Application of laparoscopy in the combined surgical procedures of gynecological and digestive disorders in obese women: a retrospective cohort study

Different Doses of Nalbuphine Combined with Dexmedetomidine in Laparoscopic Oophorocystectomy

BACKGROUND The goal of this study was to investigate different doses of nalbuphine combined with dexmedetomidine in the postoperative treatment of laparoscopic oophorocystectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective single-blinded randomized controlled study included 219 patients with benign ovarian cysts who received laparoscopic oophorocystectomy from March 2017 to October 2019. Patients were randomized into 4 groups: low (0.5 mg/kg), middle (1.0 mg/kg), and high (1.5 mg/kg) doses of nalbuphine combined with dexmedetomidine (4 μg/kg) (LND, MND, and HND groups, respectively) and a control group with sufentanil (2.5 μg/kg), with different patient-controlled intravenous analgesia pump (PCIA) strategies. Rest and active visual analog scale (VAS) scores measured postoperative pain, and Ramsay scores were used to measure sedation. RESULTS The HND group showed the lowest rest and cough VAS scores at 2 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h after surgery, the lowest PCIA pressing time within 48 h after surgery, and the highest Ramsay scores at 2 h, 8 h, 24 h and 48 h after surgery. Rest and cough VAS scores decreased with higher nalbuphine doses in a dose-dependent manner. One day after surgery, IL-1ß and IL-6 levels increased in all groups, with the lowest levels of IL-1ß and IL-6 in the HND group. Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the HND group compared with the LND and MND groups. There were no significant differences in complications among groups. CONCLUSIONS Combined nalbuphine and dexmedetomidine improved postoperative pain and sedative conditions, reduced inflammation in a nalbuphine dose-dependent manner, and might facilitate patient recovery.

Laparoscopic Splenectomy: Has It Become the Standard Surgical Approach in Pediatric Patients?

BACKGROUND

Splenectomy is often required in the pediatric population as part of the treatment of hematologic disorders and can be performed laparoscopically or open. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic (LS) and open (OS) splenectomies using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric (NSQIP-P) data set.

METHODS

The NSQIP-P data set was used to identify children who underwent elective splenectomy between January 2012 and December 2016. Thirty-day outcomes between OS and LS, and LS alone and concurrent LS and cholecystectomy were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Most of the splenectomies (91%) were performed laparoscopically. There was no difference in overall complications between OS (n = 60) and LS (n = 613), although OS had a higher risk of perioperative transfusion (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.52-6.69). LS was associated with a shorter median hospital length of stay (2 versus 4 d, P < 0.001) and similar mean operative times compared to OS (120 versus 133 min, P = 0.559). There was no difference in outcomes of children undergoing LS versus LS and concurrent cholecystectomy (n = 129).

CONCLUSIONS

LS has become the standard approach for elective splenectomies in the pediatric population and has minimal morbidity, and when indicated, concurrent cholecystectomies do not increase the risk of complications.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

III.

Sealing of the cystic and appendix arteries with monopolar electrocautery during laparoscopic combined cholecystectomy and appendectomy

The best method to ligate the arteries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy or appendectomy remains controversy. The aim of this study is to introduce a new approach during laparoscopic combined cholecystectomy and appendectomy using a monopolar electrocautery to seal the cystic and appendix arteries. We retrospectively reviewed data from 57 patients who underwent laparoscopic combined cholecystectomy and appendectomy between December 2006 and June 2016. Each laparoscopic combined cholecystectomy and appendectomy was performed by coagulating and sealing the cystic and appendix arteries. Absorbable clip or coils were then used to ligate the proximal of cystic duct and the stump of appendix. The other side of the cystic duct and appendix which subsequently were to be removed from abdomen were used titanium clips or silk ligature. Of the 57 patients, 3 patients (5.3%) were converted to open surgery due to severe abdominal adhesions or gallbladder perforation. The mean operative time was 56 minutes (range, 40-80 minutes). Mean blood loss was 12 mL (range, 5-120 mL), and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.0 days (range, 2-5 days). No postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, infection, or mortality occurred. Monopolar electrocautery to seal the cystic and appendix arteries is a safe, effective, and economical surgical procedure during laparoscopic combined cholecystectomy and appendectomy. Further randomized controlled clinical trials are required to validate our findings.