Reconstructive surgery for foot and ankle defects in pediatric patients: Comparison between anterolateral thigh perforator flaps and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps

Individualized design program of multiple flaps for adapting different zones to repair large irregular wounds in children

Objective

Management of large irregular wounds in children had been confusing plastic and reconstructive surgeons. Herein, this study was aimed to propose a new treatment method based on the principle of adapting different recipient zones to overcome the intractable wounds, simplifying and programing the design process of targeted flaps for covering large irregular soft-tissue defects.

Patients and methods

From January 2009 to December 2020, 31 children (9 girls and 22 boys) aged 3-16 years (mean 9.8 years) underwent multiple modular flaps with edge to edge splicing reconstruction of the lower extremities. All the wounds were large with non-adjacent defects and with or without a dead space. Several variants of flaps were harvested according to the needs and reconstruction requirements of patients.

Results

A total of 71 flaps were harvested from 31 patients and all flaps donor sites received primary closure. Nine patients underwent split-thickness skin grafting, and three cases of flaps survived from vascular crisis by rebuilding the vessels and the rest accepting LD flap transplants. And five partial necrosis of the distal epidermis flaps recovered using skin grafting and dressing change. No major complication was encountered in other patients and donor sites, except one heel ulcer. During the follow-up (ranging from 16 to 38 months, mean 27.7 months), aesthetic and functional results of reconstructed limbs were satisfactory in all patients.

Conclusions

The Individualized design program of multiple flaps for adapting different recipient zones is an alternative for repairing large irregular soft-tissue defects in children, beneficial for plastic and reconstructive surgeons to simplify and program the process of designing and perform multiple flaps to achieve this goal.

Level of evidence

III, Retrospective.

Surgical Considerations of One-Stage Reconstruction of Large Extremity Defects Using a Thin Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap

Background  One-stage reconstruction with "thin perforator flaps" has been attempted to salvage limbs and restore function. The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is a commonly utilized flap in breast reconstruction (BR). The purpose of this study is to present the versatility of DIEP flaps for the reconstruction of large defects of the extremities. Methods  Patients with large tissue defects on extremities who were treated with thin DIEP flaps from January 2016 to January 2018 were included. They were minimally followed up for 36 months. We analyzed the etiology and location of the soft tissue defect, flap design, anastomosis type, outcome, and complications. We also considered the technical differences in the DIEP flap between breast and extremity reconstruction. Results  Overall, six free DIEP flaps were included in the study. The flap size ranged from 15 × 12 to 30 × 16 cm 2 . All flaps were transversely designed similar to a traditional BR design. Three flaps were elevated with two perforators. Primary closure of the donor site was possible in all cases. Five flaps survived with no complications. However, partial necrosis occurred in one flap. Conclusion  A DIEP flap is not the first choice for soft tissue defects, but it should be considered for one-stage reconstruction of large defects when the circulation zone of the DIEP flap is considered. In addition, this flap has many advantages over other flaps such as provision of the largest skin paddle, low donor site morbidity with a concealed scar, versatile supercharging technique, and a long pedicle.

Patient-reported outcomes following free flap lower extremity reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Free flap reconstruction in the lower extremity has shown success for the management of large and complex defects, restoration of function, and favorable aesthetic outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have not been well explored in previous literature. This meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of PROs after free flap reconstruction in the lower extremity.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 1946 to 2021 for studies reporting on PROs following free flap reconstruction in the lower extremity.

RESULTS

Overall, 53 studies were included, and 11 studies reported validated PRO measures for meta-analysis. A total of 1953 patients underwent reconstruction with 1958 free flaps for lower limb defects with a mean follow-up of 3.26 (0.25-7.83) months. The mean postoperative Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) scores were 60.3 (±12) out of 80 points (4 studies, 85 patients). The mean postoperative AOFAS scores were 75.1 (±15) out of 100 points (4 studies, 68 patients). The mean postoperative SF-36 scores were 88.1 (±8.0) out of 100 points; mental health component was 48.7 (±8.9), and physical component was 38.4 (±8.2), out of 50 points (4 studies, 88 patients).

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated that patients report improved physical health, mental health, and function following lower extremity reconstruction with free flaps. Patients reported similar improvements in functional scores following lower extremity reconstruction regardless of their free flap type. Furthermore, patients with myocutaneous flaps may have improved mental health and worse physical health scores when compared to perforator flaps. The evidence profiles presented in this review indicate that additional research is needed to help guide future decision-making.

Comparison of "complications" and functional outcome of anterolateral thigh flap and sural neurofasciocutaneus flap for foot and ankle reconstruction: A single center cohort study

BACKGROUND

Skin and soft-tissue defects around the foot and ankle remain a challenge for orthopedic and plastic surgeons. Anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap and sural neurofasciocutaneous (NFC) flap are both used to reconstruct lower-extremity soft-tissue defects. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of the two flaps and attempt to provide an optimal strategy.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted, reviewing data from 93 patients who underwent reconstruction of wounds around the foot and ankle with ALT flap (42 cases) or NFC flap (51 cases) from January 2014 to January 2020. Patients' demographics, characteristics of the defect, complications, cosmetic appearance, and functional outcome were analyzed, and statistical analysis was performed.

RESULT

There was no difference in gender and etiology; however, NFC flaps were more frequently used in elderly patients. Mean size of the flap in the ALT group was significantly larger in comparison with the NFC group. The ALT group had longer operation and hospitalization time than the NFC group (P < 0.05). The incidence of partial necrosis in ALT group was significantly lower than that in NFC group, while its general complications rate was higher. In long-term follow-up, esthetic appearance of the reconstructed site was comparable in both groups, the ALT group had a higher ratio of revision surgery. Moreover, the ALT group showed better overall esthetic outcomes in the donor site.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that anterolateral thigh flaps in wound coverage of foot and ankle achieved better outcomes than neurofasciocutaneous flaps in terms of recipient benefits and donor-site compromise with a special indication for larger and more distally located defects.

Microsurgical Anterolateral Thigh Flap for Reconstruction of Extremity Soft Tissue Defects in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

The anterolateral thigh flap is one of the most widely used flaps because it has the advantages of less damage to the donor site, no sacrifice of main blood vessels, and abundant soft tissue. However, the application of anterolateral thigh flap in children is relatively rare because of small blood vessels and rapid physiological changes. The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness and characteristics of free anterolateral thigh flaps for the reconstruction of extremity soft tissue defects in pediatric patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 26 pediatric patients, with an average age of 6.7 years (range, 2-13 years). There were 5 cases of upper limb defects and 21 cases of lower limb defects, all of which were accompanied by exposed bones or tendons. The causes of defects included traffic injury in 9 cases, mechanical injury in 7 cases, collision injury in 4 cases, spoke injury in 3 cases, cicatricial contracture in 2 cases, and fibroma in 1 case. All defects were reconstructed with free anterolateral thigh flaps.

RESULTS

Twenty-six anterolateral thigh flaps were harvested, including 15 fasciocutaneous flaps and 11 musculocutaneous flaps. The mean size of the flap was 73.4 cm2 (range, 4 × 3 to 24 × 8 cm). The donor sites were sutured directly in 19 cases and underwent split-thickness skin grafting in 7 cases. There were 3 cases of vascular crisis, 3 cases of flap edge necrosis, 3 cases of infection, 1 case of pressure ulcer, and 1 case of dehiscence after surgery. Eleven patients had scar hyperplasia in the donor site. A total of 34 reoperations were performed, including 14 flap debulking, 7 debridement, 4 skin graft, 3 vascular crisis re-exploration, and 6 other procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Free anterolateral thigh flap was a safe and reliable option for reconstructing soft tissue defects of extremities in pediatric patients. Notably, the incidence of scar hyperplasia in the donor site and the possibility of reoperation in pediatric patients were higher than those in adult patients.

Thin and superthin free flaps: An innovative approach to pediatric extremity reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Published standards for the management of open extremity fractures have improved limb salvage, fracture union, and deep infection rates, but the aesthetic and functional importance of our flap choices has been overlooked. Thin and superthin free flaps exhibit advantages over traditional free flaps in some situations but have seldom been reported in children. The aim of this paper is to present our experience of thin and superthin free flaps in pediatric extremity reconstruction.

METHODS

Children (≤13 years) who underwent soft tissue reconstruction using a thin and superthin free flap following major extremity trauma are presented.

RESULTS

Five patients (5 flaps) met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 9 (range 6-13). There were 3 Gustilo IIIB open fractures and 2 multiplanar degloving injuries. The median mangled extremity severity score (MESS) was 4 (range 2-6). The median time from injury to definitive soft tissue closure was 72 h (range 28-120 h). Four anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps were raised as thin flaps, and 1 superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) was raised as a superthin flap. There was one re-exploration owing to venous congestion, and a second venous anastomosis was performed to enhance flap drainage. The same ALT flap exhibited necrosis at one margin, which was debrided and grafted before discharge. There were no other flap complications. No flap-related secondary surgeries were required.

CONCLUSION

Thin and superthin free flaps are viable options in pediatric extremity reconstruction. They exhibit excellent aesthetic and functional contouring when a slender fasciocutaneous flap is needed, especially when body habitus renders traditional options unfavorable.

Strategies for selecting perforator vessels for transverse and oblique DIEP flap in male pediatric patients: Anatomical study and clinical applications

BACKGROUND

Transverse and oblique deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps are widely used in breast, lower extremity, urogenital, head and neck reconstruction. In this report, we present our experience with selecting perforator vessels for transverse and oblique DIEP flaps based on an anatomical study and clinical cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A detailed anatomical study of the DIEP flap was carried out using a standardized injection of lead oxide in 10 fresh cadavers. Additionally, 35 male pediatric patients (age 5-12 years) underwent lower extremity reconstruction with a DIEP flap. A transverse DIEP flap was used when the defect template did not exceed zone IV, while an oblique DIEP flap was used when the defect template exceeded zone IV.

RESULTS

Perforators located below the umbilicus in zones I and II were rich in transverse anastomoses across the midline of the abdominal wall, which is the basis for the transverse DIEP flap. Perforators lateral to the umbilicus in zone I had true anastomoses with the musculophrenic artery, the morphological basis for the oblique DIEP flap. The DIEP flap design was transverse in 20 patients and oblique in 15. Flap sizes ranged from 8 × 4.5 cm² to 24 × 9 cm². One oblique DIEP flap was necrosed totally, and it was repaired by a latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap.

CONCLUSION

The transverse DIEP flap design based on the perforator located below the umbilicus in zone I is recommended for small skin and soft tissue defects. We recommend the use of the oblique DIEP flap design based on the perforator lateral to the umbilicus in zone I as an extended flap to reconstruct large tissue defects.

Is Pregnancy Following a TRAM or DIEP Flap Safe? A Critical Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous data were not conclusive on the safety of gestation in patients whose abdominal flaps were earlier harvested. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the abdominal wall complications and birth mode of pregnancy in post-TRAM or post-DIEP harvested individuals.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google scholar database. Heterogeneity was statistically analyzed, and random effect models were applied. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot.

RESULTS

We included 25 papers that captured 56 patients giving birth to 69 healthy babies after elevation of abdominally based flaps, with a pooled abdominal complication rate of 0.00-0.09. The complication incidence in TRAM group was 0.01 (95% CI = [0.00-0.14%]) while 0.00 in the DIEP group (95% CI = [0.00-0.26%]). Discrepancies in incidence following unilaterally or bilaterally based TRAM flaps, following free or pedicled TRAM flaps, following primary sutured or mesh strengthened fascia, following MS free TRAM or conventional free TRAM could not be calculated as statistically significant. TRAM group and DIEP group patients had identical birth modes.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis did not detect evidence that abdominal walls with the prior harvest of abdominal flaps could affect the process of pregnancy or contraindicate vaginal delivery. No abdominal hernia or bulge occurred with post-DIEP pregnancies. However, such conclusions need to be substantiated by larger sample studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Novel Design of the Chimeric Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap that Provides for Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Composite Tissue Defects of the Heel in Children

Objective

The aim of the present study was to report a novel design of the chimeric deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) to achieve dead space filling, Achilles tendon bridging, and skin resurfacing simultaneously with minimal donor‐site morbidity.

Methods

From September 2012 to May 2016, a retrospective study was carried out on six pediatric patients with composite soft tissue defects of the heel that were repaired with the chimeric DIEP flap. The chimeric flap design included a flap of the anterior sheath of the rectus, a block of rectus muscle, and a large skin paddle. All the parts were supplied by a common artery. After harvesting the flap, all element parts were inserted at the corresponding sites in a tension‐free manner. With one set of vessel anastomoses at the recipient site, accurate repair with tendon reconstruction, dead space elimination, and wound covering were accomplished. The donor site incisions were closed initially. Data on patient age, medical history, injury severity, defect size, flap dimensions, recipient vessels, donor site closure, complications, and follow‐up were collected and reviewed.

Results

Five of the six chimeric DIEP flaps survived without complications. The remaining one case experienced partial necrosis of the skin paddle caused by venous congestion, which healed after routine dressing changes. Primary donor site closure was accomplished in all cases. The mean follow‐up was 18.6 months (range, 10–36 months). Five patients had satisfactory aesthetic and functional outcomes; one patient needed a secondary debulking procedure. Compared to the unaffected side, the affected side showed no obvious difference for ankle movement, tiptoe function, and patient gait during the follow‐up period. Good ankle function was observed in all patients. There was no donor site breakdown, with only a slightly noticeable linear scar.

Conclusion

The chimeric DIEP flap reduced the operative time, solved the problem of deficiency of recipient vessels, and attained satisfactory functional and aesthetic outcomes with low donor site morbidity. Therefore, it is a promising option for three‐dimensional reconstruction of composite defects with dead space and Achilles tendon defects as well as skin loss in children.

The esthetic outcome of lower limb reconstruction

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the progress of anatomical knowledge and microsurgical techniques, in particular the development of perforator flaps, has risen the number of flaps available for lower leg reconstruction. The esthetic consequences of flap choice and harvest do have an impact on patients' quality of life. Nowadays, more researchers evaluate the esthetic changes following lower limb reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to summarize the available evidence on the esthetic outcome of lower limb reconstruction.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review was planned to identify the most relevant indexed articles on this subject. The search was performed on Pubmed database without date of publication limits.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All papers about reporting information about the esthetic outcome of lower limb reconstruction were selected. Case reports and the articles not including specific information about complications, secondary procedures, and outcomes were excluded. The articles were categorized according to their topic and date of publication. The full texts of all the articles were obtained and read thoroughly. The references for each article were screened to identify articles that were eventually left outside our database search.

PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS

One hundred and eight articles were retained for the definitive review. Eleven review articles were kept because they represented a good source of information. Thirty-three articles were added after reading the full texts. The articles appear highly heterogeneous and at, this stage, only a critical and qualitative analysis could be performed.

RESULTS

We found information about 7895 lower reconstructions, 1295 local flaps, 6546 free flaps.

LIMITATIONS

The esthetic evaluation is intrinsic subjective. Many psychological and cultural factors influence both the patient and the surgeon. There is not a validated assessment tool for the esthetic outcome of lower leg reconstruction. Therefore, no quantitative analysis was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Some ancient techniques are today obsolete, like the rectus abdominis free muscle flaps and perhaps free forearm flap, others are always useful, like gracilis and latissimus dorsi free flap. ALT flap is the most versatile perforator flap today available, but the SCIP flap is gaining the favor of a growing number of surgeons. Local flaps will be always performed with success but their indications should not be pushed beyond the medium-size defects. The best cosmetic outcome for each patient cannot necessarily be obtained neither with the easiest techniques nor with the most technically demanding ones. It is necessary to develop validated tools to assess the cosmetic outcome of lower limb reconstruction.

Selecting a free flap for soft tissue coverage in lower extremity reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Goals of lower extremity microvascular reconstruction (LEMR) include the restoration of function, prevention of infection, and optimal cosmesis. Indications for LEMR include large defects that are not amenable to pedicled options, a large zone of injury, and large complex defects. The novice microsurgeon should first master a handful of free flaps to develop an armamentarium of options for addressing such defects. The scope of this review is to provide free flap options for LEMR in any of the thirds of the lower leg. After reading this article, the reader will understand variations, advantages, disadvantages, indications, and tips for raising each of these flaps.

METHODS

Six most commonly used free flaps for LEMR are described in this paper, including the anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) and its variations, the radial forearm flap (RFFF), the lateral arm flap (LAF), the gracilis muscle flap, the rectus abdominis flap (RAF) and the latissimus dorsi flap and its variations. Indications, advantages, disadvantages and technique tips are discussed for each flap. Moreover, selection of the recipient vessels, preoperative management along with an algorithm are also provided.

CONCLUSIONS

The ALT flap is a workhorse in covering defects of the leg, foot, and ankle. It's the flap of choice at our institution, especially given the number of traumatic wounds seen as a result of motor vehicles, all-terrain vehicles (ATV), lawnmowers, and gunshot wounds (GSW). At times, the lower extremity zone of injury requires a distant donor site. The RAF can also provide coverage for large soft tissue defects but donor-site morbidity remains its main drawback. The LAF and RFFF provide two pliable options, one that provides pliable soft tissue with minimal donor site morbidity and another that provides a long pedicle. The free gracilis flap is an excellent choice for crossing the ankle joint. Lastly, the free latissimus dorsi is indicated for large defects of the lower extremity independently of the location.