1
|
Evidence from Clinical Studies Related to Dermatologic Surgeries for Skin Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153835. [PMID: 35954498 PMCID: PMC9367341 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Although significant progress in pharmacotherapy for skin cancer has been made in the past several years, surgical removal of primary skin cancer is still the first choice of treatment unless distant metastases are evident. In the surgical treatment of primary skin tumors, the surgical margin is critical not only for reducing the possibility of tumor recurrence but also for minimizing the cosmetic and functional complications associated with wide local excision. In contrast, dermatologic surgeries including lymph node dissection and skin graft can cause various complications, and these complications are frequently associated with significant morbidity and discomfort. In this review, we summarize the evidence from previous clinical studies regarding the optimal surgical margin for skin cancer and the methods for diminishing the complications associated with dermatologic surgery. Abstract Despite the significant progress made in the past several years in pharmacotherapies for skin cancer, such as BRAF/MEK inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and Hedgehog pathway inhibitors, surgical removal of primary skin cancer is still the first choice of treatment unless distant metastases are evident. In cases of lymph node metastases with clinically palpable lymphadenopathy, lymph node dissection (LND) is typically performed for most skin cancers. In the surgical treatment of primary skin tumors, the surgical margin is critical not only for reducing the possibility of tumor recurrence but also for minimizing the cosmetic and functional complications associated with wide local excision. In contrast, dermatologic surgery can cause various complications. Although skin graft is frequently used for reconstruction of the surgical defect, extensive graft necrosis may develop if optimal stabilization of the graft is not obtained. LND also sometimes causes complications such as intraoperative or postoperative bleeding and postoperative lymphoceles. Moreover, as in other types of surgery, surgical site infection, intraoperative anxiety, and intraoperative and postoperative pain may also develop. These complications are frequently associated with significant morbidity and discomfort. In this review, we summarize the evidence from previous clinical studies regarding the optimal surgical margin for skin cancer and the methods for diminishing the complications associated with dermatologic surgery.
Collapse
|
2
|
Shin K, Kim HJ, Ko HC, Kim BS, Kim MB, Kim HS. Dermoscopy-guided Mohs micrographic surgery in post-laser basal cell carcinomas: is dermoscopy helpful for demarcation of the surgical margin? J DERMATOL TREAT 2021; 33:433-436. [PMID: 32345116 DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1762839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in cases where the tumor margin is poorly defined to the naked eye can lead to the need to take an increased number of Mohs stages. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the usefulness of dermoscopy in determining MMS surgical margins of BCCs with a history of ablative laser treatment. METHODS Patients were randomly allocated to naked eye (n = 69) or dermoscopy (n = 64) groups by the surgical margin detection method. Surgical outcomes of 133 post-laser BCC patients treated with MMS were analyzed. RESULTS The lateral margin involvement rate at the first MMS stage was significantly lower in the dermoscopy group than in the naked eye group (4.7% vs. 29.0%; p < .001). However, the deep margin involvement rate at the first and mean MMS stages were not significantly different between the groups. The ablative laser treatment duration correlated to the number of MMS stages (p = .026). CONCLUSION The results demonstrated that lateral margin was mostly controlled within the first MMS stage with dermoscopy. Dermatosurgeons could focus on the deep margin after the first MMS stage; thus, the performance of MMS could be improved with dermoscopic assistance in post-laser BCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kihyuk Shin
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.,Department of Dermatology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.,Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea.,Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Hak-Jun Kim
- Department of Dermatology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Hyun-Chang Ko
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea
| | - Byung-Soo Kim
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.,Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Moon-Bum Kim
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.,Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Hoon-Soo Kim
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.,Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thomson J, Hogan S, Leonardi-Bee J, Williams HC, Bath-Hextall FJ. Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 11:CD003412. [PMID: 33202063 PMCID: PMC8164471 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003412.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the commonest cancer affecting white-skinned individuals, and worldwide incidence is increasing. Although rarely fatal, BCC is associated with significant morbidity and costs. First-line treatment is usually surgical excision, but alternatives are available. New published studies and the development of non-surgical treatments meant an update of our Cochrane Review (first published in 2003, and previously updated in 2007) was timely. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions for BCC in immunocompetent adults. SEARCH METHODS We updated our searches of the following databases to November 2019: Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and LILACS. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions for BCC in immunocompetent adults with histologically-proven, primary BCC. Eligible comparators were placebo, active treatment, other treatments, or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Primary outcome measures were recurrence at three years and five years (measured clinically) (we included recurrence data outside of these time points if there was no measurement at three or five years) and participant- and observer-rated good/excellent cosmetic outcome. Secondary outcomes included pain during and after treatment, early treatment failure within six months, and adverse effects (AEs). We used GRADE to assess evidence certainty for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS We included 52 RCTs (26 new) involving 6690 participants (median 89) in this update. All studies recruited from secondary care outpatient clinics. More males than females were included. Study duration ranged from six weeks to 10 years (average 13 months). Most studies (48/52) included only low-risk BCC (superficial (sBCC) and nodular (nBCC) histological subtypes). The majority of studies were at low or unclear risk of bias for most domains. Twenty-two studies were industry-funded: commercial sponsors conducted most of the studies assessing imiquimod, and just under half of the photodynamic therapy (PDT) studies. Overall, surgical interventions have the lowest recurrence rates. For high-risk facial BCC (high-risk histological subtype or located in the facial 'H-zone' or both), there may be slightly fewer recurrences with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) compared to surgical excision (SE) at three years (1.9% versus 2.9%, respectively) (risk ratio (RR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 2.64; 1 study, 331 participants; low-certainty evidence) and at five years (3.2% versus 5.2%, respectively) (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.18 to 2.04; 1 study, 259 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, the 95% CI also includes the possibility of increased risk of recurrence and no difference between treatments. There may be little to no difference regarding improvement of cosmetic outcomes between MMS and SE, judged by participants and observers 18 months post-operatively (one study; low-certainty evidence); however, no raw data were available for this outcome. When comparing imiquimod and SE for nBCC or sBCC at low-risk sites, imiquimod probably results in more recurrences than SE at three years (16.4% versus 1.6%, respectively) (RR 10.30, 95% CI 3.22 to 32.94; 1 study, 401 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and five years (17.5% versus 2.3%, respectively) (RR 7.73, 95% CI 2.81 to 21.3; 1 study, 383 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference in the number of participant-rated good/excellent cosmetic outcomes (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.06; 1 study, 326 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, imiquimod may result in greater numbers of good/excellent cosmetic outcomes compared to SE when observer-rated (60.6% versus 35.6%, respectively) (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.15; 1 study, 344 participants; low-certainty evidence). Both cosmetic outcomes were measured at three years. Based on one study of 347 participants with high- and low-risk primary BCC of the face, radiotherapy may result in more recurrences compared to SE under frozen section margin control at three years (5.2% versus 0%, respectively) (RR 19.11, 95% CI 1.12 to 325.78; low-certainty evidence) and at four years (6.4% versus 0.6%, respectively) (RR 11.06, 95% CI 1.44 to 84.77; low-certainty evidence). Radiotherapy probably results in a smaller number of good participant- (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.91; 50.3% versus 66.1%, respectively) or observer-rated (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.62; 28.9% versus 60.3%, respectively) good/excellent cosmetic outcomes compared to SE, when measured at four years, where dyspigmentation and telangiectasia can occur (both moderate-certainty evidence). Methyl-aminolevulinate (MAL)-PDT may result in more recurrences compared to SE at three years (36.4% versus 0%, respectively) (RR 26.47, 95% CI 1.63 to 429.92; 1 study; 68 participants with low-risk nBCC in the head and neck area; low-certainty evidence). There were no useable data for measurement at five years. MAL-PDT probably results in greater numbers of participant- (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.27; 97.3% versus 82.5%) or observer-rated (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.54 to 2.26; 87.1% versus 46.6%) good/excellent cosmetic outcomes at one year compared to SE (2 studies, 309 participants with low-risk nBCC and sBCC; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on moderate-certainty evidence (single low-risk sBCC), imiquimod probably results in fewer recurrences at three years compared to MAL-PDT (22.8% versus 51.6%, respectively) (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.62; 277 participants) and five years (28.6% versus 68.6%, respectively) (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.57; 228 participants). There is probably little to no difference in numbers of observer-rated good/excellent cosmetic outcomes at one year (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.16; 370 participants). Participant-rated cosmetic outcomes were not measured for this comparison. AEs with surgical interventions include wound infections, graft necrosis and post-operative bleeding. Local AEs such as itching, weeping, pain and redness occur frequently with non-surgical interventions. Treatment-related AEs resulting in study modification or withdrawal occurred with imiquimod and MAL-PDT. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Surgical interventions have the lowest recurrence rates, and there may be slightly fewer recurrences with MMS over SE for high-risk facial primary BCC (low-certainty evidence). Non-surgical treatments, when used for low-risk BCC, are less effective than surgical treatments, but recurrence rates are acceptable and cosmetic outcomes are probably superior. Of the non-surgical treatments, imiquimod has the best evidence to support its efficacy. Overall, evidence certainty was low to moderate. Priorities for future research include core outcome measures and studies with longer-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Thomson
- Department of Dermatology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sarah Hogan
- Department of Dermatology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jo Leonardi-Bee
- Centre for Evidence Based Healthcare, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Clinical Sciences Building Phase 2, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Fiona J Bath-Hextall
- Emeritus Professor, Evidence Based Health Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lang BM, Balermpas P, Bauer A, Blum A, Brölsch GF, Dirschka T, Follmann M, Frank J, Frerich B, Fritz K, Hauschild A, Heindl LM, Howaldt HP, Ihrler S, Kakkassery V, Klumpp B, Krause-Bergmann A, Löser C, Meissner M, Sachse MM, Schlaak M, Schön MP, Tischendorf L, Tronnier M, Vordermark D, Welzel J, Weichenthal M, Wiegand S, Kaufmann R, Grabbe S. S2k Guidelines for Cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma - Part 2: Treatment, Prevention and Follow-up. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2020; 17:214-230. [PMID: 30762963 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignant tumor among fair-skinned individuals, and its incidence had been steadily rising in the past decades. In order to maintain the highest quality of patient care possible, the German S2k guidelines were updated following a systematic literature search and with the participation of all professional societies and associations involved in the management of the disease. Part 2 addresses issues such as proper risk stratification, the various therapeutic approaches, and prevention as well as follow-up of patients with basal cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berenice M Lang
- Department of Dermatology, Mainz University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Frankfurt University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, Carl Gustav Carus University Medical Center, Dresden, Germany
| | - Andreas Blum
- Dermatology and Teaching Practice, Konstanz, Germany
| | - G Felix Brölsch
- Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Thomas Dirschka
- CentroDerm Clinic, Wuppertal, Germany.,Faculty of Health, Witten-Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | | | - Jorge Frank
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Göttingen University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Frerich
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Klaus Fritz
- Dermatology and Laser Center, Landau, Germany
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Schleswig-Holstein University Medical Center, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ludwig M Heindl
- Department of Ophthalmology, Cologne University Medical Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Howaldt
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gießen University Medical Center, Gießen, Germany
| | - Stephan Ihrler
- Laboratory for Dermatohistology and Oral Pathology, Munich, Germany
| | - Vinodh Kakkassery
- Department of Ophthalmology, Schleswig-Holstein University Medical Center, Lübeck, Germany.,Department of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Bernhard Klumpp
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Tübingen University Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Radiology, Rems-Murr Medical Center, Winnenden, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Löser
- Department of Dermatology, Ludwigshafen Medical Center, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Markus Meissner
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Frankfurt University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Michael M Sachse
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Phlebology, Bremerhaven Medical Center, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Max Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Munich University Medical Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael P Schön
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Göttingen University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Tronnier
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Helios Medical Center, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Halle University Medical Center, Martin Luther University, Halle, Germany
| | - Julia Welzel
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Augsburg Medical Center, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michael Weichenthal
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Schleswig-Holstein University Medical Center, Kiel, Germany
| | - Susanne Wiegand
- Department of Otolaryngology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Roland Kaufmann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Frankfurt University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Stephan Grabbe
- Department of Dermatology, Mainz University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lang BM, Balermpas P, Bauer A, Blum A, Brölsch GF, Dirschka T, Follmann M, Frank J, Frerich B, Fritz K, Hauschild A, Heindl LM, Howaldt HP, Ihrler S, Kakkassery V, Klumpp B, Krause-Bergmann A, Löser C, Meissner M, Sachse MM, Schlaak M, Schön MP, Tischendorf L, Tronnier M, Vordermark D, Welzel J, Weichenthal M, Wiegand S, Kaufmann R, Grabbe S. S2k-Leitlinie Basalzellkarzinom der Haut - Teil 2: Therapie, Prävention und Nachsorge. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2019; 17:214-231. [PMID: 30762951 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13755_g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Andrea Bauer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
| | | | - G Felix Brölsch
- Klinik für Plastische, Ästhetische, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Thomas Dirschka
- CentroDerm, Wuppertal.,Fakultät für Gesundheit, Universität Witten-Herdecke
| | | | - Jorge Frank
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
| | - Bernhard Frerich
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und plastische Gesichtschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock
| | | | - Axel Hauschild
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel
| | | | - Hans-Peter Howaldt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
| | | | - Vinodh Kakkassery
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck.,Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsmedizin Rostock
| | - Bernhard Klumpp
- Abteilung für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen.,Radiologie, Rems-Murr-Klinikum Winnenden
| | | | | | - Markus Meissner
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
| | - Michael M Sachse
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Phlebologie, Klinikum Bremerhaven
| | - Max Schlaak
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Klinikum der Universität München
| | - Michael P Schön
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
| | | | - Michael Tronnier
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Helios Klinikum Hildesheim
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
| | - Julia Welzel
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Klinikum Augsburg
| | - Michael Weichenthal
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel
| | - Susanne Wiegand
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - Roland Kaufmann
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
With a clear increase in the incidence and a continuously earlier onset, the main risk factors for the development of basal cell carcinoma are still exposure to sunlight, fair skin, immunosuppression, carcinogens such as arsenic, chronic irritations and certain genodermatoses. Treatment options for localized resectionable basal cell carcinoma include micrographically controlled surgery, simple excision, curettage, laser ablation, cryosurgery, imiquimod, 5‑fluorouracil, photodynamic treatment and radiotherapy. Non-surgical treatment options are more suited for cases in which surgical procedures lead to disfigurement or functional impairments or for patients with a high surgical risk. Laser treatment, ablative and non-ablative as monotherapy or in combination can represent a meaningful treatment option in selected cases. In recent years there has been an increase in knowledge about the indications and effects of laser treatment of basal cell carcinoma; nevertheless, further studies with a high level of evidence are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Salavastru
- Abteilung für paediatrische Dermatologie, Colentina Clinical Hospital, 19-21 Stefan cel Mare Av., Bukarest, Rumänien. .,"Carol Davila" Universität für Medizin und Pharmazie, Bukarest, Rumänien.
| | - G S Tiplica
- "Carol Davila" Universität für Medizin und Pharmazie, Bukarest, Rumänien.,2. Dermatologische Klinik, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bukarest, Rumänien
| | - K Fritz
- "Carol Davila" Universität für Medizin und Pharmazie, Bukarest, Rumänien.,Hautärzte und Laserzentrum, Landau (Pfalz), Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Doğan F, Kemaloğlu CA. A very interesting traditional method in the treatment of skin lesions: aqua regia and related complications. SPRINGERPLUS 2016; 5:1585. [PMID: 27652158 PMCID: PMC5025418 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-3259-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2016] [Accepted: 09/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Aqua regia, a highly corrosive mixture of concentrated nitric acid and hydrochloric acid, is used to dissolve various metals such as gold and platinum that are not soluble in other types of acids. For the first time in the literature, we report the adverse effects that were observed following the utilization of this strong acid solution in the treatment of various skin lesions. Methods Between 2010 and 2013, 43 patients (55.8 % female) with a mean age of 40.2 years, were admitted to our hospital for scars, wounds or malign lesions related to the use of aqua regia on skin lesions. Sixteen patients reported to use aqua regia for treating wounds and 27 of them used it for their scars. Results Out of 43 patients, 9 patients developed necrosis, 12 had hypertrophic scars, 15 had scars and 7 had non-healing wounds resembling malignant lesions. The non-healing wounds were located in the facial region in five patients, in the cervical region in one and on the finger-tip in another. Histopathological examination of these non-healing wounds revealed basal and squamous cell carcinoma. The patients were admitted to the plastic surgery department approximately 6–24 months after aqua regia application with complaints of growing lesions. Secondary healing in the lesions with scar development in 55 % of the patients is an acceptable result. However, 27 % of the patients with hypertrophic scars and 16 % of the patients with malignant lesions required intervention. Conclusion This present study showed that non-medical alternative treatments have major risks. Aqua regia application might have resulted in the development or rapid progression of malignant tumours in seven patients. In the literature, it has been reported that a number of physical traumas may cause skin cancer. Based on this information, the possibility of such an effect of aqua regia cannot be excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatih Doğan
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Adıyaman University, Altınşehir Mh. 3005 Sokak No:13, 02040 Adıyaman, Turkey
| | - Cemal Alper Kemaloğlu
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim HS, Kim TW, Mun JH, Song M, Ko HC, Kim BS, Kim MB. Basal cell carcinoma-mimicking lesions in korean clinical settings. Ann Dermatol 2014; 26:431-6. [PMID: 25143670 PMCID: PMC4135096 DOI: 10.5021/ad.2014.26.4.431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2013] [Revised: 06/10/2013] [Accepted: 06/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common form of skin cancer and possesses various clinical features including translucency, ulceration, pigmentation, telangiectasia, and rolled borders. Accordingly, many cutaneous lesions can mimic BCCs and differential diagnosis is difficult. Objective To clarify the differences in clinical characteristics between BCCs and BCC-mimicking lesions (BMLs), and to determine which clinical characteristics are helpful for an accurate clinical diagnosis of BCC. Methods We performed clinicopathologic analysis of cutaneous lesions that received a clinical diagnosis of BCC. All lesions included in this study showed more than one of the following characteristics of BCCs: translucency, ulceration, flecked pigmentation, black or blue hue, telangiectasia, and rolled borders. We compared six clinical characteristics between the BCC group and the BML group. Results Among 48 lesions in the BML group, there were 15 premalignant or malignant lesions and 33 benign lesions. Various dermatoses mimicking BCC that have not been reported in the dermatological literature were identified, including angiosarcoma, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasm, foreign body granuloma, intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia, sarcoidosis, and others. Compared to the BML group, the BCC group had a significantly higher frequency of translucency (76.3% vs. 52.1%, p<0.001), ulceration or erosion (44.2% vs. 27.1%, p=0.022), black or blue hue (40.0% vs. 22.9%, p=0.020), and rolled borders (49.5% vs. 14.6%, p<0.001). Cutaneous lesions with two or less clinical features of BCC were significantly more likely to be BMLs. Conclusion The results of this study could be helpful for the differential diagnosis of BCCs and BCC-mimicking cutaneous lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoon-Soo Kim
- Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Tae-Wook Kim
- Department of Dermatology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Je-Ho Mun
- Department of Dermatology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Margaret Song
- Department of Dermatology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Hyun-Chang Ko
- Department of Dermatology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Byung-Soo Kim
- Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Moon-Bum Kim
- Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dourmishev LA, Rusinova D, Botev I. Clinical variants, stages, and management of basal cell carcinoma. Indian Dermatol Online J 2013; 4:12-7. [PMID: 23439912 PMCID: PMC3573444 DOI: 10.4103/2229-5178.105456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common paraneoplastic disease among human neoplasms. The tumor affects mainly photoexposed areas, most often in the head and seldom appears on genitalia and perigenital region. BCC progresses slowly and metastases are found in less than 0.5% of the cases; however, a considerable local destruction and mutilation could be observed when treatment is neglected or inadequate. Different variants as nodular, cystic, micronodular, superficial, pigment BCC are described in literature and the differential diagnosis in some cases could be difficult. The staging of BCC is made according to Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) classification and is essential for performing the adequate treatment. Numerous therapeutic methods established for treatment of BCC, having their advantages or disadvantages, do not absolutely dissolve the risk of relapses. The early diagnostics based on the good knowledge and timely organized and adequate treatment is a precondition for better prognosis. Despite the slow progress and numerous therapeutic methods, the basal cell carcinoma should not be underestimated.
Collapse
|