Intramedullary tibial nailing using infrapatellar and suprapatellar approaches: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A Retrospective Study With 2-Year Follow-up Comparing Semi-Extended Tibia Nailing Techniques: The Suprapatellar Versus the Extra-Articular Lateral Parapatellar Approach

Background

The quest for optimal approaches to treating tibial shaft fractures in orthopedic surgery remains a topic of debate.

Purpose

We sought to compare the patellofemoral and radiological outcomes of 2 surgical techniques for treating tibial shaft fractures: the suprapatellar and extra-articular lateral parapatellar (ELP) approaches, both used in intramedullary tibial nailing in a semi-extended position.

Methodology

This retrospective analysis examined 73 adult patients treated for tibial shaft fracture from January 2018 to December 2023, divided into 2 groups: 42 in the suprapatellar group and 31 in the ELP group. Evaluation metrics included radiographic outcomes, clinical results, and complication rates, focusing on anterior knee pain (measured by visual analog scale) and knee function (Kujala and Lysholm scores).

Results

No significant differences were found in union rate, nail apex distance, reoperation rate, or malalignment between the 2 approaches. However, the ELP approach was associated with significantly better clinical outcomes, with higher Lysholm scores and reduced anterior knee pain. Additionally, the suprapatellar approach (SP) was associated with a higher incidence of painful hemarthrosis during hospitalization.

Conclusion

While this retrospective comparison found both techniques to be effective in treating tibial shaft fractures, the ELP approach was associated with superior functional outcomes as assessed by higher Lysholm scores and Kujala scores, less anterior knee pain, and a lower risk of painful hemarthrosis compared to the SP approach. Further study is warranted.

Refined Techniques in Tibial Nailing

Intramedullary nail fixation of unstable tibial diaphyseal fractures is commonly used with excellent clinical results. Indications for nailing have rapidly expanded over recent years, allowing for more difficult fractures to be addressed with "extreme nailing." Despite its widespread use, evolution of newer nailing systems and varying techniques for insertion bring new difficulties with tibial fracture reduction, and malalignment occurs with relative frequency. This highlights the need for a methodical approach for efficient and predictable tibial nailing. An algorithmic approach is essential, beginning with identifying challenging patterns in proximal and distal fractures and addressing any intra-articular elements initially. A semiextended approach is helpful to neutralize deforming forces. Optimizing the starting point and confirming lateral termination of the guidewire mitigate fracture malreduction after nail placement. Fracture reduction is facilitated with clamps, fibular or tibial plating, blocking screws or wires, external fixation, universal distractor, or manual manipulation to optimize outcomes and avoid pitfalls in an effective tibial nailing.

Surgical treatment of ipsilateral bifocal tibial fractures: a challenge for the surgeon

INTRODUCTION

The association of ipsilateral tibia fractures has a low incidence, being up to 3.2% of total tibia fractures. Currently there is no gold standard regarding the ideal surgical treatment. The objective of this study is to analyze the surgical treatment and the radiographic and functional results, as well as the associated complication rate of ipsilateral bifocal tibia fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective observational study in our hospital from 2010 to 2022 of 24 patients who underwent bifocal fracture of the ipsilateral tibia. Demographic and surgical data and complications during follow-up were included.

RESULTS

The 24 patients were classified into group 1 when they presented a fracture of the plateau and distal tibia (25%), group 2 with a fracture of the plateau and diaphysis (33%) and group 3 with a fracture of the diaphysis and distal tibia (42%). 3 patients underwent surgery with 1 implant and 21 patients with 2 implants. The average follow-up time in outpatient clinics was 2 and a half years. At one year, 22 patients (92%) had full weight bearing and 2 patients had partial weight bearing (8%) due to the sequelae of the fractures. The average time for consolidation of the diaphysis was 7.75±2 months, with no significant differences observed between group 2 and group 3 (p=0.06). The average time for consolidation of the metaphysis was 3.50±1.5 months, with no significant differences observed between group 1 and group 2 (p=0.065). 7 patients (30%) had complications during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Bifocal tibia fractures can be treated using a combination of intramedullary nailing and plate osteosynthesis with good long-term results, obtaining an optimal union rate and low complications. In addition, it facilitates the reduction of the fracture, thus facilitating the patient's recovery and obtaining good long-term functional results.

[Translated article] Surgical treatment of ipsilateral bifocal tibial fractures: A challenge for the surgeon

INTRODUCTION

The association of ipsilateral tibia fractures has a low incidence, being up to 3.2% of total tibia fractures. Currently there is no gold standard regarding the ideal surgical treatment. The objective of this study is to analyze the surgical treatment and the radiographic and functional results, as well as the associated complication rate of ipsilateral bifocal tibia fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective observational study in our hospital from 2010 to 2022 of 24 patients who underwent bifocal fracture of the ipsilateral tibia. Demographic and surgical data and complications during follow-up were included.

RESULTS

The 24 patients were classified into Group 1 when they presented a fracture of the plateau and distal tibia (25%), Group 2 with a fracture of the plateau and diaphysis (33%) and Group 3 with a fracture of the diaphysis and distal tibia (42%). Three patients underwent surgery with 1 implant and 21 patients with 2 implants. The average follow-up time in outpatient clinics was 2 and a half years. At one year, 22 patients (92%) had full weight bearing and 2 patients had partial weight bearing (8%) due to the sequelae of the fractures. The average time for consolidation of the diaphysis was 7.75±2 months, with no significant differences observed between Group 2 and Group 3 (p=0.06). The average time for consolidation of the metaphysis was 3.50±1.5 months, with no significant differences observed between Group 1 and Group 2 (p=0.065). Seven patients (30%) had complications during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Bifocal tibia fractures can be treated using a combination of intramedullary nailing and plate osteosynthesis with good long-term results, obtaining an optimal union rate and low complications. In addition, it facilitates the reduction of the fracture, thus facilitating the patient's recovery and obtaining good long-term functional results.

Comparison of Efficacy of Suprapatellar and Infrapatellar Approaches for Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing of Tibia in Patients With Tibial Fracture

INTRODUCTION

Intramedullary interlocking nailing is a common surgical procedure for tibial fractures, enabling early patient mobilization. Traditionally, the infrapatellar approach has been used for intramedullary interlocking nailing of tibial fractures, but the suprapatellar approach is gaining attention for its potential benefits. This randomized controlled study aimed to compare the duration of the surgery, intra-operative blood loss, and fluoroscopy time between the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches.

METHODS

We included 38 adult patients with tibial shaft fractures, excluding those with non-union, open fractures, revision surgery, or low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Patients were divided equally into two groups using block randomization: Group A (19 patients) underwent the infrapatellar approach, and Group B (19 patients) underwent the suprapatellar approach. Blood loss was measured using the gravimetric method and by changes in pre-operative and post-operative hemoglobin levels. Surgical duration by calculating the time elapsed between the start and end of the procedure and fluoroscopy time was logged from the fluoroscopy machine.

RESULTS

In group A, blood loss averaged 154±30.98 mL, slightly more than in group B (150±32.92 mL), though the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Group A also showed a higher difference in hemoglobin levels (2.20±1.13 g/dL) compared to group B (1.15±0.93 g/dL), which was statistically significant (p=0.02). Fluoroscopy time and duration of the surgery were slightly longer in group A compared to group B but not statistically significant (p=0.693).

CONCLUSION

The suprapatellar approach results in less blood loss, potentially promoting faster recovery, reduced need for blood transfusions, and shorter hospital stays. It also entails shorter fluoroscopy time and surgical duration, though not statistically significant, which may reduce radiation exposure for the surgical team.

Assessment of functional and radiological outcomes of suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches of tibial nailing in patients with tibial shaft fracture: A randomized control study

Background

The study aimed to assess functional and radiological outcomes of the suprapatellar approach (SPA) and infrapatellar approaches (IPA) of tibial nailing in patients with closed tibia shaft fractures.

Method

After Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) and Clinical Trials Registry- India (CTRI) approval, patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture type 42 were enrolled from August 2021 and August 2022 at a level I trauma centre and randomized to SPA and IPA with informed consent. Demographics, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical grading, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, operative duration, bleeding, postoperative radiographic alignment, and union were compared among both approaches. Functional parameters like Lysholm knee score, Anterior knee pain (AKP), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score upon kneeling, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), KOOS Patellofemoral score (KOOS PF), EuroQol (EQ5D5L), Forgotten joint score (FJS), Range of motion (ROM) of knee and any complications were assessed at 3,6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Results

Per protocol analysis of 50 patients (25 SPA, 25 IPA) done at the end of the study. SPA group had significantly lesser fluoroscopy time (91.28 ± 12.40s vs. 105.36 ± 9.23s, p < 0.001) and operative duration (mins) (123.80 ± 24.25 vs. 130.00 ± 18.20, p < 0.001) than IPA. No significant differences were noted in Lysholm knee score at three months (p = 0.094), six months (p = 0.406), and 12 months (p = 0.071). The SPA group showed significantly lower VAS Score upon kneeling at six months (p < 0.0001). Similarly, KOOS (p < 0.001), KOOS PF (p = 0.01), and EQ 5D5L (p = 0.03) were significantly better in the SPA group at six months postoperatively. Lower Coronal translation was found in SPA [0 (0-1.8) vs. 1.4 (0.9-1.8), p = 0.010]. Whereas, IPA had higher range of flexion at 3 months [130.0 (129.0-135.0) vs 123.1 (120.0-130.5), p = 0.047]. However, no significant differences were noted in blood loss, AKP, FJS, EQ-VAS, coronal angulation, sagittal malalignment, time to union, return to work and postoperative complications among the groups.

Conclusion

SPA has lesser surgery time, more straightforward anatomic fracture reduction, better fracture alignment, lesser radiation exposure for both patients and surgeons, quicker recovery time, and promotes early kneeling activities with similar long-term functional outcomes and union rates, and can be considered in routine clinical practice than conventional IPA.

Outcomes and their predictors in suprapatellar nailing for tibia fractures. Multivariable analysis of 293 consecutive cases

PURPOSE

Intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures is one of the most common procedures in orthopedic surgery. It can be technically demanding in proximal or distal fractures, which may be facilitated using semi-extended approaches. The aim of this study is to identify outcomes and their predictors using a semi-extended suprapatellar approach for tibial fracture nailing.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort of 293 patients who underwent intramedullary nail fixation of a tibial fracture through a suprapatellar approach, considering a postoperative follow-up of 1 year. Data on patient's baseline characteristics, injuries, treatments, and outcomes regarding alignment, fracture union, and complications were recorded. For multivariable analysis, hierarchical binary (logistic) regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 47.7 years (SD 18.9), with 42A1 the most frequent fracture pattern (n = 98, 33.5%). Correct or anatomical alignment (≤ 5º in both planes) was achieved in 272 (92.8%) of the patients. On multivariate analysis, surgical delay ≥ 7 days (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.3-8.1) and age over 50 years (OR = 3.2, 95% CI = 1.2-8.3) were found as predictors of fracture malalignment. Fracture healing was achieved in 97.6%, and reoperation rate was 6.14%. Overall complication's predictors were proximal fracture (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.1-7.2), temporary external fixation (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.2-4.9), and fracture malalignment (OR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.1-7.9).

CONCLUSION

The suprapatellar approach is a safe and useful technique for treating tibial fractures, leading to no less than correct reduction in almost all patients and achieving a high fracture healing rate, at very low rates of complications. Pre- and postoperative predictors identified must be taken into account to improve outcomes while treating these fractures.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approach intramedullary nailing for tibal shaft fractures

BACKGROUND

The application of the suprapatellar (SP) approach has challenged the traditional infrapatellar (IP) approach in the surgery treatment of tibial shaft fractures, yet the advantages and disadvantages still remain controversial. We included more high-quality studies for this meta-analysis and systematic review to evaluate the clinical outcomes and prognosis of both approaches and thus to provide new ideas for surgeons.

METHOD

We searched literatures from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases from January 2000 to December 2022. We extracted general information including sample size, gender, proportion of open fracture, follow-up time, and outcome indicators including entrance accuracy, fluoroscopy time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, Lysholm score, VAS pain score, range of motion (ROM) function score, reposition accuracy, and revision cases. Cochrane Collaboration's tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to evaluate literature qualities. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies were generated that qualified for inclusion, 17 of which were used for meta-analysis. This study found statistically significant differences in coronal plane entrance accuracy, fluoroscopy time, Lysholm score, and VAS pain score.

CONCLUSION

The results of our meta-analysis showed that the SP approach was significantly better than the IP approach in angle and distance entrance accuracy of coronal plane, angle entrance accuracy of sagittal plane, fluoroscopy time, Lysholm score, and VAS pain score. There were no significant differences in sagittal angle accuracy, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and ROM score.

The absence of reporting standards and a lack of objective, performance-based outcomes following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: findings from a scoping review into 179 articles

PURPOSE

This scoping review was conducted to summarise the outcome tools reported in the assessment of tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary (IM) nailing, with a key focus on knee pain and function, and performance-based outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase databases were searched on May 31, 2023. All study designs and populations were included, including ex vivo studies without fracture. Studies with only open or intra-articular fractures, or other fracture fixation, were excluded. Reported outcome tools and pertinent study characteristics were extracted and summarised.

RESULTS

Of 488 articles identified, 179 met the inclusion criteria. For in vivo studies (n = 152), there were 13,705 fractures; the IM nailing approach not described for 30% of these. There were 133 unique patient outcomes, with a binary assessment of knee pain (29% of studies) and Lysholm score (21%) most common. Only 10/152 (7%) in vivo studies included an objective, performance-based measure of knee function. Fracture union was most frequent (52%) of 81 different clinical outcomes. For ex vivo studies (n = 29), there were 408 tibias included, with nail insertion location most prevalent (66% of studies) of 34 reported outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The heterogeneity of outcome tools reported limits comparison between studies and the most commonly reported patient outcomes may not be the most appropriate. Future studies should report the IM nailing approach and consider capturing both patient-reported and performance-based outcomes to help inform surgical decision making.

Suprapatellar intramedullary nail combined with screw fixation has comparable surgical outcomes to minimally invasive locking plate fixation in ipsilateral tibial plateau and shaft fractures

PURPOSE

To compare union rate, union time, alignment, and complication rate in ipsilateral tibia plateau and shaft fractures treated via suprapatellar intramedullary nailing with screw fixation and minimally invasive locking plate fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 48 patients who underwent minimally invasive plate fixation (n = 35) or suprapatellar intramedullary nailing with screw fixation (n = 13), for the treatment of ipsilateral tibial plateau and shaft fractures with at least 1-year follow-up. Union rate, union time, radiologic alignment, and complication rate such as malalignment, nonunion, and fracture-related infection (FRI) were investigated.

RESULTS

Demographic data were not different between the two groups. Coronal plane alignment was 0.17 ± 4.23 in the plate group and -0.48 ± 4.17 in the intramedullary nail group (p = 0.637). Sagittal plane alignment was -0.13 ± 5.20 in the plate group and -1.50 ± 4.01 in the suprapatellar intramedullary nail group (p = 0.313). Coronal and sagittal malalignment recorded equal results: (p > 0.99), FRI (p = 0.602), nonunion and union times recorded (p = 0.656) and (p = 0.683, 0.829), respectively, and showed no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Suprapatellar intramedullary nailing with screw fixation had similar surgical outcomes with minimally invasive locking plate fixation in ipsilateral tibial plateau and shaft fractures in terms of union rate, union time, alignment, and complication rate. Thus, frequent use of intramedullary nailing combined with screw fixation is anticipated in patients with ipsilateral tibial plateau and shaft fractures when the soft tissue condition is not desirable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Suprapatellar tibial fracture nailing is associated with lower rate for acute compartment syndrome and the need for fasciotomy compared with the infrapatellar approach

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary tibial nailing (IMN) is the gold standard for stabilizing tibial shaft fractures. IMN can be performed through an infra- or suprapatellar approach.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the rate of fasciotomies for acute compartment syndrome between infra- and suprapatellar approaches.

METHODS

A total of 614 consecutive patients who were treated with IMN for tibial fracture between October 2007 and February 2020 were included in the study. The approach used for IMN was determined by the operating surgeon. Infrapatellar IMN was performed with the knee in deep flexion position, with or without calcaneal traction. Suprapatellar IMN was performed in straight or semiflexed position. The diagnosis of compartment syndrome was based on clinical analysis, but for some patients, a continuous compartment pressure measurement was used. The primary outcome was the rate of peri- and postoperative compartment syndrome treated with fasciotomies.

RESULTS

The study sample included 513 patients treated with infrapatellar IMN and 101 patients treated with suprapatellar IMN technique. The mean age of the patients was 44.7 years (infrapatellar technique) and 48.4 years (suprapatellar technique). High energy trauma was seen in 138 (27%) patients treated with infrapatellar technique and in 39 (39%) patients treated with suprapatellar technique. In the suprapatellar group (n = 101), there were no cases of peri- or postoperative compartment syndrome treated with fasciotomies. In the infrapatellar group (n = 513), the need for fasciotomies was stated in 67 patients, 31 patients (6.0%) perioperatively and in 36 patients (7.0%) postoperatively. The rate of fasciotomies (0/101 versus 67/513 cases) differed significantly (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the fracture morphology or patient demographics between the study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The suprapatellar technique is recommended over the infrapatellar approach in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures. The rate of peri- and postoperative compartment syndrome and the need for fasciotomies was significantly lower with the suprapatellar technique. The major cause of increased rate of peri- or postoperative acute compartment syndrome with infrapatellar IMN technique is presumably associated with the positioning of the patient during the operation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Comparison of suprapatellar intramedullary nailing versus minimal invasive locked plating for proximal tibia fractures

PURPOSE

To compare the radiological alignment, union time, union rate, and complication rate between suprapatellar intramedullary nails and minimally invasive locking plate fixation in the treatment of proximal tibial fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 103 patients who underwent plate fixation (n = 50) or suprapatellar intramedullary nailing (n = 53) for proximal tibial fractures involving the meta-diaphyseal junction between November 2015 and October 2020 at our institution. The union rate, union time, radiologic alignments, and complications, such as malalignment, nonunion, and deep infection, were investigated.

RESULTS

The demographic data did not differ between the plate and suprapatellar intramedullary nail groups. The alignment of the coronal plane was 0.24 ± 3.19 in the plate group and - 0.49 ± 2.22 in the intramedullary nail group (p = 0.196). Sagittal plane alignment was - 0.29 ± 4.97 in the plate group and 0.24 ± 4.12 in the intramedullary nail group (p = 0.571), and coronal malalignment (p = 0.196), sagittal malalignment (p = 0.57), deep infection (p = 0.264), nonunion (p = 0.695), union time (p = 0.329), and final union rate (p = 0.699) were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the minimally invasive locking compression plate group, the suprapatellar intramedullary nail group yielded comparable results in terms of radiological alignment and complications. Considering that proximal tibial fractures are associated with high-energy trauma and severe soft tissue damage, we believe that a suprapatellar intramedullary nail may be a good alternative.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Semi-extended extra-synovial (SEES) tibial intramedullary nailing technique: Up to 10 year retrospective analysis of outcomes and anterior knee pain rates

Background

Tibial intramedullary nailing is a common method of fixation for fractures of the tibia, with several approaches described. Anterior knee pain is a common complication following nailing, but the reported incidence of knee pain varies in the literature between 10 % and 86 %. There is considerable variation in incidence between nailing techniques, with an exact aetiology still unknown. We investigated the reported incidence of anterior knee pain in patients undergoing tibial nailing using the semi-extended extra synovial (SEES) technique at a Major Trauma Centre (MTC) in the UK.

Methods

A retrospective review of tibial fractures treated with the SEES technique between December 2012 to February 2021. Data collected included patient demographics, mechanism of injury, fracture characteristics, length of stay, union rates and re-operation rates. Primary outcomes were anterior knee pain rates and patient reported outcome measures (PROM), the Kujala Score. Secondary outcomes were rates of union and complications.

Results

55 fractures were identified in 53 patients. Male: Female ratio was 32:21. The average age was 45.5 years. 96 % were unilateral fractures; with 53 % being right-sided. 21(38 %) fractures were open. Prior to definitive nailing 21 fractures had temporary stabilisation with an external fixator (Ex-Fix) ± wound debridement whilst the rest received plaster backslab immobilisation. 13 of the open fractures required soft tissue cover. 75 % of patients had initial surgery (SEES Nailing/Ex-Fix) within 4 days. There was a 91 % union rate with a median time to full radiographic union of 14 months. One post-operative complication of wound dehiscence was recorded. The mean follow-up time was 13.6 months. 15 % of patients reported anterior knee pain in the postoperative follow-up period. The average Kujala PROM score was 85 (Range: 52-100).

Conclusion/findings

The SEES technique had favourable PROM scores and displayed a lower incidence of anterior knee pain than the traditional infrapatellar approach. Knee pain rates were comparable to suprapatellar approaches without violating the knee joint.

Disclosures

None.

Avoiding deformity in proximal tibial nailing: risk factors, deformity rules, tips, and tricks

Malalignment is one of the most common problems linked to nailing of proximal tibial fractures. This review will cover technical aspects of intramedullary nailing and will help explain the various risk factors. Deformity rules aid in identifying the likely deformity and help to develop management strategies. Various tools and techniques are discussed which can help optimize the outcome.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level V.

Tibial Intramedullary Nailing by Suprapatellar Approach: Is It Quicker and Safer?

Background

With the increasingly accepted method of suprapatellar tibial nailing for tibial shaft fractures, we aimed to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of infrapatellar (IP) vs suprapatellar (SP) tibial nails.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort analysis of 34 SP tibial nails over three years vs 24 IP tibial nails over a similar time frame. We compared total radiation dose (TRD), patient positioning time (PPT), fracture healing and follow up time. Knee pain in the SP group was evaluated utilising the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).

Results

Fifty-eight patients with a mean age of 43 years were included. Mean intraoperative radiation dose for SP nails was 61.78 cGy (range: 11.60-156.01 cGy) vs 121.09 cGy (range: 58.01-18.03 cGy) for IP nails (p < 0.05). Mean PPT for SP nails was 10 minutes vs 18 minutes for IP nails (p < 0.05). All fractures united in the SP group vs one non-union in the IP group. Mean follow up was 5.5 months vs 11 months in the IP and SP groups, respectively. Mean KOOS was 7 (range: 0-22) at six months for the SP group.

Conclusion

The semi-extended position (SP group) leads to reduced TRD because of ease of imaging. Patients showed improved outcomes with shorter follow up and fracture union in all patients (SP group). The KOOS revealed that SP nail patients had minimal pain and good knee function. This study establishes a management and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) baseline for ongoing evaluation of SP nails.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Suprapatellar Versus Infrapatellar Nailing Techniques for Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients who underwent intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation for tibial shaft fractures using an infrapatellar (IP) or the newer suprapatellar (SP) approach. Secondary outcomes included fluoroscopic radiation exposure, operative time, and radiographic outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search of the databases Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Study Selection.

STUDY SELECTION

Level I to III studies in which patients over the age of 18 years with acute tibial shaft fractures who underwent tibial IMN fixation using an IP or SP approach for fracture fixation were assessed for inclusion. Studies with a minimum of 10 patients in each cohort that reported on postoperative patient-reported outcomes with at least 6 months of follow-up were included for analysis.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Twelve studies that reported PROMs and compared IP and SP intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures were analyzed. This included 654 patients who underwent IP IMN fixation and 542 patients who underwent SP IMN fixation. A random-effects model for unadjusted/crude study estimates were pooled using inverse variance (IV) weighting for continuous variable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This review found a significant improvement in PROM for patients with tibial shaft fractures when the SP IMN technique was used. In addition, there was a significant decrease in intraoperative fluoroscopy time consistent with other radiographic findings demonstrating improved start point accuracy and reduction with SP IMN fixation of tibial shaft fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.