Selective left bundle branch pacing for pediatric complete heart block

Conduction System Pacing in Pediatrics and Congenital Heart Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review

Conduction system pacing involving either His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a modality that has been introduced as a safe and effective alternative to right ventricular (RV) pacing to help prevent pacemaker-associated cardiomyopathy. While HBP has been employed in the pediatric and congenital populations, several small studies have shown LBBP to be safe and effective in the pediatric population. We present a patient with congenital atrioventricular block and postoperative ventricular septal defect repair cardiomyopathy with subsequent left ventricular function improvement following a transition from an RV epicardial pacemaker system to an LBBP system. This case report serves as a foundation for a review of the current state of LBBP in pediatrics and congenital heart disease.

Case report: Challenges and implications of conduction system pacing in pediatrics: Case series

Cardiac electrical stimulation in children usually is needed in the setting of complete congenital atrioventricular block, atrioventricular block after heart surgery, and bradycardia associated with some specific channelopathies. In cases of atrioventricular block, the high percentage of ventricular stimulation raises concern on the deleterious effects of chronic stimulation of the right ventricle. In recent years, physiologic stimulation has developed as a valid approach for adult patients and a great interest has risen in offering conduction system pacing also to the pediatric population. We present three pediatric cases of stimulation of the conduction system (His bundle or left bundle branch), in order to show the intrinsic particularities and challenges implied in these new techniques.

Conduction system pacing in pediatric and congenital heart disease

Conduction system pacing (CSP) has evolved rapidly to become the pacing method of choice for many adults with structurally normal hearts. Studies in this population have repeatedly demonstrated superior hemodynamics and outcomes compared to conventional pacing with the recruitment of the native conduction system. Children and patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) are also likely to benefit from CSP but were excluded from original trials. However, very recent studies have begun to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of CSP in these patients, with growing evidence that some outcomes may be superior in comparison to conventional pacing techniques. Concerns regarding the technical challenges and long-term lead parameters of His Bundle Pacing (HBP) have been overcome to many extents with the development of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP), and both techniques are likely to play an important role in pediatric and CHD pacing in the future. This review aims to assimilate the latest developments in CSP and its application in children and CHD patients.

Permanent His Bundle Pacing in Patients With Congenital Complete Heart Block: A Multicenter Experience

OBJECTIVES

This study retrospectively assessed the safety and efficacy of permanent His bundle pacing (HBP) in patients with congenital complete heart block (CCHB).

BACKGROUND

HBP has become an accepted form of pacing in adults. Its role in CCHB is not known.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with CCHB who underwent successful HBP were analyzed at 6 academic centers between 2016 and 2019. Nine patients had de novo implants, and 8 patients had previous right ventricular (RV) leads. Three RV paced patients had reduced left ventricular ejection fractions at the time of HBP. Implant/follow-up device parameters, New York Heart Association functional class, QRS duration, and left ventricular ejection fraction data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients' mean age was 27.4 ± 11.3 years, 59% were women, and mean follow-up was 385 ± 279 days. The following parameters were found to be statistically significant between implant and follow-up, respectively: impedance, 602 ± 173 Ω versus 460 ± 80 Ω (p < 0.001); and New York Heart Association functional class, 1.7 ± 0.9 versus 1.1 ± 0.3 (p = 0.014). In patients with previous RV pacing, HBP resulted in a significant decrease in QRS duration: 167.1 ± 14.3 ms versus 118.3 ± 13.9 ms (p < 0.0001). In de novo implants, HBP resulted in increases in QRS duration compared with baseline: 111.1 ± 19.4 ms versus 91.0 ± 4.8 ms (p = 0.016). Other parameters exhibited no statistically significant differences. During follow-up, 2 patients required lead revision due to elevated pacing thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

HBP seems to be safe and effective, with improvement in clinical outcomes in patients with CCHB. Larger studies with longer follow-up periods are required to confirm our findings.

His Bundle and Left Bundle Pacing in Pediatrics and Congenital Heart Disease: A Single Center Experience

Long-term right ventricular pacing is associated with left ventricular dysfunction and cardiomyopathy, particularly in pediatric patients and those with congenital heart disease (CHD). Research has shown that pacing-induced cardiomyopathy can be reversed with nonselective or selective His bundle pacing in adults, however, the information available about the use of this type of therapy in pediatrics and CHD is scarce. We performed a retrospective chart review of all the cases of His or left bundle pacing at the University of Minnesota, division of Pediatric Cardiology from January of 2019 to April of 2020. Parametric data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Non-parametric data are presented as median value with interquartile ranges. Eight patients, ages 8 to 18 years (median of 11.5) and weight from 21.5 to 81.6 kg (median of 40 kg) underwent this procedure successfully. The most common structural heart disease was a repaired peri-membranous ventricular septal defect. Three patients (37.5%) had selective and three (37.5%) had nonselective His bundle pacing, and two patients (25%) had left bundle pacing. There were two cases of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy and each had a 14% and 16% improvement of the ejection fraction after nonselective His bundle pacing. There were no procedural complications. Selective and nonselective His bundle, as well as left bundle pacing may be a feasible procedure in pediatric patients with and without CHD. This procedure may improve pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in this population.

Permanent left bundle branch area pacing in a child with a third-degree atrioventricular block: A case report

Permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBP) is a promising physiological pacing technique that has emerged in recent years. However, LBBP is almost exclusively clinically applied in adult patients. The feasibility and safety of the use of LBBP in children have not been well-assessed. Here, we report the case of a 6-year-old child with a third-degree atrioventricular block after surgical aortic valve replacement who successfully received a permanent LBBP.

Left Bundle Pacing for Left Bundle Branch Block and Intermittent Third-Degree Atrioventricular Block in a MYH7 Mutation-Related Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With Restrictive Phenotype in a Child

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a group of myocardial diseases defined by cardiac hypertrophy which cannot be explained by secondary causes with a non-dilated left ventricle and preserved or increased ejection fraction. Sometimes it can be combined with restrictive cardiomyopathy. Here we describe a very rare case of a 12-year-old girl with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy accompanied by restrictive phenotype, complete left bundle branch block and intermittent third-degree atrioventricular block, who presented with recurrent syncope. Her father was also found to have hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillator for ventricular tachycardia. Her younger brother is currently asymptomatic but echocardiogram showed hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Genetic analysis identified a heterozygous missense mutation (c.2155C>T, p.R719W) of MYH7 in the proband girl, her father and her brother. The girl was treated with left bundle pacing and recovered well. The case we present further demonstrates the feasibility of left bundle pacing in children.