Psoriasis

Integrating Biologic Agents into Management of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: A Consensus of the Canadian Psoriasis Expert Panel

Background:

Approximately 2% of people worldwide have psoriasis, with as many as 1 million people with psoriasis in Canada alone.1,2 The severity of psoriasis ranges from mild to severe. It can lead to substantial morbidity and psychological stress and have a profound negative impact on patient quality of life.3,4 Although available therapies reduce therapies reduce the extent and severity of the disease and improve quality of life,3 reports have indicated a patient preference for more aggressive therapy and a dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of current treatment options.5

Objective:

A Canadian Expert Panel, comprising Canadian dermatologists, convened in Toronto on 27 February 2004 to reach a consensus on unmet needs of patients treated with current therapies and how to include the pending biologic agents in and improve the current treatment algorithm for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Current treatment recommendations suggest a stepwise strategy starting with topical agents followed by phototherapy and then systemic agents.3,6,7 The Panel evaluated the appropriate positioning of the biologic agents, once approved by Health Canada, for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Methods:

The Panel reviewed available evidence and quality of these data on current therapies and from randomized, controlled clinical trials.8–14 Subsequently, consensus was achieved by small-group workshops followed by plenary discussion.

Results:

The Panel determined that biologic agents are an important addition to therapies currently available for moderate-to-severe psoriasis and proposed an alternative treatment algorithm to the current step wise paradigm.

Conclusion:

The Panel recommended a new treatment algorithm for moderate-to-severe psoriasis whereby all appropriate treatment options, including biologic agents, are considered together and patients' specific characteristics and needs are taken into account when selecting the most appropriate treatment option.

Compliance with pregnancy prevention plan recommendations in 8672 French women of childbearing potential exposed to acitretin

PURPOSE

Acitretin is an oral synthetic aromatic analogue of retinoic acid available in most European countries since 1988. It is mainly used to treat severe psoriasis. Like all systemic retinoids, acitretin is teratogenic. Strict pregnancy prevention is required in women of childbearing potential who use acitretin. This study assessed compliance with Pregnancy Prevention Plan (PPP) recommendations, specifically looking at compliance with pregnancy testing (PT) and pregnancy occurrence.

METHODS

A cohort of 8672 women aged 15-49 years initiating acitretin treatment from 1 January 2007 through 31 December 2013 was identified using French SNIIRAM (administrative claims data) and PMSI (hospitalisations data) databases. Pregnancy tests (PTs) were identified from reimbursed serum βHCG and urine laboratory PTs. To satisfy PT criteria, patients who started treatment had to undergo a PT within 3 days before acitretin was dispensed. Pregnancies were identified by a pregnancy-related hospital stay or an outpatient medical abortion.

RESULTS

A PT was performed in only 12% of women starting treatment and was rarely performed during treatment or during the 24 months following discontinuation of treatment. Compliance with PPP recommendations although poor appeared to be better among private dermatologists, as a PT was performed for 16% of treatment initiations (vs. 4% for general practitioners, p < 0.001). Moreover, 470 pregnancies were reported corresponding to 27 pregnancies per 1000 person-years at risk of teratogenicity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights poor compliance with acitretin PPP recommendations in France. Physicians and pharmacists must more rigorously apply the acitretin PPP recommendations, and patients must be better informed about acitretin's risk of teratogenicity.

Variáveis individuais e familiares na psoríase: um estudo com doentes e parceiros

Este trabalho avalia morbilidade, qualidade de vida, ajustamento de casal, coping familiar e imagem corporal em 101 doentes com psoríase e 78 parceiros. Os resultados revelaram uma relação positiva entre as variáveis dos doentes e parceiros no que diz respeito ao ajustamento, coping e morbilidade. Pior qualidade de vida e imagem corporal no doente estão associadas a mais morbilidade no parceiro. Os doentes em tratamento combinado e fototerapia apresentaram pior qualidade de vida e insatisfação com a imagem corporal. Melhor ajustamento de casal e menor ansiedade no parceiro predizem ajustamento de casal no doente. Satisfação com a imagem corporal prevê melhor qualidade de vida no doente. Os resultados enfatizam a necessidade de envolver os parceiros nos programas de intervenção. As implicações são apresentadas.

A pharmacoeconomic analysis of severe psoriasis therapy: a review of treatment choices and cost efficiency

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory disease afflicting 2% of the US population; it results in significant morbidity. The annual healthcare costs related to psoriasis are an estimated $11.3 billion and, with an expanding biologic market, an updated costs analysis is needed.

AREAS COVERED

Current treatments, including systemic agents (acitretin, cyclosporine, methotrexate), phototherapies and all available biologics (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, alefacept, ustekinumab) appropriate for severe psoriasis are described mechanistically and with regard to their efficacy, quality-of-life improvements and side effects. A cost-efficacy model considering US health-system-based annual costs, clinical and quality-of-life improvements was created. Reported Psoriasis Area and Severity Index improvement of 75% from baseline (PASI-75) scores, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) improvements and estimated costs of medications are described. Annual costs ranged from $1330 for methotrexate to $48,731 for high-dose etanercept. The lowest cost per achieving DLQI minimally important difference was from phototherapy; the highest was from alefacept. The lowest costs per patient achieving PASI-75 was from methotrexate and the highest was from alefacept.

EXPERT OPINION

Phototherapies and methotrexate offer high efficacy for their costs. Therapeutic approaches must be individualized for each patient given all considerations described.

New biologics for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

The prevalence of psoriasis is estimated to be 2.2% in the United States, and 6-39% of patients with psoriasis also develop psoriatic arthritis. New advances have been made in developing treatment options. A new human tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antibody, golimumab, has been shown to significantly improve symptoms of psoriatic arthritis. In addition, clinical trials of certolizumab pegol, a PEGylated Fab' fragment of an anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody, show promising results for treating rheumatoid arthritis and suggest that it may be applicable for treating psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in the future. New biologic therapies also include antibodies to interleukin-12 and interleukin-23. Phase II studies suggest that ustekinumab is effective in alleviating symptoms of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. However, longer studies with radiographic evaluation will be required before their impact on joint destruction can be assessed.

Are patients with psoriasis undertreated? Results of National Psoriasis Foundation survey

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess whether patients with psoriasis with moderate or severe disease are being treated with systemic therapy.

METHODS

Participants were identified from a random sample of the National Psoriasis Foundation contact database who were 18 years and older, with severe psoriasis (>10% body surface area) and moderate psoriasis (3%-10% body surface area); respondents with psoriatic arthritis were excluded.

RESULTS

In all, 1657 respondents with psoriasis completed the survey (28% severe, 41% moderate). A total of 39% of respondents with severe psoriasis and 37% with moderate psoriasis were not currently receiving any treatment. Among respondents currently receiving therapy, only 43% of respondents with severe psoriasis received either traditional systemic therapy, biologic therapy, or phototherapy.

LIMITATIONS

Respondents were from the National Psoriasis Foundation contact database and reported their current severity, which may be affected by their treatment. Body surface area as a measure of patient-reported severity has not been validated but has been used in several published studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost 40% of respondents with psoriasis were currently not receiving treatment. For respondents with severe psoriasis, 26% were treated with systemic therapy, phototherapy, or both; 39% were not in treatment; and 35% were treated with topical therapy alone.

Phase II randomized, placebo-controlled trial of M. vaccae-derived protein (PVAC) for the treatment of psoriasis

The treatment effect against psoriasis of an antigen (delipidated, deglycolipidated form of M. vaccae-PVAC) was investigated. One hundred and sixty-five patients were enrolled in three arms (50 or 15 microg or placebo), each receiving a total of two intradermal injections (days 0 and 21). At week 12, a 75% decrease in psoriasis area and severity index was similar among the studied groups (13, 9 and 18%, p=0.429). The overall incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the PVAC treated groups when compared to placebo (98.2, 87.3 and 70.9%; p<0.001) largely due to local reactions that were limited for the most part to grades 1 and 2 in severity and were self-limiting. Despite its overall safety, PVAC was not clearly indicated to be superior to placebo in the treatment of psoriasis in this study.

Integrating Biologic Agents into Management of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: A Consensus of the Canadian Psoriasis Expert Panel

BACKGROUND

Approximately 2% of people worldwide have psoriasis, with as many as 1 million people with psoriasis in Canada alone.1,2 The severity of psoriasis ranges from mild to severe. It can lead to substantial morbidity and psychological stress and have a profound negative impact on patient quality of life.3,4 Although available therapies reduce therapies reduce the extent and severity of the disease and improve quality of life,3 reports have indicated a patient preference for more aggressive therapy and a dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of current treatment options.5

OBJECTIVE

A Canadian Expert Panel, comprising Canadian dermatologists, convened in Toronto on 27 February 2004 to reach a consensus on unmet needs of patients treated with current therapies and how to include the pending biologic agents in and improve the current treatment algorithm for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Current treatment recommendations suggest a stepwise strategy starting with topical agents followed by phototherapy and then systemic agents.3,6,7 The Panel evaluated the appropriate positioning of the biologic agents, once approved by Health Canada, for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

METHODS

The Panel reviewed available evidence and quality of these data on current therapies and from randomized, controlled clinical trials.8-14 Subsequently, consensus was achieved by small-group workshops followed by plenary discussion.

RESULTS

The Panel determined that biologic agents are an important addition to therapies currently available for moderate-to-severe psoriasis and proposed an alternative treatment algorithm to the current step wise paradigm.

CONCLUSION

The Panel recommended a new treatment algorithm for moderate-to-severe psoriasis whereby all appropriate treatment options, including biologic agents, are considered together and patients' specific characteristics and needs are taken into account when selecting the most appropriate treatment option.