Does the duration of symptoms of anal fissure impact its response to conservative treatment? A prospective cohort study

The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of anal fissure

INTRODUCTION

The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia) on the diagnosis and management of anal fissure, with the purpose to guide every physician in the choice of the best treatment option, according with the available literature.

METHODS

A panel of experts was designed and charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key-questions on the main topics covering the management of anal fissure and to performe an accurate search on each topic in different databanks, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in different rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to the PICO criteria, and the statements developed adopting the GRADE methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute anal fissure the medical therapy with dietary and behavioral norms is indicated. In the chronic phase of disease, the conservative treatment with topical 0.3% nifedipine plus 1.5% lidocaine or nitrates may represent the first-line therapy, eventually associated with ointments with film-forming, anti-inflammatory and healing properties such as Propionibacterium extract gel. In case of first-line treatment failure, the surgical strategy (internal sphincterotomy or fissurectomy with flap), may be guided by the clinical findings, eventually supported by endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry.

Fissurectomy with mucosal advancement flap anoplasty: The end of a dogma?

INTRODUCTION

The goal was to compare fissurectomy with mucosal advancement flap anoplasty to fissurectomy alone in the surgical treatment of anal fissure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included patients who underwent surgery in 2019 for solitary, idiopathic, non-infected, posterior anal fissure, after failure of medical treatment. The choice to perform advancement flap anoplasty was based on surgeon preference and did not depend on the fissure itself. The main endpoint was the time to relief of pain.

RESULTS

Of 599 fissurectomies performed during the study period, 226 patients (37.6% women, mean age 41.7±12.0 years old) underwent fissurectomy alone (n=182) or associated with advancement flap anoplasty (n=44). The two groups differed as to their sex ratio (33.5 vs. 54.5% women, P=0.01), body mass index (25.3±4.0 vs. 23.6±3.9, P=0.013) and Bristol score (3.2 vs. 3.4, P=0.038). Time to relief of pain, time to disappearance of bleeding and time to healing were 1.1 (0.5-2.3), 1.0 (0.5-2.1) and 2.0 (1.1-3.6) months, respectively. The rate of healing was 93.8% and the complication rate was 6.2%. The differences between the two groups for these outcomes were not statistically significant. The risk factors associated with absence of healing were age ≥ 40 years (Odds ratio (OR): 3.84; 95% CI, 1.12-17.68) and pre-surgical duration of fissure<35.6 weeks (OR: 6.54; 95% CI: 1.69-43.21).

CONCLUSION

Mucosal advancement flap anoplasty does not provide any added value to fissurectomy alone.

The Efficacy of Sitz Baths as Compared to Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in Patients with Anal Fissures: A Systematic Review

An anal fissure is a common condition that affects patients of all ages. Its clinical presentation is a sharp pain on defecation with or without blood. It is treated by conservative or surgical means. This study aims to assess the efficacy of a sitz bath as compared to lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of anal fissures. The search strategy used keywords related to the topic of study. Three databases were used: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct. A total of 551 articles were screened. A quality assessment check was done on the articles leaving 11 articles. Four aspects of sitz bath outcomes were evaluated in the articles. In terms of analgesia, articles showed conflicting evidence. However, the overall evidence supports the use of sitz baths for their analgesic properties. In terms of healing, most articles had similar recovery rates of around 80%. Much of the research supported the use of sitz baths as the primary treatment to heal acute fissures. When compared to lateral internal sphincterotomy, the recovery rates of lateral internal sphincterotomy are superior to those of conservative treatment, including sitz baths. However, studies showed incontinence as a side effect of lateral internal sphincterotomy, and no studies reported side effects from the sitz baths. To conclude, the results of the articles support the use of sitz baths to treat anal fissures. Sitz baths have been found to have analgesic properties, as well as a good healing time. But, compared to lateral internal sphincterotomy, there is a significant difference in the healing rate at the end stage of treatment, lateral internal sphincterotomy is found to be superior. With regards to the side effects, none have been reported from using a sitz bath.

Injection of botulinum toxin significantly increases efficiency of fissurectomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures

PURPOSE

While acute anal fissures can be treated with topical therapy to reduce sphincter hypertonia (e.g., isosorbide dinitrate, glyceryl trinitrate, diltiazem), chronic fissures may require more invasive instrumental therapy. Currently, the golden standard remains lateral internal sphincterotomy; however, this carries the long-term risk of faecal incontinence. Fissurectomy can be a valuable alternative, but is less efficient because of absence of correction of underlying hypertonia. In this study, we aim to evaluate the additional effect of injection of botulinum toxin during fissurectomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures.

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective analysis of 293 isolated superficial fissurectomies with or without injection of botulinum toxin was performed, with pain relief as primary endpoint.

RESULTS

The majority of patients undergoing fissurectomy were women (65%, mean age 45.0 years vs. 35% men, mean age 48.3 years), often because of ventral fissures (30% in women vs. 8% in men). Fissurectomy resulted in resolution of complaints in 81.1%, while additional injection of botulinum toxin resulted in resolution in 90.1% (p < 0.05). Complication rate was identical between the two groups, mainly (flatus) incontinence (4.5% vs 4.9% with botulinum toxin) and post-operative bleeding (1.8% vs 2.5% with botulinum toxin).

CONCLUSION

Injection of botulinum toxin significantly increases the efficiency of fissurectomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures without additional complications.

The importance of topical metronidazole in the treatment of acute anal fissure: a double-blind study controlled for prospective randomization

Purpose

Acute anal fissure, a disease characterized by severe pain in the anorectal area, reduces quality of life and becomes chronic absent appropriate treatment. More recently, anaerobic infections have been noted as contributive to etiopathogenesis. This study investigates topical metronidazole's effect in the treatment of acute anal fissure.

Methods

Our prospective randomized controlled double-blind study included 2 groups of 100 patients older than 18 years from our General Surgery Clinic with anal fissure complaints for less than 8 weeks. Topical diltiazem treatment was started in group 1, and topical diltiazem and metronidazole treatment in group 2. Pain levels were evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and recovery status was evaluated by physical examination findings ab initio and at the 1st, 4th, and 6th weeks. VAS score levels, demographic, clinical, and recovery status were then compared.

Results

There was no difference between the groups as to age, sex, pain on defecation, bleeding, constipation, and duration of pain, bleeding and constipation (P>0.05). From week 1, fissure epithelialization and healing rates were higher in group 2 (P<0.001); group 2 VAS score levels were lower than in group 1 (P<0.001) and achieved by group 1 only in week 4 (P=0.073).

Conclusion

Adding topical metronidazole to treatment reduces the duration and severity of pain, shortens healing time, and increases the healing rate.

MEBO versus topical Diltiazem versus a combination of both ointments in the treatment of acute anal fissure: a randomized clinical trial protocol

Background

Anal fissure is a common complication of the anorectal region and one of the most reported causes of anal pain. Acute anal fissure can be cured by surgery or medical treatment. There is an increase in the use of topical therapy for the treatment of anal fissures. A common topical drug used is Diltiazem (DTZ), a calcium-channel blocker, which relaxes the anal sphincter and thus promotes healing of the anal fissure. Moist exposed burn ointment (MEBO) is an ointment that is effective for the treatment of burns and wound healing and is becoming popular in the treatment of anal fissures.

Methods

This is a 1:1:1 randomized, controlled, parallel design, with endpoint measures of change in pain score, wound healing, defecation strain score and patient’s global impression of improvement. The study will be conducted at AUBMC over a 10-week period. Patients will be randomized to three treatment arms: MEBO, Diltiazem, and a combination of MEBO and Diltiazem ointments.

Discussion

The results of this study will allow physicians to assess the efficacy and safety of MEBO in the treatment of acute anal fissure, and also in comparison to Diltiazem. This trial will generate evidence-based conclusions regarding the use of a herbal/natural-based product (MEBO ointment) for the treatment of anal fissures.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04153032. Clinical Trial Registration Date: 06-NOVEMBER-2019.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12906-021-03227-z.

S3-Leitlinie: Analfissur

Die Analfissur ist eine der häufigsten Pathologien, welche sich dem Proktologen präsentiert. Entsprechend ist es wichtig, verlässliche Leitlinien dazu zu entwickeln. Die aktuelle Leitlinie wurde anhand eines systematischen Literaturreview von einem interdisziplinären Expertengremium diskutiert und verabschiedet.

Die akute Analfissur, soll auf Grund ihrer hohen Selbstheilungstendenz konservativ behandelt werden. Die Heilung wird am besten durch die Einnahme von Ballaststoff reicher Ernährung und einer medikamentösen Relaxation durch Kalziumkanal-Antagonisten (CCA) unterstützt. Zur Behandlung der chronischen Analfissur (CAF), soll den Patienten eine medikamentöse Behandlung zur „chemischen Sphinkterotomie“ mittels topischer CCA oder Nitraten angeboten werden. Bei Versagen dieser Therapie, kann zur Relaxation des inneren Analsphinkters Botulinumtoxin injiziert werden. Es ist belegt, dass die operativen Therapien effektiver sind. Deshalb kann eine Operation schon als primäre Therapie oder nach erfolgloser medikamentöser Therapie erfolgen. Die Fissurektomie, evtl. mit zusätzlicher Botulinumtoxin Injektion oder Lappendeckung, ist die Operation der Wahl. Obwohl die laterale Internus Sphinkterotomie die CAF effektiver heilt, bleibt diese wegen dem höheren Risiko für eine postoperative Stuhlinkontinenz eine Option für Einzelfälle.

Topical 5% minoxidil versus topical 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate in treatment of chronic anal fissure: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic anal fissure (CAF) is a common painful anal condition. Medical treatment of CAF involves the use of agents that induce chemical sphincterotomy. The present trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of topical minoxidil and glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) preparations in treatment of CAF.

METHODS

Adult patients with CAF were randomly assigned to one of two equal groups; group I received topical 5% minoxidil gel and group II received topical 0.2% GTN cream. The main outcome measures were healing of anal fissure, duration to healing, relief of symptoms, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

62 patients (36 female and 26 male) were included to the study. Group I comprised 30 patients and group II comprised 32 patients. Healing of anal fissure was achieved in 23 (76.7%) patients in group I and 15 (46.9%) patients in group II (p = 0.03). The average duration to healing in group I was significantly shorter than group II (4.1 ± 1.9 vs 5.3 ± 2.7 weeks, p = 0.048). Adverse effects were recorded in 2 (6.6%) patients in group I and 13 (40.6%) patients in group II. The post-treatment pain score in the GTN group was significantly lower than the Minoxidil group.

CONCLUSION

Topical 5% minoxidil gel achieved greater and quicker healing of CAF and fewer adverse effects than topical 0.2% GTN cream. Post-treatment pain scores after GTN were significantly lower than minoxidil.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03528772.

Efficacy of a combination of herbal gel versus topical diltiazem (2%) in chronic anal fissure healing: a randomized doubleblind clinical trial

Introduction: Chronic anal fissure (CAF) is a common painful ailment that adversely affects quality of life. Nonsurgical treatments such as topical diltiazem are routinely administered to patients with CAF. However, diltiazem is associated with side effects such as headache and allergic reactions, which often lead to discontinuation of the treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of a topical Persian herbal remedy with analgesic, antiinflammatory and antiseptic properties versus topical diltiazem (2%) in CAF healing. Methods: In this randomized double-blind clinical trial, 70 patients with CAF were randomly divided into an intervention group receiving topical herbal medicine and control group receiving topical diltiazem (2%) for 6 weeks. Both groups were given lifestyle and dietary advice including adherence to a high-fiber diet, avoidance of spicy foods, use of a laxative (psyllium powder) in case of constipation, and taking sitz baths. Severity of pain, bleeding, and itching were measured at the first visit as well as the first, third, and sixth weeks of treatment. Wound healing and epithelialization were evaluated by anal examination. The treatment and follow-up period was 12 weeks; 6 weeks for assessing the effect of treatment and 6 weeks for examining treatment maintenance and evaluating the percentage of recurrence. Results: The herbal medicine caused significant reduction in pain compared with diltiazem (P < 0.001). The herbal medicine had a significant effect in terms of wound healing at the end of the period (P < 0.001). Recurrence rate was lower in the intervention group (32%) than the control group (56%), though this difference was not significant (P = 0.323) Conclusion: Findings of this clinical trial suggest a higher efficacy of the combination herbal remedy versus topical diltiazem 2% in the management of pain and wound associated with CAF.

[Experience of using an individual approach in the anal fissures treatment]

AIM

To objectify the criteria for choosing the method of treatment of anal fissures, to determine the indications for surgery and sphincterotomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The results of treatment of 206 patients with chronic and acute anal fissures between the ages of 17 to 75 years are analyzed. The posterior anal fissure was detected in 175 (84.9%) patients, the front - in 18 (8.7%), the combination of fissures was noted 13 (6.3%) times. The history of the disease - from 1 month to 12 years. The examination included analysis of clinical data, indicators of pre- and postoperative anorectal manometry, endorectal ultrasound. The period of postoperative monitoring is from 6 to 12 months, control examinations with a functional study of the anal sphincters were carried out 1 and 2 months after healing. Concomitant hemorrhoids were noted in 65 (31.5%) patients, of which 20 (9.7%) patients were simultaneously hemorrhoidectomized. In 11 (5.3%) patients, simultaneous operations were performed in the presence of paraproctitis, rectal fistula.

RESULTS

In 77.8% of patients with acute fissures, the use of conservative therapy, which included myotropic antispasmodics and local application of glycerol trinitrate made it possible to achieve healing of fissures without surgery. Operated 185 (89.8%) patients. With an increase in the basal anal pressure at the level of the internal sphincter, an increase in the average pressure in the anal canal, a decrease in the amplitude and duration of the rectoanal reflex, the indications for dosed sphincterotomy were determined in 167 patients. At the same time, in 117 persons, the excision of fissures was supplemented with a lateral 'closed' sphincterotomy, in 50 cases the posterior 'open' dosed sphincterotomy was performed. In 18 (9.7% of the operated ones) patients in the absence of sphincter hypertonus, the fissures were excised without sphincterotomy. The best functional results were obtained after performing the lateral 'closed' subcutaneous sphincterotomy. It was noticed that in the absence of characteristic complaints and clinical manifestations of incontinence, in 14 patients there was a decrease in the average pressure in the anal canal at rest and with volitional contraction. At the same time, 6 patients out of 14 belonged to the older age groups, and in 9 women there was a rectocele, pelvic floor prolapse. Postoperative incontinence was not observed. Recovery with complete epithelialization of the anoderm defect and the absence of complaints was achieved in 191 (92.7%) patients, satisfactory results (healing of fissures in the presence of pain or proctitis) - in 8 (3.9%) and in 7 (3.4%) patients relapse of the disease was noted with the ineffectiveness of therapy.

CONCLUSION

The ineffectiveness of complex conservative treatment for more than two weeks, with a history of more than 3 months, is an indication for surgical treatment. Preoperative functional and clinical and physiological examination of patients allows the formation of surgical tactics. A differentiated approach to the choice of treatment method, as well as individual determination of indications for surgery and sphincterotomy can improve long-term results. The technique of simultaneous operations with the combination of anal fissure and other proctological diseases needs to be improved.

Bilateral versus unilateral botulinum toxin injections for chronic anal fissure: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin injected into the internal anal sphincter is used in the treatment of chronic anal fissure but there is no standardised technique for its administration. This randomised single centre trial compares bilateral (either side of fissure) to unilateral injection.

METHODS

Participants were randomised to receive bilateral (50 + 50 units) or unilateral (100 units) Dysport® injections into the internal anal sphincter in an outpatient setting. Injection-related pain assessed by visual analogue scale was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes were healing rate, fissure pain, incontinence, and global health scores.

RESULTS

Between October 2008 and April 2012, 100 patients with chronic anal fissure were randomised to receive bilateral or unilateral injections. Injection-related pain was comparable in both groups. There was no difference in healing rate. Initially, there was greater improvement in fissure pain in the bilateral group but at 1 year the unilateral group showed greater improvement. Cleveland Clinic Incontinence score was lower in the unilateral group in the early post-treatment period and global health assessment (EuroQol EQ-VAS) was higher in the unilateral group at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Injection-related pain was similar in bilateral and unilateral injection groups. Unilateral injection was as effective as bilateral injections in healing and improving fissure pain without any deterioration in continence.