–dislocation of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP), Lisfranc, and naviculocuneiform joints as an overwhelming injury has not been reported in the literature yet. In a 29-year-old man, 6 months following the trauma, the medial column of foot was reconstructed using iliac tricortical bone graft from navicular to the first metatarsal. Arthrodesis of the second and third tarsometatarsal joints and resection arthroplasty of the first MTP joint were done. His clinical and radiographic evaluation after 18 months revealed an acceptable function with returning to pre-injury job but with some limitations in recreational activities.

Level of evidence: level 4