1
|
Smith KN, Algarin YA, Archila M, Barbieri JS, Goldman N, Perez-Chada LM, Noe MH. Exploring dermatologists' perspectives on vaccines in dermatology: a qualitative study. Arch Dermatol Res 2023; 316:36. [PMID: 38085346 PMCID: PMC11284893 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-023-02777-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Vaccination rates among adults in the United States, including dermatology patients, remain suboptimal. Previous research has concluded that outpatient specialty offices often have administrative and patient-related barriers to administering vaccines in their clinics, however, this has never been examined specifically in dermatology. This study aims to examine dermatologists' perspectives on vaccine education in dermatology clinics, identify facilitators and barriers to vaccine administration in dermatology clinics, and explore strategies to improve vaccination rates in dermatology patients. Virtual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with board-certified dermatologists to explore their perspectives on vaccines in dermatology clinic. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to analyze the data. Participating dermatologists were 60% female (n = 9) and 40% male (n = 6) and had a median of 7 years of clinic experience (min-max: 3-39 years). Vaccine education emerged as one of the prominent themes during the interview with dermatologists, who emphasized the importance of comprehensive vaccine education for both healthcare providers and patients. Barriers identified encompassed patient hesitancy, lack of provider knowledge, resource limitations, and logistical challenges. Dermatologists proposed solutions such as standardized protocols, improved patient communication, enhanced coordination with other healthcare providers, and increased clinic resources. These results emphasize that dermatologists can play a crucial role in advocating for and addressing preventative care through vaccine implementation and provide a high-level framework to think about implementation. Additionally, this study highlights the need for comprehensive vaccine education, systematic implementation strategies, and organizational support within dermatology clinics to improve vaccine administration for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Nabel Smith
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yanci A Algarin
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
| | - Marjorie Archila
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John S Barbieri
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nathaniel Goldman
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Lincoln Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Megan H Noe
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Noe MH, Archila M, Barbieri JS, Goldman N, Lopez CG, Mostaghimi A, Scherer AM, Tan AJ, Perez-Chada LM, Asgari MM, Gelfand JM. The patient perspective on vaccine uptake in adults with psoriasis and eczema. Arch Dermatol Res 2023; 315:1583-1592. [PMID: 36749390 PMCID: PMC9904245 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-023-02546-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Having a chronic disease is one of the most consistent factors associated with vaccine uptake for adults in the general population, but vaccination beliefs and behaviors specific to those with chronic skin diseases have not been explored. The objective of this study was to explore factors associated with vaccine uptake and barriers to vaccination in adults with psoriasis and eczema. Virtual, video-based semi-structured interviews were performed with adults who self-reported a diagnosis of psoriasis or eczema. Interviews explored themes around healthcare decision making, perceived risks/benefits to vaccination, barriers, and vaccine knowledge. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Of 34 study participants, 25 participants (74%) were females and 9 (26%) were males, with a mean age of 50.8 years (SD: 16.4, range: 24-71 yrs). Half of participants (n = 17) had psoriasis, and half (n = 17) had eczema. Participants recognized both personal and societal benefits to vaccines. Common vaccination barriers identified were access to appointments, concerns about side effects, and misinformation. Physicians, friends/family, and media, including internet resources, were health information resources identified by patients. These results summarize the unique patient perspective around vaccine uptake in adults with eczema and psoriasis and represent an important first step in a multi-pronged approach to improve vaccination rates in adults with chronic skin diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan H Noe
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Marjorie Archila
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John S Barbieri
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nathaniel Goldman
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- School of Medicine, New York Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christina G Lopez
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arash Mostaghimi
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aaron M Scherer
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA, USA
| | - Alice J Tan
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | | - Maryam M Asgari
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joel M Gelfand
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chiricozzi A, Gisondi P, Bellinato F, Girolomoni G. Immune Response to Vaccination in Patients with Psoriasis Treated with Systemic Therapies. Vaccines (Basel) 2020; 8:vaccines8040769. [PMID: 33339348 PMCID: PMC7767096 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8040769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease usually treated with immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive agents. The use of these agents has been associated with an increased susceptibility to infections. Vaccination might represent a critical aspect in the management of patients with psoriasis treated with immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive therapies. This narrative review aimed to provide an overview on the immune response to vaccines in subjects treated with systemic agents used to treat patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. Publications appearing in PubMed, Scopus, and ISI–Web of Knowledge database were selected using Medical Subject Headings key terms. Overall, published data confirmed that vaccination with attenuated live vaccines during therapy with immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive therapies should be avoided. For nonlive vaccines, a more favorable safety profile of biologic agents compared to conventional systemic agents is described as the humoral response to vaccines is in general well-preserved. Treatment with cyclosporine and methotrexate is associated with lower antibody titers to vaccines, and thus these agents are better discontinued during vaccination. In contrast, treatment with biological agents is not associated with lower antibody response and can thus be continued safely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Chiricozzi
- Dermatologia, Dipartimento Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Dermatologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-3395668320; Fax: +39-0761-571321
| | - Paolo Gisondi
- Section of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (P.G.); (F.B.); (G.G.)
| | - Francesco Bellinato
- Section of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (P.G.); (F.B.); (G.G.)
| | - Giampiero Girolomoni
- Section of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (P.G.); (F.B.); (G.G.)
| |
Collapse
|