Randomized clinical trial of ligasure™ versus conventional splenectomy for injured spleen in blunt abdominal trauma

LigaSure technique for splenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to clarify the optimal management of the LigaSure technique and conventional techniques during splenectomy.

METHODS

All databases, including CBM, CNKI, WFPD, Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases up to April 2023, were searched for relevant studies comparing the LigaSure technique with conventional techniques. Six studies, extracted by 2 independent reviewers, were evaluated for blood loss, operative time, conversion, mortality, hospital stay, and transfusion.

RESULTS

The blood loss was significantly higher in the convention group than in the LigaSure group (WMD = -48.98, 95% CI: -62.41 to -35.55, P < .00001). Meanwhile, the mean operative time was significantly shorter in LigaSure group than in convention group (WMD = -10.57; 95% CI: -12.35 to -8.78), P < .00001). No significant differences were found regarding the conversion rate, hospital stay, morbidity, and transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The LigaSure technique has comparable effects to conventional techniques, but to some extent reduces blood loss and operative time.

High-energy devices in different surgical settings: lessons learnt from a full health technology assessment report developed by SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica)

BACKGROUND

The present paper aims at evaluating the potential benefits of high-energy devices (HEDs) in the Italian surgical practice, defining the comparative efficacy and safety profiles, as well as the potential economic and organizational advantages for hospitals and patients, with respect to standard monopolar or bipolar devices.

METHODS

A Health Technology Assessment was conducted in 2021 assuming the hospital perspective, comparing HEDs and standard monopolar/bipolar devices, within eleven surgical settings: appendectomy, hepatic resections, colorectal resections, cholecystectomy, splenectomy, hemorrhoidectomy, thyroidectomy, esophago-gastrectomy, breast surgery, adrenalectomy, and pancreatectomy. The nine EUnetHTA Core Model dimensions were deployed considering a multi-methods approach. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used: (1) a systematic literature review for the definition of the comparative efficacy and safety data; (2) administration of qualitative questionnaires, completed by 23 healthcare professionals (according to 7-item Likert scale, ranging from - 3 to + 3); and (3) health-economics tools, useful for the economic evaluation of the clinical pathway and budget impact analysis, and for the definition of the organizational and accessibility advantages, in terms of time or procedures' savings.

RESULTS

The literature declared a decrease in operating time and length of stay in using HEDs in most surgical settings. While HEDs would lead to a marginal investment for the conduction of 178,619 surgeries on annual basis, their routinely implementation would generate significant organizational savings. A decrease equal to - 5.25/-9.02% of operating room time and to - 5.03/-30.73% of length of stay emerged. An advantage in accessibility to surgery could be hypothesized in a 9% of increase, due to the gaining in operatory slots. Professionals' perceptions crystallized and confirmed literature evidence, declaring a better safety and effectiveness profile. An improvement in both patients and caregivers' quality-of-life emerged.

CONCLUSIONS

The results have demonstrated the strategic relevance related to HEDs introduction, their economic sustainability, and feasibility, as well as the potentialities in process improvement.

An unusual case of a traumatic splenic rupture masquerading as myocardial ischemia: a case report

BACKGROUND

The spleen is one of the most frequently injured abdominal organs during trauma, which can result in intraperitoneal bleeding of life-threatening magnitude. Although splenic injury secondary to trivial trauma comprises a minor fraction of abdominal injuries, undiagnosed or delayed diagnosis may result in a complicated clinical course.

CASE PRESENTATION

One such event is presented here, wherein a late diagnosis of an advanced grade splenic injury following a trivial trauma initially presented in disguise as acute myocardial ischaemia in a previously healthy South Asian woman in her late 30s. Emergency laparotomy and splenectomy were performed with simultaneous massive transfusion for a 3.5-L blood loss. She subsequently had an uncomplicated clinical course with regular surgical follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Splenic injuries might present with ambiguous symptoms such as atypical chest pain and shoulder pain, necessitating attending clinicians to have a high degree of suspicion, especially in busy units such as the emergency department (ED).

LigaSure versus monopolar cautery for recipient hepatectomy in liver transplantation: a propensity score-matched analysis

Background

Recipient hepatectomy during liver transplantation (LT) is one of the most challenging aspects of surgery due to the possibility of massive bleeding. This study aimed to compare and analyze the effectiveness between LigaSure and monopolar cautery in recipients.

Methods

We reviewed 187 recipients who underwent LT from March 2019 to June 2020. We compared the surgical outcomes of the 69 recipients who underwent recipient hepatectomy with LigaSure (LigaSure group) and 118 recipients who underwent with monopolar cautery. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using the nearest-neighbor method at a ratio of 1:1 based on 14 baseline characteristics and possible factors that influence postoperative bleeding.

Results

A total of 187 adult recipients were reviewed retrospectively. In the propensity score-matched analysis, The rates of bleeding and infectious complication were significantly lower in the LigaSure group than in the monopolar cautery group (3/69, 4.35% versus 13/69, 18.8%; P=0.015 and 1/69, 1.45% versus 9/69, 13.0%; P=0.017). The length of postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the LigaSure group (mean: 23.1±16.1 versus 39.6±58.2 days; P=0.024).

Conclusions

Recipient hepatectomy with LigaSure is associated with a short hospital stay due to low re-operation rates, postoperative bleeding, and secondary infection related to bleeding.

A Comparative Study on the Advantages of Using a Stapling Device in a Splenectomy for Patients with Traumatic Splenic Injury

Purpose: Surgery is prioritized for a splenic injury when the patient is hemodynamically unstable or the injury is severe and there is an increased risk of bleeding. This study aimed to examine the outcomes of splenectomies where a surgical stapling device was used to reduce operation time and rapidly control bleeding. Methods: This retrospective study included 53 patients who underwent a splenectomy for traumatic splenic injury at Chosun University Hospital between 2012 and 2017. Clinical outcomes including operation time (duration), blood transfusion amount (number of units), length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit stay, and mortality rate were compared between patients who received conventional ligation [conventional group (CG)] and patients who received a splenectomy where a surgical stapling device was used [stapling group (SG)]. Results: The SG showed an average operation time of 17 minutes less than the CG, although the reduction was not statistically significant. No significant differences in estimated blood loss and blood transfusion amount were determined between the 2 groups, although the SG received 1 more unit of red blood cells for transfusion in the 48-hour post-operative period compared with the CG. One case of pancreatic fistula as a postoperative complication was reported in the SG. Conclusion: The use of a surgical stapling device in a splenectomy may be considered for a hemodynamically unstable patient with splenic injury which caused severe anatomical damage.

Risk factor for wound complications following wide resection of soft tissue sarcoma in the adductor compartment of the thigh

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate deep-seated soft tissue sarcoma (STS) occurring in the adductor compartment of the thigh that underwent wide resection and to clarify the high-risk group for wound complications.

Patients and methods

From 2000 to 2017, we reviewed 104 cases of deep-seated STS occurring in the adductor compartment of the thigh that were treated at four specialized facilities with expertise in sarcoma treatment.

Results

Wound complications occurred in 40 cases (38.5%), of which 23 cases (22.1%) were cases with major wound complications (MWC). In univariate analysis, BMI (P &lt; 0.01), maximum tumor diameter (P &lt; 0.01), operation time (P &lt; 0.01), amount of intraoperative bleeding (P &lt; 0.01), and intraoperative intervention to the femoral artery and vein (P &lt; 0.01) were significantly associated with wound complications. In multivariate analysis, the associated parameters were BMI (P &lt; 0.01), maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.02), and intraoperative intervention to the femoral artery and vein (P = 0.01). When limited to cases with MWC, univariate analysis showed that maximum tumor diameter (P &lt; 0.01), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.03), operation time (P &lt; 0.01), amount of intraoperative bleeding (P &lt; 0.01), and intraoperative intervention to the femoral artery and vein (P = 0.02) were significantly associated parameters. In multivariate analysis, maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.02) and amount of intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.04) were associated parameters.

Conclusions

For patients with risk factors for wound complications, control of bleeding are crucial when resecting deep-seated STS in the adductor compartment of the thigh. In cases with large tumors, surgeons should be especially cautious of cases requiring interventions that surround the femoral artery and vein in order to attain an appropriate surgical margin.