A Randomized Trial Comparing 1 mg of Oral Vitamin K With No Treatment in the Management of Warfarin-Associated Coagulopathy in Patients With Mechanical Heart Valves

Safety of Vitamin K in mechanical heart valve patients with supratherapeutic INR: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients who had mechanical heart valves and an international normalized ratio (INR) of >5.0 should be managed by temporary cessation of vitamin K antagonist. This study aimed to investigate the safety of low-dose vitamin K1 in patients with mechanical heart valves who have supratherapeutic INR.

METHODS

CINAHL, Cochran Library, Clinical trial.gov, OpenGrey, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus were systematically searched from the inception up to October 2021 without language restriction. Studies comparing the safety of low-dose vitamin K1 treatment in patients with placebo or other anticoagulant reversal agents were included. We used a random-effect model for the meta-analysis. Publication bias was determined by a funnel plot with subsequent Begg's test and Egger's test.

RESULTS

From 7529 retrieved studies, 3 randomized control trials were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled data demonstrated that low-dose vitamin K was not associated with thromboembolism rate (risk ratio [RR] = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.19-4.55) major bleeding rate (RR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.07-4.82), and minor bleeding rate (RR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.07-5.09). Subgroup and sensitivity analysis demonstrated the nonsignificant effect of low-dose vitamin K on the risk of thromboembolism. Publication bias was not apparent, according to Begg's test and Egger's test (P = .090 and 0.134, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The current evidence does not support the role of low-dose vitamin K as a trigger of thromboembolism in supratherapeutic INR patients with mechanical heart valves. Nevertheless, more well-designed studies with larger sample sizes are required to justify this research question.

Vitamin K for reversal of excessive vitamin K antagonist anticoagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Patients receiving vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) with an international normalized ratio (INR) between 4.5 and 10 are at increased risk of bleeding. We systematically reviewed the literature to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of administering vitamin K in patients receiving VKA therapy with INR between 4.5 and 10 and without bleeding. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials in April 2018. Search strategy included terms vitamin K administration and VKA-related terms. Reference lists of relevant studies were reviewed, and experts in the field were contacted for relevant papers. Two investigators independently screened and collected data. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated, and certainty of the evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Six studies (1074 participants) were included in the review and meta-analyses. Pooled estimates indicate a nonsignificant increased risk of mortality (RR = 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-2.47), bleeding (RR = 2.24; 95% CI, 0.81-7.27), and thromboembolism (RR = 1.29; 95% CI, 0.35-4.78) for vitamin K administration, with moderate certainty of the evidence resulting from serious imprecision as CIs included potential for benefit and harm. Patients receiving vitamin K had a nonsignificant increase in the likelihood of reaching goal INR (1.95; 95% CI, 0.88-4.33), with very low certainty of the evidence resulting from serious risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. Our findings indicate that patients on VKA therapy who have an INR between 4.5 and 10.0 without bleeding are not likely to benefit from vitamin K administration in addition to temporary VKA cessation.

American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy

BACKGROUND

Clinicians confront numerous practical issues in optimizing the use of anticoagulants to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE).

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians and other health care professionals in their decisions about the use of anticoagulants in the management of VTE. These guidelines assume the choice of anticoagulant has already been made.

METHODS

ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 25 recommendations and 2 good practice statements to optimize management of patients receiving anticoagulants.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong recommendations included using patient self-management of international normalized ratio (INR) with home point-of-care INR monitoring for vitamin K antagonist therapy and against using periprocedural low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) bridging therapy. Conditional recommendations included basing treatment dosing of LMWH on actual body weight, not using anti-factor Xa monitoring to guide LMWH dosing, using specialized anticoagulation management services, and resuming anticoagulation after episodes of life-threatening bleeding.

Conservative Management of Overanticoagulation in Patients With Low-Moderate Risk for Bleeding Complications

Despite long-standing experience with warfarin, anticoagulation clinic services are often confronted with the challenging clinical situation of patients with overanticoagulation. This requires repeat international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring and in some cases administration of vitamin K to minimize the risk of bleeding. A study was performed to determine the safety and efficacy of outpatient management in order to provide guidance on the management of patients with prolonged INRs. Patients on stable warfarin therapy for more than 1 month attending a dedicated academic hospital anticoagulation clinic who had an INR ≥5 were identified over a 1-year period. Follow-up INR results and outcomes were recorded for 30 days. One hundred and ninety-five episodes of overanticoagulation in 148 patients were identified. Patients were classified as low risk (n = 85, 57.4%) and moderate risk of bleeding (n = 63, 42.6%). The mean index INR was 7.22 (1.88). Management with low-dose oral vitamin K (n = 32, 16.4%) did not significantly result in a more rapid correction of the INR when compared to conservative management (n = 163, 83.6%; P = .103). Follow-up INR testing was performed at a mean of 11.1 (8.9) days from the index measurement. A mean of 1.6 (0.9) follow-up INR tests were performed per episode. During the 30-day follow-up, there was 1 (0.5%) episode of major bleeding and 1 (0.5%) death. The management of asymptomatic outpatients with overanticoagulation is associated with a low risk of major bleeding within 30 days. Conservative management of overanticoagulation is as effective as utilizing low-dose oral vitamin K.

Assessment of the efficacy of a novel tailored vitamin K dosing regimen in lowering the International Normalised Ratio in over-anticoagulated patients: a randomised clinical trial

Current guidelines advocate using fixed-doses of oral vitamin K to reverse excessive anticoagulation in warfarinised patients who are either asymptomatic or have minor bleeds. Over-anticoagulated patients present with a wide range of International Normalised Ratio (INR) values and response to fixed doses of vitamin K varies. Consequently a significant proportion of patients remain outside their target INR after vitamin K administration, making them prone to either haemorrhage or thromboembolism. We compared the performance of a novel tailored vitamin K dosing regimen to that of a fixed-dose regimen with the primary measure being the proportion of over-anticoagulated patients returning to their target INR within 24 h. One hundred and eighty-one patients with an index INR > 6·0 (asymptomatic or with minor bleeding) were randomly allocated to receive oral administration of either a tailored dose (based upon index INR and body surface area) or a fixed-dose (1 or 2 mg) of vitamin K. A greater proportion of patients treated with the tailored dose returned to within target INR range compared to the fixed-dose regimen (68·9% vs. 52·8%; P = 0·026), whilst a smaller proportion of patients remained above target INR range (12·2% vs. 34·0%; P < 0·001). Individualised vitamin K dosing is more accurate than fixed-dose regimen in lowering INR to within target range in excessively anticoagulated patients.

Management of Supratherapeutic International Normalized Ratio without Bleeding after Warfarin Use: An Evaluation of Vitamin K Administration (SUPRA-WAR-K Study)

BACKGROUND

For patients with supratherapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) and no evidence of bleeding, the 2012 guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians discourage administration of vitamin K. At the study hospital, it was observed that vitamin K was frequently prescribed for patients with INR of 4.5 or higher and no bleeding.

OBJECTIVES

To compare efficacy and safety outcomes between holding warfarin alone and holding warfarin with administration of vitamin K and to compare these outcomes among various doses and routes of vitamin K administration in non-critical care inpatients experiencing supratherapeutic INR without evidence of bleeding.

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective chart review involved noncritical care inpatients with supratherapeutic INR (4.5-8.9) without evidence of bleeding. The primary outcomes were the change in INR 1 day after implementation of supratherapeutic INR management and the time to reach INR less than 3.0. The secondary outcomes were length of stay, frequency of warfarin resistance, incidence and duration of bridging anticoagulation, incidence of thromboembolism and major bleeding, and death.

RESULTS

Regardless of vitamin K dose, the administration of vitamin K combined with holding warfarin, relative to holding warfarin alone, was associated with a greater INR decrease 1 day after the intervention (mean ± standard deviation -3.2 ± 1.9 versus -0.9 ± 1.0, p < 0.001) and a shorter time to reach INR below 3.0 (1.9 ± 1.0 days versus 2.6 ± 1.4 days, p = 0.003). No statistically significant differences in any other outcomes were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In hospitalized non-critical care patients with INR between 4.5 and 8.9 without evidence of bleeding, the combination of holding warfarin and administering vitamin K was associated with greater and faster decreases in INR than holding warfarin alone. No significant differences were found in clinically important outcomes. The practice of administering vitamin K in this population warrants further study and re-evaluation.

Vitamin K dosing to reverse warfarin based on INR, route of administration, and home warfarin dose in the acute/critical care setting

BACKGROUND

Vitamin K is commonly used for reversal of anticoagulation of warfarin. However, the optimal dose and route of vitamin K that does not increase the duration of bridging therapy is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine factors influencing the extent and rate of INR reversal with vitamin K in the acute/critical care setting.

METHODS

This was a chart review of 400 patients who received vitamin K for reversal of warfarin effects between February 2008 and November 2010. Data collected included international normalized ratios (INRs) 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours prior to vitamin K administration; intravenous or oral vitamin K dose; and whether or not fresh frozen plasma (FFP) was administered.

RESULTS

Intravenous vitamin K reduced INR more rapidly than oral vitamin K (5.09, 1.91, 1.54, and 1.41 vs 5.67, 2.90, 2.14, and 1.58) at baseline, 12, 24, and 48 hours, respectively. The dose of vitamin K (p < 0.001), route of administration (p < 0.001), and baseline INR (p < 0.001) influenced subsequent INR values. The INR reduction was similar for intravenous vitamin K doses 2 mg or greater. Home warfarin dose did not affect INR responses to intravenous (p = 0.27) or oral vitamin K (p = 0.98). FFP did not influence INR values at 48 hours. Although longer anticoagulation bridge therapy seemed to be associated with higher vitamin K doses, the incidence (p = 0.63) and duration (p = 0.61) were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin K dose, route, and initial INR influence subsequent INR values. INR reduction is similar for intravenous vitamin K doses of 2 mg or greater. Preadministration of FFP does not alter INR values at 48 hours or more after vitamin K administration.

Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

High-quality anticoagulation management is required to keep these narrow therapeutic index medications as effective and safe as possible. This article focuses on the common important management questions for which, at a minimum, low-quality published evidence is available to guide best practices.

METHODS

The methods of this guideline follow those described in Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines in this supplement.

RESULTS

Most practical clinical questions regarding the management of anticoagulation, both oral and parenteral, have not been adequately addressed by randomized trials. We found sufficient evidence for summaries of recommendations for 23 questions, of which only two are strong rather than weak recommendations. Strong recommendations include targeting an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0 for patients on vitamin K antagonist therapy (Grade 1B) and not routinely using pharmacogenetic testing for guiding doses of vitamin K antagonist (Grade 1B). Weak recommendations deal with such issues as loading doses, initiation overlap, monitoring frequency, vitamin K supplementation, patient self-management, weight and renal function adjustment of doses, dosing decision support, drug interactions to avoid, and prevention and management of bleeding complications. We also address anticoagulation management services and intensive patient education.

CONCLUSIONS

We offer guidance for many common anticoagulation-related management problems. Most anticoagulation management questions have not been adequately studied.

Treatment of warfarin-associated coagulopathy with vitamin K

Warfarin is the most common form of oral anticoagulant therapy. Although it has indisputable benefit in the management of thromboembolic disease, warfarin-associated coagulopathy (WAC) is a well-documented complication of its use. As warfarin exerts its effect by impairing formation of the vitamin K-dependent clotting factors, a cornerstone of WAC management is vitamin K replacement. Daily vitamin K supplementation is an emerging approach to regulate international normalized ratios in difficult-to-control patients. Mild WAC without bleeding can often be managed with warfarin withdrawal alone. For excessive international normalized ratio elevation in the absence of bleeding, low-dose oral vitamin K (1?2.5 mg) is sufficient and achieves the same degree of international normalized ratio correction by 24 h as intravenous therapy. The stable patient with WAC and minor bleeding can also be given oral vitamin K, with correction of the underlying defect. Major bleeding should first be managed with factor replacement for immediate correction of the coagulopathy, using either a prothrombin complex concentrate or fresh-frozen plasma. High-dose vitamin K (10 mg) should be given concurrently via intravenous infusion to confer lasting correction. Warfarin resistance and vitamin K-associated anaphylaxis are rare. Despite development of new oral anticoagulant therapy compounds, warfarin will probably retain a prominent role in thromboembolism management for several years to come.

Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

This article concerning the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is part of the American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). It describes the antithrombotic effect of the VKAs, the monitoring of anticoagulation intensity, and the clinical applications of VKA therapy and provides specific management recommendations. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do or do not outweigh the risks, burdens, and costs. Grade 2 recommendations suggest that the individual patient's values may lead to different choices. (For a full understanding of the grading, see the "Grades of Recommendation" chapter by Guyatt et al, CHEST 2008; 133:123S-131S.) Among the key recommendations in this article are the following: for dosing of VKAs, we recommend the initiation of oral anticoagulation therapy, with doses between 5 mg and 10 mg for the first 1 or 2 days for most individuals, with subsequent dosing based on the international normalized ratio (INR) response (Grade 1B); we suggest against pharmacogenetic-based dosing until randomized data indicate that it is beneficial (Grade 2C); and in elderly and other patient subgroups who are debilitated or malnourished, we recommend a starting dose of < or = 5 mg (Grade 1C). The article also includes several specific recommendations for the management of patients with nontherapeutic INRs, with INRs above the therapeutic range, and with bleeding whether the INR is therapeutic or elevated. For the use of vitamin K to reverse a mildly elevated INR, we recommend oral rather than subcutaneous administration (Grade 1A). For patients with life-threatening bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage, we recommend the use of prothrombin complex concentrates or recombinant factor VIIa to immediately reverse the INR (Grade 1C). For most patients who have a lupus inhibitor, we recommend a therapeutic target INR of 2.5 (range, 2.0 to 3.0) [Grade 1A]. We recommend that physicians who manage oral anticoagulation therapy do so in a systematic and coordinated fashion, incorporating patient education, systematic INR testing, tracking, follow-up, and good patient communication of results and dose adjustments [Grade 1B]. In patients who are suitably selected and trained, patient self-testing or patient self-management of dosing are effective alternative treatment models that result in improved quality of anticoagulation management, with greater time in the therapeutic range and fewer adverse events. Patient self-monitoring or self-management, however, is a choice made by patients and physicians that depends on many factors. We suggest that such therapeutic management be implemented where suitable (Grade 2B).

Outpatient management of oral vitamin K antagonist therapy: defining and measuring high-quality management

Oral anticoagulation therapy with warfarin is the mainstay of prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. However, it remains one of the leading causes of harmful medication errors and medication-related adverse events. The beneficial outcomes of oral anticoagulation therapy are directly dependent upon the quality of dose and anticoagulation management, but the literature is not robust with regards to what constitutes such management. This review focuses on, and attempts to define, the parameters of high-quality anticoagulation management and identifies the appropriate outcome measures constituting high-quality management. Elements discussed include the most fundamental measure, time in therapeutic range, along with other parameters including therapy initiation, time to therapeutic range, dosing management when patients are not in therapeutic range, perioperative dosing management, patient education, and other important outcome measures. Healthcare providers who manage oral anticoagulation therapy should utilize these parameters as a measure of their performance in an effort to achieve high-quality anticoagulation management.

Management of Excessive Anticoagulant Effect Due to Vitamin K Antagonists

Unexpectedly elevated INR values are commonly encountered in clinical practice. In the absence of bleeding, such values may be treated with either simple warfarin withdrawal or the administration of low doses of oral vitamin K. Oral vitamin K will more rapidly return the INR to the therapeutic reference interval; however, its impact on bleeding is unknown. If the INR is in excess of 10, most experts would recommend the administration of vitamin K and, in the case of active bleeding, additional administration of coagulation factors either in the form of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC). Coagulation factor replacement is required given the need to urgently correct the INR; however, vitamin K should not be forgotten since it is required to antagonize the effect of warfarin, preventing “rebound” anticoagulation after transfused coagulation factors are consumed. This paper will review the evidence supporting various treatment modalities and will provide suggestions for treatment. Future advances in this area will likely focus on evaluations of the relative merits of FFP and PCCs.

Treatment of coumarin-associated coagulopathy: a systematic review and proposed treatment algorithms

BACKGROUND

An excessive anticoagulant effect because of coumarins is frequently encountered.

OBJECTIVE

To review available literature on the management of warfarin-associated coagulopathy and to propose evidence-based treatment algorithms.

METHODS

Data sources were Medline and Embase. Papers published between 1966 and December 2005 describing randomized trials or prospective cohort studies evaluating treatments for coumarin-associated coagulopathy were abstracted.

RESULTS

Low dose oral vitamin K rapidly and reliably returns the international normalized ratio (INR) to the usual therapeutic range in non-bleeding patients. Simple withholding of acenocumarol results in rapid correction of its anticoagulant effect. The impact of oral vitamin K on phenprocumon-associated coagulopathy cannot be determined from available literature. Intravenous vitamin K and coagulation factors should be given to patients with major or life-threatening hemorrhage. The optimal dose and type of coagulation factor is not known.

CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin K therapy is an effective treatment for INR prolongation in patients with coumarin-associated coagulopathy; coagulation factor replacement is required, in addition, in patients with major bleeding or with indication for immediate correction of their INR. Clinical trials powered to detect differences in rates of bleeding and thrombosis are now required to determine if vitamin K reduces the risk of bleeding without causing thrombosis in non-bleeding patients with prolonged INR.

Managing Oral Anticoagulation Requires Expert Experience and Clinical Evidence

The management of patients on chronic oral anticoagulant therapy, namely Vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin, is often associated with difficult and challenging issues for the healthcare practitioner. Many of these issues, such as warfarin failure or resistance, the optimal warfarin initiation dose, the optimal target International Normalized Ratio in antiphospholipid syndrome, the optimal monitoring frequency and use of point-of-care monitoring, the management of oral anticoagulation during invasive procedures, and the management of over-anticoagulation, have not been evaluated in rigorously-designed clinical trials. The latest American College of Chest Physician recommendations concerning these issues are Grade 2C, the weakest recommendations available. It remains up to the experience and expertise of the individual practitioner along with whatever clinical evidence is available in a particular healthcare environment-especially one associated with an anticoagulant management service-to implement management strategies with respect to these issues in patients on oral anticoagulation.