Minimally invasive anterior pelvic internal fixation: An anatomic study comparing Pelvic Bridge to INFIX

Treatment of unstable pelvic fractures with double INFIX

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the clinical efficacy of Double INFIX for the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 23 patients with unstable pelvic fractures treated using the Double INFIX minimally invasive technique. The cohort included five cases of Tile B1 type, eight cases of B2 type, six cases of B3 type, three cases of C1 type and one case of type C2. Pre- and postoperative evaluations included standardised pelvic serial films and three-dimensional CT scans. Key observational indicators were fracture reduction quality (assessed using Matta's criteria), fracture healing, functional recovery (evaluated with the Majeed function assessment criteria), and incidence of complications.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 24.48 ± 1.78 months. The average fracture healing time was 4.00 ± 1.41 months, and the average time for removal of fixation was 7.43 ± 1.75 months. Repeat imaging at 12 months postoperatively using Matta's criteria showed eight cases with excellent results (52.17%), 13 cases with good results (34.78%), three cases with fair results (13.04%), and no cases with poor results. The combined excellent and good rate was 86.96%, whereas the fair rate was 13.04%. The average Majeed hip joint function score at the final follow-up was 95.04 ± 1.72. Postoperative complications included meralgia paresthetica in two cases (8.7%) and sacrococcygeal discomfort in three patients when lying flat.

CONCLUSION

Double INFIX is a minimally invasive treatment technique with adequate clinical efficacy for managing unstable pelvic fractures.

Experimental and numerical assessment of two reconstructive techniques for the fragility fractures of the pelvis type Ia

Anterior pelvic ring fractures are common in geriatric patients. The Supraacetabular External Fixator (SEF) is a relatively simple and effective surgical procedure. On the other hand, there is the option of a Subcutaneous Iliopubic Plate (SIP) osteosynthesis. Only limited comparative biomechanical data of these two devices are available. Therefore, this biomechanical study's objective was to compare the stabilizing effect of the SEF versus the SIP in a model of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis (FFP) type Ia. A test stand for pelvic biomechanics testing that emulates the gait loading cycle with physiological relevance was used. The osteotomy on the right pelvic ring was stabilized either with the SEF or the SIP. Strain gauges were used to measure strain in the pelvic ring. The osteotomy's spatial interfragmentary displacement (SID) was monitored using a 3D digital image correlation system. The SEF stabilization reduced the SID by approximately 10%, whereas the locking SIP could reduce displacement by about 62%. Additionally, the SIP reduced the stress/strain levels by 67% in the posterior pelvic ring. We could demonstrate that the SIP is superior to SEF in treating FFP type Ia as it significantly reduced the osteotomy's SID and the strain in the posterior pelvic ring.

Clinical Experience with the New EASY (Endoscopic Approach to the Symphysis) Preparation Technique for Injuries of the Anterior Pelvic Ring

BACKGROUND

High-energy injuries of the anterior pelvic ring and especially disruptions of the pubic symphysis usually require surgical stabilization. There is a conflict between biomechanical stability and size in the surgical approach. We have previously presented a minimally invasive approach for symphyseal plating.

METHODS

Our current endoscopic surgical technique is presented step-by-step and is illustrated in a video. The results and courses of the first seven patients treated with the EASY preparation are presented.

RESULTS

In all seven patients, the EASY preparation was successful. In four of the seven patients with an anterior pelvic ring injury, we performed a complete endoscopic plate osteosynthesis of the pubic symphysis. One patient gave consent only for endoscopic preparation, in one patient, we converted to open plate due to ventilation problems, and in one patient, the superior pubic rami fracture was stable. There were no surgical complications.

CONCLUSION

The EASY is a feasible minimally invasive preparation technique to stabilize anterior pelvic ring injuries in the most biomechanically stable manner by performing plate osteosynthesis. However, further scientific monitoring is necessary to improve the technique and validate our data.

Subcutaneous anterior pelvic bridge — an innovative technique for fixation of selective acetabular fracture: a case series and literature review

Introduction

The aim of the study was to introduce an innovative technique involving the use of a subcutaneous anterior pelvic bridge (SAPB) in the treatment of selective acetabular fractures.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of 21 patients with acetabular fracture who were treated with SAPB between January 2016 and March 2021. The patients’ data were retrieved from electronic charts. Radiological results were evaluated according to the Matta system to assess the quality of the reduction and time of union. Functional outcomes were assessed in line with the d’Aubigné and Postel scoring system. Post-operative complications were also recorded.

Results

SAPB required around 60 minutes, with minimal blood loss and short learning curve. Matta score revealed excellent radiological outcomes in seventeen displaced fractures with seven excellent outcomes and nine good outcomes. Functional outcomes were excellent in twelve hips, good in seven hips, and fair in two hips. Six patients had transient lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy.

Discussion

The innovative SAPB method for the treatment of selective acetabular fracture is proven to be a feasible method with promising outcomes. SAPB is a minimally invasive technique and strengthens the stability of fixation, with less blood loss and fewer intra-operative/post-operative complications.

Danger zone - The spermatic cord during anterior plating of the symphysis pubis

BACKGROUND

Distances between anatomic landmarks and anatomic structures at risk are often underestimated by surgeons.

PURPOSE

The goal of the study was to evaluate the distances between anatomic landmarks and the spermatic cord in case of anterior plating of the symphysis.

METHODS

A total of 25 pelves (50 hemipelves) of male embalmed cadavers were dissected. A 5-hole 3.5mm locking compression plate (Synthes GmbH) was fixed from directly anterior on the symphysis. Measurements were taken 1) distance between the tips of both pubic tubercles, 2) horizontal interval between the lateral border of the plate and the medial margin of the SC (bilateral), 3) distances between the medial border of the SC and the tip of the pubic tubercle (bilateral), 4) distances between the medial border of the SC and the lateral basis of the pubic tubercle (bilateral).

RESULTS

The distance between the pubic tubercles was 60.3mm in average (SD: 5.7). The interval between the lateral border of the plate and the medial margin of the SC was on average 4.5mm (SD: 1.9) on the right and 4.7mm (SD: 2.6) on the left side. The distance between the tip of the pubic tubercle and the medial border of the SC was in average 11.2mm (SD: 2.7) on the right, and 11.0mm (SD: 2.7) on the left side. The average distance between the medial border of the SC and the lateral basis of the pubic tubercle was 8.1mm (SD: 2.4) on the right and 8.2 mm (SD: 2.4) on the left side.

CONCLUSION

The SC is at risk not only during dissection but also during anterior plating of the symphysis, because of its close relation to the SC.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Average distances between the palpable pubic tubercle and the SC are below one finger breadth (as reference).

Modified pedicle screw-rod versus anterior subcutaneous internal pelvic fixation for unstable anterior pelvic ring fracture: a retrospective study and finite element analysis

Objectives

This study compared the stability and clinical outcomes of modified pedicle screw-rod fixation (MPSRF) and anterior subcutaneous internal pelvic fixation (INFIX) for the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fractures using the Tornetta and Matta grading system and finite element analyses (FEA).

Methods

In a retrospective review of a consecutive patient series, 63 patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA)/Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) type B or C pelvic ring fractures were treated by MPRSF (n = 30) or INFIX (n = 33). The main outcome measures were the Majeed score, incidence of complications, and adverse outcomes, and fixation stability as evaluated by finite element analysis.

Results

Sixty-three patients were included in the study, with an average age of 34.4 and 36.2 in modified group and conventional group, respectively. Two groups did not differ in terms of the injury severity score, OTA classification, cause of injury, and time to pelvic surgery. However, the MPSRF group had a rate of higher satisfactory results according to the Tornetta and Matta grading system than the conventional group (73.33% vs 63.63%) as well as a higher Majeed score (81.5 ± 10.4 vs 76.3 ± 11.2), and these differences were statistically significant at 6 months post-surgery. FEA showed that MPSRF was stiffer and more stable than INFIX and had a lower risk of implant failure.

Conclusions

Both MPSRF and INFIX provide acceptable biomechanical stability for the treatment of unstable anterior pelvic ring fractures. However, MPSRF provides better fixation stability and a lower risk of implant failure, and can thus lead to better clinical outcomes. Therefore, MPSRF should be more widely applied to anterior pelvic ring fractures

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02618-9.

Minimally invasive internal fixation for unstable pelvic ring fractures: a retrospective study of 27 cases

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of anterior subcutaneous internal fixation (INFIX) with or without posterior fixation for the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures.

Methods

Intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and duration of hospital stay were recorded, and fracture union and postoperative complications were evaluated. The fracture reduction quality was evaluated using the Matta score, pelvic deformity index (PDI), and pubic symphyseal width (PSW). In addition, the functional recovery and general quality of life were evaluated using the Majeed score and the 12-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-12), respectively. Furthermore, sacral nerve injury was evaluated using the Gibbons classification.

Results

Twenty-seven patients (14 males and 13 females) with an average age of 37.4 years were followed up for a mean of 22 months. The average operation time, median intraoperative blood loss, and average duration of hospital stay were 129 ± 47 min, 100 mL, and 22 ± 13 days, respectively. All patients achieved bony union with an average union time of 13.3 weeks. Furthermore, the average PDI and PSW were 0.07 ± 0.04 vs. 0.04 ± 0.03 (P = 0.009) and 1.15 ± 1.36 vs. 0.54 ± 0.17 (P = 0.048) before and after the operation, respectively. In 78% of the patients, the Matta or Majeed scores were excellent or good. The SF-12 physical and mental health scores were 45.1 ± 10.2 and 53.2 ± 6.3, respectively. Furthermore, one superficial surgical site infection, one loosening of INFIX, one lateral femoral cutaneous nerve irritation, one femoral nerve injury, and two implant discomforts due to the bar were noted. Among five patients with sacral nerve injuries, four were asymptomatic, and one just had paresthesia at the last follow-up.

Conclusion

INFIX with or without sacroiliac screws can achieve satisfactory radiographic and functional outcomes in the treatment of unstable pelvic ring fractures.

Trial registration

ChiCTR2000038812. Registered 04 October 2020. Retrospectively registered.

[Comparison of effectiveness of anterior subcutaneous internal fixator and plate internal fixation for unstable anterior pelvic ring fractures]

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of anterior subcutaneous pelvic internal fixator (INFIX) and plate internal fixation in treatment of unstable anterior pelvic ring fractures.

Methods

The clinical data of 48 patients with unstable anterior pelvic ring fractures who met the selection criteria between June 2014 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 21 cases were treated with INFIX (INFIX group), and 27 cases were treated with plate (plate group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and fracture type between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, partial weight-bearing time, and complete weight-bearing time were recorded and compared between the two groups. Matta standard was used to evaluate the quality of fracture reduction, and Majeed score system was used to evaluate the functional recovery of pelvic fracture after operation.

Results

The patients in both groups were followed up for an average of 12.5 months (range, 6-16 months). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in INFIX group were significantly lower than those in plate group ( t=-11.965, P=0.000; t=-20.105, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in the quality of fracture reduction, fracture healing time, partial weight-bearing time, and complete weight-bearing time between the two groups ( P>0.05). At 14 weeks after operation, there was no significant difference in the scores of pain, working, standing and walking, and total scores between INFIX group and plate group ( P>0.05), but there were significant differences in sitting and sexual intercourse scores ( t=-4.250, P=0.003; t=-6.135, P=0.006). The incidences of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, femoral nerve injury, and heterotopic ossification were significantly higher in INFIX group than in plate group ( P<0.05), while the incidence of incision infection was lower in INFIX group than in plate group ( P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the plate internal fixation, the INFIX internal fixation can obtain the similar effectiveness for the unstable anterior pelvic ring fracture and has the advantages of shorter operation time, less blood loss, and lower risk of infection.

[Comparison study of minimally invasive percutaneous bridge internal fixator and traditional external fixator in treatment of unstable pelvic fractures]

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of unstable pelvic fractures treated with minimally invasive percutaneous bridge internal fixator or traditional external fixator.

Methods

The clinical data of 45 patients with unstable pelvic fractures who met the selection criteria between January 2013 and February 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different surgical methods, they were divided into two groups. In the observation group (25 cases), minimally invasive percutaneous bridge internal fixators were used, and three-dimensional printing pelvic models were used to simulate the reduction and fixation before operation to develop individual reduction strategies. In the control group (20 cases), external fixators were used. There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, cause of injury, fracture type (according to Tile classification), and time from injury to operation ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The reduction quality was evaluated according to the Matta standard, and functional recovery was evaluated according to the Majeed scoring standard.

Results

All patients were followed up 12-20 months (mean, 15 months). The operation time of the observation group was significantly longer than that of the control group ( t=2.719, P=0.009); no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss was found between the two groups ( t=0.784, P=0.437). There was no significant difference between the two groups in fracture healing time ( t=0.967, P=0.341). According to the Matta standard, the excellent and good rate of the observation group was 92%, and that of the control group was 70%, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( χ ² =3.748, P=0.053). At last follow-up, according to the Majeed scoring standard, the excellent and good rate of the observation group was 88%, and that of the control group was 60%, showing significant difference between the two groups ( χ ² =4.717, P=0.030). The incidences of incision and nailway infection, secondary displacement of fracture, and malunion in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group ( P<0.05); the differences in incidences of iatrogenic injury of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, deep vein thrombosis, and loosening of fixation between the two groups were not significant ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

Minimally invasive percutaneous bridge internal fixator is a safe and effective method for the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures. It has the advantages of minimal trauma, stable fixation, less interference to patients' daily life, early functional exercise, and quickly recovery after operation.

[Research progress on minimally invasive treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture]

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the related research results of minimally invasive treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture, and to improve the understanding of minimally invasive treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture.

METHODS

The literature of minimally invasive treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture at domestic and overseas in recent years was reviewed, and the reduction and fixation methods of minimally invasive treatment were summarized and analyzed.

RESULTS

The pelvic reduction frame may be an effective auxiliary method for minimally invasive reduction of pelvis. The fixation methods of anterior pelvic ring include percutaneous screw fixation, stent fixation, and percutaneous plate fixation.

CONCLUSION

One kind of fixation is not applicable to all types of anterior pelvic ring fracture, and the fixation method should be selected according to the type of fracture and the patient's condition to minimize the complications.

Use of INFIX for managing unstable anterior pelvic ring injuries: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Subcutaneous screw rod system which is popularly known as Pelvic internal fixator (INFIX) has emerged as an alternative to external fixators in management of unstable pelvic injuries. INFIX has shown various advantages over external fixation such as reduced infection rate and patient morbidity. However, it has its own set of complications such as lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, heterotopic ossification, femoral nerve palsy etc. We intended to conduct a systematic review of the current literature to assess outcomes and complications with INFIX technique of fixation.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of literature was performed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and online database of EMBASE, PubMed, Medline and Scopus was searched for all studies in English language till March 2020. Included studies were reviewed for demographic data, fracture type/classification, radiological outcome and functional outcomes. The inclusion criteria were: 1. Studies in English language 2. Clinical studies reporting use of INFIX technique in pelvis fracture where clinical and radiological outcomes were reported.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this systematic review with total of 619 patients. Radiographic parameters and outcome measures were infrequently reported. Fixation with INFIX in these fractures leads to 87% excellent to good radiological results and 84% excellent to good functional results. Complications include lateral femoral cutaneous nerve irritation (25.3%), heterotopic ossification (24.7%), infection (3%), and femoral nerve palsy (1.6%); which is likely related to placing the bar and screws too deep.

CONCLUSION

This analysis supports the use of INFIX in management of unstable pelvis fractures where anterior fixation is required.

The Anterior Subcutaneous Pelvic Ring Fixator: No Biomechanical Advantages Compared with External Fixation

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous fixation of the anterior pelvic ring is an emerging surgical technique for trauma patients. The aim of this study was to biomechanically evaluate 2 internal fixation devices for stabilizing a disrupted pelvic ring and compare them with traditional external fixation.

METHODS

Thirty-six synthetic pelvises with a simulated unstable ring fracture (anteroposterior compression type III) were divided into 3 groups. Group A underwent fixation with a supra-acetabular external fixator; group B, with an internal fixator using the USS II polyaxial system; and group C, with an internal fixator using the Click'X polyaxial system. Biomechanical testing included measurement of peak-to-peak displacement at 300, 400, and 500 N; total displacement; plastic deformation; stiffness; and fracture-line displacement.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis of all measured parameters revealed no significant differences among the groups. However, vertical displacement of the preshaped connecting rod within the screw heads occurred as a result of inadequate stability of the internal fixation at the rod-screw interface.

CONCLUSIONS

Although internal fixator devices are placed close to the bone and should therefore maintain greater stiffness, our data did not support the hypothesis of superior stability. Special attention is required when using a curved connecting rod as the rod is easily displaced, placing relevant anatomical structures at risk. These devices require further refinement to avoid potential patient injury.

Safe Supra-Acetabular Pin Insertion in Relation to Intraosseous Depth

In pelvic fractures, dysfunction of the pelvic ring is often stabilized with supra-acetabular pin insertion. In existing literature, there are heterogeneous indications on proper pins selection and inclinations. Therefore, this study aimed to quantify the narrowing of safe pin corridors in the transverse and sagittal planes with increments of intraosseous screw depths. A computer algorithm created cross-sections over three-dimensional pelvic reconstructions at sagittal inclinations from 45° cranial to 45° caudal in 5° increments. Templates of screw depths spanning 60-120 mm in 15 mm increments were disposed in the transverse plane from 45° medial to 45° lateral. Each intraosseous screw depth and transverse angle were evaluated for intraosseous containment to evaluate ranges narrowing with increasing screw depths. The 60-mm depth resulted in the largest sagittal range (60.9° ± 6.9°) and transverse range (27.5° ± 4.1°) at 30° caudal. Increasing depths by 15 mm resulted in ranges being significantly different from one another (p < 0.01). The sagittal plane of 20° cranial had the highest frequency of insertion for all depths, while transverse ranges were narrowed (p < 0.01). Bisecting angles were similar for sagittal planes 20° cranial to 30° caudal with an average of 27.9° ± 1.2° (p ≥ 0.115). In conclusion, while 60 mm depths can be inserted with the highest discretion, 15 mm increments in depth significantly reduce safe ranges. Screws depths above 90 mm have low frequencies of insertion, should be inserted more cranially and must be considered prone to breaching. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:1790-1797, 2019.

The use of anterior subcutaneous internal fixation (INFIX) for treatment of pelvic ring injuries in major trauma patients, complications and outcomes

Purpose: Pelvic anterior internal fixators (INFIX) are a relatively new alternative in the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures. The authors wanted to review the use of complications and outcomes of this method of pelvic fixation at our institution.

Method: Patients over the age of 18 who had an INFIX used in treatment of their pelvic ring injury were identified. Patient demographics, fracture type, injury severity score, morbidity, complications and time until removal were recorded. All available patients were followed up following the removal of the INFIX and completed an Iowa Pelvic Score (IPS) at this time.

Results and Discussion: 24 patients (19 male) with a mean age of 38.5 (range 18–71) met the inclusion criteria with an average injury severity score of 29.8 (10–66). The most common complication following insertion was a lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury, which occurred in 11 patients (bilaterally in two), 6 patients (25%) had ongoing numbness 6 months post removal. Two patients had an infection, one of which prompted the removal of the INFIX. One INFIX was removed for implant failure. All other removals were planned electively. Heterotopic ossification was noted to have occurred in five cases. The mean IPS following removal of the INFIX was 79.2 (52–100). INFIX is a safe and successful treatment for unstable pelvic ring injuries. Overall, patients tolerate the INFIX well with good outcome scores. The main concern being the high rate of LFCN injuries, although many resolved after removal of the INFIX.

Pelvic ring fractures in the elderly

Pelvic ring fractures are rare injuries in the elderly though the incidence is increasing due to the increasing age of the population.

Main goal of treatment is the quickest possible re-mobilization to prevent side-effects of immobilization such as osteopenia, pulmonary infections or thromboembolic events.

Isolated anterior pelvic ring fractures are stable injuries and therefore they usually can be treated conservatively, while pelvic ring injuries with involvement of the posterior ring are considered unstable and should undergo surgical stabilization if the patient’s condition allows for it.

Conservative treatment includes adequate analgesia, guided mobilization with partial weight bearing if possible and osteoanabolic medication.

The appropriate surgical procedure should be discussed in an interdisciplinary round considering patient’s pre-injury condition, anaesthetic and surgical risks.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180062

Modified internal fixator for anterior pelvic ring fractures versus conventional two-screw fixation

PURPOSE

The present study aims to evaluate the short-term clinical effects and complications of modified three-screw fixation and conventional two-screw fixation for treating anterior pelvic ring fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 51 patients with type B fractures was performed. 25 patients (modified group) were treated with modified three-screw fixation and the other 26 patients (conventional group) with conventional two-screw fixation. Outcome measures included operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stays, postoperative complications and the Majeed score at postoperatively 2 months, 3 months, 1 year and the time of implant removal.

RESULTS

The mean operative times and mean blood loss for modified three-screw fixation versus conventional two-screw fixation bilateral were 54.8 ± 10.7 min versus 32.3 ± 9.9 min, and 153.3 mL versus 550.0 mL (p < 0.001), respectively. However, the Majeed score was better in modified group at postoperatively 2 months (75.6 ± 9.5 vs. 69.7 ± 8.3, p = 0.008) and 3 months (80.3 ± 10.7 vs. 75.1 ± 11.9, p = 0.014). There was no statistical difference between two groups at the time of implant removal (82.1 ± 9.3 vs. 80.9 ± 8.8, p = 0.272) and postoperatively 1 year (83.5 ± 7.8 vs 82.6 ± 8.2, p = 0.723). No patients experienced surgical wound infection, deep vein thrombosis, delayed union or nonunion, implant loosening or rupture. One patient complained of tardive unilateral thigh pain at postoperatively 4 months in conventional group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both modified three-screw fixation and conventional two-screw fixation could ultimately afford satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes with less complication for anterior pelvic ring fractures. The modified three-screw fixation might have better biomechanical strength and faster pelvic rehabilitation.

Minimally Invasive Endoscopic-Assisted Technique for Implant Removal After Pelvic Bridge Plating

Subcutaneous internal plate fixation for anterior pelvic ring injuries has become more common, but implants require removal, usually by 12 weeks. The purpose of this article is to report a novel, minimally invasive, endoscopic-assisted technique for the removal of subcutaneous anterior pelvic plates safely and atraumatically without violating the underlying fascia.

The Pelvic Bridge: A Subcutaneous Approach for Anterior Pelvic Fixation

Introduction

An alternative method to external fixation for the treatment of unstable anterior pelvic ring injuries, termed the pelvic bridge technique, provides equivalent results with fewer complications and is performed using occipital cervical rods subcutaneously, with fixation into the iliac wings and parasymphyseal bone.

Indications & Contraindications

Step 1 Preoperative Planning

For preoperative planning, review the appropriate imaging, including radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans, to mesh the findings on imaging to the clinical picture of the patient and ensure that the patient meets operative criteria and that none of the contraindications are present.

Step 2 Patient Positioning

Position the patient to facilitate anterior and posterior fixation.

Step 3 Approach

Make the incisions necessary to expose the osseous contour where fixation will be utilized.

Step 4 Contouring the Plate-Rod Construct

Carefully contour the plate-rod construct, which is necessary to minimize postoperative complications.

Step 5 Passing the Plate-Rod Construct

Use care when inserting the rod as doing so will help to avoid neurovascular complications.

Step 6 Achieving Adequate Reduction

To recreate pelvic stability, the pelvic ring needs to heal in as close to anatomic position as possible and there are multiple methods that help to obtain an adequate reduction.

Step 7 Fracture Fixation

Multiple constructs may be used to stabilize the anterior pelvic ring, but the fundamental principle is to attach the 2 hemipelves to achieve stability, and the location where fixation can be achieved depends on the fracture pattern.

Step 8 Wound Closure

Ensure meticulous closure to reduce the chance of infection and achieve appropriate soft-tissue coverage over hardware.

Step 9 Rehabilitation

Early mobilization is a fundamental goal of this procedure, but the time to full weight-bearing is dependent on fracture characteristics and healing.

Results

Anterior pelvic internal fixation (APIF) using the pelvic bridge technique has been demonstrated to have significantly fewer complications than APEF².

Pitfalls & Challenges