A comment on “Fractionating Intelligence” and the peer review process

Distinct patterns of structural damage underlie working memory and reasoning deficits after traumatic brain injury

It is well established that chronic cognitive problems after traumatic brain injury relate to diffuse axonal injury and the consequent widespread disruption of brain connectivity. However, the pattern of diffuse axonal injury varies between patients and they have a correspondingly heterogeneous profile of cognitive deficits. This heterogeneity is poorly understood, presenting a non-trivial challenge for prognostication and treatment. Prominent amongst cognitive problems are deficits in working memory and reasoning. Previous functional MRI in controls has associated these aspects of cognition with distinct, but partially overlapping, networks of brain regions. Based on this, a logical prediction is that differences in the integrity of the white matter tracts that connect these networks should predict variability in the type and severity of cognitive deficits after traumatic brain injury. We use diffusion-weighted imaging, cognitive testing and network analyses to test this prediction. We define functionally distinct subnetworks of the structural connectome by intersecting previously published functional MRI maps of the brain regions that are activated during our working memory and reasoning tasks, with a library of the white matter tracts that connect them. We examine how graph theoretic measures within these subnetworks relate to the performance of the same tasks in a cohort of 92 moderate-severe traumatic brain injury patients. Finally, we use machine learning to determine whether cognitive performance in patients can be predicted using graph theoretic measures from each subnetwork. Principal component analysis of behavioural scores confirm that reasoning and working memory form distinct components of cognitive ability, both of which are vulnerable to traumatic brain injury. Critically, impairments in these abilities after traumatic brain injury correlate in a dissociable manner with the information-processing architecture of the subnetworks that they are associated with. This dissociation is confirmed when examining degree centrality measures of the subnetworks using a canonical correlation analysis. Notably, the dissociation is prevalent across a number of node-centric measures and is asymmetrical: disruption to the working memory subnetwork relates to both working memory and reasoning performance whereas disruption to the reasoning subnetwork relates to reasoning performance selectively. Machine learning analysis further supports this finding by demonstrating that network measures predict cognitive performance in patients in the same asymmetrical manner. These results accord with hierarchical models of working memory, where reasoning is dependent on the ability to first hold task-relevant information in working memory. We propose that this finer grained information may be useful for future applications that attempt to predict long-term outcomes or develop tailored therapies.

Making cognitive latent variables manifest: distinct neural networks for fluid reasoning and processing speed

Cognitive psychologists posit several specific cognitive abilities that are measured with sets of cognitive tasks. Tasks that purportedly tap a specific underlying cognitive ability are strongly correlated with one another, whereas performances on tasks that tap different cognitive abilities are less strongly correlated. For these reasons, latent variables are often considered optimal for describing individual differences in cognitive abilities. Although latent variables cannot be directly observed, all cognitive tasks representing a specific latent ability should have a common neural underpinning. Here, we show that cognitive tasks representing one ability (i.e., either perceptual speed or fluid reasoning) had a neural activation pattern distinct from that of tasks in the other ability. One hundred six participants between the ages of 20 and 77 years were imaged in an fMRI scanner while performing six cognitive tasks, three representing each cognitive ability. Consistent with prior research, behavioral performance on these six tasks clustered into the two abilities based on their patterns of individual differences and tasks postulated to represent one ability showed higher similarity across individuals than tasks postulated to represent a different ability. This finding was extended in the current report to the spatial resemblance of the task-related activation patterns: The topographic similarity of the mean activation maps for tasks postulated to reflect the same reference ability was higher than for tasks postulated to reflect a different reference ability. Furthermore, for any task pairing, behavioral and topographic similarities of underlying activation patterns are strongly linked. These findings suggest that differences in the strengths of correlations between various cognitive tasks may be because of the degree of overlap in the neural structures that are active when the tasks are being performed. Thus, the latent variable postulated to account for correlations at a behavioral level may reflect topographic similarities in the neural activation across different brain regions.