1
|
Greif R, Bray JE, Djärv T, Drennan IR, Liley HG, Ng KC, Cheng A, Douma MJ, Scholefield BR, Smyth M, Weiner G, Abelairas-Gómez C, Acworth J, Anderson N, Atkins DL, Berry DC, Bhanji F, Böttiger BW, Bradley RN, Breckwoldt J, Carlson JN, Cassan P, Chang WT, Charlton NP, Phil Chung S, Considine J, Cortegiani A, Costa-Nobre DT, Couper K, Couto TB, Dainty KN, Dassanayake V, Davis PG, Dawson JA, de Caen AR, Deakin CD, Debaty G, Del Castillo J, Dewan M, Dicker B, Djakow J, Donoghue AJ, Eastwood K, El-Naggar W, Escalante-Kanashiro R, Fabres J, Farquharson B, Fawke J, de Almeida MF, Fernando SM, Finan E, Finn J, Flores GE, Foglia EE, Folke F, Goolsby CA, Granfeldt A, Guerguerian AM, Guinsburg R, Hansen CM, Hatanaka T, Hirsch KG, Holmberg MJ, Hooper S, Hoover AV, Hsieh MJ, Ikeyama T, Isayama T, Johnson NJ, Josephsen J, Katheria A, Kawakami MD, Kleinman M, Kloeck D, Ko YC, Kudenchuk P, Kule A, Kurosawa H, Laermans J, Lagina A, Lauridsen KG, Lavonas EJ, Lee HC, Han Lim S, Lin Y, Lockey AS, Lopez-Herce J, Lukas G, Macneil F, Maconochie IK, Madar J, Martinez-Mejas A, Masterson S, Matsuyama T, Mausling R, McKinlay CJD, Meyran D, Montgomery W, Morley PT, Morrison LJ, et alGreif R, Bray JE, Djärv T, Drennan IR, Liley HG, Ng KC, Cheng A, Douma MJ, Scholefield BR, Smyth M, Weiner G, Abelairas-Gómez C, Acworth J, Anderson N, Atkins DL, Berry DC, Bhanji F, Böttiger BW, Bradley RN, Breckwoldt J, Carlson JN, Cassan P, Chang WT, Charlton NP, Phil Chung S, Considine J, Cortegiani A, Costa-Nobre DT, Couper K, Couto TB, Dainty KN, Dassanayake V, Davis PG, Dawson JA, de Caen AR, Deakin CD, Debaty G, Del Castillo J, Dewan M, Dicker B, Djakow J, Donoghue AJ, Eastwood K, El-Naggar W, Escalante-Kanashiro R, Fabres J, Farquharson B, Fawke J, de Almeida MF, Fernando SM, Finan E, Finn J, Flores GE, Foglia EE, Folke F, Goolsby CA, Granfeldt A, Guerguerian AM, Guinsburg R, Hansen CM, Hatanaka T, Hirsch KG, Holmberg MJ, Hooper S, Hoover AV, Hsieh MJ, Ikeyama T, Isayama T, Johnson NJ, Josephsen J, Katheria A, Kawakami MD, Kleinman M, Kloeck D, Ko YC, Kudenchuk P, Kule A, Kurosawa H, Laermans J, Lagina A, Lauridsen KG, Lavonas EJ, Lee HC, Han Lim S, Lin Y, Lockey AS, Lopez-Herce J, Lukas G, Macneil F, Maconochie IK, Madar J, Martinez-Mejas A, Masterson S, Matsuyama T, Mausling R, McKinlay CJD, Meyran D, Montgomery W, Morley PT, Morrison LJ, Moskowitz AL, Myburgh M, Nabecker S, Nadkarni V, Nakwa F, Nation KJ, Nehme Z, Nicholson T, Nikolaou N, Nishiyama C, Norii T, Nuthall G, Ohshimo S, Olasveengen T, Olaussen A, Ong G, Orkin A, Parr MJ, Perkins GD, Pocock H, Rabi Y, Raffay V, Raitt J, Raymond T, Ristagno G, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Rossano J, Rüdiger M, Sandroni C, Sawyer TL, Schexnayder SM, Schmölzer G, Schnaubelt S, Seidler AL, Semeraro F, Singletary EM, Skrifvars MB, Smith CM, Soar J, Solevåg AL, Soll R, Stassen W, Sugiura T, Thilakasiri K, Tijssen J, Tiwari LK, Topjian A, Trevisanuto D, Vaillancourt C, Welsford M, Wyckoff MH, Yang CW, Yeung J, Zelop CM, Zideman DA, Nolan JP, Berg KM. 2024 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces. Circulation 2024; 150:e580-e687. [PMID: 39540293 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001288] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
This is the eighth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recent published resuscitation evidence reviewed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces list priority knowledge gaps for further research.
Collapse
|
2
|
Greif R, Bray JE, Djärv T, Drennan IR, Liley HG, Ng KC, Cheng A, Douma MJ, Scholefield BR, Smyth M, Weiner G, Abelairas-Gómez C, Acworth J, Anderson N, Atkins DL, Berry DC, Bhanji F, Böttiger BW, Bradley RN, Breckwoldt J, Carlson JN, Cassan P, Chang WT, Charlton NP, Phil Chung S, Considine J, Cortegiani A, Costa-Nobre DT, Couper K, Bittencourt Couto T, Dainty KN, Dassanayake V, Davis PG, Dawson JA, de Caen AR, Deakin CD, Debaty G, Del Castillo J, Dewan M, Dicker B, Djakow J, Donoghue AJ, Eastwood K, El-Naggar W, Escalante-Kanashiro R, Fabres J, Farquharson B, Fawke J, Fernanda de Almeida M, Fernando SM, Finan E, Finn J, Flores GE, Foglia EE, Folke F, Goolsby CA, Granfeldt A, Guerguerian AM, Guinsburg R, Malta Hansen C, Hatanaka T, Hirsch KG, Holmberg MJ, Hooper S, Hoover AV, Hsieh MJ, Ikeyama T, Isayama T, Johnson NJ, Josephsen J, Katheria A, Kawakami MD, Kleinman M, Kloeck D, Ko YC, Kudenchuk P, Kule A, Kurosawa H, Laermans J, Lagina A, Lauridsen KG, Lavonas EJ, Lee HC, Han Lim S, Lin Y, Lockey AS, Lopez-Herce J, Lukas G, Macneil F, Maconochie IK, Madar J, Martinez-Mejas A, Masterson S, Matsuyama T, Mausling R, McKinlay CJD, Meyran D, Montgomery W, Morley PT, Morrison LJ, et alGreif R, Bray JE, Djärv T, Drennan IR, Liley HG, Ng KC, Cheng A, Douma MJ, Scholefield BR, Smyth M, Weiner G, Abelairas-Gómez C, Acworth J, Anderson N, Atkins DL, Berry DC, Bhanji F, Böttiger BW, Bradley RN, Breckwoldt J, Carlson JN, Cassan P, Chang WT, Charlton NP, Phil Chung S, Considine J, Cortegiani A, Costa-Nobre DT, Couper K, Bittencourt Couto T, Dainty KN, Dassanayake V, Davis PG, Dawson JA, de Caen AR, Deakin CD, Debaty G, Del Castillo J, Dewan M, Dicker B, Djakow J, Donoghue AJ, Eastwood K, El-Naggar W, Escalante-Kanashiro R, Fabres J, Farquharson B, Fawke J, Fernanda de Almeida M, Fernando SM, Finan E, Finn J, Flores GE, Foglia EE, Folke F, Goolsby CA, Granfeldt A, Guerguerian AM, Guinsburg R, Malta Hansen C, Hatanaka T, Hirsch KG, Holmberg MJ, Hooper S, Hoover AV, Hsieh MJ, Ikeyama T, Isayama T, Johnson NJ, Josephsen J, Katheria A, Kawakami MD, Kleinman M, Kloeck D, Ko YC, Kudenchuk P, Kule A, Kurosawa H, Laermans J, Lagina A, Lauridsen KG, Lavonas EJ, Lee HC, Han Lim S, Lin Y, Lockey AS, Lopez-Herce J, Lukas G, Macneil F, Maconochie IK, Madar J, Martinez-Mejas A, Masterson S, Matsuyama T, Mausling R, McKinlay CJD, Meyran D, Montgomery W, Morley PT, Morrison LJ, Moskowitz AL, Myburgh M, Nabecker S, Nadkarni V, Nakwa F, Nation KJ, Nehme Z, Nicholson T, Nikolaou N, Nishiyama C, Norii T, Nuthall G, Ohshimo S, Olasveengen T, Olaussen A, Ong G, Orkin A, Parr MJ, Perkins GD, Pocock H, Rabi Y, Raffay V, Raitt J, Raymond T, Ristagno G, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Rossano J, Rüdiger M, Sandroni C, Sawyer TL, Schexnayder SM, Schmölzer G, Schnaubelt S, Lene Seidler A, Semeraro F, Singletary EM, Skrifvars MB, Smith CM, Soar J, Lee Solevåg A, Soll R, Stassen W, Sugiura T, Thilakasiri K, Tijssen J, Kumar Tiwari L, Topjian A, Trevisanuto D, Vaillancourt C, Welsford M, Wyckoff MH, Yang CW, Yeung J, Zelop CM, Zideman DA, Nolan JP, Berg KM. 2024 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces. Resuscitation 2024; 205:110414. [PMID: 39549953 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110414] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2024]
Abstract
This is the eighth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recent published resuscitation evidence reviewed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces list priority knowledge gaps for further research.
Collapse
|
3
|
Drew T, Radwan MA, McCaul CL. In the Nick of Time-Emergency Front-of-Neck Airway Access. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2024; 62:101-114. [PMID: 39233576 DOI: 10.1097/aia.0000000000000456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/06/2024]
Abstract
Emergency front-of-neck access refers to all techniques that deliver oxygen into the airway lumen through the anterior neck structures and encompasses access both through the cricothyroid membrane and the tracheal wall. There has yet to be a universal agreement regarding the preferred technique. A surgical incision is currently the most common approach in prehospital and in-hospital care. This review intends to review and summarize the existing clinical, basic science, and societal guidelines for eFONA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Drew
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences
| | - Mohamad Atef Radwan
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences
| | - Conan Liam McCaul
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aljanoubi M, Almazrua AA, Johnson S, Drennan IR, Reynolds JC, Soar J, Couper K. Emergency front-of-neck access in cardiac arrest: A scoping review. Resusc Plus 2024; 18:100653. [PMID: 38716381 PMCID: PMC11074978 DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 12/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Airway management is a core component of the treatment of cardiac arrest. Where a rescuer cannot establish a patent airway to provide oxygenation and ventilation using standard basic and advanced airway techniques, there may be a need to consider emergency front-of-neck airway access (eFONA, e.g., cricothyroidotomy), but there is limited evidence to inform this approach. OBJECTIVES This scoping review aims to identify the evidence for the use of eFONA techniques in patients with cardiac arrest. METHODS In November 2023, we searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central to identify studies on eFONA in adults. We included randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies, and case series with at least five cases that described any use of eFONA. We extracted data, including study setting, population characteristics, intervention characteristics, and outcomes. Our analysis focused on four key areas: incidence of eFONA, eFONA success rates, clinical outcomes, and complications. RESULTS The search identified 21,565 papers, of which 18,934 remained after de-duplication. After screening, we included 69 studies (53 reported incidence, 40 reported success rate, 38 reported clinical outcomes; 36 studies reported complications). We identified only one randomised controlled trial. Across studies, there was a total of 4,457 eFONA attempts, with a median of 31 attempts (interquartile range 16-56.5) per study. There was marked heterogeneity across studies that precluded any pooling of data. There were no studies that included only patients in cardiac arrest. CONCLUSION The available evidence for eFONA is extremely heterogeneous, with no studies specifically focusing on its use in adults with cardiac arrest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Aljanoubi
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Prince Sultan bin Abdul Aziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulkarim A. Almazrua
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Prince Sultan bin Abdul Aziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Ian R Drennan
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Emergency Services and Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joshua C. Reynolds
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Jasmeet Soar
- Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Keith Couper
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Critical Care Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Morton S, Avery P, Kua J, O'Meara M. Success rate of prehospital emergency front-of-neck access (FONA): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2023; 130:636-644. [PMID: 36858888 PMCID: PMC10170392 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Front-of-neck access (FONA) is an emergency procedure used as a last resort to achieve a patent airway in the prehospital environment. In this systematic review with meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the number and success rate of FONA procedures in the prehospital setting, including changes since 2017, when a surgical technique was outlined as the first-line prehospital method. METHODS A systematic literature search (PROSPERO CRD42022348975) was performed from inception of databases to July 2022 to identify studies in patients of any age undergoing prehospital FONA, followed by data extraction. Meta-analysis was used to derive pooled success rates. Methodological quality of included studies was interpreted using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS From 909 studies, 69 studies were included (33 low quality; 36 very low quality) with 3292 prehospital FONA attempts described (1229 available for analysis). The crude median success rate increased from 99.2% before 2017 to 100.0% after 2017. Meta-analysis revealed a pooled overall FONA success rate of 88.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.0-91.0%). Surgical techniques had the highest success rate at a median of 100.0% (pooled rate=92.0%; 95% CI, 88.0-95.0%) vs 50.0% for needle techniques (pooled rate=52.0%; 95% CI, 28.0-76.0%). CONCLUSIONS Despite being a relatively rare procedure in the prehospital setting, the success rate for FONA is high. A surgical technique for FONA appears more successful than needle techniques, and supports existing UK prehospital guidelines. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL PROSPERO CRD42022348975.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Morton
- Essex and Herts Air Ambulance, Colchester, UK; Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Pascale Avery
- Emergency Retrieval and Transfer Service (EMRTS) Wales Air Ambulance, Dafen, UK
| | | | - Matt O'Meara
- Essex and Herts Air Ambulance, Colchester, UK; Emergency Retrieval and Transfer Service (EMRTS) Wales Air Ambulance, Dafen, UK; University Hospitals North Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Needle Cricothyroidotomy by Intensive Care Paramedics. Prehosp Disaster Med 2022; 37:625-629. [PMID: 35959773 PMCID: PMC9470526 DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x22001157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Objective: Cricothyroidotomy is an advanced airway procedure for critically ill or injured patients. In Victoria, Australia, intensive care paramedics (ICPs) perform needle cricothyroidotomy utilizing the proprietary QuickTrach II (QTII) device. Recently, an Ambulance Victoria (AV) institutional change in workflow included pre-puncture surgical incision to assist in successful placement. This review aims to explore whether a surgical pre-incision prior to the insertion of the device improved overall procedural success rates of needle cricothyroidotomy using the QTII. Methods: This was a retrospective review of all patients who received a needle cricothyroidotomy by ICPs from May 1, 2015 through September 15, 2020. Data and patient care records were sourced from the AV data warehouse. Results: A total of 27 patients underwent a needle cricothyroidotomy with the mean age of patients being 50.2 years. Most cricothyroidotomies were performed using the QuickTrach II kit (92.6%). Prior to modification of the QTII procedure, front-of-neck access (FONA) success was 50.0%; however, this improved to 82.4% after the procedures recent update. The overall success rate of all paramedic-performed needle cricothyroidotomy during the study period was 74.1% (n = 20). Conclusions: This review demonstrates that propriety devices such as the QTII device achieve a low success rate for a FONA intervention. Despite the low frequency of this procedure, ICPs with extensive training and regular maintenance can perform needle cricothyroidotomy using scalpel assistance with a reasonable success rate. But when compared to the broader literature, success rate using a more straightforward technique such as a surgical cricothyroidotomy technique is likely going to be higher.
Collapse
|
7
|
Aziz S, Foster E, Lockey DJ, Christian MD. Emergency scalpel cricothyroidotomy use in a prehospital trauma service: a 20-year review. Emerg Med J 2021; 38:349-354. [DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundThis study aimed to determine the rate of scalpel cricothyroidotomy conducted by a physician–paramedic prehospital trauma service over 20 years and to identify indications for, and factors associated with the intervention.MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2019 using clinical database records. This study was conducted in a physician–paramedic prehospital trauma service, serving a predominantly urban population of approximately 10 million in an area of approximately 2500 km2.ResultsOver 20 years, 37 725 patients were attended by the service, and 72 patients received a scalpel cricothyroidotomy. An immediate ‘primary’ cricothyroidotomy was performed in 17 patients (23.6%), and ‘rescue’ cricothyroidotomies were performed in 55 patients (76.4%). Forty-one patients (56.9%) were already in traumatic cardiac arrest during cricothyroidotomy. Thirty-two patients (44.4%) died on scene, and 32 (44.4%) subsequently died in hospital. Five patients (6.9%) survived to hospital discharge, and three patients (4.2%) were lost to follow-up. The most common indication for primary cricothyroidotomy was mechanical entrapment of patients (n=5, 29.4%). Difficult laryngoscopy, predominantly due to airway soiling with blood (n=15, 27.3%) was the most common indication for rescue cricothyroidotomy. The procedure was successful in 97% of cases. During the study period, 6570 prehospital emergency anaesthetics were conducted, of which 30 underwent rescue cricothyroidotomy after failed tracheal intubation (0.46%, 95% CI 0.31% to 0.65%).ConclusionsThis study identifies a number of indications leading to scalpel cricothyroidotomy both as a primary procedure or after failed intubation. The main indication for scalpel cricothyroidotomy in our service was as a rescue airway for failed laryngoscopy due to a large volume of blood in the airway. Despite high levels of procedural success, 56.9% of patients were already in traumatic cardiac arrest during cricothyroidotomy, and overall mortality in patients with trauma receiving this procedure was 88.9% in our service.
Collapse
|
8
|
Tsur N, Benov A, Nadler R, Tsur AM, Glick Y, Radomislensky I, Abuhasira S, Mizrachi A, Chen J. Neck injuries - israel defense forces 20 years' experience. Injury 2021; 52:274-280. [PMID: 32972724 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neck injuries are an important cause of combat mortality and morbidity. This study's objective was to examine the characteristics and causes of neck injuries among Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and emphasize the best treatment protocols for the advanced life support providers in the prehospital combat environment. METHODS The IDF Trauma Registry (IDF-TR) includes prehospital data regarding casualties treated by the IDF's medical forces. This study was a retrospective, observational study that included all casualties who were injured between January 2006 and December 2018. RESULTS Between January 2016 and December 2018, 3294 casualties were recorded. During the study period, 1% (41/3,394) of all injury casualties in the registry were isolated neck injuries compared to 94% (3185/3,394) without neck injury. 42% (14/41) percent of the neck casualties were classified as urgent compared to 26% (830/3185, P = 0.09) in the no neck group. The most frequent type of injury mechanism in the neck casualties was penetrating injury (54% 22/41), mostly due to shrapnel (68% 15/22). 60% of neck injured personnel were injured during the 2nd Lebanon War and Operation Protective Edge in high-intensity conflicts. As for life-saving interventions, advanced airway interventions were performed in 12% of neck injured group (5/41) compared to 3% (104/3185, P = 0.02) in the no neck group. We revealed that cricothyroidotomy was performed in almost 10% (4/41) of neck injured casualties compared to only 1% (19/3185, P<0.0001) in no neck casualties. As for damage control resuscitation, neck injury casualties received higher amounts of Fresh Dried Plasma 7% (3/41) Vs. 1% (32/3185, P = 0.02) and Tranexamic acid 15% (6/41) Vs. 4% (124/3185, P = 0.01) compared to non-neck casualties. CONCLUSIONS Military neck injuries are a significant cause of substantial disability and result in incompatibility with combat duties in previously healthy soldiers. Prompt medical care, especially urgent hemodynamic and airway management, is paramount in these injuries. Routine use of designated neck protection might lower the number of neck injuries, mitigate their severity, and even decrease mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III (Retrospective study with up to two negative criteria).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nir Tsur
- Israel Defense Forces, Medical Corps, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
| | - Avi Benov
- Israel Defense Forces, Medical Corps, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel; Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Roy Nadler
- Israel Defense Forces, Medical Corps, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Avishai M Tsur
- Israel Defense Forces, Medical Corps, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Yuval Glick
- Israel Defense Forces, Medical Corps, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | | | | | - Aviram Mizrachi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jacob Chen
- Israel Defense Forces, Medical Corps, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Law JA, Duggan LV, Asselin M, Baker P, Crosby E, Downey A, Hung OR, Jones PM, Lemay F, Noppens R, Parotto M, Preston R, Sowers N, Sparrow K, Turkstra TP, Wong DT, Kovacs G. Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 1. Difficult airway management encountered in an unconscious patient. Can J Anaesth 2021; 68:1373-1404. [PMID: 34143394 PMCID: PMC8212585 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-021-02007-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Since the last Canadian Airway Focus Group (CAFG) guidelines were published in 2013, the literature on airway management has expanded substantially. The CAFG therefore re-convened to examine this literature and update practice recommendations. This first of two articles addresses difficulty encountered with airway management in an unconscious patient. SOURCE Canadian Airway Focus Group members, including anesthesia, emergency medicine, and critical care physicians, were assigned topics to search. Searches were run in the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL databases. Results were presented to the group and discussed during video conferences every two weeks from April 2018 to July 2020. These CAFG recommendations are based on the best available published evidence. Where high-quality evidence was lacking, statements are based on group consensus. FINDINGS AND KEY RECOMMENDATIONS Most studies comparing video laryngoscopy (VL) with direct laryngoscopy indicate a higher first attempt and overall success rate with VL, and lower complication rates. Thus, resources allowing, the CAFG now recommends use of VL with appropriately selected blade type to facilitate all tracheal intubations. If a first attempt at tracheal intubation or supraglottic airway (SGA) placement is unsuccessful, further attempts can be made as long as patient ventilation and oxygenation is maintained. Nevertheless, total attempts should be limited (to three or fewer) before declaring failure and pausing to consider "exit strategy" options. For failed intubation, exit strategy options in the still-oxygenated patient include awakening (if feasible), temporizing with an SGA, a single further attempt at tracheal intubation using a different technique, or front-of-neck airway access (FONA). Failure of tracheal intubation, face-mask ventilation, and SGA ventilation together with current or imminent hypoxemia defines a "cannot ventilate, cannot oxygenate" emergency. Neuromuscular blockade should be confirmed or established, and a single final attempt at face-mask ventilation, SGA placement, or tracheal intubation with hyper-angulated blade VL can be made, if it had not already been attempted. If ventilation remains impossible, emergency FONA should occur without delay using a scalpel-bougie-tube technique (in the adult patient). The CAFG recommends all institutions designate an individual as "airway lead" to help institute difficult airway protocols, ensure adequate training and equipment, and help with airway-related quality reviews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Adam Law
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax Infirmary Site, 1796 Summer Street, Room 5452, Halifax, NS B3H 3A7 Canada
| | - Laura V. Duggan
- grid.28046.380000 0001 2182 2255Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Civic Campus, University of Ottawa, Room B307, 1053 Carling Avenue, Mail Stop 249, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9 Canada
| | - Mathieu Asselin
- grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Département d’anesthésiologie et de soins intensifs, Université Laval, 2325 rue de l’Université, Québec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada ,grid.411081.d0000 0000 9471 1794Département d’anesthésie du CHU de Québec, Hôpital Enfant-Jésus, 1401 18e rue, Québec, QC G1J 1Z4 Canada
| | - Paul Baker
- grid.9654.e0000 0004 0372 3343Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142 New Zealand
| | - Edward Crosby
- grid.28046.380000 0001 2182 2255Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Suite CCW1401, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6 Canada
| | - Andrew Downey
- grid.1055.10000000403978434Department of Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Orlando R. Hung
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, 1796 Summer Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3A7 Canada
| | - Philip M. Jones
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, LHSC- University Hospital, 339 Windermere Rd., London, ON N6A 5A5 Canada
| | - François Lemay
- grid.417661.30000 0001 2190 0479Département d’anesthésiologie, CHU de Québec – Université Laval, Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, 11, Côte du Palais, Québec, QC G1R 2J6 Canada
| | - Rudiger Noppens
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, LHSC- University Hospital, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON N6A 5A5 Canada
| | - Matteo Parotto
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, EN 442 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4 Canada
| | - Roanne Preston
- grid.413264.60000 0000 9878 6515Department of Anesthesia, BC Women’s Hospital, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1 Canada
| | - Nick Sowers
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Department of Emergency Medicine, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, 1796 Summer Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3A7 Canada
| | - Kathryn Sparrow
- grid.25055.370000 0000 9130 6822Discipline of Anesthesia, St. Clare’s Mercy Hospital, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John’s, NL A1B V6 Canada
| | - Timothy P. Turkstra
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, LHSC- University Hospital, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON N6A 5A5 Canada
| | - David T. Wong
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Anesthesia, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399, Bathurst St, Toronto, ON M5T2S8 Canada
| | - George Kovacs
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Department of Emergency Medicine, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, 1796 Summer Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3A7 Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Edwards KH, FitzGerald G, Franklin RC, Edwards MT. Air ambulance outcome measures using Institutes of Medicine and Donabedian quality frameworks: protocol for a systematic scoping review. Syst Rev 2020; 9:72. [PMID: 32241304 PMCID: PMC7118977 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01316-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dedicated air ambulance services provide a vital link for critically ill and injured patients to higher levels of care. The recent developments of pre-hospital and retrieval medicine create an opportunity for air ambulance providers and policy-makers to utilize a dashboard of quality performance measures to assess service performance. The objective of this scoping systematic review will be to identify and evaluate the range of air ambulance outcome measures reported in the literature and help to construct a quality dashboard based on a healthcare quality framework. METHODS We will search PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (from January 2001 onwards). Complementary searches will be conducted in selected relevant journals. We will include systematic reviews and observational studies (cohort, cross-sectional, interrupted time series) in critically ill or injured patients published in English and focusing on air ambulance delivery and quality measures. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. The study methodological quality (or bias) will be appraised using appropriate tools. Analysis of the characteristics associated with outcome measure will be mapped and described according to the proposed healthcare quality framework. DISCUSSION This review will contribute to the development of an air ambulance quality dashboard designed to combine multiple quality frameworks. Our findings will provide a basis for helping decision-making in health planning and policy. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019144652.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin H Edwards
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Gerard FitzGerald
- Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Richard C Franklin
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mark Terrell Edwards
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- LifeFlight Retrieval Medicine Australia, Edward Street, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Queensland Health, Emergency Medicine Department Rockhampton, Rockhampton Base Hospital, Canning Street, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Okada Y, Hashimoto K, Ishii W, Iiduka R, Koike K. Development and validation of a model to predict the need for emergency front-of-neck airway procedures in trauma patients. Anaesthesia 2019; 75:591-598. [PMID: 31788784 DOI: 10.1111/anae.14895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The present study aimed to develop and validate a model for predicting the need for emergency front-of neck airway (eFONA) procedures among trauma patients. This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study using data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank between January 2004 and December 2017. Only adult trauma patients were included. The cohort was divided into development and validation cohorts. A simple scoring system was developed to predict the necessity for emergency front-of neck airway procedures in the development cohort using a logistic regression model. The external validity and diagnostic ability of the scoring system was assessed in the validation cohort. In total, 198,182 out of 294,274 patients were included; emergency front-of-neck airway occurred in 467 patients (0.24%) they were divided into development (n = 100,120 with 0.22% undergoing emergency front-of neck airway) and validation (n = 98,062 with 0.25% undergoing emergency front-of neck airway) cohorts. The 'eFONA' prediction scoring system was developed in the development cohort, with a score of +1 for each of the following: Eye opening (no eye opening in response to any stimuli); Fall from height or motor bike; Oral-maxillofacial injury; Neck tracheal injury; and Airway management by paramedics. In the validation cohort, the C-statistic of the scoring system was 0.820. Setting the cut-off value at one for rule-out, the sensitivity and negative likelihood ratios were 0.86 and 0.22, respectively. Setting the cut-off value at two for rule-in, the specificity and positive likelihood ratios were 0.91 and 6.6, respectively. The present scoring system may assist in predicting the need for emergency front-of neck airway procedures among the general trauma population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Okada
- Department of Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Preventive Services, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - K Hashimoto
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - W Ishii
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Japanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - R Iiduka
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Japanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - K Koike
- Department of Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bougie-assisted cricothyroidotomy: Delphi-derived essential steps for the novice learner. CAN J EMERG MED 2018; 21:283-290. [PMID: 29952276 DOI: 10.1017/cem.2018.386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A cricothyroidotomy is a life-saving procedure, performed as a final option to emergency airway algorithms, and is essential for all clinicians who perform emergency airway management. The bougie-assisted cricothyroidotomy (BAC) is a novel technique that may be performed faster and with fewer complications than other traditional approaches. There is no established standard set of steps to guide the instruction of BAC performance. This study sought to systematically develop a BAC checklist for novice instruction using a modified Delphi methodology and international airway experts. METHODS A literature review informed the creation of a preliminary BAC checklist. A three round, modified Delphi method was used to establish a BAC checklist intended for novice-level instruction. The consensus level for each step and the final checklist were predefined at 80%. Participants were international airway experts identified by study personnel and snowball sampling. RESULTS Fourteen international airway experts across six acute care specialities participated in the study. The checklist was refined using a seven-point rating scale for each item and participant comments. A 17-item checklist was developed with expert consensus achieved after three rounds. Internal consistency, measured with Cronbach's α, was 0.855 (95% confidence interval 0.73-0.94). CONCLUSION This modified Delphi-derived checklist is the first systematically developed list of essential steps for guiding BAC instruction for novice learners. This tool serves to standardize BAC skill instruction and provide learners with a structured and consistent set of steps for deliberate practice.
Collapse
|
13
|
Sunde GA, Sandberg M, Lyon R, Fredriksen K, Burns B, Hufthammer KO, Røislien J, Soti A, Jäntti H, Lockey D, Heltne JK, Sollid SJM. Hypoxia and hypotension in patients intubated by physician staffed helicopter emergency medical services - a prospective observational multi-centre study. BMC Emerg Med 2017; 17:22. [PMID: 28693491 PMCID: PMC5504565 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-017-0134-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 06/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effective treatment of airway compromise in trauma and non-trauma patients is important. Hypoxia and hypotension are predictors of negative patient outcomes and increased mortality, and may be important quality indicators of care provided by emergency medical services. Excluding cardiac arrests, critical trauma and non-trauma patients remain the two major groups to which helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) are dispatched. Several studies describe the impact of pre-hospital hypoxia or hypotension on trauma patients, but few studies compare this in trauma and non-trauma patients. The primary aim was to describe the incidence of pre-hospital hypoxia and hypotension in the two groups receiving pre-hospital tracheal intubation (TI) by physician-staffed HEMS. METHODS Data were collected prospectively over a 12-month period, using a uniform Utstein-style airway template. Twenty-one physician-staffed HEMS in Europe and Australia participated. We compared peripheral oxygen saturation and systolic blood pressure before and after definitive airway management. Data were analysed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel methods and mixed-effects models. RESULTS Eight hundred forty three trauma patients and 422 non-trauma patients receiving pre-hospital TI were included. Non-trauma patients had significantly lower predicted mean pre-intervention SpO2 compared to trauma patients. Post-intervention and admission SpO2 for the two groups were comparable. However, 3% in both groups were still hypoxic at admission. For hypotension, the differences between the groups were less prominent. However, 9% of trauma and 10% of non-trauma patients were still hypotensive at admission. There was no difference in short-term survival between trauma (97%) and non-trauma patients (95%). Decreased level of consciousness was the most frequent indication for TI, and was associated with increased survival to hospital (cOR 2.8; 95% CI: 1.4-5.4). CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that non-trauma patients had a higher incidence of hypoxia before TI than trauma patients, but few were hypoxic at admission. The difference for hypotension was less prominent, but one in ten patients were still hypotensive at admission. Further investigations are needed to identify reversible causes that may be corrected to improve haemodynamics in the pre-hospital setting. We found high survival rates to hospital in both groups, suggesting that physician-staffed HEMS provide high-quality emergency airway management in trauma and non-trauma patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01502111 . Registered 22 Desember 2011.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geir Arne Sunde
- Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway. .,Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. .,Department of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway. .,Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Møllendalsveien 34, 5009, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Mårten Sandberg
- Air Ambulance Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Richard Lyon
- University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.,Kent, Surrey & Sussex Air Ambulance Trust, Marden, UK
| | - Knut Fredriksen
- UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,The University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Brian Burns
- Sydney HEMS, NSW Ambulance, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Jo Røislien
- Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway.,Department of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Akos Soti
- Hungarian Air Ambulance Nonprofit Ltd, Budaors, Hungary
| | - Helena Jäntti
- Centre for Pre-hospital Emergency Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - David Lockey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.,London's Air Ambulance, Bartshealth NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jon-Kenneth Heltne
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Medical Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Stephen J M Sollid
- Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway.,Department of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.,Air Ambulance Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Darby JM, Halenda G, Chou C, Quinlan JJ, Alarcon LH, Simmons RL. Emergency Surgical Airways Following Activation of a Difficult Airway Management Team in Hospitalized Critically Ill Patients: A Case Series. J Intensive Care Med 2016; 33:517-526. [PMID: 27899469 DOI: 10.1177/0885066616680594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION An emergency surgical airway (ESA) is widely recommended for securing the airway in critically ill patients who cannot be intubated or ventilated. Little is known of the frequency, clinical circumstances, management methods, and outcomes of hospitalized critically ill patients in whom ESA is performed outside the emergency department or operating room environments. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients undergoing ESA in our intensive care units (ICUs) and other hospital units from 2008 to 2012 following activation of our difficult airway management team (DAMT). RESULTS Of 207 DAMT activations for native airway events, 22 (10.6%) events culminated in an ESA, with 59% of these events occurring in ICUs with the remainder outside the ICU in the context of rapid response team activations. Of patients undergoing ESA, 77% were male, 63% were obese, and 41% had a history of a difficult airway (DA). Failed planned or unplanned extubations preceded 61% of all ESA events in the ICUs, while bleeding from the upper or lower respiratory tract led to ESA in 44% of events occurring outside the ICU. Emergency surgical airway was the primary method of airway control in 3 (14%) patients, with the remainder of ESAs performed following failed attempts to intubate. Complications occurred in 68% of all ESAs and included bleeding (50%), multiple cannulation attempts (36%), and cardiopulmonary arrest (27%). Overall hospital mortality for patients undergoing ESA was 59%, with 38% of deaths occurring at the time of the airway event. CONCLUSION An ESA is required in approximately 10% of DA events in critically ill patients and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Efforts directed at early identification of patients with a difficult or challenging airway combined with a multidisciplinary team approach to management may reduce the overall frequency of ESA and associated complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Darby
- 1 Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Gregory Halenda
- 2 Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Courtney Chou
- 3 Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joseph J Quinlan
- 2 Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Louis H Alarcon
- 4 Department of Surgery, The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Richard L Simmons
- 4 Department of Surgery, The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|