A Silent March- Post Covid Fibrosis in Asymptomatics-A Cause for Concern?

Unravelling the transcriptomic characteristics of bronchoalveolar lavage in post-covid pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Post-Covid Pulmonary Fibrosis (PCPF) has emerged as a significant global issue associated with a poor quality of life and significant morbidity. Currently, our understanding of the molecular pathways of PCPF is limited. Hence, in this study, we performed whole transcriptome sequencing of the RNA isolated from the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples of PCPF and compared it with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-ILD (Interstitial Lung Disease) control to understand the gene expression profile and associated pathways.

METHODS

BAL samples from PCPF (n = 3), IPF (n = 3), and non-ILD Control (n = 3) (individuals with apparent healthy lung without interstitial lung disease) groups were obtained and RNA were isolated for whole transcriptomic sequencing. Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) were determined followed by functional enrichment analysis and qPCR validation.

RESULTS

A panel of differentially expressed genes were identified in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cells (BALF) of PCPF as compare to control and IPF. Our analysis revealed dysregulated pathways associated with cell cycle regulation, immune responses, and neuroinflammatory processes. Real-time validation further supported these findings. The PPI network and module analysis shed light on potential biomarkers and underscore the complex interplay of molecular mechanisms in PCPF. The comparison of PCPF and IPF identified a significant downregulation of pathways that were more prominent in IPF.

CONCLUSION

This investigation provides crucial insights into the molecular mechanism of PCPF and also outlines avenues for prospective research and the development of therapeutic approaches.

Integrative single-cell transcriptome analysis provides new insights into post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis and potential therapeutic targets

The global COVID-19 pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus has resulted in a significant number of patients experiencing persistent symptoms, including post-COVID pulmonary fibrosis (PCPF). This study aimed to identify novel therapeutic targets for PCPF using single-cell RNA-sequencing data from lung tissues of COVID-19 patients, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients, and a rat transforming growth factor beta-1-induced fibrosis model treated with antifibrotic drugs. Patients with COVID-19 had lower alveolar macrophage counts than healthy controls, whereas patients with COVID-19 and IPF presented with elevated monocyte-derived macrophage counts. A comparative transcriptome analysis showed that macrophages play a crucial role in IPF and COVID-19 development and progression, and fibrosis- and inflammation-associated genes were upregulated in both conditions. Functional enrichment analysis revealed the upregulation of inflammation and proteolysis and the downregulation of ribosome biogenesis. Cholesterol efflux and glycolysis were augmented in both macrophage types. The study suggests that antifibrotic drugs may reverse critical lung fibrosis mediators in COVID-19. The results help clarify the molecular mechanisms underlying pulmonary fibrosis in patients with severe COVID-19 and IPF and highlight the potential efficacy of antifibrotic drugs in COVID-19 therapy. Collectively, all these findings may have significant implications for the development of new treatment strategies for PCPF.

Risk of Pulmonary Fibrosis and Persistent Symptoms Post-COVID-19 in a Cohort of Outpatient Health Workers

Background: Infection by SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with multiple symptoms; however, still, little is known about persistent symptoms and their probable association with the risk of developing pulmonary fibrosis in patients post-COVID-19. Methods: A longitudinal prospective study on health workers infected by SARS-CoV-2 was conducted. In this work, signs and symptoms were recorded of 149 health workers with a positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 at the beginning of the diagnosis, during the active infection, and during post-COVID-19 follow-up. The McNemar chi-square test was used to compare the proportions and percentages of symptoms between the baseline and each follow-up period. Results: The signs and symptoms after follow-up were cardiorespiratory, neurological, and inflammatory. Gastrointestinal symptoms were unusual at the disease onset, but unexpectedly, their frequency was higher in the post-infection stage. The multivariate analysis showed that pneumonia (HR 2.4, IC95%: 1.5−3.8, p < 0.001) and positive PCR tests still after four weeks (HR 5.3, IC95%: 2.3-12.3, p < 0.001) were factors associated with the diagnosis of post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis in this study group. Conclusions: Our results showed that pneumonia and virus infection persistence were risk factors for developing pulmonary fibrosis post-COVID-19, after months of initial infection.