Is routine blood cross-matching necessary in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

Pre-Operative Group and Save in Elective and Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Necessity, Cost-Effectiveness, and Own Experience

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a high safety profile. This study seeks to quantify the incidence of blood transfusion in both the elective and emergency settings, examine related patient outcomes, and investigate selection criteria for pre-operative Group and Save (G&S) sampling. Methods: A prospective multi-centre observational study was conducted to investigate patients undergoing either elective or emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the UK between January 2020 and May 2021. Multivariate logistical regression models were used to identify patient factors associated with the risk of transfusion and explore outcomes linked to pre-operative G&S sampling. Results: This study comprised 959 patients, with 631 (65.8%) undergoing elective cholecystectomy and 328 (34.2%) undergoing emergency surgery. The median age was 48 years (range: 35-59), with 724 (75.5%) of the patients being female. Only five patients (0.5%) required blood transfusions, receiving an average of three units, with the first unit administered approximately six hours post-operatively. Among these cases, three patients (60%) had underlying haematological conditions. In adjusted models, male gender was significantly associated with the need for a blood transfusion (OR 11.31, p = 0.013), while the presence of a pre-operative Group and Save sample did not demonstrate any positive impact on patient outcomes. Conclusions: The incidence of blood transfusion following laparoscopic cholecystectomy is very low. Male gender and haematological conditions may present as independent risk factors. Pre-operative G&S sampling did not yield any positive impact on patient outcomes and could be safely excluded in both elective and emergency cases, although certain population subsets will warrant further consideration.

A preoperative risk score to predict red blood cell transfusion in patients undergoing hysterectomy for ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with ovarian cancer experience a high rate of anemia throughout their treatment course, with rates that range from 19-95%. Blood transfusions offer symptom relief but may be costly, are limited in supply, and have been associated with worse 30-day surgical morbidity and mortality rates.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for blood transfusion with packed red blood cell and to develop a transfusion risk score to identify patients who undergo surgery for ovarian cancer and who are at lowest risk for a blood transfusion. Our aim was to help clinicians identify those patients who may not require a crossmatch to encourage resource use and cost-savings.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective database cohort study of 3470 patients who underwent hysterectomy for ovarian cancer with the use the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2014-2016. The association between risk factors with respect to 30-day postoperative blood transfusion was modeled with the use of logistic regression. A risk score to predict blood transfusion was created.

RESULTS

Eight hundred ninety-one (25.7%) patients received a blood transfusion. In multivariate analysis, blood transfusion was associated independently with age (odds ratio, 1.90, P<.01), African American race (odds ratio, 2.30; P<.01), ascites (odds ratio, 1.89; P=.02), preoperative hematocrit level <30% (odds ratio, 10.70; P<.01), preoperative platelet count >400×10⁹/L (odds ratio, 1.75; P<.01), occurrence of disseminated cancer (odds ratio, 1.71; P<.01), open surgical approach (odds ratio, 7.88; P<.01), operative time >3 hours (odds ratio, 2.19; P<.01), and additional surgical procedures that included large bowel resection (odds ratio, 4.23; P<.01), bladder/ureter resection (odds ratio, 1.69; P=.02), and pelvic exenteration (P=.02). A preoperative risk score that used age, race, ascites, preoperative hematocrit level, platelets, presence of disseminated cancer, planned hysterectomy approach, and procedures accurately predicted blood transfusion with good discriminatory ability (C-statistic=0.80 [P<.001]; C-statistic=0.69 [P<.001] for derivation and validation datasets, respectively) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit, P=.081; P=.56 for derivation and validation datasets, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients who undergo hysterectomy for ovarian cancer experience a high incidence of blood transfusions in the perioperative period. Preoperative risk factors and planned surgical procedures can be used in our transfusion risk score to help predict anticipated blood requirements.

Red blood cell transfusion probability and associated costs in neurosurgical procedures

BACKGROUND

The extent of red blood cell units (RBC) needed for different neurosurgical procedures and the time point of their administration are widely unknown, which results in generously cross-matching prior to surgery. However, RBC are increasingly requested in the aging western populations, and blood donations are significantly reduced. Therefore, the knowledge of the extent and time point of administration of RBC is of major importance.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single center analysis. The incidence of RBC transfusion during surgery or within 48 h after surgery was analyzed for all neurosurgical patients within 3 years. Costs for cross-matched and transfused RBC were calculated and risk factors for RBC transfusion analyzed.

RESULTS

The risk of intraoperative RBC administration was low for spinal and intracranial tumor resections (1.87%) and exceeded 10% only in spinal fusion procedures. This was dependent on the number of fused segments with an intraoperative transfusion risk of > 12.5% with fusion of more than three levels. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed a significantly increased risk for RBC transfusion for female gender (p = 0.006; OR 1.655), higher age (N = 4812; p < 0.0001; OR 1.028), and number of fused segments (N = 737; p < 0.0001; OR 1.433). Annual costs for cross-matching were 783,820.88 USD and for intraoperative RBC administration 121,322.13 USD.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurosurgical procedures are associated with a low number of RBC needed intraoperatively. Only elective spine fusion procedures with ≥ 3 levels involved and AVM resections seem to require cross-matching of RBC. The present data may allow changing the preoperative algorithm of RBC cross-matching in neurosurgical procedures and help to save resources and costs.