Minimally invasive appendectomy for resection of appendiceal mucocele: Case series and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;37:13-16. [PMID: 28618350 PMCID: PMC5472142 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.05.027]

CT features with histopathological correlation in inflammatory versus benign & malignant neoplastic appendiceal mucoceles: a retrospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

Differentiation of histologic subtypes of appendiceal mucoceles may prove to be difficult on computed tomography (CT). The main objective of this study was to identify the CT features of mucocele of the appendix and correlate the imaging findings with histopathology in inflammatory, benign, and malignant neoplastic lesions, and whether these entities can be accurately differentiated on CT imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT scans of 31 patients with diagnosis of appendiceal mucocele were retrospectively reviewed and compared with histopathology. The appendix was evaluated for maximal luminal diameter, cystic dilatation, luminal attenuation, appendicolith, mural calcification and enhancement, periappendiceal fat stranding and fluid. CT findings were compared by use of Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic utility of appendiceal luminal diameter in differentiating different types of mucoceles.

RESULTS

Patients were classified into three groups: those with inflammatory mucoceles (n = 10), benign mucoceles (simple mucocele, mucosal hyperplasia and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (n = 17), and those with malignant mucinous adenocarcinoma (n = 4). The mean diameter was found to be significantly different in the three groups with the largest diameter in the benign subgroup. Soft tissue thickening (p-value 0.01), mural calcification (p-value < 0.01), internal septation (p-value 0.02) and fat stranding (p-value 0.05) was found to be of statistical significance among the various groups. The best cut-off diameter for diagnosis of inflammatory mucoceles to be ≤ 2.3 cm with a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 90%.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that CT findings such as appendiceal diameter less than 2.3 cm, absence of soft tissue thickening, mural calcification and internal septation may be useful in preoperative diagnosis of inflammatory appendiceal mucocele.

Diagnostic Challenges and Treatment Options for Mucocle of the Appendix: A Comprehensive Review

Mucocles of the appendix, encompassing mucinous cystadenomas and mucinous cystadenocarcinomas, represent rare but clinically significant appendiceal lesions characterized by the accumulation of mucin within the appendix lumen. This review explores the diagnostic complexities and treatment strategies associated with mucocles, emphasizing the importance of its accurate recognition and management. Diagnostic challenges arise due to overlapping symptoms with acute appendicitis and other appendiceal pathologies, necessitating a multidimensional approach that includes imaging, histopathological analysis, and clinical correlation. Treatment options range from appendectomy for benign lesions to more extensive surgical procedures, such as right hemicolectomy for malignant forms. Prognostic factors, including histological subtype and tumor size, influence treatment decisions and long-term outcomes. By synthesizing current evidence and clinical insights, this review aims to provide a comprehensive framework for clinicians to navigate the complexities of mucocles of the appendix, offering perspectives that can guide effective management and future research endeavors.

Comparative Analysis of Robotic-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Review

Appendectomy ranks among the most common surgical procedures. Laparoscopic appendectomy has become increasingly popular among certain surgeons. Even laparoscopic appendectomy is considered the gold standard; many surgical subspecialties have adopted robotic surgery in the past 10 years. The robotic system is recognized for enhancing stability, visualization, precision, and spatial flexibility. Surgeons can operate with enhanced dexterity, reduced tremors, three-dimensional visualization, up to 10 times magnification, and control over four arms thanks to improved ergonomics that allow them to sit at a customizable console. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the overall effects, such as intraoperative time, postoperative recovery, feasibility for surgeons, and cost-effectiveness, of robotic-assisted appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy through the available literature. It was found that both robotic and laparoscopic surgeries work well for appendectomy, but in some studies, it was found that robotic surgery comes with the perks of shorter hospital stays and quicker recovery, even though it is more expensive, and in some studies, no differences were observed in patient recovery postoperatively. Laparoscopic surgery is still a highly effective and commonly used method, with proven advantages over open appendectomy, despite taking longer for the procedure. We need more studies to fully understand the advantages and disadvantages of robotic surgery, especially when it comes to cost-effectiveness and wider health outcomes.

Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm: A Case of an Incidental Finding

Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs) are uncommon gastrointestinal tumors characterized by mucus accumulation in the appendix. Patients may complain of acute appendicitis-like symptoms with other alarming features, but approximately half of the cases of AMNs are found incidentally on imaging. Early diagnosis and management of these neoplasms are important to prevent malignant progression and complications such as bowel obstruction and pseudomyxoma peritonei. We report a case of a 28-year-old female who initially presented with vomiting and acute left lower abdominal pain radiating to the left flank. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a 1.5 mm stone in the left ureteral vesicular junction and a 2.3 x 2.4 x 5.2 cm cystic tubular mass at the base of the cecum, suspicious of an appendiceal mucocele. An elective laparoscopic appendectomy was performed on this admission, which was converted to a right hemicolectomy due to the pathologic finding of a focally high-grade AMN on intraoperative frozen specimen pathology. This report aims to provide an example of a case of an incidental AMN and how it was diagnosed and managed surgically. AMNs are rare tumors that originate from the appendix and can pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their diverse clinical presentations and variable histopathological features. The majority of cases of AMNs are discovered in middle-aged individuals (40-50 years of age) after an appendectomy is performed and examined by pathology. This case report aims to describe a rare presentation of a 28-year-old female patient with an incidental finding of AMN on a CT scan of the abdomen while being worked up for suspected nephrolithiasis. We will provide a comprehensive overview of a unique presentation of AMN, highlighting its clinical manifestations, diagnostic approach, and management strategies. We present the case of a 28-year-old female patient who presented to the emergency department with complaints of acute left lower quadrant abdominal pain radiating to the left flank and vomiting. After an initial assessment and workup, which included lab investigations and imaging, a diagnosis of unilateral hydronephrosis due to a calculus of the ureterovesical junction was made. However, there was also suspicion of an appendiceal mucocele, as evidenced by a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis. On admission day one, under the care and management of the urology team, she passed the stone with complete resolution of the presenting symptoms. On hospital day two, she underwent an elective laparoscopic appendectomy followed by a right hemicolectomy due to findings of high-grade mucinous neoplasm on the resected frozen specimen near the base of the appendix. AMN was an incidental finding based on CT imaging and macroscopic findings, which was later confirmed by histopathological assessment and report.

The distribution of robotic surgery in general and visceral surgery departments in Switzerland - a nationwide inquiry

Objectives

Since its introduction as a clinical technique, robotic surgery has been extended to different fields of surgery. However, the indications as well as the number of robotic procedures varied in different institutions. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the current use of robotic surgery in general and digestive surgery in Switzerland.

Methods

All Swiss surgical departments that are recognized training institutes for postgraduate training in surgery by the Swiss Institute of Medical Education (SIWF) were queried with a detailed questionnaire regarding the use of robotic surgery techniques and were analyzed regarding hospital size and type of hospital.

Results

Ninety-three departments were queried, and 67 % (n=63) answered the survey. Fifty-eight were public, and five were private institutions. Seventeen (26 %) of the queried departments used robotic surgery in digestive surgery. Four out of 17 (23 %) of the departments that performed robotic surgery were private hospitals, while 13 (77 %) were public institutions. In the majority of departments, robotic surgery of the rectum (n=12; 70.6 %) and colon (n=11; 64.7 %) was performed, followed by hernia procedures (n=8; 47.1 %) and fundoplication (n=7; 41.2 %). Less frequently, pancreatic resections (n=5; 29.4 %), cholecystectomy (n=4; 23.5 %), adrenalectomy (n=4; 23.5 %), gastric bypass (n=3; 17.7 %), gastric sleeve (n=3; 17.7 %), hepatic procedures (n=2; 11.7 %), or small bowel resections (n=1; 5.9 %) were performed as robotic procedures. More than 25 procedures per year per department were performed for hernia surgery (n=5 departments), gastric bypass (n=2 departments), cholecystectomy, fundoplication, and colon surgery (each n=1 department).

Conclusions

The number and range of robotic procedures performed in Switzerland varied widely. Higher accreditation for general surgery or subspecialization of visceral surgery of the department was positively associated with the use of robotic techniques, reflecting an unequal availability of robotic surgery.

Robotic Appendicectomy: A review of feasibility

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common abdominal emergencies. There has been an increasing use of robotic abdominal surgery. However, it remains underutilised in emergency settings. This study aimed to systematically review robotic appendicectomy (RA) feasibility. A 20-year systematic review was performed, along with quality assessment. The research protocol was registered with PROSPERO. The search yielded 1,242 citations, including 9 articles. The mean quality score was 10.72 ± 2.56. The endpoints across the studies were rate of conversion to open surgery, length of hospital stay, blood loss and operative time. RA is a safe, feasible technique that can be performed in elective and emergency settings with minimal blood loss. The operative time and hospital stay were within acceptable limits. Robotic surgery's major drawback is its high cost and limited availability. Future studies evaluating RA with a focus on its application during emergencies and its cost-effectiveness are recommended.

Appendiceal Mucocele - A Review of Literature with a Case Report

Background: Appendiceal mucoceles represent neoplastic and non-neoplastic, dilatated, mucus filled appendix vermiformix. Appendectomy is obligatory due to a possible malignancy. It is crucially important to avoid rupturing of the mucocele because it can result in pseudomyxoma peritonei, with high morbidity and mortality. Case Report: We presented a 52-year-old man with pain and palpable mass in the lower right quadrant of the abdomen. The mucocele was removed without a rupture, and the patient was discharged from the surgical department one day after the surgery without a complication. Discussion: The resection must be done very carefully, because the rupture of a mucocele can cause pseudomyxoma peritonei, a very dangerous and often lethal condition. Due to the concern of rupture, we performed the classical resection through laparotomy. Conclusion: It is very important, especially for young, inexperienced surgeons to be aware of this rare diagnosis and perform a surgical intervention according to the guidelines of good clinical practice.

Mucinous appendiceal neoplasm: A case report

BACKGROUND

Primary appendiceal tumors are histologically diverse and have an insidious onset and few specific clinical manifestations. In the majority of cases, these tumors are discovered after appendectomy during pathological exam of the resected tissue. Treatment may include appendectomy (simple or radical) and right hemicolectomy depending on factors such as histological type, tumor size and lymph node/organ involvement. The aim of this case study is to describe a rare case of a giant appendicular mucocele and raise awareness of this condition and its management options and follow-up protocol.

CASE SUMMARY

We present the case of a 43-year-old patient who presented to our emergency department with mild right lower quadrant pain. After the initial check-up and imaging exams, he underwent surgery, where a giant 20 cm × 13 cm appendicular tumor was found and resected. Appendicular mucocele was suspected due to the macroscopic appearance and was later confirmed by the pathological exam. The patient's postoperative evolution was uneventful, and after discharge, he was included in our follow-up program.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, mucinous appendiceal neoplasms embody a rare pathology; they are asymptomatic or have few, unspecific clinical signs and in many cases are discovered after appendectomy.

Minimally invasive surgery for appendiceal intussusception caused by mucocele of the appendix: case report and review of the literature

Appendiceal intussusception caused by mucocele of the appendix is extremely rare. In the current study, a 32-year-old woman was admitted to the department of general surgery of our hospital, complaining of persistent right, lower quadrant pain without an obvious cause for 17 hours. Physical examination indicated significant pain and tenderness in the right, lower abdominal quadrant. Blood analysis indicated that leukocyte count, the percentage of neutrophils and the serum C-reactive protein were increased. Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography revealed a well-encapsulated cystic mass surrounded by the caecum and intussusception. The appendiceal intussusception caused by mucocele of the appendix was revealed during the laparoscopic exploration. Appendectomy and partial cecectomy were conducted using the laparoscopic approach. Postoperative pathological examinations showed ileocecal intussusception and chronic inflammation, appendiceal mucocele and acute suppurative appendicitis. The patient showed satisfactory recovery that was observed during 15-months of follow-ups. This case highlights that laparoscopic appendectomy and partial cecectomy may be a beneficial, minimally invasive approach for appendiceal intussusception caused by mucocele of the appendix.

Mucocele of the Apendix – A Case Report and Review of the References

Mucocele of the apendix is a rare clinical and pathological entity with a higher incidence in the female population, and non-specific symptomatology that includes more diagnoses including neoplastic and non-neoplastic causes of the apendix dilation and mucin proliferation. With obtained numerous variations in symptomatology, clinical picture, intraoperative presentation, surgical treatment and histopathological findings, the aim of this paper is an inspection into current knowledge of this disease, its histo-pathological characteristics, differential diagnosis and current treatment modalities. We present a patient with a clinical picture of the acute abdomen and numerous comorbidities. Ultrasound diagnostics indicated the presence of thin-walled dilatation of the small intestine, especially in the lower right quadrant, as well as the presence of free fluid in the peritoneal cavity. Apendectomy and removal of the mucocele and resection of the gangrenous sigmoid colon according to Hartmann were done. A definitive histo-pathological finding suggests ischemic colitis and retention mucocele of the apendix with normal mucosa. Histopathologically, four types of mucocele apendixes are distinguished, namely the retention mucinous cyst, mucosal hyperplasia, mucinous cystadenoma and mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. Surgical treatment is the method of choice in treating these tumors, either open or laparoscopic. Imperative is the preservation of the integrity of the entire mucocele, due to the possible dissemination of contents of the cyst and the subsequent development of pseudomyxoma peritonei.

Laparoscopic Resection of an Appendix Mucocele in a Breast Cancer Patient

Background

Acute appendicitis may be treated with antibiotics, but most surgeons offer laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Appendiceal mucocele (AMC) is a rare disorder. Surgical removal is recommended due to the risk of pseudomyxoma peritonei. LA has been suggested for this condition. Although rare, breast cancer (BC) may metastasize to the appendix. An appendiceal mass in a breast cancer patient should be approached as a possible metastatic focus until proven otherwise.

Case Presentation

A 45-year-old Caucasian woman with invasive lobular BC underwent bilateral mastectomy. An AMC was found on CT scan. LA was done with a strict minimal touch technique. The appendix was resected with a 1 cm margin of the cecal pole, and the specimen was removed from the abdomen in a retrieval bag. Pathology showed benign cystadenoma. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course.

Conclusion

This case highlights the diagnostic challenge of an appendiceal mass in a BC patient. BC patients with AMC should undergo appendectomy to rule out metastatic disease and to prevent pseudomyxoma peritonei. LA can be performed safely in patients with AMC.

A case report of a giant appendiceal mucocele and literature review

A 43-year-old female presented at the accident and emergency department of Princess Marina Hospital, Gaborone, Botswana. She reported a deep dull aching pain of two years duration in the right iliac fossa that has been progressively becoming worse. Ultrasound revealed a large sausage like cystic mass extending from the pelvis up to the medial aspect of the ascending colon. CT scan showed a large sausage like cystic mass extending from the pelvis up to the hepatic flexure of the colon with the cecum displaced. No metastatic features were seen. We made an impression of appendiceal mucocele. A semi-elective laparotomy was scheduled. Intraoperative findings: a giant intact cystic distended appendix with involved base, displacing the cecum cranially. A right hemicolectomy was performed. The histopathological results revealed a low-grade appendicular mucinous neoplasm with no lymph node involvement. The surgical margins were free. The patient recovered uneventfully.