1
|
Wang F, Bao M, Tao B, Yang F, Wang G, Zhu L. A deep learning model combining circulating tumor cells and radiological features in the multi-classification of mediastinal lesions in comparison with thoracic surgeons: a large-scale retrospective study. BMC Med 2025; 23:267. [PMID: 40335930 PMCID: PMC12060378 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-025-04104-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2025] [Indexed: 05/09/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND CT images and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are indispensable for diagnosing the mediastinal lesions by providing radiological and intra-tumoral information. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep multimodal fusion network (DMFN) combining CTCs and CT images for the multi-classification of mediastinal lesions. METHODS In this retrospective diagnostic study, we enrolled 1074 patients with 1500 enhanced CT images and 1074 CTCs results between Jan 1, 2020, and Dec 31, 2023. Patients were divided into the training cohort (n = 434), validation cohort (n = 288), and test cohort (n = 352). The DMFN and monomodal convolutional neural network (CNN) models were developed and validated using the CT images and CTCs results. The diagnostic performances of DMFN and monomodal CNN models were based on the Paraffin-embedded pathologies from surgical tissues. The predictive abilities were compared with thoracic resident physicians, attending physicians, and chief physicians by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and diagnostic results were visualized in the heatmap. RESULTS For binary classification, the predictive performances of DMFN (AUC = 0.941, 95% CI 0.901-0.982) were better than the monomodal CNN model (AUC = 0.710, 95% CI 0.664-0.756). In addition, the DMFN model achieved better predictive performances than the thoracic chief physicians, attending physicians, and resident physicians (P = 0.054, 0.020, 0.016) respectively. For the multiclassification, the DMFN achieved encouraging predictive abilities (AUC = 0.884, 95%CI 0.837-0.931), significantly outperforming the monomodal CNN (AUC = 0.722, 95%CI 0.705-0.739), also better than the chief physicians (AUC = 0.787, 95%CI 0.714-0.862), attending physicians (AUC = 0.632, 95%CI 0.612-0.654), and resident physicians (AUC = 0.541, 95%CI 0.508-0.574). CONCLUSIONS This study showed the feasibility and effectiveness of CNN model combing CT images and CTCs levels in predicting the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions. It could serve as a useful method to assist thoracic surgeons in improving diagnostic accuracy and has the potential to make management decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, School of Medicine, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, Tongji University, No. 1279, Sanmen Road, Shanghai, 200081, China
| | - Minwei Bao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University, 507 Zhengmin Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Bo Tao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University, 507 Zhengmin Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Fugui Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, 1800 Yuntai Road, Shanghai, 200123, China
| | - Guangxue Wang
- Research Center for Translational Medicine, School of Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, 150 Jimo Road, Shanghai, 200120, China
| | - Lei Zhu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University, 507 Zhengmin Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cottrell TR, Lotze MT, Ali A, Bifulco CB, Capitini CM, Chow LQM, Cillo AR, Collyar D, Cope L, Deutsch JS, Dubrovsky G, Gnjatic S, Goh D, Halabi S, Kohanbash G, Maecker HT, Maleki Vareki S, Mullin S, Seliger B, Taube J, Vos W, Yeong J, Anderson KG, Bruno TC, Chiuzan C, Diaz-Padilla I, Garrett-Mayer E, Glitza Oliva IC, Grandi P, Hill EG, Hobbs BP, Najjar YG, Pettit Nassi P, Simons VH, Subudhi SK, Sullivan RJ, Takimoto CH. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) consensus statement on essential biomarkers for immunotherapy clinical protocols. J Immunother Cancer 2025; 13:e010928. [PMID: 40054999 PMCID: PMC11891540 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2025] [Indexed: 03/12/2025] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy of cancer is now an essential pillar of treatment for patients with many individual tumor types. Novel immune targets and technical advances are driving a rapid exploration of new treatment strategies incorporating immune agents in cancer clinical practice. Immunotherapies perturb a complex system of interactions among genomically unstable tumor cells, diverse cells within the tumor microenvironment including the systemic adaptive and innate immune cells. The drive to develop increasingly effective immunotherapy regimens is tempered by the risk of immune-related adverse events. Evidence-based biomarkers that measure the potential for therapeutic response and/or toxicity are critical to guide optimal patient care and contextualize the results of immunotherapy clinical trials. Responding to the lack of guidance on biomarker testing in early-phase immunotherapy clinical trials, we propose a definition and listing of essential biomarkers recommended for inclusion in all such protocols. These recommendations are based on consensus provided by the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Clinical Immuno-Oncology Network (SCION) faculty with input from the SITC Pathology and Biomarker Committees and the Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer readership. A consensus-based selection of essential biomarkers was conducted using a Delphi survey of SCION faculty. Regular updates to these recommendations are planned. The inaugural list of essential biomarkers includes complete blood count with differential to generate a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio or systemic immune-inflammation index, serum lactate dehydrogenase and albumin, programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry, microsatellite stability assessment, and tumor mutational burden. Inclusion of these biomarkers across early-phase immunotherapy clinical trials will capture variation among trials, provide deeper insight into the novel and established therapies, and support improved patient selection and stratification for later-phase clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tricia R Cottrell
- Queen's University Sinclair Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Alaa Ali
- Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Carlo B Bifulco
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Christian M Capitini
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health and Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Anthony R Cillo
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Deborah Collyar
- Patient Advocates In Research (PAIR), Danville, California, USA
| | - Leslie Cope
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Sacha Gnjatic
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Denise Goh
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency of Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore
| | - Susan Halabi
- Duke School of Medicine and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Gary Kohanbash
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Holden T Maecker
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Saman Maleki Vareki
- Department of Oncology and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Mullin
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Barbara Seliger
- Campus Brandenburg an der Havel, Brandenburg Medical School, Halle, Germany
| | - Janis Taube
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Wim Vos
- Radiomics.bio, Liège, Belgium
| | - Joe Yeong
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency of Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Kristin G Anderson
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Cancer Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beirne B. Carter Center for Immunology Research and the University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Tullia C Bruno
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Tumor Microenvironment Center, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Program, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Codruta Chiuzan
- Institute of Health System Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Elizabeth G Hill
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Brian P Hobbs
- Dell Medical School, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Yana G Najjar
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Sumit K Subudhi
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ryan J Sullivan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Needham, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Küffer S, Müller D, Marx A, Ströbel P. Non-Mutational Key Features in the Biology of Thymomas. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:942. [PMID: 38473304 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Thymomas (THs) are a unique group of heterogeneous tumors of the thymic epithelium. In particular, the subtypes B2 and B3 tend to be aggressive and metastatic. Radical tumor resection remains the only curative option for localized tumors, while more advanced THs require multimodal treatment. Deep sequencing analyses have failed to identify known oncogenic driver mutations in TH, with the notable exception of the GTF2I mutation, which occurs predominantly in type A and AB THs. However, there are multiple alternative non-mutational mechanisms (e.g., perturbed thymic developmental programs, metabolism, non-coding RNA networks) that control cellular behavior and tumorigenesis through the deregulation of critical molecular pathways. Here, we attempted to show how the results of studies investigating such alternative mechanisms could be integrated into a current model of TH biology. This model could be used to focus ongoing research and therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Küffer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Denise Müller
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Alexander Marx
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Philipp Ströbel
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|