Interval laparoscopic appendectomy after laparotomy drainage for acute appendicitis with abscess: A case report

Clinical prediction model for gangrenous appendicitis: A retrospective single-center study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gangrenous appendicitis, a type of complicated appendicitis, is an indication of emergency surgery due to a high risk of perforation. However, it can be challenging to diagnose preoperatively. This study aimed to validate the predictive factors of patients with gangrenous appendicitis and develop a novel scoring model based on objective parameters.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included 171 of 302 consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy between April 2014 and December 2023. Patients with perforation, chronic appendicitis, and appendicitis presenting with an abscess were excluded from the analysis. In other words, the study targeted Grades 1 and 2 on the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) severity assessment scale. Computed tomography (CT) scan value was defined as the average value of fluid in the appendix lumen on plain CT scan. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the independent objective predictors of gangrenous appendicitis. A new scoring model was developed based on the logistic regression coefficients of the independent predictors. The scores were then classified into three categories, and the probability of gangrenous appendicitis for each category was evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 46 (27%) and 125 (73%) patients presented with gangrenous appendicitis (=AAST Grade 2) and non-gangrenous (uncomplicated) appendicitis (=AAST Grade 1), respectively. The independent predictive factors of gangrenous appendicitis included a CT value of ≥24 HU, an appendiceal diameter of ≥12 mm, the presence of cecal mucosal edema, and a C-reactive protein level of ≥5.4 mg/dL. The scoring model, based on these four independent predictors, ranged from 0 to 4. The probability values of gangrenous appendicitis were 0%, 15%, and 97% in the low (0)-, moderate (1, 2)-, and high (3, 4)-risk categories, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our scoring model may assist in decision-making concerning emergency surgery and appendicitis management.

Interval appendectomy as a safe and feasible treatment approach after conservative treatment for appendicitis with abscess: a retrospective, single-center cohort study

Emergency appendectomy (EA) is the gold standard management for acute appendicitis (AA). However, whether EA or interval appendectomy (IA) after conservative treatment is the optimal approach in AA with abscess remains controversial. This study compared IA and EA in patients presenting with AA accompanied by abscess. This was a retrospective single-center study including 446 consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy between April 2009 and March 2023. AA with abscess was defined as a pericecal abscess observed by computed tomography or abdominal ultrasonography, and patients with signs of peritoneal irritation were excluded. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the patients who directly underwent EA and those who underwent IA after conservative treatment. Among 42 patients (9.4%) with AA and abscess, 34 and 8 patients underwent IA and EA, respectively. The rates of ileocecal resection and postoperative complications were lower in the IA group than in the EA group (3% vs. 50%, P < 0.001 and 9% vs. 75%, P < 0.001, respectively). Colonoscopy before IA was performed in 16 of the 17 patients aged ≥ 40 years in the IA group, and one patient underwent ileocecal resection because of suspicious neoplasm in the root of the appendix. IA after conservative treatment might be considered as the useful therapeutic option for AA with abscess. Colonoscopy during the waiting period between the initial diagnosis and IA should be considered in patients aged ≥ 40 years who may have malignant changes. Implementing IA as a first-line treatment will be beneficial to both patients and healthcare providers.

Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in patients with COVID-19 confirmation: A case report

Introduction

Strategies to postpone elective surgeries were proposed to maintain the hospital capacity to cater for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and emergency non-COVID cases. Non-operative management (NOM) was recommended when possible during the COVID-19 era. However, the optimal approach to acute appendicitis (AA) in patients with COVID-19 remains controversial.

Presentation of case

A 25-year-old man who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) was referred to our institution with a diagnosis of AA with appendicolith. Chest computed tomography did not detect evidence of pneumonia. Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed after strict infection prevention measures were taken. The postoperative course was uneventful. No respiratory symptoms such as cough or sputum production occurred postoperatively. No signs of infection in medical staff or spread in the operating room and infectious disease ward were observed.

Discussion

The treatment policy should fully consider the risk of COVID-19 infection to medical staff and the risk of aggravation in patients who tested positive for SARS-Cov-2. Surgery was chosen over NOM for AA with appendicolith because the presence of appendicolith was thought to indicate a high probability of treatment failure in NOM and possible perforation; thus, case more difficult measures were required for SARS-Cov-2-positive cases.

Conclusion

Careful assessment of the patient's condition and consideration of the treatment method is important, rather than choosing NOM over operative management based solely on SARS-Cov-2-positive status. Laparoscopic appendectomy with adequate infection control measures can be safely performed in SARS-Cov-2-positive cases.