Concordance data for inpatient asynchronous eDermatology consultation for immunobullous disease, zoster, and vasculitis

Descriptive and Concordance Data for Asynchronous Teledermatology Consultations for Dermatitis: A Retrospective Study

Background: Implementation of teledermatology for assessing dermatitis patients provides comparable diagnostic and management outcomes to in-person visits, but studies on consumer to physician asynchronous teledermatology (eDerm) consults submitted by patients in large dermatitis cohorts are limited. The objective of this study was to retrospectively assess associations of eDerm consults with diagnostic accuracy, management, and follow-up in a large cohort of dermatitis patients. Methods: One thousand forty-five eDerm encounters between April 1, 2020, and October 29, 2021, recorded in the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System Epic electronic medical record were reviewed. Descriptive statistics and concordance were analyzed using chi-square. Results: Asynchronous teledermatology modified/changed treatment in 97.6% of cases and had the same diagnosis between teledermatology and in-person follow-up in 78.3% of cases. Patients following up in the time line requested were more likely to follow-up in person (61.2% vs. 43.8%) than those who did not. Patients with intertriginous dermatitis (p = 0.003), preexisting conditions (p = 0.002), who required follow-ups (<0.0001), and moderate-high severity scores of 4-7 (p = 0.019) were more likely to follow up in the time line requested. Limitations: Lack of similar in-person visit data did not allow us to compare descriptive and concordance data between eDerm and clinic visits. Conclusions: eDerm offers a quick accessible solution to provide comparable dermatologic care for patients with dermatitis.

Inpatient Teledermatology: a Review

Purpose of Review

Inpatient teledermatology is a rapidly growing field with significant potential to add value and streamline patient care. This review summarizes the current literature on inpatient teledermatology, primarily focusing on its diagnostic and clinical management utility as compared to live dermatologic evaluation.

Recent Findings

The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of inpatient teledermatology, which has been shown to be comparable to live hospitalist evaluation for triage, diagnosis, and management of hospitalized patients for a wide variety of conditions. Despite its comparative cost-effectiveness and recent changes in reimbursement practices, inpatient teledermatology still lacks sufficient reimbursement incentive for widespread implementation.

Summary

Inpatient teledermatology is an effective, efficient, accurate, and cost-effective means of managing the hospital burden of skin disease, especially in areas where access to dermatologic care is limited. It is essential that dermatologists and referring providers comprehend the use and potential pitfalls of inpatient teledermatology to effectively incorporate it into hospital practice.