Fractal-based belief entropy

Higher Order Fractal Belief Rényi Divergence With Its Applications in Pattern Classification

Information can be quantified and expressed by uncertainty, and improving the decision level of uncertain information is vital in modeling and processing uncertain information. Dempster-Shafer evidence theory can model and process uncertain information effectively. However, the Dempster combination rule may provide counter-intuitive results when dealing with highly conflicting information, leading to a decline in decision level. Thus, measuring conflict is significant in the improvement of decision level. Motivated by this issue, this paper proposes a novel method to measure the discrepancy between bodies of evidence. First, the model of dynamic fractal probability transformation is proposed to effectively obtain more information about the non-specificity of basic belief assignments (BBAs). Then, we propose the higher-order fractal belief Rényi divergence (HOFBReD). HOFBReD can effectively measure the discrepancy between BBAs. Moreover, it is the first belief Rényi divergence that can measure the discrepancy between BBAs with dynamic fractal probability transformation. HoFBReD has several properties in terms of probability transformation as well as measurement. When the dynamic fractal probability transformation ends, HoFBReD is equivalent to measuring the Rényi divergence between the pignistic probability transformations of BBAs. When the BBAs degenerate to the probability distributions, HoFBReD will also degenerate to or be related to several well-known divergences. In addition, based on HoFBReD, a novel multisource information fusion algorithm is proposed. A pattern classification experiment with real-world datasets is presented to compare the proposed algorithm with other methods. The experiment results indicate that the proposed algorithm has a higher average pattern recognition accuracy with all datasets than other methods. The proposed discrepancy measurement method and multisource information algorithm contribute to the improvement of decision level.

A New Reliability Coefficient Using Betting Commitment Evidence Distance in Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory for Uncertain Information Fusion

Dempster-Shafer evidence theory is widely used to deal with uncertain information by evidence modeling and evidence reasoning. However, if there is a high contradiction between different pieces of evidence, the Dempster combination rule may give a fusion result that violates the intuitive result. Many methods have been proposed to solve conflict evidence fusion, and it is still an open issue. This paper proposes a new reliability coefficient using betting commitment evidence distance in Dempster-Shafer evidence theory for conflict and uncertain information fusion. The single belief function for belief assignment in the initial frame of discernment is defined. After evidence preprocessing with the proposed reliability coefficient and single belief function, the evidence fusion result can be calculated with the Dempster combination rule. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed uncertainty measure, a new method of uncertain information fusion based on the new evidence reliability coefficient is proposed. The experimental results on UCI machine learning data sets show the availability and effectiveness of the new reliability coefficient for uncertain information processing.

Measuring Uncertainty in the Negation Evidence for Multi-Source Information Fusion

Dempster-Shafer evidence theory is widely used in modeling and reasoning uncertain information in real applications. Recently, a new perspective of modeling uncertain information with the negation of evidence was proposed and has attracted a lot of attention. Both the basic probability assignment (BPA) and the negation of BPA in the evidence theory framework can model and reason uncertain information. However, how to address the uncertainty in the negation information modeled as the negation of BPA is still an open issue. Inspired by the uncertainty measures in Dempster-Shafer evidence theory, a method of measuring the uncertainty in the negation evidence is proposed. The belief entropy named Deng entropy, which has attracted a lot of attention among researchers, is adopted and improved for measuring the uncertainty of negation evidence. The proposed measure is defined based on the negation function of BPA and can quantify the uncertainty of the negation evidence. In addition, an improved method of multi-source information fusion considering uncertainty quantification in the negation evidence with the new measure is proposed. Experimental results on a numerical example and a fault diagnosis problem verify the rationality and effectiveness of the proposed method in measuring and fusing uncertain information.

Managing uncertainty of expert's assessment in FMEA with the belief divergence measure

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is an effective model that identifies the potential risk in the management process. In FMEA, the priority of the failure mode is determined by the risk priority number. There is enormous uncertainty and ambiguity in the traditional FMEA because of the divergence between expert assessments. To address the uncertainty of expert assessments, this work proposes an improved method based on the belief divergence measure. This method uses the belief divergence measure to calculate the average divergence of expert assessments, which is regarded as the reciprocal of the average support of assessments. Then convert the relative support among different experts into the relative weight of the experts. In this way, we will obtain a result with higher reliability. Finally, two practical cases are used to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of this method. The method can be used effectively in practical applications.