The Great Unknown-A systematic literature review about risk associated with intraoperative imaging during orthopaedic surgeries

Automated Digital Image Optimisation in Intraoperative 2D and 3D Imaging Using a Mobile C-Arm With Flat-Panel Detector

BACKGROUND

Assistance tools for intraoperative 2D and 3D imaging to decrease acquisition effort and to improve assessment of 3D image data were evaluated.

METHODS

Two automated optimisation procedures were evaluated in a cadaver (Cios Spin, Siemens, Germany): The ScrewScout function for assisted pedicle screw assessment. Then, an algorithm for metal artefact reduction (MAR). Additionally, a tool for simplified setting of image contrast and brightness was evaluated regarding the result and elapsed time.

RESULTS

The time required without automated assistance was 83s [70-105]. With the computer assistance, this time was significantly lower at 22s [15-32] (p = 0.003). MAR resulted in an improvement in image impression. This improvement became smaller with increasing clinical experience. The time needed for setting of image acquisition parameters was significantly (p = 0.05) lowered from 140s [24-389] to 61s [14-166] using the assistance tool.

CONCLUSIONS

Automated assistance tools for image optimisation can provide practical support in the intraoperative setting.

Skyline view versus intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy for dorsal screw protrusion identification following volar plating in the treatment of distal radial fracture

BACKGROUND

Dorsal screw protrusion can lead to complications such as extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tear or rupture after volar locking plate (VLP) fixation. Previous studies displayed that intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy and skyline view had similar diagnostic accuracy. This study investigated the efficacy of intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy compared to skyline view for detecting dorsal cortex screw protrusion in VLP procedures for unstable intra-articular distal radius fractures (DRF). We used postoperative computed tomography (CT) to assess the efficacy and addressed the limitations of previous methods in evaluating screw penetration accurately.

METHODS

We utilized the ICUC database, a prospective cohort of patients with surgically treated DRF, to collect cases with available images, including skyline views, intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy, and postoperative CT scans. The postoperative CT confirmed whether the screw protruded through the dorsal cortex. The interrater reliability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa, and a diagnostic test was utilized to compare the two intraoperative imaging modalities.

RESULTS

Twenty-one unstable DRFs were included in the study. The agreement between skyline view and postoperative CT was moderate agreement, with a kappa value of 0.481 (95% CI: 0.297-0.652, N = 84), identifying 10 uncertain, 56 shorter screws, and 18 screw penetrations. Intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy demonstrated almost perfect agreement with postoperative CT, with a kappa of 0.839 (95% CI: 0.703-0.975, N = 84), identifying 62 shorter screws and 22 screw penetrations. The sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy in detecting dorsal screw protrusion were 81.8% and 98.4%, respectively, while the skyline view's sensitivity and specificity were 72.2% and 90.9%.

CONCLUSION

3D fluoroscopy offers an almost perfect evaluation, whereas the skyline views provide only moderate agreement. 3D fluoroscopy could reduce cumulative radiation exposure of surgeon and patient compared to skyline view. Clinically, 3D fluoroscopy would be beneficial for surgeons to evaluate dorsal screw protrusion precisely and safely.

Outcomes of utilizing double-incision technique with combination of cortical button and interference screw fixation for distal biceps rupture: A case series

Background

Distal biceps tendon rupture is an injury that causes a significant reduction in strength and endurance. Combined cortical button and interference screw fixation has been utilized via single-incision technique. There are limited data describing this technique utilizing a double-incision approach. This study describes patient outcomes for primary distal biceps repair with combined cortical button and interference screw fixation via double-incision approach.

Methods

This is a case series analysis of patients within a single Midwest institution between January 2006 and February 2020. We examined patient demographics, intraoperative efficiency variables, patient outcomes, and postoperative complications.

Results

Sixty-two cases were included (62 males; 44 acute complete ruptures, 1 acute partial rupture, 8 chronic complete ruptures, 9 chronic partial ruptures). Average operative time was 48 ± 23 min. Nonformal manner postoperative range of motion (ROM) results show 89%-92% within satisfactory elbow ROM parameters. There were two reported postoperative complications, but no instances of neurapraxia, wound dehiscence, synostosis, proximal radius fracture, or fixation failure.

Conclusion

The findings of this study demonstrate that the described technique is safe, reliable, and effective. This will help surgeons determine the best method of fixation and approach with the goal of minimizing postoperative complications in patients with distal biceps ruptures.

Intraoperative fluoroscopy skills in distal radius fracture surgery: valid and reliable assessment on a novel immersive virtual reality simulator

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

 Orthopedic trainees must be able to perform intraoperative fluoroscopy imaging to assess the surgical result after volar locking plate surgeries of distal radius fractures. Guided by Messick's contemporary validity framework, the aim of our study was to gather evidence of validity for a test of proficiency for intraoperative imaging of a distal radius fracture using a novel immersive virtual reality simulator.

METHODS

 11 novices and 9 experienced surgeons employed at orthopedic departments completed 2 individual simulator sessions. At each session the participants performed 3 repetitions of an intraoperative fluoroscopic control of a distal radius fracture, consisting of 5 different fluoroscopic views. Several performance metrics were automatically recorded by the simulator and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

 Simulator metrics for 3 of the 5 fluoroscopic views could discriminate between novices and experienced surgeons. An estimated composite score based on these 3 views showed good test-retest reliability, ICC = 0.82 (confidence interval 0.65-0.92; P < 0.001). A discriminatory standard was set at a composite score of 6.15 points resulting in 1 false positive (i.e., novice scoring better than the standard), and 1 false negative (i.e., experienced surgeon scoring worse than the standard).

CONCLUSION

 This study provided validity evidence from all 5 sources of Messick's contemporary validity framework (content, response process, internal structure, relationship with other variables, and consequences) for a simulation-based test of proficiency in intraoperative fluoroscopic control of a distal radius fracture fixated by a volar locking plate.

Quantification of Radiation Exposure in Canadian Orthopaedic Surgery Residents

Introduction

Natural radiation exposure in the general population averages 3 milliSieverts (mSv) annually; however, radiation exposure in orthopaedic residents is not well defined. Despite protective measures, evidence of radiation-related diseases in orthopaedic surgeons is increasing. The purpose of this study was to quantify radiation exposure in orthopaedic residents and to determine the variability of exposure among post graduate year (PGY) of residency.

Methods

Monthly radiation exposure was measured prospectively over a 12-month period in orthopaedic surgery residents from a single program. Participants wore dosimeters above ("exposed") and beneath ("shielded") protective lead. The primary outcome measure was the absolute value of radiation exposure in mSv. Repeated measures analysis was used to assess exposure with age, sex, year of training, operating room (OR) days, and height.

Results

Mean annual occupational radiation exposure was 3.30 ± 0.64 mSv over an average of 107 ± 38 OR days. Mean exposure per OR day was 0.033 ± 0.008 mSv. PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents had the highest cumulative exposure, and PGY-5 residents had the highest mean exposure per OR day (0.044 ± 0.009 mSv/d). Number of OR days per month and PGY level were significant predictors of radiation exposure (p < 0.05). Sex, age, and height were not significant in predicting radiation of the exposed dosimeter.

Conclusions

Orthopaedic residents' exposure to radiation is nearly twice the general population's exposure. Given that yearly radiation exposure was highest during early residency years, but exposure based on number of OR days was highest in the final year of training, it is essential for resident education regarding radiation safety and safe clinical practices throughout their training.

Differences in Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure During Ankle Fracture Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Between Orthopaedic Surgery and Podiatry

Surgical ankle fractures pose a unique situation because both podiatrists and orthopaedic surgeons manage these injuries. Intraoperative fluoroscopy is routinely used; however, excessive radiation can be harmful to both the patient and the surgical team. The primary goal of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in the amount of intraoperative radiation exposure during ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) when performed by orthopaedic surgeons versus podiatrists. This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent ankle fracture ORIF at an urban level I trauma center between January 1st, 2018, and April 1st, 2023. The electronic health record was queried using International Classification of Diseases nine and 10 codes associated with ankle fractures. Patients aged older than 18 years with an ankle fracture managed surgically were included. Subjects were then stratified by procedure. The mean total radiation dose (mRad) and mean total fluoroscopic time (seconds) were then compared between those performed by orthopaedic surgeons and podiatrists. Of the 333 included procedures, 186 were done by orthopaedic surgeons and 147 were done by podiatrists. Using multiple linear regression analysis to control for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and body mass index, patients undergoing isolated malleolus ORIF with syndesmosis repair performed by orthopaedic surgery were found to have a significantly lower mean fluoroscopic time compared with those performed by podiatry (68.4 s versus 104.8 s; P = 0.028). In addition, trimalleolar ORIF with syndesmotic repair performed by orthopaedic surgery had a significantly lower mean total radiation dose compared with those performed by podiatry (244.6 mRad v 565.6 mRad; P = 0.009). Patients and surgical teams are exposed to markedly less radiation in isolated malleolar and trimalleolar fracture ORIF with syndesmosis repair when performed by an orthopaedic surgeon as compared with those performed by a podiatrist.

Intraoperative Radiation Exposure During Midfoot Charcot Reconstruction

While radiation exposure in foot and ankle surgery varies by procedure, attempts to minimize this hazard remain imperative to protect patients and surgeons. Hindfoot deformity correction employs significant radiation through intraoperative fluoroscopy, however, a paucity of data exists concerning Charcot reconstruction. This investigation describes and compares radiation exposure across varying Charcot pathology and fixation constructs. A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing midfoot Charcot reconstruction under large C-arm assistance from 2016-2022 was conducted. Demographics, pathology-specific, and intervention-specific variables were recorded and compared among midfoot reconstructions. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p ≤ .05. Among 40 patients, the average midfoot radiation exposure and fluoroscopy times were 9.5 ± 5.39 mGy and 256.64 ± 130.67 seconds, respectively. There existed no statistically significant difference in radiation exposure (p = .32) or fluoroscopy times (p = .71) among the different midfoot constructs. There existed a statistically significant relationship between radiation exposure with weight (p = .01) body mass index (p = .03) and number of stages (p = .04). Similarly, a relationship existed between fluoroscopy time with weight (p = .02), body mass index (p = .03), and number of beams/screws (p = .003). Due to the complexity of Charcot reconstruction coupled with multiple robust types of fixation, surgeons must remain cognizant of fluoroscopy usage. Moreover, providers who routinely perform Charcot reconstruction should wear personal protective equipment to protect against radiation.

A Novel Intraoperative CT Navigation System for Spinal Fusion Surgery in Lumbar Degenerative Disease: Accuracy and Safety of Pedicle Screw Placement

Background: In recent years, intraoperative computed tomography (CT) navigation has become widely used for the insertion of pedicle screws in spinal fusion surgery. However, conventional intraoperative CT navigation may be impaired by infrared interference between the infrared camera and surgical instruments, which can lead to the misplacement of pedicle screws. Recently, a novel intraoperative CT navigation system, NextAR, has been developed. It uses a small infrared camera mounted on surgical instruments within the surgical field. NextAR navigation can minimize the problem of infrared interference and be expected to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Methods: This study investigated the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion under NextAR navigation in spinal fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was evaluated in 15 consecutive patients using a CT grading scale. Results: Screw perforation occurred in only 1 of the total 70 screws (1.4%). Specifically, there was one grade 1 perforation within 2 mm, but no perforations larger than 2 mm. There were no reoperations or neurological complications due to screw misplacement. Conclusions: NextAR navigation can provide high accuracy for pedicle screw insertion and help ensure safe spinal fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases.

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Regarding Radiation and its Hazards Among Orthopaedic Surgeons in India: A Questionnaire-Based Study

Introduction

Orthopaedic surgeons are among the most frequent users of radiation and are often exposed to X-Ray radiation regularly. There is an overall unsatisfactory level of knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding the same among surgeons. This study aimed to assess the practices among orthopaedic surgeons regarding radiation and its hazards in India.

Methodology

This questionnaire-based survey was conducted between March and September 2022. The questionnaire broadly assessed the knowledge, awareness, and practices among orthopaedic surgeons regularly exposed to X-ray radiation. The questionnaire consisted of objective and Likert scale questions which were distributed to the respondents electronically using publicly available contact information. A qualitative review of interpretations obtained from the responses and available evidence in the literature was then performed.

Results

The response rate for the survey was 36.4%. 65.9% reported using trunk protection all the time during procedures. 57.1% of respondents reported not using thyroid protection during procedures. 92.3% reported not using protective goggles and 100% did not use appropriate gloves. 76.9% were not issued dosimeters, and only 5.5% of those who had been issued one wore it during radiation procedures. 58.2% reported having a dedicated employee to operate the machine. 86.8% of respondents did not have formal training and 81.3% were not aware of institutes offering formal training.

Conclusion

There is very high compliance with the use of protection aprons among the respondents however, the use of other apparel like thyroid shields, protection goggles and gloves was poor. The awareness regarding radiation exposure was also poor as most respondents were not issued dosimeters, however, those issued with one were well aware of their exposure. It is imperative to prioritize both surgeons' and patients' safety where radiation exposure is concerned.

Image Correlation Between Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs, C-arm Fluoroscopic Radiographs, and X-ray: A Phantom Study

OBJECTIVE

Digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) are planar two-dimensional (2D) X-rays derived from a three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) dataset. DRRs allow the simulation of radiographs of all desired views and facilitate preoperative planning. However, orthopedic surgeons rely on C-arm fluoroscopic imaging during surgery to verify fracture reduction and implant placement. Pincushion distortion represents a technical limitation of fluoroscopic imaging, resulting in a greater distance between points at the periphery of the image compared to the center. This project, therefore, aimed to assess the image correlation between digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) and fluoroscopic imaging (C-arm) using conventional radiographs (X-ray) as a control.

METHODS

A 3D-printed cubic prototype and an anatomical humerus bone model were used. C-arm fluoroscopic radiographs and conventional X-ray images were taken in an anteroposterior (AP) view at 10-degree steps while rotating the objects from 0 to 90 degrees. CT scans were made and used to compute and export DRRs in AP view at 10-degree rotational steps from 0 to 90 degrees. The surface area (cm2) was measured and compared between the different modalities. For automated image analysis of the anatomical humerus model, matching (%) between modalities was calculated using the structural similarity index (SSIM).

RESULTS

The overall regression was statistically significant in all models, with an R2 >0.99 when comparing all three imaging modalities of the prototype. Surface correlation in the anatomical humerus model was R2 0.99 between X-ray and C-arm and R2 0.95 between C-arm and X-ray to DRRs, respectively. The SSIM was highest for comparing DRR and C-arm images (0.84±0.01%).

CONCLUSIONS

The study indicates a strong agreement between digitally reconstructed radiographs and X-ray/C-arm images. DRRs, therefore, represent a valuable tool for research and clinical application.

Orthopaedic surgeons' knowledge and practice of radiation safety when using fluoroscopy during procedures: A narrative review

OBJECTIVES

The fluoroscopy environment poses a potential occupational radiation exposure risk to theatre personnel. Risks can be mitigated with effective application of radiation protection knowledge and methods. This review aimed to determine the link between orthopaedic surgeon's knowledge and the use of appropriate safety methods when using fluoroscopy.

KEY FINDINGS

A keyword search of three databases discovered six articles, totalling 2209 orthopaedic surgeons, who completed surveys to assess knowledge on various aspects of radiation safety and training. Participants had varying levels of experience. Moreover 1981 participants always wore a lead gown (89 %), while only 1052 participants wore thyroid protection (47 %). 449 participants (20 %) received some form of training.

CONCLUSION

Although surveys asked a range of questions it appeared that there was low knowledge of the ALARP principles. Usage of protective equipment is a legal requirement and thus was observed throughout, however, there were a number of incidences of disregarding some protective measures. Although there appeared to be limited knowledge surrounding radiation protection measures and lack of training provided, no clear link was demonstrated between compliance with protective methods and knowledge of the risks.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Formal and continuous training should be provided for the enhancement of knowledge to ensure the safety of all staff and help prevent the long-term effects of ionising radiation when using fluoroscopy.

Prospective observational analysis of intraoperative radiation exposure with a mini C-arm intensifier in percutaneous forefoot surgery

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous forefoot surgery has been associated with higher radiation exposure than the conventional approach. However, there is little data on forefoot surgery using a mini C-arm intensifier. We, therefore, conducted a prospective study to (1) evaluate the intraoperative radiation received by the surgeon during percutaneous forefoot surgery with a mini C-arm; (2) compare the radiation received by the surgeon with the guidelines for occupational exposure issued by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (20 millisieverts per year [mSv/year] for the whole body, 500mSv/year for the hands, and 20mSv/year for the lens of the eye); and (3) compare the radiation received during percutaneous forefoot surgery with that of the open approach, which has already been reported in the literature.

HYPOTHESIS

The radiation received by the surgeon during percutaneous forefoot surgery with a mini C-arm is lower than the ICRP guidelines, and the findings reported in the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective single-center study was conducted from September 2020 to May 2021. A total of 639 feet (i.e., 435 patients) were included. Of these 639 feet, 336 (52%) were hallux valgus repairs, 49 (8%) were stand-alone procedures of the lateral rays, and 124 (19%) were a combination of both. The radiation dose data was retrieved from the mini C-arm daily: dose-area product (DAP) in centigray per square centimeter (cGy/cm2) and radiation exposure duration in seconds. The doses received by the surgeon were collected every month by 4 passive dosimeters (hand, eye lens, and chest [on and under the lead apron]) and 2 active dosimeters (on and under the lead apron).

RESULTS

The DAP emitted by the mini C-arm during an operating day was 0.10±0.01cGy/cm2 (range, 0.0-3.9), and the mean daily radiation duration was 34.7±19.3seconds (range, 0.7-226.8). There was a mean of 8±8 (range, 1-18) elective procedures per operating day. The daily reading on the active dosimeter worn on the lead apron was 0.002±0 microSv (range, 0-0.04), while the one worn under the apron was 0.001±0 microSv (range, 0-0.03). The equivalent doses over the 7-month study period for the hand, eye lens, and chest (over and under the apron) were 0.14mSv, 0mSv, 0.22mSv, and 0mSv, respectively.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

The radiation exposure in percutaneous forefoot surgery with a mini C-arm intensifier observed in our study was lower than the ICRP recommendations and literature findings during open surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; prospective study without a control group.

Does radiation exposure during pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture surgery change according to the C-arm position? A comparison of two different techniques

INTRODUCTION

In the surgical treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures (SHF), the surgeon has to stand right next to the fluoroscopy device, so it is very important to know how to use it in the most appropriate way to reduce radiation exposure. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of using C-arm in uniplanar (inverted) and biplanar (standard-horizontal) configurations on (1) the radiation exposure to the surgeon, and (2) surgical time and fluoroscopy exposure time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective randomised study was conducted on 20 patients who underwent fluoroscopy during closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for a SHF. In the first configuration, the C-arm was inverted and the image intensifier was used as a surgical table. In the second configuration, the C-arm was used biplanar. The operations were performed by 5 surgeons, with each surgeon using each method only twice. During the operation, to find a value closed to direct radiation exposure measurement was made by attaching a dosimeter to the wrist and scatter radiation exposure was measured by attaching a dosimeter to the neck and waist of the surgeons. The operation time and fluoroscopy exposure time were determined.

RESULTS

The duration of operations performed with the biplanar C-arm position and the fluoroscopy exposure time in operations performed with the uniplanar method were found to be statistically significantly longer (p = 0.001). The measurements on the dosimeter worn on the neck of surgeons were found to be statistically significantly higher while using the uniplanar C-arm configuration (p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the dosimeter measurements on the wrists and waists of the surgeons and the C-arm configurations (p = 0.820; p = 0.185).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the use of biplanar C-arm has no effect on radiation exposure to the surgeon's wrist, the most important advantages are that the neck area is exposed to less radiation and it shortens the fluoroscopy time so the use of a biplanar C-arm can be recommended.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Radiation Using OEC 9900 Elite C-arm: Risk and Method for Decreasing Exposure

ABSTRACT

The use of intraoperative fluoroscopy in surgery produces scattered radiation that can expose all operating room personnel to measurable and, in some cases, substantial radiation doses. The goal of this work is to assess and document potential radiation doses to various staff positions in a simulated standard operating room environment. Adult-sized mannequins wearing standard lead protective aprons were placed at seven positions around large and small BMI cadavers. Doses were recorded in real time at thyroid level with Bluetooth-enabled dosimeters for a variety of fluoroscope settings and imaging views. A total of 320 images were acquired, resulting in 2,240 dosimeter readings from the seven mannequins. Doses were compared to cumulative air kerma (CAK) calculations provided by the fluoroscope. There was a strong correlation between the CAK and the recorded scattered radiation doses ( P < 0.001). Radiation doses could be reduced by manipulating C-arm manual technique settings [e.g., turning off the automatic exposure control (AEC) and using pulse (PULSE) or low dose (LD) settings]. Staff position and patient size also affected the recorded doses. The highest radiation doses were recorded across all settings for the mannequin positioned immediately adjacent to the C-arm x-ray tube. The larger BMI cadaver generated greater scattered radiation than the smaller BMI cadaver for all views and settings. This work provides suggestions for reducing exposure to operating room personnel beyond standard techniques of reducing beam-on time, increasing the distance from the radiation source, and use of shielding. Simple changes in C-arm settings (turning AEC off, avoiding DS setting, use of PULSE or LD settings) can markedly reduce dose to staff.

Pregnant theatre staff in orthopaedic operating rooms: An observational study

PURPOSE

Trauma & Orthopaedic (T&O) surgery presents several occupational hazards to pregnant women and the unborn child. National bodies have produced guidelines to mitigate these risks as far as possible but individual trusts must be aware of them and implement them in their local policies. Our study aims to re-assess whether national guidelines for the protection of pregnant women are better adhered to nationally by providing a comparison to a previous study in 2018.

METHODS

A national observational study of 146 NHS trusts in the UK was conducted. Each trust was asked to complete a freedom of information request regarding all orthopaedic guidelines relating to pregnant theatre staff, which specifically related to the protection of the mother and foetus from exposure to harmful activity in theatre. Compliance was ascertained by cross-checking local policies with national guidelines.

RESULTS

82/146 (52.0%) of NHS trusts responded to the Freedom of Information  request. 31/75 (41.3%) respondents followed Health and Safety Executive (HSE) guidance for New and Expectant Mothers with 17/75 (22.7%) following multiple national guidelines. 16/75 (21.3%) NHS trusts do not follow any national guidelines in protecting new and expectant mothers from occupational hazards in the orthopaedic theatre setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Although an improvement has been made since 2018 in complying with national guidelines protecting new and expectant mothers from orthopaedic-related hazards, a sizeable proportion of NHS trusts do not comply with any national guidelines, putting employees at undue risk. There is a continued need for pregnant surgeons to be aware of and seek occupational health advice from dedicated professional bodies if the NHS trust does not provide specific guidance. Simultaneously, a sustained effort must be present to continue to inform NHS employers of their duty to protect new and expectant mothers and signpost them to relevant guidance.

Occupational injuries and burn out among orthopedic oncology surgeons

BACKGROUND

Orthopedic oncology surgeons commonly engage in prolonged and complex surgical procedures. These types of surgeries increase the risk of physical and psychological stressors, which may in turn make these physicians prone to work-related occupational injuries.

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore in orthopedic oncologists, the prevalence of work-related physical injuries and psychological disturbances.

METHODS

A modified version of the physical discomfort survey was developed to assess occupational injuries among orthopedic oncology surgeon members of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society, the Canadian Orthopedic Oncology Society and European Musculoskeletal Oncology Societies. The survey was sent by email, and it explored musculoskeletal complaints, psychological disturbances, treatment required for these complaints and the requirement of time off work.

RESULTS

A total of 67 surgeon responses were collected. A high number of orthopedic oncologists (84%) reported an occupational injury. Low back pain (39%) was the most prevalent musculoskeletal condition, followed by lumbar disk herniation (16%), shoulder tendinitis (15%) and lateral epicondylitis (13%). Of the cohort, 46% required surgery and 31% required time off work due to their injury. Thirty-three respondents reported a psychological disorder. Burnout (27%), anxiety (20%) and insomnia (20%) were the most commonly reported. Time required off work due to injury was associated with old age and years in practice.

CONCLUSION

Orthopedic oncology surgeons report a high prevalence of work-related disorders. Lower back related injury and burnout were the most reported disorders. Improving operative room ergonomics and prevention of stress related to the work environment should be areas to explore in upcoming research.

Influence of direct radiography in decision making during orthopaedic trauma surgery: A prospective study

Objective

To evaluate the effects of intraoperative direct radiography on the change in the patient's treatment and the reliability of fluoroscopy in orthopaedic trauma surgery operations.

Methods

A total of 773 fractures were evaluated prospectively. The surgeons involved in the case were divided into three groups according to their experiences: less than 5 years, 5-10 years and over 10 years. After each case, the fracture classification, whether any interventions were made after the X-ray, and the interventions were recorded.

Results

There were 312(40%) intra-articular, 200(26%) metaphyseal, 161(21%) diaphyseal, 81(10%) pelvis-acetabulum, and 19(3%) vertebrae fractures. Surgeons needed to intervene in 71(9.2%) cases after direct-radiography. There was a significant difference between the location of the fracture and the number of interventions (p < 0.001). The most frequent interventions were intra-articular distal radius, acetabulum and intra-articular calcaneus fractures, respectively. Surgeons with more than 10 years of the experience felt the need to make fewer changes, it was statistically significant compared to the other two groups (p = 0.001 for both).

Conclusion

It was found that the final evaluation with x-ray images before the operation was completed in trauma surgery affected the surgeon's decision. In particular, intra-articular fractures, acetabular fractures, and vertebral fractures are recommended to evaluate fixation with direct radiography in addition to fluoroscopy images before ending the operation.

Level of evidence

LEVEL III.

Knowledge and practice of radiation protection in the operating theater among orthopedic surgeons

Purpose

Many orthopedic procedures, particularly minimally invasive surgeries that require fluoroscopic imaging, present a radiation exposure risk to the orthopedic surgeon. Surgeons may have a higher risk of developing cancer if they receive significant amounts of radiation. Using personal protective equipment (PPE) and appropriate imaging device positioning, plays an important role in reducing the surgeon's radiation exposure. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the surgeon's radiation safety awareness and practices. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the practices and radiation protection knowledge of orthopedic surgeons in the operating theater.

Approach

A nationwide survey was conducted from October 2021 to January 2022 to evaluate the radiation protection practices and awareness of orthopedic surgeons in Jordan. Normalized practice and knowledge scores were evaluated through the survey and compared between different groups. Descriptive statistics were used to present the surgeon's practices and radiation protection knowledge. Student's t -test was used to compare the outcomes between surgeons that received radiation protection training and surgeons who did not. Using ANOVA analysis, we compared the score outcomes for all the other variables.

Results

The surgeons that received radiation protection training had significantly higher practice score 39.6% compared with 31% for the group that did not have training ( p = 0.01 ). No statistically significant difference in the knowledge scores was found between the two groups. Although 91% of the surgeons reported using some kind of PPE, only 5.5% used a dosimeter badge during surgeries.

Conclusion

There is an obvious deficit in radiation safety training of orthopedic surgeons.

Are Indian orthopaedic surgeons aware of the health hazards of radiation exposure? A survey and review on awareness and ways to mitigate them

BACKGROUND

Standardized education on the short and long-term health hazards of radiation and thus the awareness regarding current radiation exposure limits is restricted in the field of orthopaedics. There is a lack of awareness regarding the risks related to radiation exposure amongst orthopaedic surgeons and therefore the recommended safety precautions to assess and mitigate these potential risks should be emphasized. Orthopaedic surgeons should adopt the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle. All precautions should be taken to keep all members of the operation room safe from radiation exposure and safeguard patients too.

METHODS

The survey questionnaire developed in consult with senior orthopaedic surgeons and radiation protection officer consisting of 27 questions was conducted among the orthopaedic surgeons and resident doctors.

RESULTS

15% responders were unaware about risks of radiation exposure in routine orthopaedic surgery and 82% unaware of the recommended yearly allowance per individual. 30% responders were unaware of correct positioning of the C-arm and 44% were unaware regarding the same distance to be maintained from the C-arm to reduce radiation exposure. 27% responders were unaware regarding pulsed fluoroscopy and its benefits. 45% responders were unsure regarding the thickness of the lead apron. 83% never use a thyroid gland shield and none of the responders use leaded eye glasses. Only 11% responders use lead badges for documentation of radiation exposure.

CONCLUSION

Orthopaedic surgeons should understand the basics and basis of radiation exposure limits, be familiar with this literature on the incidence of tumors, dermatitis, cancer risk and cataracts and understand the current intraoperative fluoroscopy safety recommendations. The damaging effects to human tissue caused by radiation exposure are documented since the first reports regarding use of radiographs, hence emphasis on radiation safety and protection should be universally incorporated into graduate medical education.

Percepção de cirurgiões ortopédicos sobre os riscos da exposição à radiação na fluoroscopia

Objective  The present study aims to understand the perceptions of orthopedists and traumatologists regarding the risk of exposure to ionizing radiation in fluoroscopy procedures.

Methods  An objective, structured, self-administered questionnaire with sociodemographic, professional, and occupational variables was developed, available through an invitation sent to orthopedist physicians whose contacts were made publicly available.

Results  A total of 141 questionnaires were answered and analyzed. Most respondents (99%) use fluoroscopy in their surgeries, and only 34.8% of the participants feel safe with the use of the equipment. It was observed that the knowledge about ionizing radiation is inadequate, because 22.6% of the participants are unaware of the type of radiation emitted in fluoroscopy and its biological effects. In addition, 52% of the participants did not know or do not understand the principles of radiological protection and their relationship with surgical practices.

Conclusion We concluded that the radiological protection of most orthopedists in surgical procedures is inadequate, and initial and continued training programs of professionals are necessary, bringing health benefits to orthopedists and their patients.

Radiation safety awareness and practices amongst orthopaedic surgeons in Scotland

As orthopaedic surgeons we use x-rays every day; not only when diagnosing pathology but often to assist in operative management of said pathology or ensure satisfactory outcomes for our patients in clinic. An awareness of the correct use of ionising radiation in the form of fluoroscopic imaging is therefore of great importance to reduce intraoperative exposure and has led to the development of the As Little As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle. The primary aim of this study is to determine the knowledge and practises of radiation safety amongst orthopaedic surgeons in Scotland. Secondary aim is to assess the prevalence of back pain and relation to lead gowns. A google forms survey containing 20 questions about both an individual's radiation practises, and knowledge and departmental practises were distributed to all 4 deaneries in Scotland. In total 72 responses were received from 20 hospitals across all 4 Scottish deaneries. This included 28 Consultants, 23 Senior trainees and 21 Junior trainees. We found that the level of radiation training and knowledge varied considerably across seniority and the nation. Of those surveyed 100% reported always wear lead aprons/gowns however only 46.2% (n = 34) frequently or always wear thyroid protection when using X-rays. Only 55% (n = 40) of those surveyed had completed a radiation safety course with this being far less likely amongst junior trainees (29%, n = 6) than amongst Consultants (82%, n = 23) and senior trainees (48%, n = 11) (p < 0.0001). To our knowledge this is the most extensive survey into the radiation practises of Orthopaedic Surgeons in the literature and shows the need for increased education and awareness of radiation safety practises, particularly amongst junior trainees.

A multicenter study of the 5-year trends in robot-assisted spine surgery outcomes and complications

BACKGROUND

Although a growing amount of literature that suggests robots are safe and can achieve comparable outcomes to conventional techniques, much of this literature is limited by small sample sizes and single-surgeon or single center series. Furthermore, it is unclear what the impact of robotic technology has made on operative and clinical outcomes over time. This is the first and largest multicenter study to examine the trends in outcomes and complications after robot-assisted spine surgery over a 5-year period.

METHODS

Adult (≥18 years old) patients who underwent spine surgery with robot-assistance between 2015 and 2019 at four unique spine centers. The robotic systems used included the Mazor Renaissance, Mazor X, and Mazor Stealth Edition. Patients with incomplete data were excluded from this study. The minimum follow-up was 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 722 adult patients were included (117 Renaissance, 477 X, 128 Stealth). Most patient and operative factors (e.g., sex, tobacco status, total instrumented levels, and pelvic fixation,) were similar across the years. Mean ± standard deviation Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 1.5±1.5. The most commonly reported diagnoses included high grade spondylolisthesis (40.6%), degenerative disc disease (18.4%), and degenerative scoliosis (17.6%). Mean (standard deviation) number of instrumented levels was 3.8±3.4. From 2015 to 2019, average robot time per screw improved from 7.2 to 5.5 minutes (P=0.004, R²=0.649). Average fluoroscopy time per screw improved from 15.2 to 9.4 seconds (P=0.002). Rates of both intraoperative screw exchange for misplaced screw (2015-2016: 2.7%, 2019: 0.8%, P=0.0115, R²=0.1316) and robot abandonment (2015-2016: 7.1%, 2019: 1.1%, P=0.011, R²=0.215) improved significantly over time. The incidence of other intraoperative complications (e.g., dural tear, loss of motor/sensory function, blood transfusion) remained consistently low, but similar throughout the years. The length of stay (LOS) decreased by nearly 1 day from 2015 to 2019 (P=0.007, R²=0.779). 90-day reoperation rates did not change significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

At four institutions among seven surgeons, we demonstrate robot screw accuracy, reliability, operative efficiency, and radiation exposure improved significantly from 2015 to 2019. 90-day complication rates remained low and LOS decreased significantly with time. These findings further validate continued usage of robot-assisted spine surgery and the path toward improved value-based care.

Percutaneous iliosacral screw and trans-iliac trans-sacral screw with single C-arm fluoroscope intensifier is a safe treatment for pelvic ring injuries

To elucidate the accuracy, efficacy, and safety of percutaneous iliosacral screw (ISS) and trans-iliac trans-sacral screw (TITS) insertion using a single C-arm fluoroscopy intensifier. Additionally, the potential risk factors that might cause mal-positioned screws were identified. Patients with pelvic ring injuries who underwent percutaneous screw fixation in a single medical institute were divided into an ISS group (n = 59) and a TITS group (n = 62) and assessed. The angles deviated from ideal orientation (ADIO) of the implanted screw were measured, and potential risk factors for mal-positioned screws were analyzed. Overall, the reduction quality of the pelvic ring was good or excellent in 70 patients (82.4%) by Matta’s criteria and in 48 patients (56.5%) by Lefaivre’s criteria. ADIO measurements of the ISS and TITS groups via multi-planar computed tomography were 9.16° ± 6.97° and 3.09° ± 2.8° in the axial view, respectively, and 5.92° ± 3.65° and 2.10° ± 2.01° in the coronal view, respectively. Univariate statistical analysis revealed body mass index as the single potential risk factor of mal-positioned screws. With careful preoperative planning and intraoperative preparations, placing ISS and TITS under the guidance of single C-arm fluoroscopy intensifier is a reliable and safe technique. Caution should be exercised when performing this procedure in patients with a high body mass index.

Occupational ionizing radiation-induced skin injury among orthopedic surgeons: A clinical survey

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess orthopedic surgeons' attitudes and behaviors toward occupational radiation exposure and investigate the prevalence of occupational radiation-induced skin injury among orthopedic surgeons. Similarly, risk factors for the presence of radiation-induced skin injury were investigated.

METHODS

Overall, 108 orthopedic surgeons were administered self-reported questionnaires about occupational radiation exposure, and their hands were then photographed. Their fields of expertise were classified into spine, arthroplasty, sports medicine, hand, oncology, rheumatoid arthritis, pediatric orthopedic, and resident. Dermatologists evaluated the surgeons' skin conditions and classified into 3 grades of injury: grade 0, no clinical symptoms; grade 1, careful observation required; and grade 2, detailed examination required. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the factors related to the presence of radiation-induced skin injury. Crude and adjusted logistic regression analysis using the backward stepwise selection method was similarly conducted. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to estimate the predictive power of exposure time, occupational period, and accumulated annual exposure time for radiation-induced skin injury.

RESULTS

In total, 93.5% of the surgeons were careful about occupational radiation exposure, of which 76.8% used a dosimeter. Skin changes in the hands were self-reported by 42.5% of the surgeons, and radiation-induced skin injury was diagnosed in 31.4%. The accuracy of the self-reported skin changes was 100% for grade 2 and 61.5% for grade 1. Adjusted regression analysis showed that dermatologists' diagnosis-related factors were self-reported skin changes (odds ratio [OR] 3.1) and spine surgeons (OR 3.2). ROC analysis demonstrated that an occupational period >21 years and an accumulated exposure time >6696 min were considered risk factors, with ORs of 4.07 and 5.99, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthopedic surgeons, particularly spine surgeons, should be regularly examined by dermatologists early in their careers for early detection of radiation-induced skin injury on the hands.

Design, delivery, and evaluation of seminars and hands-on courses worldwide on intraoperative imaging in orthopedic trauma

INTRODUCTION

Although intraoperative imaging is important for assessing the quality of several steps during fracture fixation, most trainees and surgeons have received little formal education on this topic and report they learn "on the job" and "through practice". A planning committee of orthopedic trauma surgeons was established to design a curriculum using "backward planning" to identify patient problems, identify gaps in surgeons' knowledge and skills, and define competencies as a framework for education in order to optimize patient care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The committee defined 8 competencies related to intraoperative imaging, with detailed learning objectives for each one (e.g. select the imaging modality, set up the operating room). An interactive, case-based half-day seminar to deliver these objectives for 2-D and 3-D intraoperative imaging during the fixation of common fractures was designed. The seminar was delivered in several locations worldwide over a 6-year period and evaluation and assessment data were gathered online. A full-day procedures course was added and delivered 6 times to address the skills component of competencies.

RESULTS

17 seminars and 6 courses were delivered and attended by an average of 26 and 17 participants respectively (ranges 13-42 and 13-20). Pre-event gap analysis and assessment question scores confirmed needs and motivation to learn in all events. 97% of the 442 seminar participants and 98% of the 100 course participants would recommend the events to colleagues. An average of 88% and 90% respectively learned something new and plan to use it in their practice (range 63%-100%). Commitment to change (CTC) statements showed intended practice improvements related to all competencies.

DISCUSSION

The large percentages of high impact ratings for all events suggest the content met the needs of many participants. Post-event reduction in gap scores and an increase in the desired level of ability for most competencies suggests the content addressed many gaps.

CONCLUSIONS

Case-based, interactive seminars and courses addressing knowledge, skills, and attitudes to optimize the use of intraoperative imaging during the fixation of common fractures help address unmet educational needs for trainees and complements existing formal training.

Occupational hazard of fluoroscopy: An invisible threat to orthopaedic surgeons

The use of fluoroscopy is widespread within different medical specialties. Improper protection may cause significant radiation hazard to medical personnel. To evaluate the concepts on radiation safety and fluoroscopy use among orthopaedic surgeons and to reflect our current training on this issue, a survey was distributed to perform an audit in our department, an academic unit. Twenty-eight orthopaedic surgeons replied. Amongst our participants, 96.4% used a lead apron at all times. Only 33% used a thyroid shield, 67% never used radiation goggles and 96% never used radiation protection gloves. 53.6% and 46.4% of participants position the fluoroscopy incorrectly in the anteroposterior and lateral positions, respectively, during use. There is clearly a need for improved safety amongst orthopaedic surgeons. A literature review was further performed, showing the hazards of fluoroscopy for doctors, including the risk of cataracts, radiation dermatitis, skin cancer and thyroid cancer. Hazards specific to females, including breast cancer risk, and in-utero irradiation of foetus were also thoroughly discussed. Recommendations towards radiation safety and practical measures to reduce fluoroscopy radiation hazard during procedure were made. Education and training to doctors on this invisible hazard is strongly advised.

A novel dynamic electromagnetic tracking navigation system for distal locking of intramedullary nails

BACKGROUND

The accurate distal locking of intramedullary (IM) nails is a clinical challenge for surgeons. Although many navigation systems have been developed, a real-time guide method with free radiation exposure, better user convenience, and high cost performance has not been proposed.

METHODS

This paper aims to develop an electromagnetic navigation system named TianXuan-MDTS that provides surgeons with a proven surgical solution. And the registration method with external landmarks for IM nails and calibration algorithm for guiders were proposed. A puncture experiment, model experiments measured by 3D Slicer and cadaver experiments (2 cadaveric leg specimens and 6 drilling operations) are conducted to evaluate its performance and stability.

RESULTS

The registration deviations (TRE) is 1.05± 0.13 mm. In the puncture experiment, a success rate of 96% can be achieved in 45.94 s. TianXuan-MDTS were evaluated on 3 tibia model. The results demonstrated that all 9 screw holes were successfully prepared at a rate of 100% in 91.67 s. And the entry point, end point, and angular deviations were 1.60±0.20 mm, 1.47±0.18 mm, and 3.10±0.84°, respectively. Postoperative fluoroscopy in cadaver experiments showed that all drills were in the distal locking holes, with a success rate of 100% and the average time 143.17± 18.27 s.

CONCLUSIONS

The experimental results indicate that our system with novel registration and calibration methods could serve as a feasible and promising tool to assist surgeons during distal locking.

Radiation in orthopaedics (RIO) study: a national survey of UK orthopaedic surgeons

OBJECTIVES

Orthopaedic surgeons have a responsibility to minimise risks of ionising radiation to patients, themselves and staff. This study aims to establish the understanding of radiation practice, legislation and risk by orthopaedic surgeons.

METHODS

A nationwide online survey of UK-based orthopaedic surgeons was conducted. Participants answered 18 multiple-choice questions assessing level of radiation safety training, basic principles/knowledge of ionising radiation, relevant legislation and operating practice.

RESULTS

A total of 406 surgeons completed the survey. 92% reported using intraoperative ionising radiation at least once per week. 38% received no formal training on radiation safety. Knowledge of basic principles of radiation and legislation was limited. There was variable knowledge when labelling an image intensifier machine and choosing its safest orientation. Poor uptake of radiation protection equipment was noted. Only 19% agreed they had adequate training in ionising radiation safety and 27% reported receiving adequate training in equipment emitting ionising radiation in the operating theatre.

CONCLUSION

Many orthopaedic surgeons in the UK do not believe they are adequately trained in radiation safety. There is a deficiency amongst practicing surgeons in basic knowledge, relevant legislation and practicalities of the use of ionising radiation in the operating room. This could potentially put patients and health-care professionals at additional risk. We recommend that a standardised national training programme on the basic principles and safety of ionising radiation is implemented for all practicing orthopaedic surgeons.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This paper is the first UK national survey amongst orthopaedic surgeons and is one of the largest reported internationally.

The use of ionising radiation in orthopaedic surgery: principles, regulations and managing risk to surgeons and patients

The use of ionising radiation for plain film radiography and computerised tomography is fundamental in both diagnostics and treatment for orthopaedics. However, radiation is not without risk as high exposure can increase the risk of cancer. Little time is spent educating doctors about the relative risks of radiation, both to patients and themselves. In addition, there are common misunderstandings about the best ways to mitigate such risk. We aim to provide an overview of the fundamental principles of the use of ionising radiation and its risks within the context of orthopaedic surgery. While providing a narrative review of the current literature, we discuss the basic physics, standards of good practice and relevant UK and European regulations. We discuss the risks to patients and surgeons and suggest ways that these can be mitigated in the operating theatre. A thorough understanding of the risks, and appropriate procedural rules, with respect to the use of ionising radiation is essential for those in orthopaedic practice.

Assessing Risks Awareness in Operating Rooms among Post-Graduate Students: A Pilot Study

Background: In this study, we promote a global approach to occupational risk perception in order to improve occupational health and safety training programs. The study investigates the occupational risk perception of operating room healthcare workers using an Analytic Hierarchy Process approach. Methods: A pilot study was carried out through a cross-sectional survey in a university hospital in Southern Italy. An ad hoc questionnaire was administered to enrolled medical post-graduate students working in the operating room. Results: Fifty medical specialists from seven fields (anaesthetists, digestive system surgeons, general surgeons, maxillofacial surgeons, thoracic surgeons, urologists, and gynaecologists) were questioned about perceived occupational risk by themselves. Biological, ionizing radiation, and chemical risks were the most commonly perceived in order of priority (w = 0.300, 0.219, 0.210). Concerning the biological risk, gynaecologists unexpected perceived this risk as less critical (w = 0.2820) than anaesthesiologists (w = 0.3354), which have the lowest perception of the risk of ionizing radiation (w = 0.1657). Conclusions: Prioritization methods could improve risk perception in healthcare settings and help detect training needs and perform sustainable training programs.

Effects of Gamification on Surgical Duration and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Fixation of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To compare surgical duration and clinical outcomes with associated complications in surgeons using gamification techniques for resident education versus those surgeons who do not.

DESIGN

Retrospective, cohort study. Level III evidence. Surgical interventions included long cephalomedullary nailing with gamification techniques compared to long cephalomedullary nailing alone. Main outcome measurements were total fluoroscopy time, operative time, hospital length of stay, discharge status, and complications.

SETTING

Urban Level 1 Trauma Center.

PARTICIPANTS

One fourty-eight adult patients with operative intertrochanteric femur fractures from January 2010 to January 2019.

RESULTS

There were lower total operative times (45.6 vs. 57.1 minutes, p =< 0.01) and fluoroscopy times (1.6 vs. 2.1 minutes, p = 0.01) in the gamification group. There were no significant differences between groups in patient demographics, fracture pattern, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, total follow-up, total ICU stay time, or discharge to extended care facility versus home.

CONCLUSIONS

Gamification techniques with use of long cephalomedullary nails are a valid approach to the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures. This approach demonstrates equivalent outcomes postoperatively to nongamification treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures, with the potential advantage of decreased operative and fluoroscopic times.

Long-length tomosynthesis and 3D-2D registration for intraoperative assessment of spine instrumentation

PURPOSE

A system for long-length intraoperative imaging is reported based on longitudinal motion of an O-arm gantry featuring a multi-slot collimator. We assess the utility of long-length tomosynthesis and the geometric accuracy of 3D image registration for surgical guidance and evaluation of long spinal constructs.

METHODS

A multi-slot collimator with tilted apertures was integrated into an O-arm system for long-length imaging. The multi-slot projective geometry leads to slight view disparity in both long-length projection images (referred to as 'line scans') and tomosynthesis 'slot reconstructions' produced using a weighted-backprojection method. The radiation dose for long-length imaging was measured, and the utility of long-length, intraoperative tomosynthesis was evaluated in phantom and cadaver studies. Leveraging the depth resolution provided by parallax views, an algorithm for 3D-2D registration of the patient and surgical devices was adapted for registration with line scans and slot reconstructions. Registration performance using single-plane or dual-plane long-length images was evaluated and compared to registration accuracy achieved using standard dual-plane radiographs.

RESULTS

Longitudinal coverage of ∼50-64 cm was achieved with a single long-length slot scan, providing a field-of-view (FOV) up to (40 × 64) cm², depending on patient positioning. The dose-area product (reference point air kerma × x-ray field area) for a slot scan ranged from ∼702-1757 mGy·cm², equivalent to ∼2.5 s of fluoroscopy and comparable to other long-length imaging systems. Long-length scanning produced high-resolution tomosynthesis reconstructions, covering ∼12-16 vertebral levels. 3D image registration using dual-plane slot reconstructions achieved median target registration error (TRE) of 1.2 mm and 0.6° in cadaver studies, outperforming registration to dual-plane line scans (TRE = 2.8 mm and 2.2°) and radiographs (TRE = 2.5 mm and 1.1°). 3D registration using single-plane slot reconstructions leveraged the ∼7-14° angular separation between slots to achieve median TRE ∼2 mm and <2° from a single scan.

CONCLUSION

The multi-slot configuration provided intraoperative visualization of long spine segments, facilitating target localization, assessment of global spinal alignment, and evaluation of long surgical constructs. 3D-2D registration to long-length tomosynthesis reconstructions yielded a promising means of guidance and verification with accuracy exceeding that of 3D-2D registration to conventional radiographs.

Use of O-arm with neuronavigation in percutaneous vertebroplasty reduces the surgeon's exposure to intraoperative radiation

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous vertebroplasty is commonly used to treat spinal fractures. The authors compare radiation exposure as potential risk for the surgical team during vertebroplasty guided by O-arm combined with neuronavigation versus vertebroplasty guided by C-arm fluoroscopy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The clinical material consisted of a group of 29 patients (44 vertebrae) with fractures of the thoracolumbar spine treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by O-arm with neuronavigation. In this new method, the operating room staff leaves the operating room for the duration of the 3D scan of the appropriate spine section using the O-arm. In the next stage, the needle of the vertebroplasty system is introduced using only neuronavigation without the need for a radiological view. Finally, the cement injection was made under O-arm fluoroscopic control. The comparison group consisted of a group of 35 patients (40 vertebrae) treated with the classical method using C-arm fluoroscopy. The two methods were compared in terms of the average dose of emitted ionizing radiation through the device (O-arm vs. C-arm) to which surgeons are exposed during percutaneous vertebroplasty.

RESULTS

As a result of vertebroplasty procedures guided by neuronavigation, a statistically significant difference between the values of mean dose of radiation emitted by O-arm and C-arm systems was noted. The O-arm emitted 912 cGy/cm² vs. 1722 cGy/cm² emitted by the C-arm during fluoroscopically assisted procedures and 601.28 cGy/cm² vs. 1506.86 cGy/cm² per vertebrae.

CONCLUSIONS

During vertebroplasty with the O-arm combined with neuronavigation the radiation dose is significantly lower as compared with the C-arm used for fluoroscopic guidance, minimizing the potential risk of radiation exposure to surgeons.

The effect of artificial X-rays on C-arm positioning performance in a simulated orthopaedic surgical setting

PURPOSE

We designed an Artificial X-ray Imaging System (AXIS) that generates simulated fluoroscopic X-ray images on the fly and assessed its utility in improving C-arm positioning performance by C-arm users with little or no C-arm experience.

METHODS

The AXIS system was comprised of an optical tracking system to monitor C-arm movement, a manikin, a reference CT volume registered to the manikin, and a Digitally Reconstructed Radiograph algorithm to generate live simulated fluoroscopic images. A user study was conducted with 30 participants who had little or no C-arm experience. Each participant carried out four tasks using a real C-arm: an introduction session, an AXIS-guided set of pelvic imaging tasks, a non-AXIS guided set of pelvic imaging tasks, and a questionnaire. For each imaging task, the participant replicated a set of three target X-ray images by taking real radiographs of a manikin with a C-arm. The number of X-rays required, task time, and C-arm positioning accuracy were recorded.

RESULTS

We found a significant 53% decrease in the number of X-rays used and a moderate 10-26% improvement in lateral C-arm axis positioning accuracy without requiring more time to complete the tasks when the participants were guided by artificial X-rays. The questionnaires showed that the participants felt significantly more confident in their C-arm positioning ability when they were guided by AXIS. They rated the usefulness of AXIS as very good to excellent, and the realism and accuracy of AXIS as good to very good.

CONCLUSION

Novice users working with a C-arm machine supplemented with the ability to generate simulated X-ray images could successfully accomplish positioning tasks in a simulated surgical setting using markedly fewer X-ray images than when unassisted. In future work, we plan to determine whether such a system can produce similar results in the live operating room without lengthening surgical procedures.

The effectiveness of a free-standing lead-shield in reducing spine surgeon radiation exposure during intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging

BACKGROUND

CONTEXT Intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) imaging has become increasingly popular in spine surgery. Previous spine surgeon radiation exposure research has focused largely on procedures using fluoroscopy, however, few studies have been performed on the subject since the introduction of the 3D imaging systems. As a result, concerns have re-emerged over surgeon radiation exposure and the effectiveness of operating room (OR) protocols for decreasing workplace radiation. Current radiation safety guidelines require surgeons wear full body protective lead while any type of radiation is being administered during surgery. As a result, local institutions do not allow for the use of free-standing lead shields for sole radiation protection in the operating room. However, there is no data available to demonstrate whether the additional personal lead is required, or if in fact the lead shield alone is sufficient.

PURPOSE

This study investigated the effectiveness of a free-standing lead shield in reducing spine surgeon radiation exposure in the operating room during intraoperative imaging.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A prospective clinical research study at a large, tertiary care center.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Twenty-seven patients undergoing instrumented spinal procedures between June and August 2019.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Fluoroscopy time, total fluoroscopy dose delivered, 3D dose delivered, total 3D spins, number of HD spins, number of standard spins, number of fluoroscopic images, number of spine levels operated on, patient size setting, shield distance from patient, radiation dose in front of shield, radiation dose behind shield.

METHODS

Twenty-seven instrumented spinal procedures using the O-Arm Imaging System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) were observed to determine radiation exposure to a spine surgeon standing behind a lead shield in the OR. Two thermoluminescent dosimeters were used to measure scatter radiation in front of and behind lead shields. Both fluoroscopy and intraoperative CT based radiation exposure was recorded. The dosimeter readings were compared to determine the degree of radiation attenuation by the lead shield. Regression analysis of the exposure values from behind the shield, shield distance from the patient, and radiation dose delivered by the imaging system was utilized to estimate the number of cases required to surpass annual exposure limits. Case numbers were calculated for the highest "worst case" and "average case" exposure values. The safe annual occupation exposure limit determined by the National Council on Radiation Protection is five roentgen equivalent man (rem) or 50,000 microsieverts (μSv).

RESULTS

Average surgeon radiation exposure per case was 0.694 μSv (SD: 0.501, Range: 0.105-2.167) behind the lead shield compared to 14.577 μSv (SD: 9.864, Range: 2.185-44.492) in front of the lead shield. The average radiation dose reduction by the lead shield was 13.962 μSv (SD: 9.49, Range: 2.08-42.72) per case, which is equivalent to an average of 95.65% (SD: 1.71) radiation attenuation by lead shielding. If surgeons stand behind lead shields in the OR, the annual number of 3D image-guided spinal procedures required to surpass exposure limits is 15,479 and 67,060 based on "worst case" and "average case" analyses, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates standing behind intraoperative lead shields is very effective at decreasing radiation exposure to surgeons. Additionally, surgeon radiation doses behind lead shielding fall far below annual exposure limits. Surgeons should not need additional protective equipment when a lead shield is used.

Radiation exposure and fluoroscopically-guided interventional procedures among orthopedic surgeons in South Korea

Background

The use of fluoroscopically-guided interventional (FGI) procedures by orthopedic surgeons has been increasing. This study aimed to investigate the occupational radiation exposure among orthopedic surgeons in South Korea.

Methods

A nationwide survey of orthopedic surgeons was conducted in South Korea in October 2017. The dosimetry data of the participants were obtained from the National Dosimetry Registry. The orthopedic surgeons were categorized by job specialty [spine or trauma specialists, other orthopedic specialists, and residents], and descriptive statistics for the demographics and work-related characteristics were presented. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for the orthopedic surgeons who were not linked with the dosimetry data.

Results

Among the total participants (n = 513), 40.5% of the orthopedic surgeons spent more than 50% of their time working with the FGI procedures when compared with their overall work. The average frequency of the FGI procedures among the orthopedic surgeons was 12.3 days per month. Less than 30% of the participants were regularly provided with radiation monitoring badges. The proportion of subjects who always wore lead aprons and thyroid shields were 52 and 29%, respectively. The residents group experienced more unfavorable working conditions of radiation exposure than the other specialists. The dosimetry data were not significantly linked among the residents (odds ratio [OR] 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–3.95) and orthopedic surgeons working at small hospitals (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.05–21.51).

Conclusions

Although orthopedic surgeons often performed FGI procedures, they wore protective gear less frequently, and a large proportion of orthopedic surgeons were not monitored by the national radiation dosimetry system. As the number of radiation procedures performed by the orthopedic surgeons increases, more intensive approaches are needed to reduce radiation exposure, especially for spine and trauma surgeons.

Radiation Safety Knowledge and Practices: Is the Indian Orthopaedic Community Well-informed?

BACKGROUND

In spite of frequent exposure to radiation, orthopaedic surgeons lack knowledge about radiation safety and do not comply with safety practices. We surveyed orthopaedic trainees and consultants in India to determine their knowledge and practices regarding radiation safety.

METHODS

A questionnaire with 16 multiple choice questions was sent out using Google forms. We included practicing orthopaedic surgeons (consultants), fellows and trainees pursuing DNB, MS and D. Ortho courses across India.

RESULTS

We received 439/700 responses (62.7% response rate) from 233 (53.1%) consultants and 206 (46.9%) trainees. Only 71 (16.2%) were aware of the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle. While lead aprons were always used by 379 (86.3%), thyroid shields were never used by 302 (68.8%) respondents. Knowledge about the ALARA principle was significantly associated with radiation safety practices. A significantly greater proportion of participants who were aware about the ALARA principle always used lead aprons (OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.0 to 1.2, p = 0.001) and thyroid shields (OR 2.00; 95% CI 1.0 to 3.7, p = 0.029) and had their dosimeters checked within the last 1 year (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.0 to 2.8, p = 0.039) when compared to those who were not aware of the ALARA principle. Almost 99% respondents expressed interest in participating in a radiation safety training program.

CONCLUSION

A majority of the respondents were keen to obtain training in radiation safety. We believe that professional organizations and hospitals could initiate training programs for the orthopaedic community in India to improve their radiation safety knowledge and practices.

Comparing the Efficiency, Radiation Exposure, and Accuracy Using C-Arm versus O-Arm With 3D Navigation in Placement of Transiliac-Transsacral and Iliosacral Screws: A Cadaveric Study Evaluating an Early Career Surgeon

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficiency, radiation exposure to surgeon and patient, and accuracy of C-arm versus O-arm with navigation in the placement of transiliac-transsacral and iliosacral screws by an orthopaedic trauma fellow, for a surgeon early in practice.

METHODS

Twelve fresh frozen cadavers were obtained. Preoperative computed tomography scans were reviewed to assess for safe corridors in the S1 and S2 segments. Iliosacral screws were assigned to the S1 segment in dysmorphic pelvises. Screws were randomized to modality and laterality. An orthopaedic trauma fellow placed all screws. Time of procedure and radiation exposure to the cadaver and surgeon were recorded. Three fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons rated the safety of each screw on postoperative computed tomography scan.

RESULTS

Six normal and 6 dysmorphic pelvises were identified. Eighteen transiliac-transsacral screws and 6 iliosacral screws were distributed evenly between C-arm and O-arm. Average operative duration per screw was significantly shorter using C-arm compared with O-arm (15.7 minutes ± 6.1 vs. 23.7 ± 8.5, P = 0.014). Screw placement with C-arm exposed the surgeon to a significantly greater amount of radiation (3.87 × 10 rads vs. 0.32 × 10, P < 0.001) while O-arm exposed the cadaver to a significantly greater amount of radiation (0.03 vs. 2.76 rads, P < 0.001). Two S2 transiliac-transsacral screws (1 C-arm and 1 O-arm) were categorized as unsafe based on scoring. There was no difference in screw accuracy between modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

A difference in accuracy between modalities could not be elucidated, whereas efficiency was improved with utilization of C-arm, with statistical significance. A statistically significant increase in radiation exposure to the surgeon using C-arm was found, which may be clinically significant over a career. The results of this study can be extrapolated to a fellow or surgeon early in practice. The decision between use of these modalities will vary depending on surgeon preference and hospital resources.

Radiation Exposure in Orthopaedics

» The damaging effects to human tissue caused by radiation exposure have been documented since the first reports regarding use of radiographs in the late nineteenth century. » Orthopaedic surgeons and residents often are undereducated about the risks associated with radiation exposure and the recommended safety precautions to help mitigate these potential risks. » Orthopaedic surgeons need to adopt the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle: whenever possible, all available precautions should be taken to keep all members of the operating room safe from radiation exposure while emphasizing the best appropriate care for patients. » An emphasis on radiation safety and protection should be universally incorporated into graduate medical education.

Intraoperative ultrasound-guided reduction of femoral shaft fractures using intramedullary nailing: a technical note

OBJECTIVES

Intramedullary (IM) nailing is the preferred method for treatment of femoral shaft fractures. However, for the surgical staff and the patients, exposure to large dose of X-rays is inevitable during the procedure. In this paper, a new technique based on ultrasound is proposed to guide the reduction of femoral fractures, reducing radiation exposure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

By means of particular continuous transverse and multiplanar longitudinal scanning, the deformity pattern information of the fracture could be efficiently acquired. Adequate reduction could be achieved under the real-time guidance of intraoperative ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative ultrasound can guide the reduction of femoral shaft fracture using IM nailing, and reduce the radiation exposure of medical staff and patients.

Are orthopedic surgeons exposed to excessive eye irradiation? A prospective study of lens irradiation in orthopedics and traumatology

INTRODUCTION

Numerous studies in recent years highlighted an increased risk of pathologies related to ionizing radiation in caregivers. A new French decree was adopted on June 4, 2018, dividing by 7.5 the radiation dose authorized in the lens for exposed workers.

HYPOTHESIS

The hypothesis of the present study was that ocular irradiation in orthopedic surgeons was below the new legal threshold.

METHOD

The equivalent dose (mSv) received by the lens was prospectively assessed in 10 orthopedic surgeons (5 senior, 5 residents), using 3 passive dosimeters placed at the forehead and either temple. Each intervention of each operator was recorded, with dose per area in the operating room at each use of the fluoroscope.

RESULTS

All equivalent doses to the lens at the end of the 4 month study period were well below threshold. Doses were not significantly different between forehead and either temple (p=0.7, p=0.6 for the 2 temples). There was no difference according to side of the head (p=0.3). The dose received in the lens correlated with the dose delivered in the room (p=0.004). There were no significant differences in irradiation according to the surgeon's experience (p=0.2) or trauma activity rate (p=0.4).

DISCUSSION

No studies have reported equivalent doses to the lens exceeding the authorized limit. But none previously measured equivalent dose to the lens according to the axis of irradiation in the eyes. The present study showed that orthopedic surgeons received as much eye radiation laterally as frontally. Ocular radiation protection needs therefore to be as effective laterally as frontally. The surgeon's experience did not emerge as a protective factor against ocular irradiation.

Evaluation of bacterial presence on lead X-ray aprons utilised in the operating room via IBIS and standard culture methods

Background

Despite precautions, surgical procedures carry risk of infection. Radiation-protective lead aprons worn by operating personnel are a potential source of bacterial contamination and have not been fully evaluated.

Aim/objective

To evaluate lead aprons as a source of bacterial contamination, identify organisms most commonly found on this source, and devise a method with which to lower the risk of contamination.

Methods

In this basic science study, 20 randomly selected lead X-ray aprons were swabbed at three time points. The experimental treatment was with a hospital-grade disinfectant wipe. The samples were assessed for bacterial growth via traditional plating methods and mass spectrometry. Plates were graded on a scale of 0 to 4+ based on the number of quadrants with growth. Growth on one quadrant or more was considered contaminated.

Findings/results

Bacteria were initially detected via IBIS on a majority of the aprons (32/40), most commonly Staphylococcus epidermidis and Propionibacterium acnes. Virulent organisms cultured were Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE), Neisseria, Streptococcus viridans and pseudomonas. MRSE were detected on 5/20 of the samples. Immediately after treatment, the majority of aprons showed less bacterial contamination (0/20 standard culture positive; 13/20 IBIS positive) with some recurrence at the 6-h time point (2/20 standard culture positive, 16/20 IBIS positive). All MRSE detected initially was eradicated.

Discussion

Lead X-ray aprons worn in the operating room harbour bacteria. Disinfecting before use may prevent the introduction of virulent organisms to patients. Our proposed method of sanitising with a disinfectant wipe is quick and effective.

Curved periacetabular osteotomy using intraoperative real-time 3-dimensional computed tomography with a robotic C-arm system: A case report

RATIONALE

Curved periacetabular osteotomy (CPO) is a procedure with excellent surgical outcome that has been proposed for patients with development dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, the surgical outcomes depend on the surgeon's experience and proficiency.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 38-year-old female indicated she was experiencing left hip pain while walking.

DIAGNOSES

The patient was diagnosed with early-stage hip osteoarthritis due to DDH.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent CPO while a 3-dimensional flat-panel C-arm (Artis zeego; Sciemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) was used to confirm the real-time 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) images during surgery. It was possible to confirm the accurate osteotomy curve using CT images twice during surgery: at the time of the ischial osteotomy and the quadrilateral surface osteotomy.

OUTCOMES

An ideal C-shaped osteotomy line was created as shown on the postoperative CT images. In addition, neither posterior column fracture nor intra-articular osteotomy was confirmed.

LESSONS

The CPO using Artis zeego resulted is a satisfactory outcome, and this is the 1st report in the world to discuss the benefits of Artis zeego in pelvic osteotomy.

New advances in intra-operative imaging in trauma

The invention of flat-panel detectors led to a revolution in medical imaging. The major benefits of this technology are a higher image quality and dose reduction. Flat-panel detectors have proved to be superior to standard C-arms (= C-arm with radiograph source and image intensifier).

Cone-beam computed tomography (cone-beam CT) is a 3D data set, which can be acquired with a flat-panel detector. The cone-shaped beam is used for 3D data generation. For cone-beam CT acquisition, the flat-panel detector rotates around the patient lying on the operating table. Intra-operative cone-beam CT can be a very helpful tool in orthopaedic surgery. Immediate control of fracture reduction and implant positioning in high image quality can reduce the need for secondary revision surgery due to implant malposition.

In recent years there has been a revival of standard fan beam CT technology in operating rooms. Fixed and mobile systems are available. Fixed systems are typically placed on a sliding gantry. Different mobile intra-operative CT scanners were recently introduced. Due to their mobility, they are not bound to a specific operating room. The use of standard intra-operative CT scanners results in high 3D image quality but, in comparison with a cone-beam CT scanner, fluoroscopy is not possible.

The introduction of flat-panel detectors has led to improvements in intra-operative image quality combined with dose reduction. The possibility of high-quality 3D imaging in combination with navigation can assure optimal implant placement. Due to immediate control of the osteosynthesis, revision surgery at a later time can be prevented.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170055