Prognostic impact of splenic artery invasion for pancreatic cancer of the body and tail

Splenic vein tumor thrombosis is a major prognostic factor in distal pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of splenic vessel involvement in distal pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains controversial. The aim of the study was to assess its prognostic relevance in a large multicenter cohort.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pancreatosplenectomy for distal pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified from 5 pancreatic surgical centers. A pathology review of the surgical specimens was performed to assess splenic vessel involvement, defined as invasion of the vessel's adventitia or deeper, and confirm the presence of splenic vein tumor thrombosis. Prognostic factors associated with overall and relapse-free survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

149 patients underwent upfront surgery. Splenic vascular involvement was observed in 69 of them (46.3%). A parietal infiltration of the splenic artery or splenic vein was observed in 26 (17.5%) and 49 patients (32.8%), respectively. A pathologic tumor thrombosis of the splenic vein was identified in 22 patients (14.8%) and associated with larger tumors (>20 mm) (P = .023), more perineural (P = .017), and lymphovascular (P = .002) invasion, and more positive lymph node (P = .001). After a median follow-up of 50.8 months (95% confidence interval: 44.3-57.3), the cumulative 5-year overall and relapse-free survival were 46.2% and 33%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, in addition to lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio = 1.8; 95% confidence interval [1.1-3.1]; P = .023) and perineural invasion (hazard ratio = 3.5; 95% confidence interval [1.3-9.7]; P = .016), presence of splenic vein tumor thrombosis was the only splenic vascular involvement that affected independently the overall survival (HR = 2.3; 95% confidence interval [ 1.3-4.3]; P = .006).

CONCLUSION

In resectable distal pancreatic adenocarcinoma, a pathologic tumor thrombosis of the splenic vein is an independent prognostic factor of overall survival. To define the perioperative oncological strategy, a preoperative evaluation of splenic vessel involvement and thrombosis is needed.

Short- and long-term outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with radiologic infiltration of splenic vessels for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The effect of radiologic splenic vessels involvement (RSVI) on the survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) located in the body and tail of the pancreas is controversial, and its influence on postoperative morbidity after distal pancreatectomy (DP) is unknown. This study aimed to determine the influence of RSVI on postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients undergoing DP for PAC.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study of DP was conducted at 7 hepatopancreatobiliary units between January 2008 and December 2018. Patients were classified according to the presence of RSVI. A Clavien-Dindo grade of >II was considered to represent a major complication.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients were included in the analysis. Moreover, 47 patients had vascular infiltration: 4 had arterial involvement, 10 had venous involvement, and 33 had both arterial and venous involvements. The rates of major complications were 20.8% in patients without RSVI, 40.0% in those with venous RSVI, 25.0% in those with arterial RSVI, and 30.3% in those with both arterial and venous RSVIs (P = .024). The DFS rates at 3 years were 56% in the group without RSVI, 50% in the group with arterial RSVI, and 16% in the group with both arterial and venous RSVIs (P = .003). The OS rates at 3 years were 66% in the group without RSVI, 50% in the group with arterial RSVI, and 29% in the group with both arterial and venous RSVIs (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

RSVI increased the major complication rates after DP and reduced the OS and DFS. Therefore, it may be a useful prognostic marker in patients with PAC scheduled to undergo DP and may help to select patients likely to benefit from neoadjuvant treatment.

Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Robotic distal pancreatectomy has increasingly been accepted as it has overcome some of the limitations of open distal pancreatectomy, whilst the outcomes following robotic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are still uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes of robotic RAMPS and open RAMPS for PDAC.

METHODS

The patients who underwent robotic RAMPS and open RAMPS for PDAC at our clinical centre between January 2017 and December 2021 were reviewed. After a propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:1 ratio, the perioperative and pathological outcomes in the both groups were reviewed. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent prognosis factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of these patients.

RESULTS

318 cases were recorded in robotic and open groups. The robotic group showed advantages in operative time [205.00 (166.00, 240.00) min vs 235 (184.75, 270.00) min, P = 0.002], estimated blood loss [100 (50, 100) ml vs 300 (100, 400) ml, P < 0.001], delayed gastric emptying [0 vs 5.03%, P = 0.007] and postoperative hospital stay [7.00 (5.00, 10.00) days vs 11.00 (8.00, 14.00) days, P < 0.001]. There were no significant differences in rate of severe postoperative complications between the robotic group and the open group. Multivariable analysis showed that carbohydrate antigen 19-9, estimated blood loss, N stage, tumour differentiation, chemotherapy and vascular invasion were independent risk factors for OS and RFS of these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic RAMPS was safe and had some advantages over open RAMPS for PDAC. There were no significantly differences in oncological outcomes and long-term survival rates between the robotic and open groups. Robotic RAMPS expanded the indications for minimally invasive surgeries for PDAC to a certain extent.

Impact of radiological and pathological splenic vein involvement in patients with resectable pancreatic body or tail cancer

PURPOSE

Several studies have reported a negative impact on survival associated with splenic vessel involvement, especially splenic artery (SpA) involvement, in patients diagnosed with pancreatic body or tail cancer. However, there is limited research on splenic vein (SpV) involvement. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the significance of splenic vessel involvement, especially SpV involvement, in patients with resectable pancreatic body or tail cancer.

METHODS

Between January 2007 and December 2021, 116 consecutive patients underwent distal pancreatectomies for pancreatic body or tail cancer. Among them, this study specifically examined 88 patients with resectable pancreatic body or tail cancer to elucidate prognostic factors using a multivariable Cox proportional analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method evaluated the impact of SpV involvement in terms of both radiological and pathological aspects and the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

Higher pre-operative carcinoembryonic antigen levels, larger tumour size, pathological SpV invasion, and non-completion of adjuvant therapy were identified as independent poor prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Additionally, patients with radiological SpV encasement had significantly worse prognoses in terms of OS (p = 0.039) and RFS (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of multidetector-row computed tomography for detecting pathological SpV invasion were 81.0% and 61.2%, respectively. However, the prognostic impact of neoadjuvant therapy could not be determined, regardless of radiological SpV involvement.

CONCLUSION

Radiological and pathological SpV involvement is a poor prognostic factor for patients with resectable pancreatic body or tail cancer. New innovative treatments and effective neoadjuvant therapy regimens are required for patients with SpV involvement.

Prognostic role of radiological splenic vessel involvement in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the body and tail: A retrospective analysis based on a large population

BACKGROUND

Tumors located in the pancreatic body or tail are more likely to invade splenic vessels; however, splenic artery (SpA) or vein (SpV) involvement is not included in the criteria for resectability. We aimed to analyze the prognostic role of radiological splenic vessel involvement in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the body and tail.

METHODS

Patients with resetable PDAC were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. SpA and SpV involvement were graded as clear, abutment and encasement. Multivariate Cox and logistic regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and risk factors for early recurrence, respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 234 patients, 94 patients had radiologic SpA invasion, including abutment in 47 patients and encasement in 47 patients, while 123 patients had radiological SpV invasion, including abutment in 69 patients and encasement in 54 patients. Patients with SpA or SpV encasement showed a significantly worse OS and recurrence-free survival than those with SpA or SpV clear (P < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, both SpA and SpV encasement were independently associated with poor OS (SpA: hazard ratio [HR] 1.89, P = 0.010; SpV: HR 2.01, P = 0.001) and early recurrence (SpA: odds ratio [OR] 4.98, P < 0.001; SpV: OR 3.71, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Radiological SpA or SpV encasement independently decreases OS, and is associated with early recurrence of resectable PDAC of the body/tail.

Prognostic Impact of Gastroduodenal Artery Involvement in Cancer of the Pancreatic Head

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) contacting major arteries such as the celiac, common hepatic, and superior mesenteric artery is linked to poor prognosis and classified as borderline resectable. Although PDAC involving the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) is considered resectable, the prognostic impact of GDA involvement remains unclear. Here we investigated the prognostic impact of GDA involvement in PDAC after resection.

METHODS

This study included 105 patients with resectable PDAC or borderline resectable with portal vein involvement. Patients were divided into two groups: those with tumor-GDA contact ≤ 180° and those with GDA contact > 180°. We evaluated the prognostic impact of GDA involvement between these groups.

RESULTS

Both recurrence-free and overall survival after the surgery were significantly poorer with GDA contact > 180° than ≤ 180°. The poorer prognosis with GDA contact > 180° was verified by multivariate analysis and propensity score matching analysis to match patient backgrounds between the groups. The frequency of postoperative distant metastasis was also significantly higher in patients with GDA contact > 180°.

CONCLUSIONS

GDA involvement is an independent factor significantly associated with postoperative survival in PDAC, and the poorer prognosis with GDA involvement may be linked to the development of postoperative distant metastasis.

Technical options in surgery for artery-involving pancreatic cancer: Invasion depth matters

Background

The artery involvement explains the majority of primary unresectability of non-metastatic pancreatic cancer patients and both arterial resection and artery-sparing dissection techniques are utilized in curative-intent pancreatectomies for artery-involving pancreatic cancer (ai-PC) patients.

Methods

This narrative review summarized the history of resectability evaluation for ai-PC and attempted to interpret its current pitfalls that led to the divergence of resectability prediction and surgical exploration, with a focus on the rationale and the surgical outcomes of the sub-adventitial divestment technique.

Results

The circumferential involvement of artery by tumor currently defined the resectability of ai-PC but insufficient to preclude laparotomy with curative intent. The reasons behind could be: 1. The radiographic involvement of tumor to arterial circumference was not necessarily resulted in histopathological artery wall invasion; 2. the developed surgical techniques facilitated radical resection, better perioperative safety as well as oncological benefit. The feasibility of periadventitial dissection, sub-adventitial divestment and other artery-sparing techniques for ai-PC depended on the tumor invasion depth to the artery, i.e., whether the external elastic lamina (EEL) was invaded demonstrating a hallmark plane for sub-adventitial dissections. These techniques were reported to be complicated with preferable surgical outcomes comparing to arterial resection combined pancreatectomies, while the arterial resection combined pancreatectomies were considered performed in patients with more advanced disease.

Conclusions

Adequate preoperative imaging modalities with which to evaluate the tumor invasion depth to the artery are to be developed. Survival benefits after these techniques remain to be proven, with more and higher-level clinical evidence needed.

Key message

The current resectability evaluation criteria, which were based on radiographic circumferential involvement of the artery by tumor, was insufficient to preclude curative-intent pancreatectomies for artery-involving pancreatic cancer patients. With oncological benefit to be further proven, periarterial dissection and arterial resection have different but overlapping indications, and predicting the tumor invasion depth in major arteries was critical for surgical planning.

Radiological tumour invasion of splenic artery or vein in patients with pancreatic body or tail adenocarcinoma and effect on recurrence and survival

BACKGROUND

Major vessel invasion is an important factor for determining the surgical approach and long-term prognosis for patients with pancreatic head cancer. However, clinical implications of vessel invasion have seldom been reported in pancreatic body or tail cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of splenic vessel invasion with pancreatic body or tail cancer compared with no invasion and investigate prognostic factors.

METHODS

This study enrolled patients who underwent upfront distal pancreatectomy from 2005 to 2018. The circular degree of splenic vessel invasion was investigated and categorized into three groups (group 1, no invasion; group 2, 0-180°; group 3, 180° or more). Clinicopathological variables and perioperative and survival outcomes were evaluated, and multivariable Cox proportional analysis was performed to evaluate prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Among 249 enrolled patients, tumour size was larger in patients with splenic vessel invasion (3.9 versus 2.9 cm, P = 0.001), but the number of metastatic lymph nodes was comparable to that in patients with no vessel invasion (1.7 versus 1.4, P = 0.241). The 5-year overall survival rates differed significantly between the three groups (group 1, 38.4 per cent; group 2, 16.8 per cent; group 3, 9.7 per cent, P < 0.001). Patients with both splenic artery and vein invasion had lower 5-year overall survival rates than those with one vessel (7.5 versus 20.2 per cent, P = 0.021). Cox proportional analysis revealed adjuvant treatment, R0 resection and splenic artery invasion as independent prognostic factors for adverse outcomes in pancreatic body or tail cancer.

CONCLUSION

Splenic vessel invasion was associated with higher recurrence and lower overall survival in pancreatic body or tail cancers suggesting a need for a neoadjuvant approach.

Prognostic impact of splenic vessel involvement and tumor size in distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: a retrospective multicentric cohort study

PURPOSE

Splenic vessel involvement occurs frequently in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the body and the tail (B/T) but the impact on survival is unknown. We assessed the influence of radiological and pathologic involvement of splenic artery (p-SA +) and vein (p-SV +) on patient outcomes after distal pancreatectomy (DP) for PDAC.

METHODS

From 2013 to 2019, all DP for PDAC in five centers were included. Factors associated with overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival were identified.

RESULTS

Among the 76 patients included, 5 (6.6%) had p-SA + only, 11 (14.5%) had p-SV + only, and 24 (31.6%) had both p-SA + and p-SV + . The preoperative CT-scan accuracy to predict p-SV + and p-SA + was high (sensitivity: 91.4% and 82.8%, respectively; negative predictive value: 89.7% and 88.3%, respectively). The 5-year OS and DFS rates were 3.9% and 8.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified splenic vessel involvement (i.e., p-SA + or p-SV + , or both p-SA + and p-SV +) as the only independent factor influencing DFS (HR 4.04; 95% CI [1.22-13.44], p = 0.023). Tumor size ≥ 30 mm was the only independent factor influencing OS (HR 4.04; 95% CI [1.26-12.95], p = 0.019) and was associated with a high risk of p-SA + (p = 0.001) and p-SV + (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Tumor size ≥ 30 mm and splenic vessel involvement occurred in more than half of the patients who underwent DP for PDAC and had negative impact on long-term survival. Preoperative CT-scan was reliable to identify splenic vessel involvement in B/T PDAC. Large tumor size and radiological splenic vessel involvement could be taken into account to propose a neoadjuvant treatment.

Splenic-vasculature involvement is associated with poor prognosis in resected distal pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Distal pancreatic carcinoma is one of the most lethal cancers largely due to its high incidence of distant metastasis. This study aims to assess the prognostic value of splenic-vasculature involvement in resected distal pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we collected the clinicopathologic information of 454 patients with pancreatic cancer and performed univariate and multivariate analyses to identify factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), with an emphasis on the prognostic value of splenic-artery and -vein involvement.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed that larger tumor size, non-intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (non-IPMN)-associated adenocarcinoma, poor differentiation, stage pT3, nodal metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and pathologic and radiographic evidence of splenic-vein invasion were significantly associated with shorter PFS and OS (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed non-IPMN-associated adenocarcinoma, stage pT3, stage pN1-2, and post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy as independent risk factors for both PFS and OS, and larger tumor size and radiographic evidence of splenic-artery invasion as predictors of PFS only.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines should be developed for a uniform approach with regard to the examination and reporting of the status of the splenic vasculature when dealing with distal-pancreatic-cancer specimens.

Comprehensive histological evaluation with clinical analysis of venous invasion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: From histology to clinical implications

OBJECTIVES

Venous invasion is a poor prognostic factor for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, our understanding of various features of venous invasion is limited. Our aim is to comprehensively evaluate various histopathologic features of venous invasion, including status, type (lymphatic or venous), number of invasion foci, and histologic pattern (pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia [PanIN]-like, conventional) in PDACs.

METHODS

Various features of venous invasion, including status, number of invasion foci, histologic patterns [pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN)-like, conventional], and size of involved vessels in 471 surgically resected PDACs were evaluated with all available hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides.

RESULTS

Venous invasion was observed in 319 cases (67.7%) and was more frequently associated with increased tumor size, extrapancreatic extension, resection margin involvement, diffuse tumor distribution, lymph node metastasis, and perineural invasion (all Ps < .05). High frequency (≥3 foci) of venous invasion was associated with shorter overall survival both in the entire group and in the early stage subgroup (stage I; all Ps < .05). Multivariate analysis indicated that a high frequency (≥3 foci) of venous invasion, large tumor size (>4 cm), higher histologic grade, and lymph node metastasis, were independent prognostic factors of worse overall survival (all Ps < .05).

CONCLUSION

Precise evaluation of venous invasion status, including foci number of invasion, can provide additional prognostic information for patients undergoing surgical resection of PDAC, especially for those with early disease stage.

Preoperative imaging characteristics predict poor survival and inadequate resection for left-sided pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the neck, body and tail (PDAC-NBT) necessitates R0 surgical resection. Preoperative radiographic identification of patients likely to achieve successful oncologic resection remains difficult. This study seeks to identify preoperative imaging characteristics predictive of non-R0 resections or impaired survival for PDAC-NBT.

METHODS

Patients at five high-volume centers who underwent resection for PDAC-NBT were retrospectively analyzed. The most immediate preoperative cross-sectional scan was assessed along with outcome measures of overall survival and margin status.

RESULTS

330 patients were treated between 2001 and 2016. Margin status included 247 R0 (78.2%), 67 R1 (21.2%), and 2 R2 (0.6%). A non-R0 resection predicted worse survival (p = 0.0002). On preoperative imaging, patients with tumors greater than 20 mm, tumor attenuation greater than 70 Hounsfield units, or who demonstrated pancreatic atrophy and/or calcifications also had worse survival (p = 0.010, p = 0.036, p = 0.025 respectively). Patients with tumors interfacing with the splenic artery or vein or extending posteriorly achieved fewer R0 resections (p = 0.0006, p = 0.0004, p = 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative cross-sectional imaging can identify tumor characteristics associated with poor survival and non-R0 resection. Further investigation is needed to identify the appropriate surgical and treatment modifications necessary to clinically benefit this subset of patients.

Radiographic Splenic Artery Involvement Is a Poor Prognostic Factor in Upfront Surgery for Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Body and Tail Cancer

PURPOSE

The prognostic impact of radiographic splenic vessel involvement in pancreatic cancer remains unclear. We evaluate its oncological significance in resectable pancreatic body/tail cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively review 102 cases of resectable pancreatic cancer and 51 of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) who underwent pancreatectomy for pancreatic body/tail cancer. Resectable pancreatic body/tail cancer was classified into one of three categories based on radiographic splenic vessel involvement.

RESULTS

Among 102 cases of resectable pancreatic cancer, 37 (36.3%), 35 (34.3%), and 30 cases (29.4%) were classified as no splenic vessel involvement (R_none), splenic vein involvement (RV), and splenic artery involvement (RA), respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) among patients with R_none, RV, RA, and BRPC was 58.5, 18.4, 10.8, and 9.2 months, respectively. Patients with RV and RA had significantly poorer DFS than patients with R_none (P = 0.010, P < 0.001, respectively). Median survival among R_none, RV, RA, and BRPC was 80.6, 23.4, 15.1, and 21.3 months, respectively. Patients with RV and RA had significantly poorer survival than patients with R_none (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively) and had short survival similar to that of those with BRPC. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis detected preoperative CA19-9 ≥ 37 IU/L, radiologic splenic vein involvement, radiologic splenic artery involvement, intraoperative bleeding ≥ 500 ml, transfusion, positive washing cytology, and noncompletion of adjuvant therapy as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiographic splenic artery involvement is a poor prognostic factor in resectable pancreatic body/tail cancer and may have a role in stratification of treatment strategy.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Body or Tail on Surgical and Oncological Outcome: A Propensity-Score Matched Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Several studies have suggested a survival benefit of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the pancreatic head. Data concerning NAT for PDAC located in pancreatic body or tail are lacking.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of an international multicenter retrospective cohort of distal pancreatectomy for PDAC in 34 centers from 11 countries (2007-2015). Patients who underwent resection after NAT were matched (1:1 ratio), using propensity scores based on baseline characteristics, to patients who underwent upfront resection. Median overall survival was compared using the stratified log-rank test.

RESULTS

Among 1236 patients, 136 (11.0%) received NAT, most frequently FOLFIRINOX (25.7%). In total, 94 patients receiving NAT were matched to 94 patients undergoing upfront resection. NAT was associated with less postoperative major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3a, 10.6% vs. 23.4%, P = 0.020) and pancreatic fistula grade B/C (9.6% vs. 21.3%, P = 0.026). NAT did not improve overall survival [27 (95% CI 14-39) versus 31 months (95% CI 19-42), P = 0.277], as compared with upfront resection. In a sensitivity analysis of 251 patients with radiographic tumor involvement of splenic vessels, NAT (n = 37, 14.7%) was associated with prolonged overall survival [36 (95% CI 18-53) versus 20 months (95% CI 15-24), P = 0.049], as compared with upfront resection.

CONCLUSION

In this international multicenter cohort study, NAT for resected PDAC in pancreatic body or tail was associated with less morbidity and pancreatic fistula but similar overall survival in comparison with upfront resection. Prospective studies should confirm a survival benefit of NAT in patients with PDAC and splenic vessel involvement.

The Prognostic Impact of the Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio in Resected Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Although the prognostic significance of systematic inflammation-based scores, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), has been explored in pancreatic cancers, few reports have investigated the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR). We aimed to retrospectively investigate the prognostic value of the preoperative LMR in patients with resectable pancreatic head cancer (PHC).

METHODS

From 2005 to 2016, 165 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for PHC. All samples of peripheral blood were collected within 2 weeks prior to surgery. The best cutoff values of the LMR for predicting survival were determined by using a minimum p value approach (cut-off value: 2.8). The clinicopathological features of LMR <2.8 (n = 25) and ≥2.8 (n = 140) were compared.

RESULTS

Patients with LMR ≥2.8 showed significantly lower NLR and PLR, and significantly higher PNI. Levels of CEA and CA19-9 were similar, and the pathological findings were comparable between the groups. The overall survival of patients with LMR ≥2.8 (66.2% at 1 year) was superior to that of patients with LMR <2.8 (36.1% at 1 year, p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis identified LMR <2.8 (hazard ratio 1.72, 95% CI 1.02-2.89, p = 0.042), lymphatic and venous invasion and positive surgical margin as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

LMR may carry important prognostic information for patients with resectable PHC. Preoperative LMR may be considered for use in risk stratification for individual patients with PHC.

Pathological and Radiological Splenic Vein Involvement are Predictors of Poor Prognosis and Early Liver Metastasis After Surgery in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma of the Body and Tail

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) invasion to the splenic vessel is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical value of pathological and radiological splenic vessel invasion in PDACs of the body and tail.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with resectable PDAC of the body and tail who underwent distal pancreatectomy between 2003 and 2016 at the Kobe University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 68 patients (29 female and 39 male patients) were enrolled. Pathologically determined splenic vein invasion (p-SV) and splenic artery invasion (p-SA) were identified in 21 (30.9%) and 5 (7.4%) patients, respectively. The p-SV (but not p-SA) was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (p = 0.009). On analysis of recurrence patterns, patients with PDAC positive for p-SV were at a higher risk for liver metastasis (p = 0.022); however, the associations were not significant for other recurrence patterns. Liver metastasis occurred earlier in patients who were positive for p-SV (p = 0.015). Preoperative computed tomography effectively diagnosed pathological vessel invasion (SV: sensitivity, 95.2%, specificity, 72.3%; SA: sensitivity, 100%, specificity, 84.1%). Radiological SV invasion remained significant in multivariate analysis regarding postoperative survival (p = 0.007), and was also associated with early liver metastases (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological/radiological SV invasion were independent adverse prognostic factors associated with early liver metastasis in patients with PDAC of the body/tail. Assessment of these findings may be useful in determining optimal therapeutic options in these patients.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic role of splenic vessels infiltration in resectable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Identification of factors associated with dismal survival after surgery in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is important to select patients for neoadjuvant treatment. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the results of distal pancreatectomy for resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic body-tail with and without splenic vessels infiltration.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria were studies including patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer with or without splenic vessels infiltration. 5-year overall survival (OS) was the primary outcomes. Meta-analysis was carried out applying time-to-event method.

RESULTS

Six articles with 423 patients were analysed. Patients with pathological splenic artery invasion had a worse survival compared with those without infiltration (Hazard ratio 1.76, 95% CI 1.36-2.28; P < 0.0001). A similar results was found when considering pathological splenic vessels infiltration, showing that survival was significantly poorer when splenic vein infiltration was present (Hazard ratio 1.51, 95% CI 1.19-1.93; P = 0.0009).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed worse survival for patients with splenic vessels infiltration undergoing distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Splenic vessels infiltration represents the stigmata of a more aggressive disease, although resectable.