Infection prevention and control considerations regarding ventilation in acute hospitals

Evolution of the Push-2-Spin Fat Graft Processing Device: Enhancing Efficiency and Reducing Risk of Contamination

Background

Small-volume fat graft efficiency is a critical determinant of the cost and material effectiveness of aesthetic fat grafting in the clinical space. Recent development of devices, such as the Push-2-Spin (P2S) system (Pittsburgh, PA), has improved upon the process by yielding a rapid, handheld, multi-use system to minimize operative time and mess.

Objectives

In this study, the authors describe further technical innovations on the P2S prototype that improve operative ease of use, time, and safety.

Methods

Abdominoplasty samples were obtained as discarded tissue. Lipoaspirate was collected utilizing a 3.0 mm liposuction cannula and processed through centrifugation (Coleman technique), gauze (telfa) rolling, mesh straining, the tabletop P2S device (prototype), or the P2S handheld (P2S-H) device. Operative processing time, spin time, oil fraction, stromal vascular fraction (SVF) yield and viability, and adipocyte viability were assessed to compare the efficacy and viability of each device/technique. Blood agar smears of lipoaspirate were performed to assess for risk of contamination.

Results

The P2S-H device outperformed its prior iteration in rotary and processing speed and was significantly faster than each other technique assessed. Furthermore, the use of an inline system offered significant advantages over open-air techniques in terms of resistance to contamination. Serial use characteristics were assessed; under these conditions, oil yield as well as adipocyte and SVF number and viability was similar between all techniques.

Conclusions

The technical advancements to the P2S system which enable single-unit, handheld operation significantly improve operative time and minimize space requirements. This operative quality of life improvement comes at no cost to the efficacy of oil extraction, cellular yield, or cell viability.

Level of Evidence 3

Laminar airflow ventilation systems in orthopaedic operating room do not prevent surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laminar airflow (LAF) technologies minimize infectious microorganisms to enhance air quality and surgical site infections (SSIs). LAF lowers SSIs in some clinical studies but not others. This study analyzes laminar airflow ventilation's capacity to reduce orthopaedic surgery-related SSIs.

METHODS

The PRISMA-compliant keywords were utilized to conduct a search for pertinent articles in various databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Sciences, and the Cochrane databases. Observational studies, including retrospective, prospective, and cohort designs, satisfy the PICOS criteria for research methodology. The assessment of quality was conducted utilizing the Robvis software, while the meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan application. The study's results were assessed based on effect sizes of odds ratio (OR) and risk ratio (RR).

RESULTS

From 2000 to 2022, 10 randomized controlled clinical trials with 10,06,587 orthopaedic surgery patients met the inclusion criteria. The primary outcomes were: (1) Risk of SSI, (2) Bacterial count in sampled air and (3) Reduction in SSIs. The overall pooled OR of all included studies was 1.70 (95% CI 1.10-2.64), and the overall pooled RR was 1.27 (95% CI 1.02-1.59) with p < 0.05. LAF is ineffective at preventing SSIs in orthopaedic procedures due to its high-risk ratio and odds ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis has determined that the implementation of LAF systems does not result in a significant reduction in the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs), bacterial count in the air, or SSIs occurrence in orthopaedic operating rooms. Consequently, the installation of said equipment in operating rooms has been found to be both expensive and inefficient.