Evolution of filler materials in dermatology

Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Highly Viscous 33-mg/mL Hyaluronic Acid Volumizing Filler in the Treatment of Facial Wrinkles: An Open-Labeled, Clinical Trials

Background:

The 33-mg/mL hyaluronic acid (HA) formulation is a highly concentrated, cross-linked, cohesive, smooth, and completely reversible volumizing filler approved by Conformité Européene. For the first time, we aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of the 33- mg/mL HA filler for soft tissue augmentation in the treatment of facial wrinkles.

Materials and Methods:

After optimal wrinkle correction was achieved in the patients undergoing treatment by injecting the 33-mg/mL HA filler at the injection site plus one touch-up at a 2-week interval, the safety and efficacy of the filler were assessed on the 5-point Facial Volume Loss Scale through the 1-year study period. Patients were evaluated daily for 14 days and after 6 and 12 months post-treatment.

Results:

A total of 86 subjects were treated. The mean wrinkle scores of the patients were 3.95+0.79 (range of 3-5) before treatment, 2.3+0.94 (range 1-5) six months after treatment, and 2.93+1.29 (range of 1-5) one year after treatment. Clinically significant mean wrinkle correction (P=0.001) was still evident at>12 months of treatment through 33-mg/ mL HA formulation. A clinically significant correction at>12 months after treatment was maintained by 79% of patients. Nodule formation and swelling were more frequent when the 33- mg/mL HA filler was used compared with the use of less concentrated HA fillers. One patient developed angioedema-like swelling and induration last few months.

Conclusion:

The 33-mg/ mL HA filler can provide long-term correction lasting for one year or more. Adverse effects, especially swelling and nodule formation were more common in this filler compared with less concentrated HA fillers. The side effects were correlated with the volume of the injected filler. We recommend using this concentration with low volume or combining high volume with lower concentration.

Hyaluronic Acid Gel With (HARRL) and Without Lidocaine (HAJU) for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Nasolabial Folds: A Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Phase III Study

BACKGROUND

Hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers are frequently used to correct or smooth facial wrinkles and folds such as nasolabial folds.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of 2 HA gels, formulated by 2 different manufacturing processes: XpresHAn Technology (HARRL [with lidocaine]) and Hylacross technology (HAJU-a comparator product without lidocaine).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred seventy subjects with bilateral nasolabial folds rated as moderate or severe, according to the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), received injections of HARRL in the nasolabial folds on one side of the face and HAJU on the other side. Investigator- and subject-assessed wrinkle severity was measured up to 48 weeks after final injection.

RESULTS

HARRL exhibited a similar safety and efficacy profile compared with HAJU. Noninferiority of HARRL was demonstrated at 24 weeks (WSRS mean change from baseline mean difference -0.1 [95% confidence interval: -0.15, 0.01], p = .090). Incidence of adverse events was 40% for both treatments.

CONCLUSION

HARRL exhibited a similar safety and efficacy profile compared with HAJU.

Calcium hydroxylapatite: A review on safety and complications

BACKGROUND

Radiesse^® , or calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA), is a biodegradable, biostimulatory soft tissue filler suitable for deeper folds and wrinkles. In the literature, good results have been documented with the use of CaHA and patient satisfaction scores are high. This study reviews the current literature on safety and complications of CaHA.

METHODS

A literature search in MEDLINE/PubMed electronic database was conducted. A total of 21 articles were included and screened for reports of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Twenty-one peer-reviewed articles, published between 2004 and 2015, were included. A total of 5081 treatments with CaHA were performed on 2779 patients. A total of 173 (3%) AEs were reported. The assessed types of AEs consisted of nodules (n=166, 96%), persistent inflammation/swelling (n=4, 2%), persistent erythema (n=2, 1%), and overcorrection (n=1, 1%).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results in this study, CaHA appears to have a good safety profile. Nodules are by far the most common AE. Of the reported nodules, 49% occurred in "dynamic" areas currently known for having a higher tendency for nodules. Several treatment approaches exist for managing CaHA nodules; however, in most cases, CaHA nodules are not visible and resolve without intervention.

Delayed immune mediated adverse effects to hyaluronic Acid fillers: report of five cases and review of the literature

Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers in cosmetic medicine have been considered relatively safe, though fillers used in European countries and throughout the world are not necessarily approved by the Food and Drug Administration. As their use continues to expand worldwide, physicians in a wide range of medical specialties are authorized to perform HA injections, including general medicine practitioners and even dentists. An increasing number of reports have appeared regarding side effects to these products. It is now known that reactions to Hyaluronic acid are related not only to technical faults of the injections, but also to immune responses, including delayed hypersensitivity and granulomatous reactions. Herein, we describe five cases treated by a variety of treatment modalities, all with delayed reactions to different brands of hyaluronic acid fillers. As there is currently no standardization of treatment options of adverse effects, these cases accentuate the debate regarding the approach to the individual patient and the possible need for pre-testing in patients with an atopic tendency.