Guideline-based medicine grading on the basis of the guidelines of care for ambulatory atopic dermatitis treatment in the United States

Evaluation of the Educational Quality of Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy Videos on YouTube with IVORY and LAP-VEGaS Guidelines

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the educational quality of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EE-DCR) videos on YouTube with Instructional Videos in Otorhinolaryngology by YO-IFOS (IVORY) and LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) guidelines and to evaluate the correlation of the 2 guidelines. Methods: EE-DCR videos were queried using search terms on YouTube. Views, likes, likes/dislikes ratio, age, and length of videos were noted. Videos were evaluated using the IVORY and LAP-VEGaS guidelines. Two IVORY scores were created: total (IVORY-1) and organ-specific (IVORY-2). The correlation analysis between video features and guideline scores was performed. Results: A total of 61 EE-DCR videos were evaluated. The mean score of LAP-VEGaS was 10.3 (±SD 2.7), the mean IVORY-1 score was 22.5 (±SD 5.5), and the mean IVORY-2 score was 10.6 (±SD 1.94). Correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between the IVORY-1 total score and the number of likes, the duration of the video, the age of the video, and the LAP-VEGaS score. Linear regression analysis showed that higher IVORY-1 scores predicted longer video duration, newer video age, and higher LAP-VEGaS scores. There was a significant association between LAP-VEGaS categories and the IVORY-1 total score (P < .001). Conclusion: The quality of EE-DCR videos is generally low to moderate. The IVORY and LAP-VEGaS guidelines were found to be correlated with each other. Both guidelines can be used to evaluate EE-DCR videos and otolaryngology surgical education videos in general. We believe that scales such as IVORY and LAP-VEGaS may be improved according to specific surgical procedures.

Assessment and Management of Atopic Dermatitis in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review

Atopic dermatitis is a complex, recurrent, chronic inflammatory skin condition. It frequently begins to manifest in early childhood and may last throughout adulthood. The need for clinical practice guidelines that are based on evidence is critical for efficient and secure care. Little is known about how primary care providers (PCPs) should handle pediatric and adult atopic dermatitis cases and whether they should follow national recommendations. Our systemic review aimed to examine management strategies for treating adult and pediatric (family) atopic dermatitis, including topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), topical corticosteroids (TCS), skin emollients, oral antihistamines, and diet. Data sources were PubMed (MEDLINE) and Embase. Our review investigated English-language articles from 2014 to 2023 that studied the management of adult and children atopic dermatitis. Overall, there were 15 articles included. Surveys and analyses of national databases were the most widely used methods (n=7). The use of TCS by PCPs was common, but they also overprescribed nonsedating antihistamines, favored low-potency drugs, and avoided TCIs. Most studies relied on healthcare personnel reporting their typical behaviors rather than looking at specific patient encounters and it is considered a limitation. Finally, there are gaps in knowledge and management of critical topics such as prescribing TCIs and understanding the safety profiles of TCS, when it comes to treating adult and pediatric atopic dermatitis. Future research in this area is urgently needed because the current systemic assessment is mostly restricted to small studies that assess prescribing behaviors with scant information describing nonmedication management.

Management of Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis by Primary Care Providers: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Primary care providers (PCPs), including pediatricians and general practitioners, are often the first to see children with eczema/atopic dermatitis (AD). Little is known about management of pediatric AD by PCPs and adherence to national guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To review existing literature examining management components of pediatric AD (topical corticosteroids [TCS], topical calcineurin inhibitors [TCIs], antihistamines, bathing, emollients, and diet) by PCPs.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/Medline and Embase.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

English-language articles dated 2015 to 2020 reporting outcomes addressing management of pediatric AD by PCPs.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Two authors independently screened titles/abstracts, reviewed full-text articles, extracted relevant data, and evaluated study quality. Disagreements were resolved by a third author.

RESULTS

Twenty articles were included. Surveys and national database analyses were the most common methodologies (n = 7 each). PCPs commonly prescribed TCS but had a preference for low-potency agents, overprescribed nonsedating antihistamines, and avoided TCIs. PCPs commonly recommended emollients, although this was not universal. Data characterizing nonmedication management were limited.

LIMITATIONS

Most studies did not examine individual patient encounters, but rather relied on providers reporting their general behaviors. Provider behavior may vary based on country of practice.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

Knowledge and management gaps exist among PCPs in treating pediatric AD in key areas including knowledge of TCS safety profiles and prescribing of TCIs. The current literature is largely limited to small studies that evaluate prescribing behaviors with limited data characterizing nonmedication management, highlighting the need for future research in this area.

Effects of variations in access to care for children with atopic dermatitis

Background

An estimated 50% of children in the US are Medicaid-insured. Some of these patients have poor health literacy and limited access to medications and specialty care. These factors affect treatment utilization for pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), the most common inflammatory skin disease in children. This study assesses and compares treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) between large cohorts of Medicaid and commercially insured children with AD.

Methods

Pediatric patients with AD were identified from 2 large US healthcare claims databases (2011–2016). Included patients had continuous health plan eligibility for ≥6 months before and ≥12 months after the first AD diagnosis (index date). Patients with an autoimmune disease diagnosis within 6 months of the index date were excluded. Treatment patterns and all-cause and AD-related HCRU during the observation period were compared between commercially and Medicaid-insured children.

Results

A minority of children were evaluated by a dermatology or allergy/immunology specialist. Several significant differences were observed between commercially and Medicaid-insured children with AD. Disparities detected for Medicaid-insured children included: comparatively fewer received specialist care, emergency department and urgent care center utilization was higher, a greater proportion had asthma and non-atopic morbidities, high- potency topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors were less often prescribed, and prescriptions for antihistamines were more than three times higher, despite similar rates of comorbid asthma and allergies among antihistamine users. Treatment patterns also varied substantially across physician specialties.

Conclusions

Results suggest barriers in accessing specialty care for all children with AD and significant differences in management between commercially and Medicaid-insured children. These disparities in treatment and access to specialty care may contribute to poor AD control, especially in Medicaid-insured patients.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12895-020-00114-x.

Coenzyme Q0 From Antrodia cinnamomea Exhibits Drug-Resistant Bacteria Eradication and Keratinocyte Inflammation Mitigation to Ameliorate Infected Atopic Dermatitis in Mouse

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin disease that is usually accompanied by Staphylococcus aureus infection due to cutaneous barrier-function damage. Benzenoid compounds from Antrodia cinnamomea are known to exhibit antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities. This study sought to investigate the potential of benzenoids for treating bacteria-infected AD. The compounds were screened against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Coenzyme Q₀ (CoQ₀), a key ingredient in A. cinnamomea, showed the strongest MRSA growth inhibition. We further tested the inhibitory effect of CoQ₀ on planktonic and biofilm MRSA. The work was also performed to explore the potential effectiveness of CoQ₀ on AD using activated keratinocytes and in vivo experimental AD mice as the models. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of CoQ₀ against MRSA were 7.81 μg/ml. CoQ₀ was found to eradicate biofilm MRSA efficiently and reduce the biofilm thickness. CoQ₀ killed MRSA by inhibiting DNA polymerase and topoisomerases. A proteomic assay showed that CoQ₀ also reduced the ribosomal proteins. In the anti-inflammation study, CoQ₀ was found to downregulate the expression of interleukin (IL)-6, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand (CCL)5, and CCL17 in HaCaT cells. CoQ₀ at 0.5 μg/ml could recover the filaggrin decreased by HaCaT activation to the normal control. We established a bacteria-infected AD-like model in mice using ovalbumin (OVA) and topically applied MRSA. Topical CoQ₀ delivery lessened the MRSA presence in the AD-like lesions by >90%. The erythema, barrier function, and epidermal thickness of the AD-like wounds were improved by CoQ₀ through the reduction of IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, interferon (IFN)-γ, and by neutrophil infiltration in the lesional skin. CoQ₀ is therefore regarded as effective in mitigating AD symptoms associated with bacterial load.