Association of CTLA-4 (+49 A/G) polymorphism with susceptibility to autoimmune diseases: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

What do we know about co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory immune checkpoint signals in ankylosing spondylitis?

Ankylosing spondylitis is the main entity of a family of inflammatory diseases affecting many musculoskeletal (sacroiliac joints, spine, and peripheral joints) and extra-musculoskeletal sites, termed spondyloarthritis. While it is debated whether disease onset is primarily driven by autoimmune or autoinflammatory processes, what is certain is that both innate and adaptive immune responses orchestrate local and systemic inflammation, which leads to chronic pain and immobility. Immune checkpoint signals are one key player in keeping the immune system in check and in balance, but their role in disease pathogenesis is still rather elusive. Therefore, we ran a MEDLINE search utilizing the PubMed platform for a variety of immune checkpoint signals in regard to ankylosing spondylitis. In this review, we summarize the experimental and genetic data available and evaluate the relevance of immune checkpoint signalling in the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis. Markers such as PD-1 and CTLA-4 have been extensively studied and facilitate the concept of an impaired negative immune regulation in ankylosing spondylitis. Other markers are either neglected completely or insufficiently examined, and the data is conflicting. Still, some of those markers remain interesting targets to decipher the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis and to develop new treatment strategies.

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA4) polymorphisms are linked to systemic lupus erythematosus: an updated meta-analysis

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) molecule controls T cell immune response. Functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the CTLA-4 gene have been associated with several autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).  However, the genetic association of the CTLA-4 variants with vulnerability to SLE remained contradictory. We have conducted a current meta-analysis by combining the findings of prior published articles in order to make a conclusive statement. Various literature databases were screened with appropriate keywords to obtain relevant articles, and eligible reports were obtained using well-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed by Comprehensive Meta-analysis V 3.3, and various statistical parameters such as odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and probability values were computed. A total of 3847 SLE patients and 5278 healthy controls were considered in the present meta-analysis from 26 individual reports. A significant association of CTLA-4 +49 A/G (G vs. A: p=0.03, OR=1.47) and -1722 T/C (p=0.02, OR=0.87) polymorphisms were observed with susceptibility and resistance against the development of SLE, respectively. However, the other two SNPs in the CTLA-4 gene (-318 C/T and -1661 A/G) failed to establish a connection. Interestingly, subgroup analysis revealed an association of CTLA-4 +49 A/G with a predisposition to SLE only in the Asian population (G vs. A: p=0.04, OR=1.26, GG vs. AA: p=0.02, OR=1.84, AG vs AA: p=0.01, OR=1.44, GG+AG vs AA: p=0.01, OR=1.52) and not in Caucasians. The current meta-analysis suggests a significant CTLA-4 +49 A/G variant association with susceptibility to SLE development in overall and Asian populations. In contrast, the other variant, -1722 T/C, is linked with protection against SLE. However, further case-control studies in diverse ethnic populations are requisite.

Risk factors of systemic lupus erythematosus: an overview of systematic reviews and Mendelian randomization studies

BACKGROUND

The etiology of systemic lupus erythematosus is complex and incurable. A large number of systematic reviews have studied the risk factors of it. Mendelian randomization is an analytical method that uses genetic data as tool variables to evaluate the causal relationship between exposure and outcome.

OBJECTIVE

To review the systematic reviews and Mendelian randomization studies that focused on the risk factors of systemic lupus erythematosus and shed light on the development of treatments for its prevention and intervention.

METHODS

From inception to January 2022, we systematically searched MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Embase for related systematic reviews and Mendelian randomization studies. Extract relevant main data for studies that meet inclusion criteria. The quality of systematic reviews was assessed by using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2). Finally, the risk factors are scored comprehensively according to the results' quantity, quality, and consistency.

RESULTS

Our study involved 64 systematic reviews and 12 Mendelian randomization studies. The results of systematic reviews showed that diseases (endometriosis, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis), lifestyle (smoking, drinking, vaccination), and gene polymorphism influenced the incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus. The results of Mendelian randomization studies identified the role of disease (periodontitis, celiac disease), trace elements (selenium, iron), cytokines (growth differentiation factor 15), and gut microbiome in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus.

CONCLUSION

We should pay attention to preventing and treating systemic lupus erythematosus in patients with endometriosis, celiac disease, and periodontitis. Take appropriate dietary supplements to increase serum iron and selenium levels to reduce the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus. There should be no excessive intervention in lifestyles such as smoking and drinking.

Autoimmunity and Carcinogenesis: Their Relationship under the Umbrella of Autophagy

The immune system and autophagy share a functional relationship. Both innate and adaptive immune responses involve autophagy and, depending on the disease's origin and pathophysiology, it may have a detrimental or positive role on autoimmune disorders. As a "double-edged sword" in tumors, autophagy can either facilitate or impede tumor growth. The autophagy regulatory network that influences tumor progression and treatment resistance is dependent on cell and tissue types and tumor stages. The connection between autoimmunity and carcinogenesis has not been sufficiently explored in past studies. As a crucial mechanism between the two phenomena, autophagy may play a substantial role, though the specifics remain unclear. Several autophagy modifiers have demonstrated beneficial effects in models of autoimmune disease, emphasizing their therapeutic potential as treatments for autoimmune disorders. The function of autophagy in the tumor microenvironment and immune cells is the subject of intensive study. The objective of this review is to investigate the role of autophagy in the simultaneous genesis of autoimmunity and malignancy, shedding light on both sides of the issue. We believe our work will assist in the organization of current understanding in the field and promote additional research on this urgent and crucial topic.

Autoimmunity and Cancer-Two Sides of the Same Coin

Autoimmune disease results from the immune response against self-antigens, while cancer develops when the immune system does not respond to malignant cells. Thus, for years, autoimmunity and cancer have been considered as two separate fields of research that do not have a lot in common. However, the discovery of immune checkpoints and the development of anti-cancer drugs targeting PD-1 (programmed cell death receptor 1) and CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4) pathways proved that studying autoimmune diseases can be extremely helpful in the development of novel anti-cancer drugs. Therefore, autoimmunity and cancer seem to be just two sides of the same coin. In the current review, we broadly discuss how various regulatory cell populations, effector molecules, genetic predisposition, and environmental factors contribute to the loss of self-tolerance in autoimmunity or tolerance induction to cancer. With the current paper, we also aim to convince the readers that the pathways involved in cancer and autoimmune disease development consist of similar molecular players working in opposite directions. Therefore, a deep understanding of the two sides of immune tolerance is crucial for the proper designing of novel and selective immunotherapies.

The Associations of rs1799724 and rs361525 With the Risk of Ankylosing Spondylitis Are Dependent on HLA-B27 Status in a Chinese Han Population

Objectives

Human leucocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27) is an important biomarker for ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, delay in the diagnosis of AS is still common in clinical practice. Several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the coding gene of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) have been reported to be AS susceptibility loci. Our aim was to explore whether SNPs in TNFα could be used to improve the performance of HLA-B27 for predicting AS.

Methods

Five SNPs (rs1799964, rs1800630, rs1799724, rs1800629, and rs361525) spanning TNFα were genotyped by qPCR-Invader assay in 93 AS patients and 107 healthy controls for association analysis and linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis. Random forest algorithm was utilized to construct the predictive classifiers for AS. HLA-B was genotyped by PCR-sequence-based typing in a subset of the HLA-B27-positive subjects (38 AS patients and 5 healthy controls).

Results

The T allele of rs1799724 was verified to significantly increase the risk of AS (OR = 4.583, p < 0.0001), while the A allele of rs361525 showed an association with the reduced AS risk (OR = 0.168, p = 0.009). In addition, the rs1799964^T-rs1800630^C-rs1799724^T-rs1800629^G-rs361525^G haplotype was significantly associated with a higher risk of AS (p < 0.0001). The optimal set of variables for classifiers to predict AS only consisted of HLA-B27. Strong associations with HLA-B27 status were found in both rs1799724 (p < 0.0001) and rs361525 (p = 0.001), and all the analyzed HLA-B27-positive subjects carried HLA-B*27:04 or HLA-B*27:05.

Conclusion

In the Chinese Han population, the minor allele T of rs1799724 could increase the risk of AS, while the minor allele A of rs361525 protects individuals from AS. However, the contributions of rs1799724 and rs361525 to AS risk were dependent on HLA-B27 status, suggesting the importance of taking the independence and specificity into consideration in AS susceptibility loci studies.