Doppelgänger Spotting in Biomedical Gene Expression Data

How missing value imputation is confounded with batch effects and what you can do about it

In data-processing pipelines, upstream steps can influence downstream processes because of their sequential nature. Among these data-processing steps, batch effect (BE) correction (BEC) and missing value imputation (MVI) are crucial for ensuring data suitability for advanced modeling and reducing the likelihood of false discoveries. Although BEC-MVI interactions are not well studied, they are ultimately interdependent. Batch sensitization can improve the quality of MVI. Conversely, accounting for missingness also improves proper BE estimation in BEC. Here, we discuss how BEC and MVI are interconnected and interdependent. We show how batch sensitization can improve any MVI and bring attention to the idea of BE-associated missing values (BEAMs). Finally, we discuss how batch-class imbalance problems can be mitigated by borrowing ideas from machine learning.

Protocol to identify functional doppelgängers and verify biomedical gene expression data using doppelgangerIdentifier

Functional doppelgängers (FDs) are independently derived sample pairs that confound machine learning model (ML) performance when assorted across training and validation sets. Here, we detail the use of doppelgangerIdentifier (DI), providing software installation, data preparation, doppelgänger identification, and functional testing steps. We demonstrate examples with biomedical gene expression data. We also provide guidelines for the selection of user-defined function arguments. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Wang et al. (2022).

Perspectives for better batch effect correction in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics

Mass-spectrometry-based proteomics presents some unique challenges for batch effect correction. Batch effects are technical sources of variation, can confound analysis and usually non-biological in nature. As proteomic analysis involves several stages of data transformation from spectra to protein, the decision on when and what to apply batch correction on is often unclear. Here, we explore several relevant issues pertinent to batch effect correct considerations. The first involves applications of batch effect correction requiring prior knowledge on batch factors and exploring data to uncover new/unknown batch factors. The second considers recent literature that suggests there is no single best batch effect correction algorithm---i.e., instead of a best approach, one may instead ask, what is a suitable approach. The third section considers issues of batch effect detection. And finally, we look at potential developments for proteomic-specific batch effect correction methods and how to do better functional evaluations on batch corrected data.