Midterm outcomes of the covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation for aortoiliac occlusive disease in a latinoamerican population

Long-Term Outcomes of the Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation (CERAB) Technique in Patients With Aorto-Iliac Occlusive Disease

BACKGROUND

The Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation (CERAB) reconstruction is an endovascular technique, developed to reconstruct the aortic bifurcation in the most optimal anatomical and physiological manner. Short-term data were promising, but long-term data are still lacking. The objective was to report the long-term outcomes of CERAB for extensive aorto-iliac occlusive disease and to identify predictors for loss of primary patency.

METHODS

Consecutive electively treated patients with CERAB for aorto-iliac occlusive disease in a single hospital were identified and analyzed. Baseline and procedural data and follow-up were collected at 6-weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter. Technical success, procedural, and 30-day complications were evaluated, as well as overall survival. Patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization rates were analyzed using Kaplan Meier curves. Uni- and multivariate analysis were performed to identify possible predictors of failure.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty patients were included (79 male). Indication for treatment was intermittent claudication for 121 patients (75.6%) and 133 patients (83.1%) had a TASC-II D lesion. Technical success was obtained in 95.6% of patients and the 30-day mortality rate was 1.3%. The 5-year primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were 77.5%, 88.1%, and 95.0%, respectively, with a freedom-from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) rate of 84.4%. The strongest predictor of loss of primary patency of CERAB was a previous aorto-iliac intervention (odds ratio [OR]=5.36 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30; 22.07), p=0.020). In patients not previously treated in the aorto-iliac tract, 5-year primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates were 85.1%, 94.4%, and 96.9%, respectively. At 5-year follow-up, an improved Rutherford was found in 97.9% of patients and the freedom from major amputation rate was 100%.

CONCLUSION

The CERAB technique is related to good long-term outcomes, particularly in primary cases. In patients that had prior treatment for aorto-iliac occlusive disease, there were more reinterventions and therefore surveillance should likely be more intense.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation (CERAB) reconstruction was designed to improve outcomes of endovascular treatment of extensive aorto-iliac occlusive disease. At 5-year follow-up clinical improvement was found in 97.9% of patients without major amputations. The 5-year overall primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were 77.5%, 88.1%, and 95.0%, respectively, with a freedom-from clinically driven target lesion revascularization rate of 84.4%. Significantly better patency rates were observed for patients that were never treated before in the target area. The data implicate that CERAB are a valid treatment option for patients with extensive aorto-iliac occlusive disease. For patients previously treated in the target area, other treatment options might be considered, or more intensive follow-up surveillance is warranted.

The Long-Term Results of Covered Endovascular Aortic Bifurcation Repair in Complex Aortoiliac Disease: A Two-Year Follow-Up

Background: We aimed to investigate the two-year outcomes of covered endovascular reconstruction (CERAB) of the aortic bifurcation in patients with complex aortoiliac occlusive dis ease. Methods: This study was prospectively initiated, with data retrospectively collected from 40 patients categorized as TASC II B, C, and D based on computed tomography angiography (CTA) findings. All patients underwent the CERAB procedure. We assessed the procedural outcomes, including clinical and symptomatic improvements, as well as patency rates over a two-year follow-up period. Results: A total of 40 patients (33 males and 7 females) with aorto-occlusive disease were treated using the CERAB procedure and included in this observational study. The technical success rate was 100% across all procedures. At 36 months, the overall primary patency, assisted primary patency, and secondary patency rates were 85%, 90%, and 92.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The two-year results of this study suggest that CERAB offers patency rates comparable to those reported in other studies for complex aorto-occlusive bifurcation diseases. The procedure showed favorable patency rates, particularly for more advanced TASC II B, C, and D lesions.

Covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation: A systematic review aggregated data and individual participant data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We investigated the early and midterm efficacy and safety of covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) in the treatment of aortoiliac disease (AID).

METHODS

A systematic search on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published by August 2023 was performed. The primary end points were primary patency and secondary patency.

RESULTS

Eleven retrospective case series, involving 579 patients, were incorporated in the review with 88.9% of the included lesions being categorized as Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C or D. The pooled primary patency estimates at 12, 24 and 36 months were 94.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.4-99.7), 84.4% (95% CI, 72.3-98.5) and 83.8% (95% CI, 71.4-98.3) respectively. The mean primary patency time, representing the period during which individuals remained event-free, was 51.9 months (95% CI, 43.6-55.4). The pooled 36 months primary patency for studies with a predominantly claudicant patient population (>75% of patients) was 89.4% (95% CI, 78.5-100.0), compared with 71.5% (95% CI, 45.6-100.0) for studies with a mixed population (50% of patients). The pooled 36 months primary patency for studies with a predominantly TASC D patient population (>82% of patients) was 70.4% (95% CI, 46.4-100.0) compared with 91.0% (95% CI, 79.1-100.0) for studies with a more homogenous cohort. The pooled secondary patency estimates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 98.6% (95% CI, 96.2-100.0), 97% (95% CI, 93.1-100.0), and 97% (95% CI, 93.1-100.0), respectively. The pooled technical success, 30-day mortality and 30-day systemic complications estimates were 95.9% (95% CI, 93.7- 97.4), 1.9% (95% CI, 1.0-3.5), and 6.4% (95% CI, 4.4-9.1), respectively. The pooled intraoperative and postoperative 30-day CERAB-related complications estimates were 7.3% (95% CI, 2.0-23.0) and 4.2% (95% CI, 0.7-21.0), respectively. The pooled major amputation and target lesion reinterventions by the end of follow-up were 1.9% (95% CI, 1.0-3.4) and 13.9% (95% CI, 9.9-19.2), respectively. The pooled access site complication estimate was 11.7% (95% CI, 5.9-21.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Although this review has showcased the safety and feasibility of the CERAB technique in treating AID, it has also highlighted the necessity for a close and prolonged follow-up period extending beyond 1 year. Moreover, the favorable secondary patency estimates predominantly attained via endovascular reinterventions emphasize a potentially advantageous characteristic of the CERAB technique, particularly valuable when addressing late-stage AID disease or anatomically complex lesions.

Safety and Efficacy of Stent-Graft in the Treatment of Aortoiliac Artery Occlusive Disease: A Multicenter Study of Short-Term and Medium-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the short-term and mid-term safety and efficacy of stent-graft compared with bare stents for treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD).

METHODS

One hundred eighty three patients diagnosed with AIOD who received stent implantation at 3 vascular centers in north China between January 2019 and December 2021 were enrolled. Patients were divided into those undergoing stent-graft (Group A; n = 67) or bare stent (Group B; n = 116) implantation for retrospective cohort analysis. Efficacy was assessed as surgical success rate and rate of freedom from clinically driven target lesion reintervention at each follow-up time point. Safety was assessed by the rate of perioperative complication, major limb amputation, and aortoiliac artery-related mortality.

RESULTS

There were no preoperative baseline differences between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The surgical success was 91.04% for Group A, significantly higher than that for Group B (79.31%; P < 0.05). Incidence of perioperative complications was 2.98% for Group A, significantly lower than that for Group B (9.48%, P < 0.05), as was the rate of major limb amputation (A: 1.49% vs. B: 5.17%) and aortoiliac artery-related mortality (A: 1.49% vs. B: 4.31%), although these 2 indicators were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Follow-up rates were 91.8% for the total follow-up time of 3 years. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis gave significantly higher 1-year and 2-year freedom from clinically driven target lesion reintervention for Group A (98.51% and 95.52%) than for Group B (95.69% and 89.66%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Stent-graft is more effective and safer than bare stent in the treatment of AIOD.