Reduction quality and nail fixation ratio as bone-implant stability factors associated with reoperation for trochanteric fractures

The observation that older men suffer from hip fracture at DXA T-scores higher than older women and a proposal of a new low BMD category, osteofrailia, for predicting fracture risk in older men

The clinical significance of osteoporosis lies in the occurrence of fragility fractures (FFx), and the most relevant fracture site is the hip. The T-score is defined as follows: (BMDpatient-BMDyoung adult mean)/SDyoung adult population, where BMD is bone mineral density and SD is the standard deviation. When the femoral neck (FN) is measured in adult Caucasian women, a cutpoint value of patient BMD of 2.5 SD below the young adult mean BMD results in a prevalence the same as the lifetime risk of hip FFx for Caucasian women. The FN T-score criterion for classifying osteoporosis in older Caucasian men has been provisionally recommended to be - 2.5, but debates remain. Based on a systematic literature review, we noted that older men suffer from hip FFx at a FN T-score approximately 0.5-0.6 higher than older women. While the mean hip FFx FN T-score of around - 2.9 for women lies below - 2.5, the mean hip FF FN T-score of around - 2.33 for men lies above - 2.5. This is likely associated with that older male populations have a higher mean T-score than older female populations. We propose a new category of low BMD status, osteofrailia, for older Caucasian men with T-score ≤  - 2 (T-score ≤  - 2.1 for older Chinese men) who are likely to suffer from hip FFx. The group with T-score ≤  - 2 for older Caucasian men is comparable in prevalence to the group with T-score ≤  - 2.5 for older Caucasian women. However, older men in such category on average have only half the FFx risk as that of older women with osteoporotic T-score.

Anteromedial cortical support reduction of intertrochanteric fractures-A review

The intertrochanteric fracture is a common fragility fracture typically resulting from low-energy falls. The functional outcome of intertrochanteric fractures is closely linked to the patient's underlying physical condition, intraoperative procedures, and postoperative complications. In terms of surgery, while timely surgery and appropriate internal fixation have demonstrated favorable outcomes, attention to intraoperative reduction is crucial. In recent years, there have been further developments in the evaluation of reduction of intertrochanteric fractures, particularly in the anteromedial cortical reduction, and these advances have been further scientifically elucidated in terms of their ability to provide stable fracture reduction and resist loss of reduction. In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of the anteromedial cortex theory, this article reviewed the anatomy, related theoretical progress, and controversies in recent years.

Anteromedial Cortical Support in Reduction of Trochanteric Hip Fractures: From Definition to Application

➤ The concept of anteromedial cortical support (AMCS) serves as valuable guidance for the intraoperative reduction of trochanteric hip fractures.➤ Positive medial cortical support (MCS) and positive or neutral anterior cortical support (ACS) are desirable. Some evidence has suggested that positive MCS is potentially superior to neutral MCS.➤ Experimental studies underscore the vital importance of the anteromedial wall and reveal why positive MCS potentially outperforms neutral MCS.➤ Incorporating the AMCS concept, the Chang reduction quality criteria (CRQC) are a reliable alternative approach to evaluate the reduction quality of trochanteric hip fractures.

A Retrospective analysis of peri-implant fractures: insights from a large volume clinical Study

PURPOSE

Peri-implant fractures (PIFs) are a concept in evolution for which different diagnostic criteria have been proposed and modified over time. They have not been extensively reported. PIFs are usually located in the distal part of previous osteosynthesis, where fragile bone is in contact with the rigid implant and are a significant complication after orthopaedic surgery, which requires careful management and treatment. This clinical study presents findings from a retrospective analysis of PIF's, providing description of characteristics and outcomes. They provide information about the associated risk factors and description of the effectiveness of various treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed in a clinical study involving patients with PIFs. Data from medical records, radiographic images, and surgical reports were collected and analyzed. The study included patients with refracture of pre-existing osteosynthesis admitted to the hospital between 2015 and 2022. Demographic information, fracture characteristics, surgical interventions, and post-operative outcomes were assessed. Each case was followed for a minimum of one year after surgery, and a critical analysis was performed by senior surgeons. Furthermore, the PIFs were classified according to the type of initial implant and the position of the new fracture in relation to the original implant.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2022, out of 18,813 fractures treated at a Level 1 traumatology hospital, a total of 85 patients with PIF's were identified. Fracture characteristics varied, including location, fracture pattern, and implant type. Most of the PIFs, 71 cases (83.53%), occurred in the femur. Additionally, there were seven cases (8.24%) involving the humerus, four cases (4.71%) affecting the tibia/fibula, two cases (2.35%) in the radius, and one case (1.18%) involving the clavicle. Surgical management was the primary attitude in treatment. Various techniques were used, including the use of longer and stronger implants to achieve high-quality fixation, facilitating early rehabilitation and return to previous activities. Postoperative complications after surgery for PIFs were observed in 16 cases (18.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Peri-implant fractures (PIF) are a distinct topic and a challenging condition with a high rate of postoperative complications. Complications after the second surgery may be severe and life threatening in older patients. A classification can be useful to make decisions about the optimal treatment in different anatomic areas and type of implant used for primary osteosynthesis. Currently there are no standardized protocols for management, therefore each case should be carefully discussed and planned before surgery.

Coronal shear fractures of the femoral neck: a comparison with basicervical fractures

PURPOSE

We propose coronal shear fracture of the femoral neck (CSFF) as a new type of fracture that differs from a basicervical fracture. This study aimed to present the incidence of CSFF and compare its clinical characteristics and outcomes with those of basicervical fractures.

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, 2207 patients with hip fractures were identified using computed tomography (CT), 17 and 27 patients were diagnosed with CSFF (CSFF group) and basicervical fractures (basicervical fracture group), respectively. The primary outcome was reoperation, while the secondary outcomes were postoperative radiographic findings, ambulatory ability, and 1-year mortality rate. These outcomes were compared between the two groups. We also conducted diagnostic reliability tests for these fractures using the Cohen's kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

The incidence of CSFF and basicervical fractures in the 2207 patients were 0.77% and 1.22%, respectively. The inter-and intra-observer agreements for the diagnosis were almost perfect. The comorbidity score was significantly higher in the CSFF group than in the basicervical fracture group. No reoperations occurred in both groups. There were no significant intergroup differences in the postoperative radiographic findings. The 1-year mortality rate was higher in the CSFF group than in the basicervical fracture group (38.5% vs. 5.3%; odds ratio: 11.9, 95% CI: 1.2-118.5; p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

This study presents the definition and incidence of CSFF with a high diagnostic reliability. Patients with CSFF had similar reoperation rate postoperative radiographic outcomes to basicervical fractures, while 1-year mortality rate was high.

Association between Immediate Postoperative Radiographic Findings and Failed Internal Fixation for Trochanteric Fractures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Failed internal fixations for trochanteric fractures have a strong negative impact owing to increased postoperative mortality and high medical costs. However, evidence on the prognostic value of postoperative radiographic findings for failed internal fixations is limited. We aimed to clarify the association between comprehensive immediate postoperative radiographic findings and failed internal fixation using relative and absolute risk measures. We followed the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines and the Cochrane handbook. We searched specific databases in November 2021. The outcomes of interest were failed internal fixation and cut-out. We pooled the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals using a random-effects model and calculated the number needed to harm for each outcome. Thirty-six studies involving 8938 patients were included. The certainty of evidence in the association between postoperative radiographic findings and failed internal fixation or cut-out was mainly low or very low except for the association between intramedullary malreduction on the anteromedial cortex and failed internal fixation. Moderate certainty of evidence supported that intramedullary malreduction on the anteromedial cortex was associated with failed internal fixation. Most postoperative radiographic findings on immediate postoperative radiographs for trochanteric fractures were uncertain as prognostic factors for failed internal fixations.

Intraoperative fractures in cephalomedullary nailing for trochanteric fractures

INTRODUCTION

Cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) is the standard treatment for internal fixation of trochanteric fractures. Complications related to CMN include intraoperative fracture (IF), which is difficult to detect using only plain radiographs. However, analyses of IFs using plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) with a large sample size of clinical cases are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to report the incidence of IFs diagnosed by CT, the risk factors for IFs, and a comparison of clinical outcomes between patients with and without IFs.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 638 patients who underwent CMN fixation for trochanteric fractures. We evaluated IF using pre-and postoperative plain radiographs and CT. The primary outcome was reoperation and the secondary outcome was the proportion of patients who regained independent mobility at 3 months postoperatively. Furthermore, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the association between risk factors and IFs.

RESULTS

Seventy-five (11.8%) patients had IFs, including 53 patients with occult IFs (8.3%). The most common location of IF was at the interference with the lag screw entry (45.3%). The nail insertion procedure (17.3%) was the most common reason for IF. In the assessment of clinical outcomes, patients with IFs had no reoperations and independent mobility at postoperative 3 months was lower (69.6% vs. 79.1%). Regarding regaining independent walking in the IF group, IF distal to lag screw entry and obvious IF diagnosed with plain radiographs were poor factors. The multivariable analysis showed that only inadequate reduction on the anteroposterior view based on the plain radiograph was significantly associated with the incidence of IFs (odds ratio 3.91; 95% CI, 1.28-11.94; p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter study indicated that the incidence of IFs detected by CT in CMN treatment for trochanteric fractures was 11.8%. An inadequate reduction in the anteroposterior view based on plain radiographs was the only independent risk factor of IFs. In the assessment of clinical outcomes, patients with IF had no incidences of reoperation. However, patients with IFs tended not to regain independent mobility compared with those without IFs.