1
|
Rovesti G, Valoriani F, Rimini M, Bardasi C, Ballarin R, Di Benedetto F, Menozzi R, Dominici M, Spallanzani A. Clinical Implications of Malnutrition in the Management of Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: Introducing the Concept of the Nutritional Oncology Board. Nutrients 2021; 13:3522. [PMID: 34684523 PMCID: PMC8537095 DOI: 10.3390/nu13103522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer represents a very challenging disease, with an increasing incidence and an extremely poor prognosis. Peculiar features of this tumor entity are represented by pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and an early and intense nutritional imbalance, leading to the highly prevalent and multifactorial syndrome known as cancer cachexia. Recently, also the concept of sarcopenic obesity has emerged, making the concept of pancreatic cancer malnutrition even more multifaceted and complex. Overall, these nutritional derangements play a pivotal role in contributing to the dismal course of this malignancy. However, their relevance is often underrated and their assessment is rarely applied in clinical daily practice with relevant negative impact for patients' outcome in neoadjuvant, surgical, and metastatic settings. The proper detection and management of pancreatic cancer-related malnutrition syndromes are of primary importance and deserve a specific and multidisciplinary (clinical nutrition, oncology, etc.) approach to improve survival, but also the quality of life. In this context, the introduction of a "Nutritional Oncology Board" in routine daily practice, aimed at assessing an early systematic screening of patients and at implementing nutritional support from the time of disease diagnosis onward seems to be the right path to take.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Rovesti
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of Children and Adults, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41125 Modena, Italy; (M.R.); (C.B.); (M.D.)
| | - Filippo Valoriani
- Division of Metabolic Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Department of Specialistic Medicines, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41125 Modena, Italy; (F.V.); (R.M.)
| | - Margherita Rimini
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of Children and Adults, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41125 Modena, Italy; (M.R.); (C.B.); (M.D.)
| | - Camilla Bardasi
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of Children and Adults, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41125 Modena, Italy; (M.R.); (C.B.); (M.D.)
| | - Roberto Ballarin
- Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41125 Modena, Italy; (R.B.); (F.D.B.)
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41125 Modena, Italy; (R.B.); (F.D.B.)
| | - Renata Menozzi
- Division of Metabolic Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Department of Specialistic Medicines, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41125 Modena, Italy; (F.V.); (R.M.)
| | - Massimo Dominici
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of Children and Adults, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41125 Modena, Italy; (M.R.); (C.B.); (M.D.)
| | - Andrea Spallanzani
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of Children and Adults, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41125 Modena, Italy; (M.R.); (C.B.); (M.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Trestini I, Cintoni M, Rinninella E, Grassi F, Paiella S, Salvia R, Bria E, Pozzo C, Alfieri S, Gasbarrini A, Tortora G, Milella M, Mele MC. Neoadjuvant treatment: A window of opportunity for nutritional prehabilitation in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:885-903. [PMID: 34621468 PMCID: PMC8462076 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i9.885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients affected by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) frequently present with advanced disease at the time of diagnosis, limiting an upfront surgical approach. Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) has become the standard of care to downstage non-metastatic locally advanced PDAC. However, this treatment increases the risk of a nutritional status decline, which in turn, may impact therapeutic tolerance, postoperative outcomes, or even prevent the possibility of surgery. Literature on prehabilitation programs on surgical PDAC patients show a reduction of postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate, while data on prehabilitation in NAT patients are scarce and randomized controlled trials are still missing. Particularly, appropriate nutritional management represents an important therapeutic strategy to promote tissue healing and to enhance patient recovery after surgical trauma. In this regard, NAT may represent a new interesting window of opportunity to implement a nutritional prehabilitation program, aiming to increase the PDAC patient's capacity to complete the planned therapy and potentially improve clinical and survival outcomes. Given these perspectives, this review attempts to provide an in-depth view of the nutritional derangements during NAT and nutritional prehabilitation program as well as their impact on PDAC patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Trestini
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Marco Cintoni
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Scienza dell’Alimentazione, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma 00133, Italy
| | - Emanuele Rinninella
- UOC Nutrizione Clinica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00168, Italy
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Futura Grassi
- UOC Nutrizione Clinica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Salvatore Paiella
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Emilio Bria
- Oncologia Medica Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00167, Italy
- Oncologia Medica Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Carmelo Pozzo
- Oncologia Medica Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00167, Italy
- Oncologia Medica Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
- Digestive Surgery Unit and Pancreatic Surgery Gemelli Center Director, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00167, Italy
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
- UOC di Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00167, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Oncologia Medica Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00167, Italy
- Oncologia Medica Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Michele Milella
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Mele
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
- UOSD Nutrizione Avanzata in Oncologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00167, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bundred J, Kamarajah SK, Roberts KJ. Body composition assessment and sarcopenia in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:1603-1612. [PMID: 31266698 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Revised: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous studies have suggested an association between sarcopenia in pancreatic cancer and adverse outcomes. This systematic review examines the evidence for the impact of sarcopenia on post-operative complications and survival METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomised and non-randomised studies of sarcopenia in pancreatic cancer. Meta-analyses of intra- and post-operative outcomes were performed (operating time, all complications, major complications, pancreatic fistulae, peri-operative mortality, overall survival). RESULTS Forty-two studies reported the assessment of body composition in 7619 patients. Methods used to assess body composition in patients with pancreatic cancers were computerized tomography (n = 34), bioelectrical impedance analysis (n = 7), and dual-energy-X-ray-absorptiometry (n = 1). Only 10 studies reported the impact of pre-operative sarcopenia upon post-operative outcomes. Sarcopenia was associated with increased peri-operative mortality (OR: 2.40, CI95%:1.19-4.85, p < 0.01) and decreased overall survival by univariable (HR: 1.95, CI95%:1.35-2.81, p < 0.001) and multivariable analysis (HR: 1.78, CI95%:1.54-2.05). Sarcopenia was not significantly associated with all complications (OR: 0.96, CI95%:0.78-1.19) or pancreatic fistula (OR: 0.95, CI95%: 0.59-1.54). CONCLUSIONS Assessment of sarcopenia in pancreatic cancer provides prognostic value but, more importantly, may provide a basis for therapeutic intervention. However, variation in the methods of assessing and reporting sarcopenia in this patient group limits the assessment of post-operative outcomes currently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Bundred
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University NHS Trust Hospitals, Newcastle, United Kingdom; Institute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Keith J Roberts
- University of Birmingham and Consultant Surgeon Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|