Selective modulator of nuclear receptor PPARγ with reduced adipogenic potential ameliorates experimental nephrotic syndrome

Alternatively Spliced Landscape of PPARγ mRNA in Podocytes Is Distinct from Adipose Tissue

Podocytes are highly differentiated epithelial cells, and their structural and functional integrity is compromised in a majority of glomerular and renal diseases, leading to proteinuria, chronic kidney disease, and kidney failure. Traditional agonists (e.g., pioglitazone) and selective modulators (e.g., GQ-16) of peroxisome-proliferator-activated-receptor-γ (PPARγ) reduce proteinuria in animal models of glomerular disease and protect podocytes from injury via PPARγ activation. This indicates a pivotal role for PPARγ in maintaining glomerular function through preservation of podocytes distinct from its well-understood role in driving insulin sensitivity and adipogenesis. While its transcriptional role in activating adipokines and adipogenic genes is well-established in adipose tissue, liver and muscle, understanding of podocyte PPARγ signaling remains limited. We performed a comprehensive analysis of PPARγ mRNA variants due to alternative splicing, in human podocytes and compared with adipose tissue. We found that podocytes express the ubiquitous PPARγ Var 1 (encoding γ1) and not Var2 (encoding γ2), which is mostly restricted to adipose tissue and liver. Additionally, we detected expression at very low level of Var4, and barely detectable levels of other variants, Var3, Var11, VartORF4 and Var9, in podocytes. Furthermore, a distinct podocyte vs. adipocyte PPAR-promoter-response-element containing gene expression, enrichment and pathway signature was observed, suggesting differential regulation by podocyte specific PPARγ1 variant, distinct from the adipocyte-specific γ2 variant. In summary, podocytes and glomeruli express several PPARγ variants, including Var1 (γ1) and excluding adipocyte-specific Var2 (γ2), which may have implications in podocyte specific signaling and pathophysiology. This suggests that that new selective PPARγ modulators can be potentially developed that will be able to distinguish between the two forms, γ1 and γ2, thus forming a basis of novel targeted therapeutic avenues.

Adriamycin-Induced Nephropathy is Robust in N and Modest in J Substrain of C57BL/6

Adriamycin (ADR)-induced nephropathy remains the leading model to study human primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), a common pathway for podocyte damage and glomerular loss of function that leads to chronic kidney disease. However, the use of this model for reverse genetics is limited by historical categorization of C57BL/6 mice as an ADR-resistant strain, which is also the most common genetically modified strain. Additionally, conflicting reports exist utilizing C57BL/6 for ADR-nephrosis due to lack of understanding of substrain differences (J/N) and variability in ADR dosage, timing, and frequency to induce damage. We have undertaken a systematic approach to elucidate the specifics of ADR-nephrosis in C57BL/6 N and J substrains. We induced nephropathy with 2 doses of ADR, and measured albuminuria for 6 weeks and performed histological evaluations. Our findings revealed induction of robust and modest proteinuria in N and J substrains, respectively. The serum creatinine levels were elevated in N, but not J substrain. Both the substrains showed reduction in body weight with N greater than J, although mortality remained at 0% in both substrains. Histological analysis showed worse renal lesions in the N than the J substrain. Podocyte markers synaptopodin, nephrin, podocin, and WT1 were reduced to a greater extent in the N than the J substrain. In summary, we provide the nephrology community with a reproducible mouse model for FSGS, in a strain otherwise assumed to be ADR-resistant and highlight the differences between J and N substrains. This enables future studies, especially concerning genetically manipulated animal models in C57BL/6.