Femoral fracture malrotation caused by freehand versus navigated distal interlocking

Malrotation of Long Bones

Rotational malreduction is a common yet underreported postoperative complication following intramedullary nailing of long bone fractures. In most situations, this can be prevented at the time of initial surgery with meticulous preoperative planning, careful use of intraoperative fluoroscopy, and awareness of risk factors for malrotation. However, rotational alignment remains difficult to assess by clinical examination so a high index of suspicion is always necessary. Here, the authors review the literature on this complication and report on 3 such cases of femoral and the tibial malrotation, methods for calculating femoral version and tibial torsion, and techniques for correcting these deformities.

Computer-Assisted Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery

BACKGROUND

There are many ways in which computer-assisted orthopedic and trauma surgery (CAOS) procedures can help surgeons to plan and execute an intervention.

METHODS

This study is based on data derived from a selective search of the literature in the PubMed database, supported by a Google Scholar search.

RESULTS

For most applications the evidence is weak. In no sector did the use of computer-assisted surgery yield any relevant clinical or functional improvement. In trauma surgery, 3D-navigated sacroiliac screw fixation has become clinically established for the treatment of pelvic fractures. One randomized controlled trial showed a reduction in the rate of screw misplacement: 0% with 3D navigation versus 20.4% with the conventional procedure und 16.6% with 2D navigation. Moreover, navigation-assisted pedicle screw stabilization lowers the misplacement rate. In joint replacements, the long-term results showed no difference in respect of clinical/functional scores, the time for which the implant remained in place, or aseptic loosening.

CONCLUSION

Computer-assisted procedures can improve the precision of certain surgical interventions. Particularly in joint replacement and spinal surgery, the research is moving away from navigation in the direction of robotic procedures. Future studies should place greater emphasis on clinical and functional results.

Use of Inherent Anteversion of an Intramedullary Nail to Avoid Malrotation in Comminuted Femur Fractures: A Prospective Case- Control Study

OBJECTIVES

To (1) evaluate using the inherent anteversion of a second or third generation femoral nail to set the version of the femur during locked intramedullary nailing of comminuted femoral shaft fractures (Espinosa Technique [ET]) and compare it with our traditional method (traditional group [TG]) and (2) assess the variation of anteversion because of the inherent play in the nail itself.

DESIGN

A prospective IRB-approved study.

SETTING

Academic US Level 1 Trauma Center.

PATIENTS

Fifty-two consecutive patients with comminuted femur fractures all completed the study.

INTERVENTION

The first 27 patients had the anteversion determined using the patellar shadow and lesser trochanter (TG), and the next 25 patients were treated by ET.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Computed tomography scanogram for femoral anteversion and length in the normal versus operated femur.

RESULTS

A >15 degree difference from native to operated legs was found in 8/27 TG (29%, 95% CI 15.3%-54.2%), with a mean difference of 11.6 ± 10.2 degrees (95% CI 8.8-16.17) verses 1/25 in the ET group (2.5%, 95% CI 0%-15.3%), with a mean difference of 4.8 ± 6.2 degrees (95% CI 1.38-8.9) (P = 0.0068). There was a 5 degree variability in our ability to center the proximal locking screw in the femoral head and 5 degrees variation in distal locking.

CONCLUSIONS

The inherent anteversion of a second generation nail can be used to minimize malrotation of the femur after comminuted fractures during locked intramedullary nailing in patients with normal anteversion and is superior to our present fluoroscopic technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Trochanteric entry femoral nails yield better femoral version and lower revision rates-A large cohort multivariate regression analysis

INTRODUCTION

Intramedullary nailing (IMN) has become the standard of care for the treatment of most femoral shaft fractures. Different IMN options include trochanteric and piriformis entry as well as retrograde nails, which may result in varying degrees of femoral rotation. The objective of this study was to analyze postoperative femoral version between three types of nails and to delineate any significant differences in femoral version (DFV) and revision rates.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Over a 10-year period, 417 patients underwent IMN of a diaphyseal femur fracture (AO/OTA 32A-C). Of these patients, 316 met inclusion criteria and obtained postoperative computed tomography (CT) scanograms to calculate femoral version and were thus included in the study. In this study, our main outcome measure was the difference in femoral version (DFV) between the uninjured limb and the injured limb. The effect of the following variables on DFV and revision rates were determined via univariate, multivariate, and ordinal regression analyses: gender, age, BMI, ethnicity, mechanism of injury, operative side, open fracture, and table type/position. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 316 patients were included. Piriformis entry nails made up the majority (n=141), followed by retrograde (n=108), then trochanteric entry nails (n=67). Univariate regression analysis revealed that a lower BMI was significantly associated with a lower DFV (p=0.006). Controlling for possible covariables, multivariate analysis yielded a significantly lower DFV for trochanteric entry nails than piriformis or retrograde nails (7.9±6.10 vs. 9.5±7.4 vs. 9.4±7.8°, p<0.05). Using revision as an endpoint, trochanteric entry nails also had a significantly lower revision rate, even when controlling for all other variables (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Comparative, objective comparisons between DFV between different nails based on entry point revealed that trochanteric nails had a significantly lower DFV and a lower revision rate, even after regression analysis. However, this is not to state that the other nail types exhibited abnormal DFV. Translation to the clinical impact of a few degrees of DFV is also unknown. Future studies to more in-depth study the intricacies of femoral version may lead to improved technology in addition to potentially improved clinical outcomes.

Torsional malalignment, how much significant in the trochanteric fractures?

OBJECTIVES

The rotational alignment is definitely important in the long bones such as tibias and femurs. We also predict the importance of rotational alignment in the trochanteric fractures. So we measured torsional malalignment in trochanteric fracture and anlaysed their risk factors and their clinical significance.

METHODS

A total of 109 inpatients who had undergone internal fixation following trochanteric fracture and a postoperative pelvic CT scan between 2008 and 2013, with at least one year follow-up, were selected. Factors that affect torsional malalignment, such as age, gender, fracture stability, injured area, operative time, time of surgery after admission, and ASA status, were investigated. Factors that affect the patients' clinical results in malrotation, including ambulation time after surgery, postoperative complication rates, pain assessment of VAS one year postoperatively and Koval score, were also investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 109 subjects, torsional malalignment was observed in 28 (25.7%) subjects with a mean torsional malalignment angle of 20.7° (range: -31.2° to 27.1°). Torsional malalignment risk factors were fracture stability (p=0.021) and operative time (p=0.043). In terms of the time to ambulation after surgery, the postoperative complication rates, and the VAS and Koval scores at one year postoperatively, no statistically significant difference was observed between the torsional malalignment patients and the non-deformity patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, 25.7% of the patients who had undergone internal fixation following trochanteric fracture experienced torsional malalignment. Major factors of the torsional malalignment were an unstable fracture and the consequent delay in the operative time. But the torsional malalignment was deemed to have no effect on clinical results.

Does electromagnetic-manual guided distal locking influence rotational alignment in antegrade femoral nailing?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine whether distal locking using an electromagnetic-manual guided distal locking decreases the malrotation rate in femur fractures treated with intramedullary nailing.

METHODS

A total of 113 adult patients having unilateral femoral shaft fractures treated using IM nails were evaluated regarding demographic features, injury mechanism, fracture type, interval between trauma and nailing, operation time and number of image intensifier shots during the operation at least one year after nailing. Patients were divided into two groups according to distal locking technique. All patients had also undergone clinical examination for lower extremity alignment and range of motion and filled out the SF-36 questionnaire and undergone ultrasound measurement of femoral anteversion angles to reveal any rotational femoral malalignment.

RESULTS

Group 1 consisted of 47 patients (41.6 %) with electromagnetic-manual targeting guided distal locking and group 2 consisted of 66 patients (58.4 %) with free-hand distal locking. Both groups were statistically similar regarding demographic features, injury mechanism, fracture type, interval between trauma and nailing, clinical examination and SF-36 results. Operation time and number of image intensifier shots were significantly less in group 1. No statistically significant difference was found between the femoral anteversion angles of injured and uninjured sides of the patients in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is no significant effect on malrotation, previously known advantages lead us to state that electromagnetic-manual guided distal interlocking is an advantageous treatment option in femoral shaft fractures.

Electromagnetic navigation reduces surgical time and radiation exposure for proximal interlocking in retrograde femoral nailing

OBJECTIVES

To compare the time required for proximal locking screw placement between a standard freehand technique and the navigated technique, and to quantify the reduction in ionizing radiation exposure.

METHODS

A fresh frozen cadaver model was used for 48 proximal interlocking screw procedures. Each procedure consisted of insertion of 2 anteroposterior locking screws. Standard fluoroscopic technique was used for 24 procedures, and an electromagnetic navigation system was used for the remaining 24 procedures. Procedure duration was recorded using an electronic timer and radiation doses were documented.

RESULTS

Mean total insertion time for both proximal interlocking screws was 405 ± 165.7 seconds with the freehand technique and 311 ± 78.3 seconds in the navigation group (P = 0.002). All procedures resulted in successful locking screw placement. Mean ionizing radiation exposure time for proximal locking was 29.5 ± 12.8 seconds.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal locking screw insertion using the navigation technique evaluated in this work was significantly faster than the standard fluoroscopic method. The navigated technique is effective and has the potential to prevent ionizing radiation exposure.

Impact of specialty and level of training on CT measurement of femoral version: an interobserver agreement analysis

BACKGROUND

To determine the interobserver agreement on femoral version measurements between an orthopedic attending, orthopedic senior and junior residents, and an attending radiologist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scanograms of 267 patients who underwent femoral intramedullary (IM) nailing with corresponding radiology attending reads for femoral version were collected and de-identified. Femoral version measurements performed by a trauma fellowship-trained attending orthopedic surgeon (ORTHO), a senior orthopedic resident (PGY4), a junior orthopedic resident (PGY1), and a musculoskeletal fellowship-trained attending radiologist (RADS) were compared via Pearson's interclass correlation coefficient to assess interobserver level of agreement.

RESULTS

Version measurements provided by the two attending physicians exhibited the highest level of agreement (r = 0.661, p < 0.01). The orthopedic attending and the senior resident had the next highest level of agreement (r = 0.543, p < 0.01). The first-year orthopedic resident had the weakest agreement across the board: with the orthopedic attending, the radiology attending, and the senior resident.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of specialty, experience and higher levels of training produce stronger agreement when measuring femoral version. Residents in training, especially those who are junior, produce weak agreement when compared to their senior colleagues.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Current state of computer-assisted trauma surgery

Computer assisted surgery (CAS) was first used in neurosurgery. Currently, CAS has gained popularity in several surgical disciplines including urology and abdominal surgery. In trauma and orthopaedic surgery, computer assisted systems are used for fracture reduction, planning and positioning of implants as well as the accurate implantation of hip and knee prostheses. The patient's anatomy is virtualized and the surgical instruments integrated into the digitized image background, thus allowing the surgeon to navigate the surgical instruments and the bone in an improved, virtual visual environment. CAS improves overall accuracy, reducing intraoperative radiation exposure and minimizing unnecessary surgical dissection combined with increased patient and surgeon safety. However, limitations include prolonged surgical time, technical errors and cost implications. This article will outline the current state of computer assisted trauma surgery including its implications and specific challenges in orthopaedic trauma surgery.

Navigation in femoral-shaft fractures--from lab tests to clinical routine

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluates the use of a navigation system (BrainLAB, Feldkirchen, Germany) to intra-operatively check for correct length, axis and rotation in intramedullary nailing of femoral-shaft fractures in an experimental setting and in clinical routine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We tested the navigation system in two experimental settings before introducing it into clinical routine. In the first experiment, 10 osteotomised model femora were fixed with intramedullary nails by using a navigation system. The goal was a locking fixation in predefined values for length and rotation. In the second experiment, eight examiners assessed values for rotation and length of one femur 10 times to examine the accuracy and reproducibility of that determination. Following this, we navigated 40 femoral nailing procedures in our department. Preoperatively, we assessed values of femur geometry on the contralateral side in a computed tomography (CT) scan and reproduced these values intra-operatively on the fractured side, guided by the navigation system. During the intervention, we recorded the length of the procedure steps and the fluoroscopy time. We verified the intra-operative values achieved with the navigation system in a postoperative CT scan and documented differences in rotation and length. After the assessment, we analysed the data for different findings on femur geometry, fluoroscopy time and procedure duration.

RESULTS

The experimental evaluation showed a range of ±5° for anteversion differences and ±2.3 mm for length differences. We estimated this accuracy as sufficient to use the system in clinical routine. The navigation system was used for 40 fracture fixations. All our criteria for restoring femoral geometry could be achieved by navigation guidance in these procedures. Setting up the system took on average 33±11.5 min. An additional fluoroscopy time of 36±22 s was needed to acquire the reference X-rays and to verify pin placement. The differences between anteversion values assessed in intra-operative planning steps on the navigation system and values assessed with a postoperative CT were on average 5.4±3.5°, whilst femur length differed on average by 4±4 mm.

DISCUSSION

Many authors judge intra-operative control of anteversion in femoral-shaft fracture fixation as problematic. Neither our experimental navigation assessment nor our clinical navigated evaluation showed relevant anteversion differences to a postoperative CT assessment of femur geometry. After initial training, guidance by a navigation system achieves consistent results in a clinical situation.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a navigation system to align axis, length and rotation led to a secure way of avoiding any relevant malalignment in complex femur-shaft fractures whilst exposing patients to an acceptable amount of additional procedure sequences. Malalignment can be avoided by using a navigation system in the operative treatment of femoral-shaft fractures and may be integrated into clinical routine in specialised centres.

Femoral malrotation following intramedullary nail fixation

Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fracture can result in inadvertent malalignment. Malrotation is the most common cause of deformity, but it is underrecognized, in part because of the difficulty in accurately assessing rotation as well as the variation that exists in normal anatomy. The consequences of femoral malrotation are not completely understood. However, initial biomechanical studies suggest that it causes a substantial change in load bearing in the affected extremity. Clinical examination, fluoroscopy, and ultrasonography are useful in measuring femoral rotational alignment intraoperatively and postoperatively. CT is useful in the identification of the degree of malrotation and in surgical planning.