Morbid obesity and short-term complications following acetabular fracture surgery: A comparative cohort study

Morbid obesity is associated with outcomes in patients undergoing vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a nationwide inpatient sample analysis

BACKGROUND

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) significantly affect older adults, leading to considerable morbidity and healthcare costs. Despite the known health risks of morbid obesity, its impact on surgical outcomes of OVCF remains underexplored. This study examines the influence of morbid obesity on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing vertebral augmentation procedures, specifically vertebroplasty (VP) or kyphoplasty (KP).

METHODS

We analyzed data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for hospitalized patients aged 60 years or older undergoing VP or KP for OVCF from 2005 to 2020. Morbid obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) above 40 kg/m². The primary outcomes assessed in-hospital mortality, discharge destinations, hospital stays, costs, and complications. Logistic and linear regressions adjusted for confounders were used to determine the impact of morbid obesity on these outcomes.

RESULTS

The analysis included 4734 patients. Patients with morbid obesity accounted for 30.1% of the study sample. After adjustment for relevant demographic and clinical confounders, morbid obesity was significantly associated with increased risks of unfavorable discharge (adjusted OR (aOR): 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-1.42, P=0.002) and overall complication (aOR=1.15, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.30, P=0.041), including venous thromboembolism (VTE; aOR=1.57, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.30, P=0.020, P=0.003), urinary tract infection (aOR=1.35, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.60, P=0.001), and acute kidney injury (AKI; aOR: 1.47, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.78, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Morbid obesity is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term outcomes in patients undergoing VP or KP for OVCF, including unfavorable discharge and specific complications. These findings contribute insights to preoperative risk stratification and encourage clinicians to be more vigilant in managing this high-risk population. Further prospective research is still needed to confirm these associations and develop effective interventions.

Obesity classification predicts early complications and mortality after acetabular fracture

INTRODUCTION

Obesity remains a global epidemic. The effect of obesity on the risk of complications after acetabular fracture is unknown. Here, we evaluate the effect of BMI on early complications and mortality after acetabular fracture. We hypothesize that the risk of inpatient complications and mortality will be greater in patients with high BMI when compared to those with normal BMI.

METHODS

Adult patients with acetabular fracture were identified via the Trauma Quality Improvement Program data from 2015 to 2019. The primary outcome was overall complication rate with reference to normal-weight patients (BMI = 25-30 kg/m2). The secondary outcome was rates of death. The association of obesity class on the primary and secondary outcomes was assessed using Bonferroni-corrected multiple logistic regression models considering patient, injury, and treatment covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 99,721 patients with acetabular fracture were identified. Class I obesity (BMI = 30-35 kg/m2) was associated with 1.2 greater adjusted relative risk (aRR; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.3) of any adverse event, without significant increases in adjusted risk of death. Class II obesity (BMI = 35-40 kg/m2) was associated with aRR = 1.2 (95% CI 1.1-1.3) of any adverse event and aRR = 1.5 (95% CI 1.2-2.0) of death. Class III obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) was associated with aRR = 1.3 (95% CI 1.2-1.4) of any adverse event and aRR = 2.3 (95% CI 1.8-2.9) of death.

CONCLUSION

Obesity is associated greater risk of adverse events and death following acetabular fracture. Obesity severity classification scales with these risks.

Does local fat thickness correlate with post-operative infection in open reduction and internal fixation of acetabulum fractures?

PURPOSE

Obesity is an epidemic which increases risk of many surgical procedures. Previous studies in spine and hip arthroplasty have shown that fat thickness measured on preoperative imaging may be as or more reliable in assessment of risk of post-operative infection and/or wound complications than body mass index (BMI). We hypothesized that, similarly, increased local fat thickness at the surgical site is a predictor of wound complication in acetabulum fracture surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of an acetabulum fracture through a Kocher-Langenbeck (K-L) approach at a single institution from 2013 to 2020 were identified. Pre-operative CT scans were used to measure fat thickness from the skin to the greater trochanter in line with the surgical approach. Post-operative infections and wound complications were recorded and associated with fat thickness and BMI.

RESULTS

238 patients met inclusion criteria. 12 patients had either infection or a wound complication (5.0%). There was no significant association with BMI or preoperative fat thickness on post-operative infection or wound complication (p-value 0.73 and 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no statistically significant association of post-operative infection or wound complications in patients with increased soft tissue thickness or increased BMI. ORIF of acetabulum fractures through a K-L approach can be performed safely in patients with large subcutaneous fat thickness and high BMI with low risk of infection or wound complications.

Opportunistic Use of Computed Tomography to Determine Muscle-Adipose Ratio Reliably Predicts Wound Complications After Kocher-Langenbeck Surgical Exposure of the Acetabulum

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether muscle-to-adipose ratio (MAR) along the course of a Kocher-Langenbeck incision is more accurate at predicting postoperative wound complications after acetabular fixation than waist-to-hip ratio or body mass index (BMI).

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Level 1 Trauma Center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients who sustained an acetabular fracture and had fixation through a Kocher-Langenbeck approach from January 1 st , 2008 to December 31 st , 2018. For inclusion, patients had to have a pre-operative and a post-operative CT of the pelvis and a minimum follow up of 12 months. Patients were excluded if an antibiotic other than cefazolin was administered for prophylaxis, if they had a femur fracture treated with an antegrade intramedullary nail, if there was any associated pelvic ring injury requiring surgical treatment of any type, if there were any abdominal or pelvic procedures completed by another surgical service, if the patient underwent pelvic embolization of a vessel, if there was presence of a genitourinary injury or Morel-Lavallée lesion, or if there was a subsequent surgical procedure unrelated to the primary endpoint (e.g., revision fixation).

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Presence of a surgical site infection or a wound healing complication. BMI, WHR and MAR were evaluated and compared for their ability to predict a surgical site infection or a wound healing complication.

RESULTS

One-hundred ninety-three patients were included in this study, and the mean follow-up was 17.4 months. Thirty patients (15.5%) developed a wound complication. Seventeen patients (8.8%) developed a superficial infection and 13 (6.7%) developed a deep infection. The mean BMI for those who developed a wound complication was 35.9. The mean MAR was 0.67 for patients who developed a wound complication versus 0.75 for those who did not. Receiver operator characteristic analysis showed an area under curve for BMI to be 0.717 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.577-0.857, P = 0.006) and for MAR to be 0.680 (inverted, 95% CI, 0.507-0.854, P = 0.022). The area under curve for waist-to-hip ratio was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

MAR is a significant predictor of postoperative wound complication in patients undergoing treatment of posterior wall acetabular fractures. The higher rate of wound complications in patients with a low MAR should be considered in the treatment of these patients and may be used to guide discussion regarding the risks of surgery and the potential use of adjuncts to reduce wound healing complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Associations between body mass index and all-cause mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Fasting insulin and c-reactive protein confound the association between mortality and body mass index. An increase in fat mass may mediate the associations between hyperinsulinemia, hyperinflammation, and mortality. The objective of this study was to describe the "average" associations between body mass index and the risk of mortality and to explore how adjusting for fasting insulin and markers of inflammation might modify the association of BMI with mortality. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies published in 2020. Studies with adult participants where BMI and vital status was assessed were included. BMI was required to be categorized into groups or parametrized as non-first order polynomials or splines. All-cause mortality was regressed against mean BMI squared within seven broad clinical populations. Study was modeled as a random intercept. β coefficients and 95% confidence intervals are reported along with estimates of mortality risk by BMIs of 20, 30, and 40 kg/m2 . Bubble plots with regression lines are drawn, showing the associations between mortality and BMI. Splines results were summarized. There were 154 included studies with 6,685,979 participants. Only five (3.2%) studies adjusted for a marker of inflammation, and no studies adjusted for fasting insulin. There were significant associations between higher BMIs and lower mortality risk in cardiovascular (unadjusted β -0.829 [95% CI -1.313, -0.345] and adjusted β -0.746 [95% CI -1.471, -0.021]), Covid-19 (unadjusted β -0.333 [95% CI -0.650, -0.015]), critically ill (adjusted β -0.550 [95% CI -1.091, -0.010]), and surgical (unadjusted β -0.415 [95% CI -0.824, -0.006]) populations. The associations for general, cancer, and non-communicable disease populations were not significant. Heterogeneity was very large (I2  ≥ 97%). The role of obesity as a driver of excess mortality should be critically re-examined, in parallel with increased efforts to determine the harms of hyperinsulinemia and chronic inflammation.

Systemic Complications of Obesity in Operative Acetabular Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of obesity on rates of systemic complications in operatively treated acetabular fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective Case-Control study.

SETTING

Level 1 Trauma Center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

All patients with acetabular fractures managed operatively from January 2015 to December 2019. Patients were divided into groups based on their body mass index (BMI) (normal weight = BMI <25 kg/m2, overweight = BMI 25-30, obese = BMI 30-40, and morbidly obese = BMI >40).

INTERVENTION

Operative management of an acetabular fracture.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

Systemic complications, including mortality, sepsis, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or venous thrombotic event.

RESULTS

A total of 428 patients were identified. One hundred nine patients (25.4%) were in normal weight, 133 (31.1%) were overweight, 133 (31.1%) were obese, and 53 (12.4%) were morbidly obese. The rate of systemic complications was 17.5%, and overall mortality rate was 0.005%. There were no significant differences between the different BMI groups in all-cause complications or any individual complications. When the morbidly obese group was compared with all other patients, there were also no significant differences in all-cause complications or any individual complications.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, in this study, there was no association with increasing BMI and inpatient systemic complications after operative management of acetabular fractures. As we continue to refine our understanding of how obesity affects outcomes after acetabular fracture surgery, other indices of obesity might prove more useful in predicting complications. In the obese population, there are well-documented risks of postoperative infections and challenges in obtaining an anatomic reduction, but the fear of postoperative systemic complications should not deter surgeons from undertaking operative management of acetabular fractures in the obese population. Because the prevalence of obesity in trauma patients continues to increase, it is incumbent on us to continue to improve our understanding of optimal treatment for our patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Is Obesity Associated With an Increased Risk of Complications After Surgical Management of Acetabulum and Pelvis Fractures? A Systematic Review

Background:

When considering surgical fixation of acetabulum and pelvis fractures in patients with obesity, a thorough understanding of the risks of potential complications is important. We performed a systematic review to evaluate whether obesity is associated with an increased risk of complications after surgical management of acetabulum and pelvis fractures.

Methods:

We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies published through December 2020 that reported the effect of increased body mass index (BMI) or obesity on the risk of complications after surgical treatment of acetabulum and pelvis fractures.

Results:

Fifteen studies were included. Eight of the 11 studies that included infection or wound complication as end points found that increased BMI or some degree of obesity was a significant risk factor for these complications. Two studies found that obesity was significantly associated with loss of reduction. Other complications that were assessed in a few studies each included venous thromboembolism, nerve palsy, heterotopic ossification, general systemic complications, and revision surgery, but obesity was not clearly associated with those outcomes.

Conclusions:

Obesity (or elevated BMI) was associated with an increased risk of complications—infection being the most commonly reported—after surgical management of acetabulum and pelvis fractures, which suggests the need for increased perioperative vigilance.