Analysis of usage and associated cost of external fixators at an urban level 1 trauma centre

Mechanical Analysis of a Novel 3D-printed External Fixator Design Versus Industry-standard External Fixators

INTRODUCTION

External fixation is a critical component of orthopaedic fracture management and is used for various conditions, including trauma and pediatric orthopaedics. However, the availability and high cost of external fixation devices are a concern, especially in rural and developing countries. 3D printing technology has shown promise in reducing manufacturing costs and improving accessibility to external fixation devices. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of a fully 3D-printed desktop external fixation device and compare the results with the mechanical properties of commonly used, clinically available external fixators.

METHODS

A fully 3D printable external fixator was designed and printed in polylactic acid at two infill densities, 20% and 100%. The mechanical properties of the 3D-printed external fixators and several commercially available fixators were tested according to applicable sections of the American Society for Testing and Materials F1541 standard protocol in axial, medial-lateral, and anterior-posterior orientations. The primary outcomes measured included failure load, safe load, rigidity, and yield load. The mean differences between experimental and control groups were calculated using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests.

RESULTS

The 20% infill 3D-printed construct showed poor performance compared with commercially available external fixators in all testing conditions and across most variables. The 100% infill 3D-printed construct was comparable with or superior to all commercially available devices in most testing conditions. The cost for printing a single 3D-printed 100% infill external fixator was $14.49 (United States Dollar).

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that a low-cost desktop 3D printer can create an entirely 3D-printed external fixator that resists clinically relevant forces similar to medical-grade industry-standard external fixators. Therefore, there is potential for customizable and low-cost external fixators to be manufactured with desktop 3D printing for use in remote areas and other resource-constrained environments for fracture care.

Sustainable orthopaedic surgery: Initiatives to improve our environmental, social and economic impact

In response to appeals from the WHO and The Lancet, a collaborative statement from over 200 medical journals was published in September 2021, advising international governments to combat the "catastrophic harm to health" from climate change. Healthcare, specifically surgery, constitutes a major contributor to environmental harm that remains unaddressed. This article provides practical guidance that can be instituted at a departmental, hospital and national level to institute transformative, sustainable efforts into practice. We also aim to provoke healthcare leaders to discuss policy-making with respect to this issue and highlight the necessity for sustainability to become a core domain of quality improvement. The average orthopaedic service produces 60% more waste than any other surgical specialty. Fortunately, simple measures such as a comprehensive education programme can decrease waste disposal costs by 20-fold. Other simple and effective "green" measures include integrating carbon literacy into surgical training, prioritising regional anaesthesia and conducting recycling audits. Furthermore, industry must take accountability and be incentivised to limit the use of single-item packaging and single-use items. National policymakers should consider the benefits of reusable implants, reusable surgical drapes and refurbishing crutches as these are proven cost and climate-effective interventions. It is crucial to establish a local sustainability committee to maintain these interventions and to bridge the gap between clinicians, industry and policymakers.

3D Printed Orthopaedic External Fixation Devices: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

External fixators are complex, expensive orthopaedic devices used to stabilize high-energy and complex fractures of the extremities. Although the technology has advanced dramatically over the last several decades, the mechanical goals for fracture stabilization of these devices have remained unchanged. Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has the potential to advance the practice and access to external fixation devices in orthopaedics. This publication aims to systematically review and synthesize the current literature on 3D printed external fixation devices for managing orthopaedic trauma fractures.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocols were followed for this manuscript with minor exceptions. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Review, Google Scholar, and Scopus online databases were systematically searched. Two independent reviewers screened the search results based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria related to 3D printing and external fixation of fractures.

RESULTS

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. These included one mechanical testing study, two computational simulation studies, three feasibility studies, and three clinical case studies. Fixator designs and materials varied significantly between authors. Mechanical testing revealed similar strength to traditional metal external fixators. Across all clinical studies, five patients underwent definitive treatment with 3D printed external fixators. They all had satisfactory reduction and healing with no reported complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature on this topic is heterogeneous, with highly variable external fixator designs and testing techniques. A small and limited number of studies in the scientific literature have analyzed the use of 3D printing in this area of orthopaedic surgery. 3D printed external fixation design advancements have yielded promising results in several small clinical case studies. However, additional studies on a larger scale with standardized testing and reporting techniques are needed.

The reuse of circular external fixator components: an assessment of safety and potential savings

PURPOSE

Cost-saving strategies are important, especially in a resource-constrained environment. One such strategy well supported in the literature is the reuse of temporary monolateral external fixator components, a strategy we utilize at our institution. The aim of the study was to determine the safety and cost saving associated with the reuse of definitive circular external fixator components in a resource-constrained environment.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective review of all adult patients who were treated with either new or reused circular external fixators from a single manufacturer between January and December 2017. Reused circular external fixator components, excluding half pins and wires, were subjected to an in-house reprocessing protocol. Cost savings were calculated as the difference between the price of a completely new frame and the amount invoiced for new components only in a reused frame.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were included in the study with an average age of 31.9 years. The mean duration of treatment with a circular external fixator was 5.8 months. No mechanical failure events were recorded during the study period. Our institution saved approximately 52% (R717 503.89) and 63% (R136 568.19) of expected total cost for hexapod and Ilizarov frames, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The strategy of reusing circular external fixator components is unconventional, and this study was conducted to evaluate the safety and potential savings in a resource-constrained environment. We demonstrated this practice to be reasonably safe and to result in significant cost savings which might be relevant in low-and-middle-income countries.

The environmental impact of orthopaedic surgery: assessing strategies for change

Climate change poses one of the most critical threats to humanity. Surgical care needs to be considered in relation to the impending climate emergency. Little thought appears to have been given to the role of operating departments as a high-yield target for environmental change. This article evaluates the environmental impact of orthopaedic surgery, focusing on anaesthesia, waste management and surgical hardware. Developing ‘green’ operating protocols should be the minimum expectation of orthopaedic departments. Just as the management of complex surgical pathology requires a multidisciplinary approach, mitigating the environmental impact of surgical endeavour requires collective action and buy-in.

Cost Variation in Temporizing External Fixation of Tibial Plateau and Pilon Fractures: Is There Room to Improve?

INTRODUCTION

External fixator costs have been shown to be highly variable. Current information on external fixator costs and cost drivers is limited. The aim of this study was to examine the cost variation as well as the patient-, injury-, and surgeon-related cost drivers associated with temporizing external fixation constructs in tibial plateau and pilon fracture management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted to identify isolated tibial plateau and pilon fractures treated with temporizing external fixation from 2006-2018 at a level 1 trauma center. Inclusion criteria were based on fractures managed with primary external fixation, skeletal maturity, and isolated ipsilateral fracture fixation. Fracture patterns were identified radiographically using Schatzker, Weber, and OTA classification systems. Implant costs were determined using direct purchase price from the institution. The primary outcome was the external fixator total construct cost. Clinical covariates and secondary outcomes, namely unplanned reoperations, were extracted. Factors associated with cost (i.e. cost drivers) were identified via multivariable regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 319 patients were included in this study (121 tibial plateau and 198 pilon fractures). Mean plateau construct cost was $5,372.12 and mean pilon construct cost was $3,938.97. Implant cost correlated poorly with demographic (r²=0.01 & r²=0.01), injury-independent (r²<0.01 & r²=0.03), and fracture pattern classifications (r²=0.03 & r²=0.02). Traumatologists produced significantly cheaper implants for pilon fractures (p=0.05) but not for plateau fractures (p=0.85). There was no difference in construct cost or components between patients that underwent unplanned reoperation and those that did not for both tibial plateau (p>0.19) and pilon (p>0.06). Clamps contributed to 69.9% and 77.3% of construct costs for tibial plateau and pilon, respectively. The most cost-efficient fixation constructs for tibial plateau and pilon fractures were the following respectively: of 5 clamps, 2 bars, and 4 pins; and of 4 clamps, 2 bars, and 3 pins.

CONCLUSIONS

There is large cost variation in temporizing external fixation management. Cost drivers included surgeon bias and implant preference as well as use of external fixator clamps. Introducing construct standardization will contain healthcare spending without sacrificing patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III. Retrospective Cohort.

Cost Reduction for Knee-Spanning External Fixation in the Staged Treatment of Tibial Plateau Fractures: A Practical Intervention

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an educational intervention affects surgeon implant decision making measured by total implant costs for temporizing a knee-spanning external fixation construct.

DESIGN

A total of 24 cases were prospectively collected after an educational intervention and matched to 24 cases before intervention using Schatzker classification and by surgeon.

SETTING

A single Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Forty-eight patients with Schatzker II-VI tibial plateau fractures.

INTERVENTION

Education session to create transparency with component pricing and to provide 3 clinical cases of Orthopaedic Trauma Association/AO 41-C3 (Schatzker VI) with accompanying images and fixator construct costs. Total implant costs displayed in the session ranged from $2354 to $11,696.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

External fixator construct cost.

RESULTS

The mean cost of constructs in the postintervention group was $4550.20 [95% confidence interval (CI) $3945.60-$5154.00], which was significantly different compared with the preintervention group cost of $6046.75 (95% CI = $5309.54-$6783.97, P = 0.003). After 1 year, the total implant costs of external fixation constructs were reduced by an average of almost $1500 per patient.

CONCLUSION

An educational intervention created a reduction in the average total implant construction costs for temporary knee-spanning external fixation in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures. Surgical implant selection and cost variance remain an ideal area to improve value for patients and hospitals. Empowering surgeons with knowledge regarding implant prices is a critical part of working toward the cost reductions of external fixation constructs.

A Novel Technique to Close Large Defects in the Foot Secondary to Infection Using Widely Available and Inexpensive Tools: A Case Report

One of the challenges after central ray resection is a large soft-tissue defect. Many authors have reported the use of external fixators as a means of narrowing the forefoot. Ours is the first article to report an interesting case using widely available and inexpensive tools such as Kirschner and cerclage wires as an external fixation means of narrowing the forefoot after a complete second-ray resection and extensive soft-tissue debridement for a severe diabetic foot ulcer. This simple yet inexpensive technique is easy to perform for any foot and ankle surgeon at any hospital or surgical center.

Evaluation of a novel semicircular locking external fixator for treating fractures of long bones: Biomechanical comparison with a circular external fixator

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical properties of a novel semicircular locking external fixator with locking screw mechanism, shape of trapezoidal corrugations, half- ring designed for greater stability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The novel external fixator had a half-ring with the shape of trapezoidal corrugations and locking screws fixing the bone at different angles in all three planes (sagittal, axial, and coronal). The biomechanical properties of the semicircular locking external fixator (group 1) were compared with those of a standard Ilizarov-type circular external fixator (group 2) (TST, İstanbul, Turkey) in an experimental study design. Five frames were used in each group. Standard PE 1000 (polyethylene) rod models (n = 10) simulating the tibia bone model were used. Both systems were compared biomechanically by applying axial and torsional loads simultaneously.

RESULT

Two samples in group 2 were damaged before the test ended during axial loading. All of the samples in group 1 completed the tests without damage after 150,000 cycles. The axial stiffness of the semicircular locking external fixator was found to be significantly higher than that of the Ilizarov-type circular external fixator (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between the two fixators in torsional loading. The application time of semicircular locking external fixator was significantly shorter than Ilizarov-type circular external fixator (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The novel semicircular locking external fixator was biomechanically stronger than the Ilizarov-type external fixator for treating fractures of long bones. It can be used as a permanent external fixator for the definitive treatment of long bone fractures with soft tissue damage in terms of stability and application time.

Use of external fixators in developing countries: a short socioeconomic analysis

The use of external fixators (EFs) dates back to 377 BC Hippocrates’ time, and it has a wide range of orthopaedic applications. External fixator has expanded its use in the management of fractures and other musculoskeletal conditions. It is widely used all over the world to manage complex musculoskeletal injuries. It has many advantages as compared to internal fixation in some trauma scenarios. However, the cost of the external fixators presents a dilemma to the healthcare system in developing countries. The goals of this review article are to explain the importance of EFs in developing countries in managing fractures, to determine the problems encountered at present during external fixation by developing countries, to identify solutions that could be used to address these issues, expand the use of external fixation into other domains of treatment, the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on fracture management based on existing literature. In conclusion, EFs are very expensive, researches have been conducted to overcome these barriers in developing countries. However, there are limitations in implementing in developing countries. It is important to have affordable and clinically acceptable EFs available in developing countries.

Norwegian Open Fracture Management System: Outcomes After 10 Years Working in Low-Resource Settings in Cambodian Hospitals

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of open lower limb fractures represents a major challenge for any trauma surgeon, and this even more so in resource-limited areas. The aim of the study is to describe the intervention, report the treatment plan, and observe the effectiveness of the Norwegian Open Fracture Management System in saving lower limbs in rural settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective and prospective interventional study was carried out in the period 2011 through 2017 in six rural hospitals in Cambodia. The fractures were managed with locally produced external fixators and orthosis developed in 2007. Based on skills and living locations, two local surgeons and one paramedic without reconstructive surgery experience were selected to reach the top of the reconstructive ladder and perform limb salvage surgeries. This study evaluated 56 fractures using the Ganga Hospital Open Injury Score (GHOIS) for Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIA and Type IIIB open fracture classification groups.

RESULTS

The primary success rate in open tibia fractures was 64.3% (95% CI, 50.3 - 76.3). The average treatment time to complete healing for all of the patients was 39.6 weeks (95% CI, 34.8 - 44.4). A percentage of 23.2% (95% CI, 13.4 - 36.7) experienced a deep infection. Fifteen of the patients had to undergo soft tissue reconstruction and 22 flaps were performed. Due to non-union, a total of 15 bone grafts were performed. All of the 56 patients in the study gained limb salvage and went back to work.

CONCLUSION

The given fracture management program proves that low-resource countries are able to produce essential surgical tools at high quality and low price. Treatment with external fixation and functional bracing, combined with high-level training of local surgeons, demonstrates that a skilled surgical team can perform advanced limb salvage surgery in low-resource settings.

Low cost 3D printed clamps for external fixator for developing countries: a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

External fixation is a mainstream limb reconstruction technique, most often used after a traumatic injury. Due to the high rates of trauma in developing countries, external fixation devices are often utilized for immediate fracture stabilization and soft tissue repair. Proper external fixation treatment too often still fails to be adopted in these regions due to the high cost and trauma complexity. A novel, inexpensive, unilateral fixator was constructed using 3D printed clamps and other readily available supporting components. ASTM standard F1541 tests were used to assess the biomechanical properties of this novel external fixator.

METHODS

Applicable sections of ASTM standard F1541 were used to determine the biomechanical properties of the novel external fixator. 3D printed clamps modeled using SolidWorks and printed with chopped carbon fibers using a fuse deposition modeling (FDM) based 3D printer by Markforged (Boston, MA) were used. This study included 3 different testing configurations: axial compression, anterior-posterior (AP) bending, and medial-lateral (ML) bending. Using the novel unilateral fixator with 3D printed clamps previously sterilized by autoclave, an input load was applied at a rate of 20 N/s, starting at 0 N via a hydraulic MTS tester Model 359. Force and deformation data were collected at a sampling rate of 30 Hz. There was a load limit of 750 N, or until there was a maximum vertical deformation of 6 mm. Also, 4 key dimensions of the 3D printed clamps were measured pre and post autoclave: diameter, width, height and length.

RESULTS

The novel external fixator had axial compression, AP and ML bending rigidities of 246.12 N/mm (σ = 8.87 N/mm), 35.98 N/mm (σ = 2.11 N/mm) and 39.60 N/mm (σ =2.60 N/mm), respectively. The 3D printed clamps shrunk unproportionally due to the autoclaving process, with the diameter, width, height and length dimensions shrinking by 2.6%, 0.2%, 1.7% and 0.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the biomechanical properties of the novel fixator with 3D printed clamps assessed in this study were comparable to external fixators that are currently being used in clinical settings. While the biomechanics were comparable, the low cost and readily available components of this design meets the need for low cost external fixators in developing countries that current clinical options could not satisfy. However, further verification and validation routines to determine efficacy and safety must be conducted before this novel fixator can be clinically deployed. Also, the material composition allowed for the clamps to maintain the appropriate shape with minimal dimensional shrinkage that can be accounted for in clamp design.

Cost Variation in Temporizing External Fixation of Tibial Plateau Fractures

BACKGROUND

Rising health care expenditures and declining reimbursements have generated interest in providing interventions of value. The use of external fixation is a commonly used intermediate procedure for the staged treatment of unstable fractures. External fixator constructs can vary in design and costs based on selected component configuration. The objective of this study was to evaluate cost variation and relationships to injury and noninjury characteristics in temporizing external fixation of tibial plateau fractures. We hypothesize that construct costs are highly variable and present no noticeable patterns with both injury and noninjury characteristics.

METHODS

A retrospective review of tibial plateau fractures treated with initial temporizing external fixation between 2010 and 2016 at 2 Level I trauma centers was conducted. Fracture and patient characteristics including age, body mass index, AO/OTA classification, and Schatzker fracture classification were observed with construct cost. In addition, injury-independent characteristics of surgeon education, site of procedure, and date of procedure were evaluated with construct cost. Factors associated with cost variation were assessed using nonparametric comparative and goodness-of-fit regression tests.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-one patient cases were reviewed. The mean knee spanning fixator construct cost was $4947 (95% confidence interval = $4742-$5152). The overall range in construct costs was from $1848 to $11,568. The mean duration of use was 16.4 days. No strong correlations were noted between construct cost and patient demographics (r = 0.02), fracture characteristics (r = 0.02), or injury-independent characteristics (r = 0.10). Finally, there was no significant difference between constructs of traumatologists and other orthopaedic surgeon subspecialists (P = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Temporizing external fixation of tibial plateau is a high-cost intervention per unit of time and exhibits massive variation in the mean cost. This presents an ideal opportunity for cost savings by reducing excessive variation in implant component selection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III. Retrospective Cohort.

Effect of Repeated Sterilization by Different Methods on Strength of Carbon Fiber Rods Used in External Fixator Systems

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to study the effects of repeated sterilization, using different methods, on the carbon fiber rods of external fixator systems.

METHODS

We used a randomized set of 44 unused, unsterilized, and identical carbon fiber rods (11 × 200 mm), randomly assigned to 2 groups: unsterilized (4 rods) and sterilized (40 rods). The sterilized rods were divided into 2 groups, those sterilized in an autoclave and those sterilized using hydrogen peroxide. These were further divided into 5 subgroups based on the number of sterilization repetition to which the fibers were subjected (25, 50, 75, 100, and 200). A bending test was conducted to measure the maximum bending force, maximum deflection, flexural strength, maximum bending moment and bending rigidity. We also measured the surface roughness of the rods.

RESULTS

An increase in the number of sterilization repetition led to a decrease in maximum bending force, maximum bending moment, flexural strength, and bending rigidity, but increased maximum deflection and surface roughness (P < 0.01). The effect of the number of sterilization repetition was more prominent in the hydrogen peroxide group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that the sterilization method and number of sterilization repetition influence the strength of the carbon fiber rods. Increasing the number of sterilization repetition degrades the strength and roughness of the rods.

Use of reprocessed external fixators in orthopaedic surgery: a survey of 243 orthopaedic trauma surgeons

Background

The increasing financial burden of orthopaedic implants on our health care system has prompted cost-control measures, such as implant reprocessing. The purpose of this study was to describe the current usage by orthopaedic trauma surgeons of reprocessed external fixators (EFs) for treatment of complex fractures.

Methods

A 16-question survey about use and perceptions of reprocessed EFs was distributed to 894 Orthopaedic Trauma Association members between August 2016 and June 2017 using a web-based survey system.

Results

The authors received 243 responses (27%). Thirty-seven percent of respondents reported using reprocessed EFs. Nonprofit hospitals used reprocessed EFs more commonly than did for-profit hospitals (41% vs 15%, P = .0004). Eighty-seven percent of respondents believed reprocessing could be cost-effective. The most common reason (32%) for not using reprocessed EFs was coordination/logistics of reprocessing. Concern about litigation was also reported as a main reason for not using (20%) or having recently stopped using (21%) reprocessed EFs.

Conclusions

Many orthopaedic traumatologists are interested in the reprocessing of EF components but few have reprocessing systems in place at their institutions. A major barrier to implementation is concern about litigation, which is likely unwarranted on the basis of Food and Drug Administration approval and a lack of previous litigation. Reprocessing by the original device manufacturers has yielded substantial savings at our institution and is an example of the cost savings that can be expected when implementing an EF reprocessing system.

The use of external fixators in the definitive stabilisation of the pelvis in polytrauma patients: Safety, efficacy and clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the complications and outcomes (functional/radiographic) of Pelvic External Fixators applied as part of the definitive fixation in polytrauma patients.

DESIGN

A single center retrospective chart review.

SETTING

A level-1 trauma center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed all the polytrauma patients (ISS>16) between 2007 and 2012 that had a PEF applied more than 30days. Complications including infection, aseptic loosening, neurological injury, loss of reduction, non-union and mal-union were recorded. Pelvic asymmetry and Deformity Index (DI) were measured at the immediate postoperative radiographs and final follow-up. The functional outcome at final follow up was estimated using a scale previously reported by Chiou et al.

RESULTS

59 patients with mean age of 38.4 (16 - 81) years and mean ISS score 28 (16- 66) were included. The PEFs were applied for mean duration of 56 (30-104) days. The average follow-up was 403days. 22 injuries were type B and 37 type C (AO/OTA). The most common symptomatic complications were pin site infection in 11 (18.6%) and loosening in 5 (8.5%) cases. 44 (74.5%) patients had satisfactory functional outcome. The immediate post-operative and final asymmetry and DI were compared between the two pelvic injury groups (type B and C fractures). The difference in displacement progression was more for type C injuries (p=0.034) but no correlation to the functional outcome was evident.

CONCLUSION

PEF can be used as definitive alternative stabilization method in specific situations at polytrauma setting. Radiological displacement occurred in both type B and C injuries but the clinical outcome was not correlated to this displacement. Complications related to PEF do not affect the final clinical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

Use of recycled external fixators in management of compound injuries

BACKGROUND

Compound fractures form a bulk of Orthopaedic Trauma cases in a developing country like India. External Fixation devices are the mainstays of treatment of these open fractures. They are generally used as a one use disposable device and add a great burden to the health care costs, especially in a developing country. In our study we evaluated the efficacy and complication rate of recycled external fixators with that of new external fixators.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective randomised interventional study conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital of a developing country. Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were entered into the trial of new vs. recycled external fixators. Outcome indicators used were pin tract infections, loss of fixation and loosening of components.

RESULTS

Patients were evaluated at the time of removal of fixator components for outcome indicators. Of the 95 patients in our study (49 new frames and 46 recycled frames) no significant difference was found in the incidence of pin tract infection (8.16% in new vs. 8.69% in recycled), loss of fixation (10.2% in new vs. 13.04% in recycled) and loosening of components (6.12% in new vs. 8.69% in recycled).

CONCLUSION

Around 17% of consentable patients did not want to have an external fixator system with recycled components. Our study concluded that recycling of external fixator components is safe and equally effective, with sizable cost saving.

Damage control orthopaedics: Variability of construct design for external fixation of the lower extremity and implications on cost

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate relative cost of external fixator constructs applied for damage control purposes in a cohort of advanced orthopaedic trainees and orthopaedic staff traumatologists. We also sought to evaluate physicians' understanding of component cost.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants were asked to apply an external fixator for three separate fracture patterns in damage control fashion. A total of 19 physicians (nine PGY-4 residents, five PGY-5 residents, two orthopaedic trauma fellows and three orthopaedic staff traumatologists) participated. Total construct cost was calculated. Participants provided an estimate of the cost of each component in a fill-in format survey. Main outcome measures included cost of external fixator construct applied and the estimated cost of external fixator components.

RESULTS

Average whole sale cost of an external fixator construct was $5252 (±$1798). Of the three fracture types examined, the tibial plafond fracture external fixator construct on average cost the most, followed by the tibial plateau fracture and the femur fracture construct. The large ex-fix combination clamp was the major contributor to cost for each construct. The combination clamp may be substituted for a multi-pin clamp, resulting in significant cost savings. The self-drilling Schanz pin and the large ex-fix combination clamp were most highly underestimated (25% and 22% of their actual cost, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Innumerous construct designs exist and even small changes can significantly impact cost. Knowledge of component cost is low among staff and trainees. Education of component cost is vital to allow adequate consideration of construct design prior to fixator application.

Temporary transarticular K-wire fixation of critical ankle injuries at risk: a neglected "damage control" strategy?

High-energy ankle fracture-dislocations are at significant risk for postoperative complications. Closed reduction and temporary percutaneous transarticular K-wire fixation was first described more than 50 years ago. This simple and effective "damage control" strategy is widely practiced in Europe, yet appears largely forgotten and abandoned in the United States. Anecdotal opposing arguments include the notion that drilling K-wires through articular cartilage may damage the joint and contribute to postinjury arthritis. This article describes the experience in a US academic level I trauma center with transarticular pinning of selected critical ankle fracture-dislocations followed by delayed definitive fracture fixation once the soft tissues are healed. Median patient follow-up of 2 years showed that the transarticular pinning technique was performed safely, not associated with increased postoperative complication rates, and characterized by good subjective outcomes using the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Outcome Score questionnaire.