Real-world experience with mechlorethamine gel in patients with mycosis fungoides-cutaneous lymphoma: Preliminary findings from a prospective observational study

Effectiveness and tolerability of chlormethine gel for the management of mycosis fungoides: a multicenter real-life evaluation

Background

Topical chlormethine (CL) is recommended as a first-line treatment for early-stage mycosis fungoides (MF) and in 2017, the European Medicines Agency approved the CL gel formulation to treat adult patients. More recently, to increase patient compliance and adherence, clinicians have developed flexible protocols that allow the concomitant use of CL gel with topical corticosteroids in daily practice regimens. Therefore, sharing real-life data on CL gel use and side effects management may help improve the use of this agent.

Objectives

To expand knowledge about the actual use of CL gel in patients with MF, the present study assessed the improvement of MF skin lesions after CL gel treatment and provided information on the management of cutaneous adverse events (AEs) in a real-life setting.

Methods

This was an Italian retrospective study conducted among six dermatology referral centers. Patients ≥18 years affected by MF and in treatment with CL gel (160 µ/g), alone or in combination according to routine clinical practice, between December 2019 and December 2021 were considered. The study's primary aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of CL gel in terms of overall response rate (ORR) after 3 months of treatment.

Results

A total of 79 patients (61% male) with different stages of MF (84% early stage) were included. CL gel was prescribed mainly in association with topical corticosteroids (66% of patients). ORR after 3 months of treatment was 42%, with no differences between early- and advanced-stage MF. Response rates improved over time up to 97% after 18 months of treatment. Overall, 66 AEs were reported in 67% of patients; most were hyperpigmentation (45%) and irritant contact dermatitis (37%). Six AEs led to treatment discontinuation, and five out of six (83%) patients who reported these events resumed treatment after interruption. No AEs were classified as severe.

Conclusions

Our observations support the use of CL gel in patients with early- and advanced-stage MF, making it a valuable treatment option.

EORTC consensus recommendations for the treatment of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome - Update 2023

On behalf of the EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Tumours Group (EORTC-CLTG) and following up on earlier versions published in 2006 and 2017 this document provides an updated standard for the treatment of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome (MF/SS). It considers recent relevant publications and treatment options introduced into clinical practice after 2017. Consensus was established among the authors through a series of consecutive consultations in writing and a round of discussion. Treatment options are assigned to each disease stage and, whenever possible and clinically useful, separated into first- and second line options annotated with levels of evidence. Major changes to the previous version include the incorporation of chlormethine, brentuximab vedotin, and mogamulizumab, recommendations on the use of pegylated interferon α (after withdrawal of recombinant unpegylated interferons), and the addition of paragraphs on supportive therapy and on the care of older patients. Still, skin-directed therapies are the most appropriate option for early-stage MF and most patients have a normal life expectancy but may suffer morbidity and impaired quality of life. In advanced disease treatment options have expanded recently. Most patients receive multiple consecutive therapies with treatments often having a relatively short duration of response. For those patients prognosis is still poor and only for a highly selected subset long term remission can be achieved with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Understanding of the disease, its epidemiology and clinical course, and its most appropriate management are gradually advancing, and there is well-founded hope that this will lead to further improvements in the care of patients with MF/SS.

Neue Therapien kutaner T-Zell-Lymphome

Kutane Lymphome gehören zu den seltenen Erkrankungen. Sie stellen eine heterogene Gruppe mit sehr unterschiedlicher klinischer Symptomatik und Prognose dar. Aufgrund der Komplexität der Erkrankung ist die Einbeziehung eines spezialisierten Zentrums empfehlenswert.

Wir stellen im Folgenden drei Patienten mit primär kutanen T-Zell-Lymphomen (CTCL) aus unserem Hauttumorzentrum vor. Anhand dieser Fallbeispiele möchten wir die multimodale Therapie von CTCL unter Berücksichtigung neu zugelassener Medikamente für diese Indikation beschreiben.

Chlormethine Gel for Patients with Mycosis Fungoides Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma: A Review of Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trial and Real-World Settings

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a rare disease and is the most common form of cutaneous T cell lymphoma. Topical chlormethine (CL) gel is the first cytotoxic chemotherapy gel that was specifically developed for treatment of MF. In this review, we provide an overview of all available data on the use of CL gel for treatment of patients with MF. On the basis of the current data collected, CL gel is highly effective, with good response rates observed both in clinical trial and real-world settings. While the gel is approved for monotherapy, it is also used in combination with concomitant skin-directed or systemic therapies in clinical practice. Responses to CL gel treatment can be rapid, but they also frequently occur with a delayed onset of up to 6 months. This indicates that continued treatment with CL gel is important. CL gel has a manageable safety profile, with most adverse events being mild and skin related. Contact dermatitis is one of the more common skin-related adverse events to occur with CL gel treatment that can potentially lead to treatment discontinuation. The data from the literature indicate that patients being treated with CL gel should be monitored carefully, and that dermatitis must be managed effectively to allow patients to continue treatment and achieve the best possible response to treatment.

Topical chlormethine gel in the treatment of mycosis fungoides: a single-center real-life experience and systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Gel formulation of chlormethine (CG) has gained a preeminent role among therapies available for mycosis fungoides (MF).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the frequency of use of CG for MF treatment and to determine the limits and potentialities of CG in a real-world setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of articles published prior to October 2021 was performed. Articles were included in the review if a full-text English version was available. MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus and Web of Science were each queried from their date of inception with the following terms: "mechlorethamine gel", "chlormethine gel" and "mycosis fungoides". The reference lists of the studies retrieved were searched manually. Moreover, this study included all consecutive patients with different stages of MF (from IA to IIB) who started treatment with CG gel between July 2020 and May 2021. Data of the literature were compared to our single-center real-life experience.

RESULTS

Of the surveyed literature, 11 publications were included in the final analysis describing a total of 548 patients with MF. 11 patients with a median (standard deviation) age of 66 years (15.1) were enrolled and followed up, receiving CG (0.02% chlormethine HCl). Response to treatment resulted higher (90.1%) in our study population than in other real-world experiences published in literature.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review supports the role of CG for MF treatment, showing its limits and potentialities. Our single-center real-life experience revealed an elevated percentage of clinical response with high safety and tolerance, demonstrating its versatile use with dose and application rate adaptability.

Feasibility of Deriving Health State Utilities in Mycosis Fungoides Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Using Mapping Algorithms

BACKGROUND

A prospective, observational, US-based study (PROVe) used three questionnaires (Pruritus-VAS, Skindex-29, MF/SS-CTCL QoL) to assess quality of life in patients diagnosed with mycosis fungoides cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (MF-CTCL); however, none of these studies was provided with a preference-based algorithm yielding health state utility values (HSUVs).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of deriving HSUVs from published mapping algorithms by comparing mapped utilities with the HSUVs reported in the MF-CTCL literature.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, the School of Health and Related Research Health Utility Database (ScHARRHUD), and the Health Economics Research Centre (HERC) database of mapping studies (version 7.0) to identify any studies mapping Pruritus-VAS, Skindex-29, or MF/SS-CTCL QoL to a preference-based instrument (ideally, EQ-5D), and any studies assessing HSUVs in MF-CTCL. Two algorithms from a recent study that mapped Pruritus-VAS onto EQ-5D-3L were applied to the PROVe patient-level data. We performed multiple imputation to handle missing VAS data, calculated average mapped utilities in the whole sample, and compared them with relevant factors using the t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

Overall, 298 patients provided 1441 Pruritus-VAS scores over a 2-year follow-up (1-21 visits per patient). The average mapped HSUVs ranged between 0.950 and 0.999 depending on the algorithm applied and imputation of missing data. In subgroup analysis, significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed according to age, race, and cancer stage. A few previous studies that collected HSUVs from MF-CTCL patients reported mean values of between 0.82 and 0.87 using time trade-off, 0.63 and 0.83 using EQ-5D, and 0.51 and 0.69 using the HUI3.

CONCLUSIONS

The HSUVs derived by applying published mapping algorithms to PROVe Pruritus-VAS data appeared largely overestimated if compared with the existing literature. More research is required to understand the applicability of existing mapping algorithms and to develop new mapping algorithms in MF-CTCL.

Chlormethine Gel is Efficient and Safe in Mycosis Fungoides Skin Lesions

Chlormethine is a bifunctional cytotoxic alkylating agent that binds to DNA, resulting in cell death (apoptosis). Chlormethine (also known as mechlorethamine) gel (CL gel) was approved in the European Union in 2017 and was first used in 2019. The aim of the study is to examine evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of chlormethine gel in everyday clinical experience from a cutaneous lymphoma centre. Twenty-three patients with stage IA-IIB mycosis fungoides received chlormethine gel between September 2020 and May 2021. All patients started by applying the gel daily and were monitored every month. At 1, 3, 6 and 9 months, 0%, 43.47%, 56.52% and 65.22% of patients, respectively, achieved an overall response. Five out of 23 patients (21.73%) achieved near complete response at a mean time of 6 months. Chlormethine gel was given as monotherapy in 12 patients (52.17%), and in addition to systemic treatments (methotrexate and peginterferon alpha-2a) in 11 patients (47.82%). Adverse events (AE) were recorded in 43.47% of patients, but only 3 discontinued treatment, due to dermatitis. Scale down of the treatment to application 3-times per week led to better patient compliance. This study shows that chlormethine gel is effective and safe in patients with mycosis fungoides with different types of skin lesions.

Chlormethin-Gel zur Behandlung der Mycosis fungoides: Ein Expertenkonsens aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz (DACH-Region) zum Therapiemanagement

HINTERGRUND

Chlormethin-Gel ist in Europa zur Therapie von Patienten mit Mycosis fungoides in allen Krankheitsstadien zugelassen. Die optimalen Behandlungsregime hinsichtlich Frequenz, Dosierung, Kombinations- oder Erhaltungstherapien sind noch nicht vollständig etabliert.

METHODIK

Zehn in der Erforschung und Behandlung kutaner T-Zell-Lymphome erfahrene Experten aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz (DACH-Region) wurden schriftlich zu Indikation, Anwendungsfrequenz, Beurteilung des Therapieerfolgs, Begleittherapie, Nebenwirkungen, Kombinationstherapien in späteren Krankheitsstadien, Erhaltungstherapie und Adhärenz im Rahmen der Therapie der Mycosis fungoides mit Chlormethin-Gel befragt. Die strukturiert aufbereiteten Ergebnisse der Umfrage wurden in einer Konsensuskonferenz diskutiert und Empfehlungen zum Management der Therapie mit Chlormethin-Gel entwickelt.

ERGEBNISSE

Wesentlich für die Therapie mit Chlormethin-Gel ist ein individuelles, symptomorientiertes Therapiemanagement. Systemische Nebenwirkungen des Wirkstoffs sind wegen der fehlenden systemischen Verfügbarkeit bei topischer Anwendung unwahrscheinlich. Die häufig auftretende allergische oder irritativ-toxische Kontaktdermatitis kann durch eine Anpassung des Therapieregimes, Therapiepausen sowie nebenwirkungsspezifische und unterstützende Maßnahmen häufig beherrscht werden. Ein einschleichender Therapiebeginn mit Anwendung von Chlormethin-Gel jeden zweiten Tag kann die Tolerabilität wesentlich verbessern, insbesondere wenn die Therapie alternierend mit topischen Kortikosteroiden erfolgt.

SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN

Die Anwendung von Chlormethin-Gel bei Mycosis fungoides wird durch die begleitende Kontaktdermatitis häufig eingeschränkt. Mit einem geeigneten Therapie- und Nebenwirkungsmanagement können vermeidbare Therapieabbrüche verhindert werden und mehr Patienten von der Therapie profitieren.

New developments in skin-directed treatments of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

The therapeutic approach for mycosis fungoides, the most common type of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, is based mainly on the stage of the disease, and skin-directed treatment is recommended by all international guidelines as the first-line treatment in early-stage disease. Skin-directed treatments may be also given in combination with systemic therapies in early-stage mycosis fungoides patients recalcitrant to different types of skin-directed treatments, or in certain patients with high-risk features. Advanced-stage mycosis fungoides is treated mainly with systemic treatments, which may be combined with skin-directed treatments. Due to the rarity of mycosis fungoides, controlled clinical trials of the different skin-directed treatment modalities are almost non-existent, with a few exceptions, and therefore recommendations are largely based on cohort studies and expert opinion. This paper reviews the new developments in skin-directed treatments and provides an update on new studies of already well-known therapies, and an update on novel treatments.

Increased Chlormethine-Induced DNA Double-Stranded Breaks in Malignant T Cells from Mycosis Fungoides Skin Lesions

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Chlormethine (CL) is recommended as first-line therapy for MF, with a major purpose to kill tumor cells through DNA alkylation. To study the extent of treatment susceptibility and tumor specificity, we investigated the gene expression of different DNA repair pathways, DNA double-stranded breaks, and tumor cell proliferation of clonal TCR Vβ+ tumor cell populations in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma skin cells on direct exposure to CL. Healthy human T cells were less susceptible to CL exposure than two T-lymphoma cell lines, resulting in higher proportions of viable cells. Interestingly, in T cells from MF lesions, we observed a downregulation of several important DNA repair pathways, even complete silencing of RAD51AP1, FANC1, and BRCA2 involved in homologous recombination repair. In the presence of CL, the double-stranded DNA breaks in malignant MF skin T cells increased significantly as well as the expression of the apoptotic gene CASP3. These data point toward an important effect of targeting CL on MF skin tumor T cells, which support CL use as an early cutaneous lymphoma treatment and can be of synergistic use, especially beneficial in the setting of combination skin-directed therapies for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Real-life experience with chlormethine gel for early-stage mycosis fungoides with emphasis on types and management of cutaneous side-effects. J DERMATOL TREAT 2021;33:2364-2370. [PMID: 34427536 DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2021.1967266]

BACKGROUND

Real-life efficacy data on the recently approved once daily application of chlormethine gel (CG) for mycosis fungoides (MF) is limited, and detailed characterization of the side effects and their management are strikingly sparse.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and particularly the side effect profile of CG in early-stage MF patients in a real-life setting.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of 66 early-stage MF adult patients treated with CG in 2016-2019.

RESULTS

Treatment with a once-daily application (52%), or at lower frequencies (48%), in some with topical corticosteroids (TCS) (40%), resulted in an overall response rate of 50%, with no significant difference between stage IA and IB. Cutaneous side effects (56%) included irritant or allergic contact dermatitis (36%, mostly mild/moderate and manageable by reducing application frequency and/or adding TCS or interrupting treatment), unmasking effect (9%), hyperpigmentation (14%), and pruritus (9%). Withdrawal due to side effects occurred in 19.6% of patients (15% for contact dermatitis).

CONCLUSION

In real-life management, flexible regimens of CG sometimes with TCS, show efficacy in early-stage MF and may reduce the rate of contact dermatitis, the main treatment-limiting side effect. Practical recommendations with emphasis of the types, time of appearance, and management of side effects are provided.

Topical treatments for early-stage mycosis fungoides using Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria: A systematic review

Background

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a cutaneous lymphoma; most patients present with early, skin-limited disease and are managed by dermatologists.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to systematically review and assess the evidence on topical treatments for early-stage (IA, IB, IIA) MF.

Methods

We performed a literature search via MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria were used to assess the certainty of the data.

Results

Two searches yielded 1252 references; 26 met the inclusion criteria and included literature on nitrogen mustard, retinoids, corticosteroids, carmustine, fluorouracil, methotrexate-laurocapram, hexadecylphosphocholine, peldesine, ingenol mebutate, topical methotrexate with oxygen flow-assisted LP3 carrier, and resiquimod. Most studies were single intervention, observational series. Nitrogen mustard, with the most published reports, was effective with 12%-82% early-stage MF patients (total n > 1000) achieving complete remission (CR) (low certainty evidence). Clinical CR was achieved among 10%-60% treated with topical retinoids (low certainty evidence). Two moderate-sized retrospective case series on topical steroids had 18%-63% CR (low certainty evidence). Only single studies were available for the other therapies.

Conclusions

For most outcomes of interest, the GRADE certainty for topical therapies for early-stage MF was low. Further randomized controlled trials and inclusion of quality of life indicators are needed.

Post hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Controlled, Phase 2 Study to Assess Response Rates with Chlormethine/Mechlorethamine Gel in Patients with Stage IA-IIA Mycosis Fungoides

BACKGROUND

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Patients can be treated using chlormethine gel, a skin-directed therapy developed and approved for MF. In the randomized, controlled 201 trial, chlormethine gel was found to be noninferior to equal-strength chlormethine ointment. However, there remains a need to gain more insight into outcome measures after treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to further investigate the potential of chlormethine gel treatment through a novel post hoc analysis of the 201 trial data (NCT00168064).

METHODS

Patients were randomized to chlormethine gel or ointment; response assessments included Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (CAILS) and total body surface area (BSA). In this post hoc analysis, additional subgroup response analyses were performed for stage IA/IB-IIA MF. Very good partial response (75 to <100% improvement) was included as an additional response category. Time to response and overall response trends were determined. Finally, multivariate time-to-event analyses were performed to determine whether associations were observed between treatment frequency, response, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Response rates were significantly higher for patients with stage IA MF for CAILS (intent-to-treat [p = 0.0014] and efficacy-evaluable [EE; p = 0.0036] populations) and BSA (EE population [p = 0.0488]) treated with gel versus ointment. Time to first CAILS response and response trends were better for all-stage gel-treated patients overall. No association was seen between treatment frequency and response or occurrence of adverse events at the following visit. An association was observed between the occurrence of contact dermatitis and improved clinical response at the next visit (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This post hoc analysis shows that treatment with chlormethine gel may result in higher and faster response rates compared with chlormethine ointment, which confirms and expands results reported in the original analysis. The incidence of contact dermatitis may potentially be a prognostic indicator for clinical response; this needs to be confirmed in a larger population.

Chlormethine Gel in Combination with Other Therapies in the Treatment of Patients with Mycosis Fungoides Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma: Three Case Reports

Introduction

Chlormethine gel is a skin-directed therapy recommended for patients with early-stage mycosis fungoides (MF) cutaneous T cell lymphoma.

Methods

Herein, we present three cases of patients with stage IB–IIB MF who were treated with chlormethine gel and concomitant therapies.

Results

All patients responded well to treatment with chlormethine gel; complete responses were observed with improvements in Modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool scores and severity of lesions; one patient reported an improvement in quality of life. While adverse events did occur after treatment initiation, they were skin related and could be effectively managed through reductions in treatment frequency and the addition of emollients and topical steroids.

Conclusion

The cases presented here illustrate that chlormethine gel is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with MF who had received prior therapies that had proved ineffective. Chlormethine gel could be combined with other skin-directed or systemic therapies for optimal benefit. Incidences of dermatitis were seen to be successfully managed and quality of life benefits were also reported.

Chlormethine Gel for the Treatment of Skin Lesions in All Stages of Mycosis Fungoides Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: A Narrative Review and International Experience

Mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common form of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, is a disease typically with an indolent course that is initially characterized by localized patches and plaques. In the early stages of the disease, treatment involves skin-directed therapies (SDTs) such as topical corticosteroids and retinoids. Chlormethine gel (also known as mechlorethamine) was the first SDT purposely developed to treat MF and is currently endorsed by international guidelines for the treatment of adult patients with MF as a first-line therapy. While chlormethine is an efficacious therapy, its usage may be complicated by the development of cutaneous reactions at the sites of application. Herein, we discuss the supportive guidelines for MF and the suitability of chlormethine as a therapeutic option in patients with MF. In addition, we present real-world experience on the use of chlormethine gel from clinics in the USA, Israel, and France with the aim of demonstrating the efficacy of chlormethine gel in routine clinical practice and outlining strategies that are being used to manage emergent cutaneous reactions.

The PROVe Study: US Real-World Experience with Chlormethine/Mechlorethamine Gel in Combination with Other Therapies for Patients with Mycosis Fungoides Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

Background

Chlormethine/mechlorethamine gel is a skin-directed therapy for patients with mycosis fungoides cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Currently, real-world data on chlormethine gel are lacking.

Objective

Our objective was to analyze the effect of chlormethine gel in combination with other therapies on efficacy, safety, and health-related quality of life in a real-world setting.

Methods

This prospective, observational study enrolled adult patients actively using chlormethine gel. Patients were monitored for up to 2 years during standard-of-care clinic visits. No specific visit schedules or clinical assessments, with the exception of patient-completed questionnaires, were mandated because of the expected variability in practice patterns. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with stage IA–IB disease receiving chlormethine + topical corticosteroids + other with ≥ 50% decrease in body surface area from baseline to 12 months. Response was assessed at each visit using by-time analysis, which investigates the trend to treatment response and allows assessment of response over time. Health-related quality of life was assessed with the Skindex-29 questionnaire.

Results

In total, 298 patients were monitored. At 12 months post-treatment initiation, 44.4% (chlormethine + topical corticosteroids + other) and 45.1% (patients receiving chlormethine + other treatment) of efficacy-evaluable patients were responders. By-time analysis demonstrated that peak response occurred (chlormethine + other; 66.7%) at 18 months. There was a significant correlation between responder status and lower post-baseline Skindex-29 scores.

Conclusions

This real-world study confirmed that chlormethine gel is an important therapeutic option for patients with mycosis fungoides and contributes to reducing the severity of skin lesions and improving health-related quality of life.

Infographic

Topical and Systemic Formulation Options for Cutaneous T Cell Lymphomas

Although various anti-cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) therapies are available for clinical use, appropriate chemotherapy lines for the treatment of CTCLs have yet to be established. Therefore, to date, various clinical trials for the treatment of advanced CTCLs are ongoing. In this review, we evaluate the therapeutic options that are available in clinical practice for treatment of early- and advanced-stage CTCLs (targeted therapies, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, retinoids, interferons, cytotoxic drugs, etc.). We also examine clinical trials of novel regimens for the treatment of CTCLs.