Preoperative cataract surgery use of an intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) in a patient with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and chronic anterior uveitis

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for macular edema and some other rare indications in uveitis

In the present study, 110 eyes of 81 patients with uveitis who underwent intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) injection and had a follow-up of at least 6 months between January, 2012 and September, 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 298 IDI injections were administered (mean, 2.71±2.37; range, 1-12). The mean age of the patients was 49.44±16.67 years (range, 15-86 years). The mean follow-up time after the first IDI was 34.31±26.53 months (range, 6-115 months). In total, 77 (95.1%) patients had non-infectious uveitis, while 4 patients (4.9%) received IDI for uveitic macular edema in association with infectious uveitis (1 patient with acute retinal necrosis and 3 patients with systemic tuberculosis). IDI was injected under the umbrella of intravitreal ganciclovir injection in the patient with healed acute retinal necrosis for the associated pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. A total of 6 patients (7.4%) received IDI prior to phacoemulsification surgery to control the possible post-operative macular edema. In addition, 3 patients (3.7%) with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease received bilateral IDI as the systemic therapy could not be administered due to side-effects of the systemic treatment. In total, 1 patient (1.2%) with idiopathic retinal vasculitis, aneurysms and neuroretinitis was treated with IDI injections in both eyes in addition to systemic therapy to reduce the ongoing inflammation. Of note, two eyes (1.8%) received simultaneous single IDI and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor administration for the treatment of unilateral extrafoveal macular neovascularization (one with active serpiginous choroiditis and one with sympathetic ophthalmia). IDI was administered for the treatment of uveitic macular edema in 68 patients (83.9%). Best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.69±0.64 to 0.60±0.76 logMAR at the final visit (P=0.008). Baseline mean central macular thickness (CMT) was 499.74±229.60 µm (range, 187-1,187 µm) and the mean final CMT was 296.60±152.02 µm (range, 126-848 µm). Intraocular pressure elevation requiring topical antiglaucomatous eye drops occurred in 28 eyes (25.5%). During the follow-up period, bilateral glaucoma surgery was required in 1 patient (1.2%) and 25 of 65 phakic eyes (38.4%) underwent phacoemulsification. Retinal detachment occurred in one eye (0.9%), endophthalmitis in one eye (0.9%), and transient intravitreal hemorrhage occurred in three eyes (2.7%) after the IDI injections. On the whole, the present study demonstrates that although IDI is mostly employed in non-infectious uveitic eyes with macular edema, it can also be administered in cases with systemic therapy intolerance, pseudophakic macular edema prophylaxis, and with great caution, in selected cases involving infectious uveitis and macular edema.

Immunomodulatory treatment and surgical management of idiopathic uveitis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis in children: a French survey practice

BACKGROUND

Surgeries for idiopathic uveitis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis in children are complex because of the high risk of inflammatory postoperative complications. There is no consensus about treatment adaptation during the perioperative period. The objectives of this study are to report the therapeutic changes made in France and to determine whether maintaining or stopping immunosuppressive therapies is associated with an increased risk of surgical site infection or an increased risk of uveitis or arthritis flare-up.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2018 in six large University Hospitals in France. Inclusion criteria were chronic idiopathic uveitis or chronic uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis under immunosuppressive therapies at the time of the surgical procedure, operated before the age of 16. Data on perioperative treatments, inflammatory relapses and post-operative infections were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 76 surgeries (42% cataract surgeries, 30% glaucoma surgeries and 16% posterior capsule opacification surgeries) were performed on 37 children. Adaptation protocols were different in the six hospitals. Immunosuppressive therapies were discontinued in five cases (7%) before surgery. All the children in the discontinuation group had an inflammatory relapse within 3 months after surgery compared to only 25% in the other group. There were no postoperative infections.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show varying practices between centres. The benefit-risk balance seems to favour maintaining immunosuppressive therapies during surgery. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal perioperative treatments required to limit post-operative inflammatory relapses.

Intravitreal dexamethasone implant as an alternative to systemic steroids as prophylaxis for uveitic cataract surgery: a randomized trial

PURPOSE

To determine the utility of the dexamethasone implant (IVD) as an alternative to systemic steroids as prophylaxis against cystoid macular edema (CMO) in patients with chronic, recurrent CMO associated intermediate or posterior uveitis (IU/PU), and cataract undergoing cataract surgery.

METHODS

This was a randomized, parallel design, and clinical trial. Patients with IU/PU and cataract scheduled for cataract surgery were randomly assigned to receive the IVD concurrently with cataract surgery (Group 1: 20 patients) or systemic steroids (Group 2: 23 patients) tapered over 4-6 weeks along with uneventful cataract surgery and routine postoperative care. Patients with glaucoma/contraindications to steroids were excluded. All patients were followed up for 6 months.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Primary-incidence of postoperative CMO. Secondary-the change in BCVA (corrected distance visual acuity) and Central Subfield thickness (CST) and complications. Appropriate statistical analysis was done.

RESULTS

The median age was 47.3 ± 4.23 years (group 1) and 49.12 ± 5.32 years (Group 2). One patient (Group 1) and two (Group 2) developed CMO. The BCVA improved significantly in both groups (p = 0.013). The CST change was insignificant. Four patients (Group 1) required intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering medications. Three patients (Group 2) required early steroid taper.

CONCLUSIONS

IVD is a good alternative as prophylaxis in IU/PU and cataract in preventing postoperative CMO.

Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone implant along with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of intraoperative intravitreal dexamethasone implant in patients of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis undergoing phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation.

METHODS

Retrospectively, data of patients with JIA-associated uveitis undergoing phacoemulsification with PCIOL implantation with intraoperative dexamethasone implant injection were analyzed. Patients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included. Primary outcome measures were ocular inflammation, intraocular pressure (IOP), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and worsening of uveitis.

RESULTS

8 eyes of 6 patients were included. BCVA was significantly improved at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively 0.20 ± 0.09, P = 0.008; 0.18 ± 0.11, P = 0.008; and 0.24 ± 0.11, P = 0.01, respectively. No statistical difference noted in mean IOP at various follow-up visits. None developed worsening of uveitis or Cystoid macular edema.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative intravitreal dexamethasone implant is a safe and effective in preventing and managing the postoperative inflammation in children with JIA-associated uveitic cataract.

Update of the evidence based, interdisciplinary guideline for anti-inflammatory treatment of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIAU) is frequently associated with the development of complications and visual loss. Topical corticosteroids are the first line therapy, and disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are commonly used. However, treatment has not been standardized.

METHODS

Interdisciplinary guideline were developed with representatives from the German Ophthalmological Society, Society for Paediatric Rheumatology, Professional Association of Ophthalmologists, German Society for Rheumatology, parents' group, moderated by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany. A systematic literature analysis in MEDLINE was performed, evidence and recommendations were graded, an algorithm for anti-inflammatory treatment and final statements were discussed in a consensus meeting (Nominal Group Technique), a preliminary draft was fine-tuned and discussed thereafter by all participants (Delphi procedure).

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on recommendations, including a standardized treatment strategy according to uveitis severity in the individual patient. Thus, methotrexate shall be introduced for uveitis not responding to low-dose (≤ 2 applications/day) topical corticosteroids, and a TNFalpha antibody (preferably adalimumab) used, if uveitis inactivity is not achieved. In very severe active uveitis with uveitis-related deterioration of vision, systemic corticosteroids should be considered for bridging until DMARDs take effect. If TNFalpha antibodies fail to take effect or lose effect, another biological should be selected (tocilizumab, abatacept or rituximab). De-escalation of DMARDs should be preceded by a period of  ≥ 2 years of uveitis inactivity.

CONCLUSIONS

An interdisciplinary, evidence-based treatment guideline for JIAU is presented.

Cataract Surgery with Primary Lens Implantation in Children with Chronic Uveitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the evolution of chronic uveitis in children undergoing cataract surgery with primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

METHODS

Twelve children with chronic uveitis underwent cataract surgery with primary posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

RESULTS

Fourteen eyes were implanted with a foldable hydrophobic acrylic IOL. The mean follow-up was 35.39 months (8.72-69.57). The mean BCDVA before surgery and at the end of follow-up was 1.11 (0.40-2.30; SD: 0.57) and 0.48 (0-3; SD: 0.77; p=0.007) respectively. The mean oral corticosteroids dosage after surgery and at the end of follow-up was 0.80 mg/kg/day (SD: 0.37) and 0.17 mg/kg/day (SD: 0.24; p=0.001) respectively. All patients except one were treated with methotrexate. Four patients (5 eyes) were additionally treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor agent.

CONCLUSIONS

Cataract surgery with primary posterior chamber hydrophobic IOL implantation is possible and leads to a good visual recovery in cases of pediatric chronic uveitis. This surgery requires aggressive anti-inflammatory management with immunosuppressive drugs to control inflammation and reduce the corticosteroids dosage.

Perspective on the role of Ozurdex (dexamethasone intravitreal implant) in the management of diabetic macular oedema

Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is the most common cause of visual loss in the working age population. Intravitreal therapy has superseded macular laser as the first-line treatment for the management of centre-involving DMO in most patients. As well as the proven efficacy of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents, phase II and III clinical trials of Ozurdex intravitreal dexamethasone implants for DMO have also demonstrated a mean increase in visual acuity and corresponding mean reduction in central macular thickness, particularly in pseudophakic eyes. Because of the risk of visual loss from cataract, glaucoma and intraocular infection with the use of intravitreal steroids, Ozurdex tends to be reserved for use in patients unresponsive to anti-VEGF therapy for centre-involving DMO. Situations where Ozurdex may be considered a first-line treatment option for eyes with centre-involving DMO include pseudophakia, impending cataract surgery, or in the context of a recent arterial thromboembolic event. Because of their stable pharmacokinetics, Ozurdex slow-release implants may also be considered in vitrectomized eyes.

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) for pediatric uveitis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of an intravitreally injected dexamethasone-containing implant (Ozurdex(®)) in the treatment of uveitis in children.

METHODS

The study group included ten patients (14 eyes) aged 6.5-15 years (mean age 12 years) with intermediate or posterior uveitis who were treated with the Ozurdex implant at two tertiary medical centers between 2009 and 2014, following an insufficient response to standard uveitis therapy. All were followed for at least 6 months (mean 12.2 ± 4.9 months). Clinical data before and after treatment were collected retrospectively from the medical files. Outcome measures were best corrected visual acuity, vitreous haze, and macular thickness. Ocular complications were documented.

RESULTS

Visual acuity improved in 12 eyes (86 %) and intraocular inflammation decreased in 13 eyes (93 %) from 1 week to 3 months after the first injection. Macular edema decreased in all eyes from 1 month to 3 months after the first injection. Five patients underwent repeated injections because of an increase in macular thickness at 3-6 month follow-up. Complications included cataract progression in one patient after one injection and cataract formation in two patients after two injections, and an elevation in intraocular pressure in two patients who responded well to topical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Both single and repeated injections of a dexamethasone-containing implant are safe and effective for the treatment of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis in children. The duration of the beneficial effect may be limited. More data are required to establish the safety profile of the implant in the pediatric age group.