Case report: Complex perianal fistula treated with fistula laser closure (FILAC) and suction catheter

Complex Fistula-in-Ano Extending From the Anal Canal to Mid-Thigh Treated With Combine Fistulectomy and Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT): A Case Report

An anal fistula is abnormal, chronic epithelial-lined communication between the anorectal lumen and the skin of the perineum or buttock. A complex fistula-in-ano is difficult to diagnose and treat; it requires careful approaches because of the high risk of complications and recurrences. We report a case of a 60-year-old male who presented with a discharging sinus on the posteromedial aspect of his left thigh for the past two years. On examination, there were two external openings on the posteromedial aspect of the left thigh, 20 cm away from the anal verge, extending toward the left buttock, with an internal opening on the right side of the anal canal at 11 o'clock in the lithotomy position. The MRI showed a fluid-filled marginally enhancing tract ascending obliquely from the skin of the posterior left thigh, passing through the left gluteus maximus to the bilateral ischioanal fossae. The distal 7 cm tract was excised, as the rest of the tract was deep, passing through the gluteus maximus. Therefore, a video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) procedure was done for the remaining tract. The wound was left open for healing by secondary intention. The patient was monitored for six months during which time the wound healed completely.

A Comparison of Laser and Fistulotomy Techniques in the Treatment of Fistula-in-Ano

Background Anal fistulas are a common complication of perianal abscesses. The treatment of anal fistulas is challenging, with persistent and high recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of laser ablation compared to fistulotomy in the treatment of anal fistulas. Materials and methods The patients were examined for external and internal openings of the fistula, its number, length, type, relationship with the sphincters, and any previous history of abscess or proctological surgery. The surgical procedures, complications, incontinence, recurrence, and recovery time were evaluated and compared between the two groups. The laser ablation group received an intermittent laser application at a wavelength of 1470 nm and 10 watts for three seconds, while the fistulotomy group underwent cutting of the fistula tract with electrocautery while keeping a stylet in place. Results A total of 253 patients were included in this retrospective study, with 149 patients undergoing fistulotomy and 104 patients undergoing laser ablation. The patients were evaluated based on the type, number, and location of internal and external openings, and the length of the fistula tract according to the Parks classification. The mean follow-up period was 9.0±4.3 months. The results showed that the laser group had a shorter time to return to work and less postoperative pain compared to the fistulotomy group. However, the recurrence rate was higher in the laser group. The recurrence rate was also found to be higher in patients with low transsphincteric fistulas and in patients with diabetes mellitus. Conclusion Our study findings indicate that while laser ablation may be associated with less pain and quicker recovery time, it may also have a higher recurrence rate compared to fistulotomy. We believe that laser ablation is a valuable option for surgeons to consider early on in the treatment process, especially in cases where fistulotomy is not suitable.