One-step mini-invasive treatment of abdominal aortic-iliac aneurysm associated with colo-rectal cancer

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients with Concomitant Cancer: A Literature Review

OBJECTIVES

Abdominal aortic aneurysmal (AAA) repair in patients with concomitant cancer is controversial due to increased comorbidity and reduced life expectancy in this specific patient group. This literature review aims to investigate the evidence supporting one treatment modality over another (endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) or open repair (OR)), as well as treatment strategy (staged AAA-, cancer first or simultaneous procedures) in patients with AAA and concomitant cancer.

METHODS

Literature review, including studies published from 2000 to 2021 on surgical treatment in patients with AAA and concomitant cancer and related outcomes (30-day morbidity/complications as well as 30-day and 3-year mortality).

RESULTS

24 studies comprising 560 patients undergoing surgical treatment of AAA and concomitant cancer were included. Of these, 220 cases were treated with EVAR and 340 with OR. Simultaneous procedures were performed in 190 cases, 370 received staged procedures. The 30-day mortality for EVAR versus OR was 1% and 8%, corresponding to a relative risk (RR) of 0.11 (95% CI: 0.03-0.46, p = 0.002). No difference in mortality was observed between staged versus simultaneous procedure nor between AAA-first versus cancer-first strategy, RR 0.59 (95% CI: 0.29-1.1, p = 0.13) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.34-2.31, p = 0.80), respectively. Overall, 3-year mortality was 21% for EVAR and 39% for OR from 2000-2021, while the mortality up to 3 years after EVAR within recent years (2015-2021) was 16%.

CONCLUSION

This review supports EVAR treatment as first choice if suitable. No consensus was established on treating either the aneurysm or the cancer first or simultaneously. Long-term mortality after EVAR was comparable to non-cancer patients within recent years.

Laparoscopic Management of Concomitant Sigmoid Colon Cancer and Type 2 Endoleak Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

The co-occurrence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and colorectal malignancy creates a significant surgical dilemma over which entity should be addressed first. A 73-year-old male was referred to our hospital due to a painful pulsatile abdominal mass. Computed tomographic angiography revealed an infrarenal aortic aneurysm measuring 5.8 cm in diameter and incidentally, a synchronous mass lesion in the sigmoid colon. The patient underwent an emergency EVAR using a Gore Excluder endograft. Postoperative CT staging for colon cancer revealed a type 2 endoleak on the grounds of a patent wide inferior mesenteric artery. The patient underwent a standard laparoscopic left colectomy with high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in order to simultaneously address the ongoing type 2 endoleak. Follow-up examinations with computed tomographic angiography were performed confirming the resolution of the endoleak. Synchronous laparoscopic sigmoidectomy and high ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for type 2 endoleak treatment appears to be applicable with hopeful results.

Management of Concomitant Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Intra-abdominal, Retroperitoneal Malignancy

BACKGROUND/AIM

As the population ages, there are increasing findings of coincidental diseases such as abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and intra-abdominal, retroperitoneal malignancy. The aim of this study was to propose an optimal treatment procedure for these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over a twenty-year-period, surgery was performed on a total of 1,098 patients with AAA and 32 (2.9%) patients with AAA and intra-abdominal, retroperitoneal malignancy: 18 renal, 6 colorectal carcinomas, 3 carcinomas of the small intestine, 3 primary liver tumours, 1 stomach carcinoma and 1 teratoma. The median age of patients was 72.5 years, there were 20 men (62.5%) and 12 women (37.5%). A one-stage procedure was performed on 19 patients (59.4%), and a two-stage procedure on 13 (40.6%) patients.

RESULTS

The average time of hospitalization was 12.4±6.9 days (median=11.0 days) for one-stage procedure, for a two-stage procedure 21.3±9.3 days (median=20.0 days), p=0.0045. Seven patients (21.9%) died within 30 days after the operation. All the deaths were in the group of one-stage procedures (p=0.0252). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival for patients following one-stage and twostage procedures was 61.0/56.3/51.5% and 89.0/79.9/53.0% respectively (p=0.1199).

CONCLUSION

Symptomatic disease must be resolved first. Two-stage procedures are the method of choice and offer better short-term results compared to one-stage procedures.

Surgical treatment for common hepatic aneurysm. Original one-step technique

Introduction

Hepatic artery aneurysms are rare, and their treatment represents a challenge for the surgeons.

Materials and methods

A new technique is presented for common hepatic artery (CHA) aneurysm: it requires minimal vascular surgical dissection and only one linear vascular stapler is applied at the bottom of aneurysm. Aneurysm exclusion is easily obtained, which allowed retrograde thrombosis. Liver blood supply is ensured to the right and left hepatic artery, through the gastroduodenal artery, and can be previously monitored, with temporary clamping of the section area, by visual control, enzyme evaluation and intraoperative ultrasound examination. We reported an open surgical treatment, with simultaneous removal of hepatic and adrenal metastases, secondary to colon cancer.

Results

The duration of vascular surgery was 30 min and did not involve complications. Postoperative controls confirmed the efficacy of the procedure.

Discussion

This original technique can be added to the various open and endovascular techniques so far described for the treatment of a CHA aneurysm. It is advisable as open surgery, mostly in case of associated pathologies.

Conclusions

The authors believe that this "one shot" technique by vascular staple of the distal part of CHA is minimally invasive and effective to obtain the exclusion of the aneurysm.

Endovascular Exclusion of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and Simultaneous Resection of Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists on the optimal strategy for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) associated with colorectal cancer (CRC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of endovascular treatment of AAA with simultaneous resection of CRC.

METHODS

Twenty-two consecutive patients presenting with AAA associated with a CRC were treated by endovascular AAA exclusion and simultaneous CRC resection. Median diameter of the aneurysm was 6.5 cm (range, 4.8-8 cm). Two patients (9%) had grade I cancer, 5 patients (23%) grade II, 13 patients (59%) grade III, and 2 patients (9%) grade IV. The 2 surgical procedures were performed under the same general anesthesia. Aneurysm exclusion was achieved using an infrarenal aorto-bi-iliac endoprosthesis (13 patients) and using an aorto-bi-iliac endoprosthesis with suprarenal fixation (9 patients), with 1 patient receiving bilateral renal chimney stent implantation. In all cases, vascularization of the hypogastric arteries was preserved. After AAA exclusion, colic resection was carried out by laparotomy with right colectomy (7 patients) and anterior rectocolic resection (15 patients). In all patients, AAA exclusion was controlled by a computed tomographic angioscan (CTA) at 1 month and duplex ultrasound every 6 months, and at some later stage, it was through inclusion of CTA as part of oncology surveillance. The mean duration of follow-up was 42 months (10-120 months). The primary endpoint was composite and regrouped any death occurring during the first 30 days after procedures, any type I endoleak, any aortic reintervention, and any AAA-related mortality.

RESULTS

No patient died during the first 30 postoperative days, and no patient was lost to follow-up. No aortic endoprosthesis infection and no type I endoleak were observed. Five endoleaks arising from the lumbar arteries (n = 4) or from the inferior mesenteric artery (n = 1) were identified. As they were not associated with an increase of the AAA diameter >5 mm, they were not treated. 1 colic anastomotic leak and 2 incisional abscesses were successfully cured by local care only. Nine patients (41%) died of cancer evolution during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, treatment of AAA and CRC during the same operative session yields results comparable to those observed when surgery is performed in 2 distinct operative sessions. Synchronous treatment reduced waiting time of colic resection. It may also shorten total hospitalization duration, although this last hypothesis is not supported by comparison with a control group.

Management of abdominal aortic aneurysm and concomitant malignant disease

INTRODUCTION

Concomitant malignant disease and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) represent a challenging issue in terms of treatment priority, timing and perspectives. This systematic review provides an overview of the available literature about AAA and concomitant malignant disease.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a literature search of all the English-language medical literature in Medline (through PubMed), Embase, Clinical Trial databases and the Cochrane Library up to December 31st, 2018.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The literature about AAA and concomitant malignant disease is mostly based on retrospective small case series. Two recently published meta-analyses focusing on the management of AAA and concomitant abdominal neoplasms came to the same conclusion "treat what is most threatening or symptomatic first." The threshold to treat asymptomatic AAA should not be altered in patients with AAA and concomitant cancer including cases under chemotherapy. An asymptomatic AAA of at least 55 mm anatomically suitable for EVAR, should only be treated first in patients with at least a life expectancy of two years followed by staged cancer surgery two weeks later.

CONCLUSIONS

Decisions about management of AAA and concomitant malignant disease should be based on clinical judgment applied individually in a multidisciplinary setting ("treat first what kills first"). The indication for treatment is not different than in patients with AAA without cancer. A staged approach is preferable and ideally the AAA should be excluded by endovascular means if anatomically suitable. An international registry should be initiated to gather more evidence about the management and outcomes of patients with AAA and concomitant carcinoma.

Synchronous Gastrointestinal Tumor and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection Treated with Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Followed by Tumor Resection

Objective

To evaluate the strategy in the management of patients with synchronous gastrointestinal tumor and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or abdominal aortic dissection (AAD) undergoing endovascular repair followed by tumor resection.

Materials and Methods

Five patients with synchronous gastrointestinal tumor and AAA or AAD were treated by endovascular repair followed by tumor resection. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed with respect to the management strategy, safety, and outcome.

Results

Endovascular repair was technically successful in all patients. All the stents were well positioned and well patent, and the AAA (n = 3) or AAD (n = 2) were correctly excluded without endoleaks. After endovascular repair, all patients underwent resection of gastrointestinal tumor. No late mortality or major complications related to the two procedures were observed in the subsequent follow-up.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that EVAR could significantly shorten the delay between AAA and gastrointestinal procedure with an excellent postoperative outcome. If the anatomical criteria are satisfied, EVAR followed by tumor resection might be an effective treatment for concomitant AAA and gastrointestinal tumor.

Meta-analysis of Outcomes Following Aneurysm Repair in Patients with Synchronous Intra-abdominal Malignancy

OBJECTIVES

The management of concomitant intra-abdominal malignancy (IAM) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) remains a challenge, even though malignancy is common in an elderly population. By means of systematic review and meta-analysis, the aim was to investigate outcomes in patients undergoing open (OAR) or endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) that have a concomitant malignancy.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed (Medline and EMBASE databases) to identify all series reporting outcomes of AAA repair (OAR or EVAR) in patients with concomitant IAM. Meta-analysis was applied to assess mortality and major morbidity at 30 days and long term.

RESULTS

The literature review identified 36 series (543 patients) and the majority (18 series) reported on patients with colorectal malignancy and AAA. Mean weighted mortality for OAR at 30 days was 11% (95% CI: 6.6% to 17.9%); none of the EVAR patients died peri-operatively. The weighted 30-day major complication rate for EVAR was 20.4% (10.0-37.4%) and for OAR it was 15.4% (7.0-30.8%). Most patients had their AAA and malignancy treated non-simultaneously (56.6%, 95% CI, 42.1-70.1%). In the EVAR cohort, three patients (4.6%) died at last follow-up (range 24-64 months). In the OAR cohort 23 (10.6%) had died at last follow up (range from 4 to 73 months).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, OAR was associated with significant peri-operative mortality in patients with an IAM. EVAR should be the first-line modality of AAA repair. The majority of patients were not treated simultaneously for the two pathologies, but further investigation is necessary to define the optimal timing for each procedure and malignancy.

Delayed recurrent nerve paralysis following post-traumatic aortic pseudoaneurysm

Blunt trauma to the neck or to the chest are increasingly observed in the emergency clinical practice. They usually follow motor vehicle accidents or may be work or sports related. A wide pattern of clinical presentation can be potentially encountered. We report the uncommon case of a patient who was referred to our observation presenting with hoarseness and disphagia. Twenty days before he had sustained a car accident with trauma to the chest, neck and the mandible. Laryngoscopy showed a left recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Further otolaryngo-logical examination showed no other abnormality. At CT and MR imaging a post-traumatic aortic pseudoaneurysm was revealed. The aortic pseudoaneurysm was consequently repaired by implantation of an endovascular stent graft under local anesthesia. The patient was discharged 10 days later. At 30-days follow-up laryngoscopy the left vocal cord palsy was completely resolved. Hoarseness associated with a dilated left atrium in a patient with mitral valve stenosis was initially described by Ortner more than a century ago. Since then several non malignant, cardiovascular, intrathoracic disease that results in embarrassment from recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy usually by stretching, pulling or compression; thus, the correlations of these pathologies was termed as cardiovocal syndrome or Ortner's syndrome. The reported case illustrates that life-threatening cardiovascular comorbidities can cause hoarseness and that an impaired recurrent laryngeal nerve might be correctable.

Diagnostic value of computed tomography colonography (CTC) after incomplete optical colonoscopy

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the role of computed tomography colonography (CTC) in patients who previously underwent incomplete optical colonoscopy (OC). We analyzed the impact of colonic lesions in intestinal segments not studied by OC and extracolonic findings in these patients.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and May 2015, 61 patients with a history of abdominal pain and incomplete OC examination were studied by CTC. CTCs were performed by 320-row CT scan in both the supine and the prone position, without intravenous administration of contrast medium. In all patients both colonic findings and extracolonic findings were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among the study group, 24 CTC examinations were negative for both colonic and extracolonic findings while 6 examinations revealed the presence of both colonic and extracolonic findings. In 24 patients CTC depicted colonic anomalies without extracolonic ones, while in 7 patients it showed extracolonic findings without colonic ones.

DISCUSSION

CTC is a noninvasive imaging technique with the advantages of high diagnostic performance, rapid data acquisition, minimal patient discomfort, lack of need for sedation, and virtually no recovery time. CTC accurately allows the evaluation of the nonvisualized part of the colon after incomplete OC and has the distinct advantage to detect clinically important extracolonic findings in patients with incomplete OC potentially explaining the patient's symptoms and conditioning their therapeutic management.

CONCLUSION

CTC accurately allows the assessment of both colonic and extracolonic pathologies representing a useful diagnostic tool in patients for whom complete OC is not achievable.

Management of concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysm and colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of the literature and perform an analysis of outcomes of treatment of concomitant colorectal cancer (CRC) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with a focus on the different treatment options and the related therapeutic outcomes.

METHODS

A review of the English-language medical literature from 1980 to 2015 was undertaken using the PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify studies reporting surgical treatment of patients with concomitant CRC and AAA. The search identified 24 articles encompassing 254 patients (81% male; mean age 73.5 ± 6.1 years).

RESULTS

In 96 patients (37.9%) cancer resection was performed first, followed by AAA repair at a later stage (open aortic repair [OAR], 79.2%; endovascular abdominal aortic repair [EVAR], 20.8%). Eighty-two patients (32.3%) underwent AAA repair (OAR, 47.5%; EVAR, 52.5%) before CRC resection. Seventy-one patients (27.9%) underwent combined OAR and CRC resection, and just five (1.9%) were treated with EVAR and cancer surgery in a single stage. There were eight of 96 interval AAA ruptures (8.3%), mostly in the early postoperative period concerning aneurysms >6 cm in diameter. The mean interval between the two procedures was much shorter in patients treated with EVAR than OAR (11.5 ± 1.8 days vs 103.9 ± 42.3 days). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 10.9%. Data from observational studies showed no significant differences in 30-day mortality between patients treated in one or two stages (P = .89). No mortality was recorded in any of the EVAR-treated patients. There was only one graft infection recorded (0.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Among different approaches, no significant differences in 30-day outcomes among patients treated in either two or one stage were evident. EVAR showed the lowest mortality and also diminished the delay between the two procedures in <2 weeks for a two-stage approach, although it has been associated with a significant risk for thrombotic events. The coexistence of AAA and CRC seems to favor the use of EVAR in treating those patients.