Classification of Different Tympanic Membrane Conditions Using Fused Deep Hypercolumn Features and Bidirectional LSTM

Optimized fine-tuned ensemble classifier using Bayesian optimization for the detection of ear diseases

External and middle ear diseases are common disorders, especially in children, and can be examined using a digital otoscope. Hearing loss can result from delayed diagnosis and treatment which is subjective and error-prone depending on the expertise of the otolaryngologist. For these reasons, deep learning-based automated diagnostic systems are highly needed. In this study, a novel weighted average voting ensemble classifier between MobileNet and DenseNet169 has been developed to diagnose and detect different ear conditions. Bayesian optimization was used to select hyperparameters that gave the best results during the training process. MobileNet and DenseNet169 were fine-tuned by updating the weights of all layers in addition to the newly added layers before fusing them into one ensemble classifier to improve the classification ability of the model and be more specific to our task. This study was performed on a public dataset consisting of 282 otoscopic images. All classes were considered except the Tympanostomy Tubes class for having only two samples. Consequently, the proposed model demonstrated promising results of 99.54 % accuracy and an AUC of 1. Grad-CAM++ saliency maps were employed to highlight the affected area and pertinent features of the otoscopic image. The proposed approach contributes to improving accuracy, decreasing the misdiagnosis rate, and developing an automatic ear disease classification tool.

Advances in Image-Based Artificial Intelligence in Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To update the literature and provide a systematic review of image-based artificial intelligence (AI) applications in otolaryngology, highlight its advances, and propose future challenges.

DATA SOURCES

Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies written in English, published between January 2020 and December 2022. Two independent authors screened the search results, extracted data, and assessed studies.

RESULTS

Overall, 686 studies were identified. After screening titles and abstracts, 325 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility, and 78 studies were included in this systematic review. The studies originated from 16 countries. Among these countries, the top 3 were China (n = 29), Korea (n = 8), the United States, and Japan (n = 7 each). The most common area was otology (n = 35), followed by rhinology (n = 20), pharyngology (n = 18), and head and neck surgery (n = 5). Most applications of AI in otology, rhinology, pharyngology, and head and neck surgery mainly included chronic otitis media (n = 9), nasal polyps (n = 4), laryngeal cancer (n = 12), and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (n = 3), respectively. The overall performance of AI in accuracy, the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity were 88.39 ± 9.78%, 91.91 ± 6.70%, 86.93 ± 11.59%, and 88.62 ± 14.03%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This state-of-the-art review aimed to highlight the increasing applications of image-based AI in otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery. The following steps will entail multicentre collaboration to ensure data reliability, ongoing optimization of AI algorithms, and integration into real-world clinical practice. Future studies should consider 3-dimensional (3D)-based AI, such as 3D surgical AI.

Machine Learning in Diagnosing Middle Ear Disorders Using Tympanic Membrane Images: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the development of Machine Learning (ML) models and compare their diagnostic accuracy for the classification of Middle Ear Disorders (MED) using Tympanic Membrane (TM) images.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were searched up until November 30, 2021. Studies on the development of ML approaches for diagnosing MED using TM images were selected according to the inclusion criteria. PRISMA guidelines were followed with study design, analysis method, and outcomes extracted. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were used to summarize the performance metrics of the meta-analysis. Risk of Bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool in combination with the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included, encompassing 20254 TM images (7025 normal TM and 13229 MED). The sample size ranged from 45 to 6066 per study. The accuracy of the 25 included ML approaches ranged from 76.00% to 98.26%. Eleven studies (68.8%) were rated as having a low risk of bias, with the reference standard as the major domain of high risk of bias (37.5%). Sensitivity and specificity were 93% (95% CI, 90%-95%) and 85% (95% CI, 82%-88%), respectively. The AUC of total TM images was 94% (95% CI, 91%-96%). The greater AUC was found using otoendoscopic images than otoscopic images.

CONCLUSIONS

ML approaches perform robustly in distinguishing between normal ears and MED, however, it is proposed that a standardized TM image acquisition and annotation protocol should be developed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 133:732-741, 2023.

Evaluating the generalizability of deep learning image classification algorithms to detect middle ear disease using otoscopy

To evaluate the generalizability of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms that use deep learning methods to identify middle ear disease from otoscopic images, between internal to external performance. 1842 otoscopic images were collected from three independent sources: (a) Van, Turkey, (b) Santiago, Chile, and (c) Ohio, USA. Diagnostic categories consisted of (i) normal or (ii) abnormal. Deep learning methods were used to develop models to evaluate internal and external performance, using area under the curve (AUC) estimates. A pooled assessment was performed by combining all cohorts together with fivefold cross validation. AI-otoscopy algorithms achieved high internal performance (mean AUC: 0.95, 95%CI: 0.80-1.00). However, performance was reduced when tested on external otoscopic images not used for training (mean AUC: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.61-0.91). Overall, external performance was significantly lower than internal performance (mean difference in AUC: -0.19, p ≤ 0.04). Combining cohorts achieved a substantial pooled performance (AUC: 0.96, standard error: 0.01). Internally applied algorithms for otoscopy performed well to identify middle ear disease from otoscopy images. However, external performance was reduced when applied to new test cohorts. Further efforts are required to explore data augmentation and pre-processing techniques that might improve external performance and develop a robust, generalizable algorithm for real-world clinical applications.