Use and Outcomes of Triple Therapy Among Older Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Atrial Fibrillation

Direct Oral Anticoagulants use in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndrome or Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The investigation for the optimal anticoagulation strategy for patients with stable coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndromes, and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention constitutes a great challenge for physicians and is a field of extensive research. Although aspirin is commonly recommended as a protective measure for all patients with coronary artery disease and dual antiplatelet therapy for those undergoing procedures, such as percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events remains significant. In this context, the shortcomings associated with the use of vitamin K antagonists have led to the assessment of direct oral anticoagulants as promising alternatives. This review will explore and provide a comprehensive analysis of the existing data regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome, as well as their effectiveness in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Antithrombotic Treatment in Coronary Artery Disease

Coronary artery disease exhibits growing mortality and morbidity worldwide despite the advances in pharmacotherapy and coronary intervention. Coronary artery disease is classified in the acute coronary syndromes and chronic coronary syndromes according to the most recent guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology. Antithrombotic treatment is the cornerstone of therapy in coronary artery disease due to the involvement of atherothrombosis in the pathophysiology of the disease. Administration of antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants and fibrinolytics reduce ischemic risk, which is amplified early post-acute coronary syndromes or post percutaneous coronary intervention; though, antithrombotic treatment increases the risk for bleeding. The balance between ischemic and bleeding risk is difficult to achieve and is affected by patient characteristics, procedural parameters, concomitant medications and pharmacologic characteristics of the antithrombotic agents. Several pharmacological strategies have been evaluated in patients with coronary artery disease, such as the effectiveness and safety of antithrombotic agents, optimal dual antiplatelet treatment schemes and duration, aspirin de-escalation strategies of dual antiplatelet regimens, dual inhibition pathway strategies as well as triple antithrombotic therapy. Future studies are needed in order to investigate the gaps in our knowledge, including special populations.

Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Management of Coronary Artery Disease in the Elderly

Elderly patients over the age of ≥ 75 years are especially susceptible to coronary artery disease (CAD) as age is an important nonmodifiable risk factors for atherosclerosis and a predictor of poorer outcomes. In fact, CAD is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in this population. Due to concerns of functional frailty, comorbidities, and patient preference of conservative to no treatment have played a role in reducing the interest in pursuing prospective studies in this high-risk group. In this review, we provide an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of CAD in older adults.

Current and Future Insights for Optimizing Antithrombotic Therapy to Reduce the Burden of Cardiovascular Ischemic Events in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

The pharmacological treatment strategies for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in recent years are constantly evolving to develop more potent antithrombotic agents, as reflected by the introduction of more novel P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors and anticoagulants to reduce the ischemic risk among ACS patients. Despite the substantial improvements in the current antithrombotic regimen, a noticeable number of ACS patients continue to experience ischemic events. Providing effective ischemic risk reduction while balancing bleeding risk remains a clinical challenge. This updated review discusses the currently approved and widely used antithrombotic agents and explores newer antithrombotic treatment strategies under development for the initial phase of ACS.

Optimal Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Focused Review on High Bleeding Risk

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a therapeutic cornerstone to prevent stent thrombosis following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the longer the DAPT duration, the higher the incidence of bleeding and mortality. Since the advent of second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), the continuous evolution of DES has reduced the thrombotic risk and allowed for a shorter DAPT duration. On the other hand, concerns on the elevated risk of bleeding during antithrombotic therapy have been further raised due to the growing number of elderly CAD patients with multiple comorbidities. The consequent debate topic over post-PCI antithrombotic therapy has shifted from simply reducing thrombotic risk to safely minimizing bleeding risk. Due to the significant impact of bleeding on clinical outcomes, including prognosis, current guidelines on antithrombotic therapy for CAD prioritize stratification of patients at a high bleeding risk (HBR) as the top consideration in determining post-PCI antithrombotic therapy. Achieving optimal antithrombotic therapy for each patient undergoing PCI requires a better understanding of the clinical variables constituting the balance of bleeding and thrombotic risk. This review highlights relevant evidence required to optimize antithrombotic therapy for HBR patients undergoing PCI.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of different combinations of antithrombotic regimens in atrial fibrillation patients with stent insertions

This study aims to compare the risks of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack, and major bleeding across different antithrombotic regimens in Asian atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with stent insertions. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database and National Mortality Registry. A total of 10,208 nonvalvular AF patients who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stents for the first time in 2007-2017 were identified. Most patients (68.4%) were prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) at discharge. During follow-up, the use of anticoagulants increased, and double therapy (an antiplatelet plus an anticoagulant) was the most frequently prescribed therapy. The risks of MACEs were comparable in double therapy and had a similar risk of MACEs compared to DAPT (aHR 0.86; 95% CI 0.67-1.11). Triple therapy (DAPT plus an anticoagulant) also had similar effectiveness to double therapy (1.23; 0.84-1.80) or DAPT (1.06; 0.77-1.45). However, triple therapy was associated with a nearly twofold higher major bleeding risk than DAPT and double therapy (1.97; 1.31-2.94 and 1.80; 1.10-2.95, respectively). DAPT was the most frequently prescribed antithrombotic regimen at discharge for Asian AF patients who had undergone stent insertions. DAPT and double and triple therapy had comparable effectiveness, but triple therapy had a significantly higher major bleeding risk than either DAPT or double therapy.

Impact of atrial fibrillation and the clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction from the K-ACTIVE registry

BACKGROUND

The clinical incidence and impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) in Japanese acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients is not fully understood.

METHODS

To elucidate the clinical incidence and impact of AF on in-hospital mortality in AMI patients, we analyzed a Japanese observational prospective multicenter registry of acute myocardial infarction (K-ACTIVE: Kanagawa ACuTe cardIoVascular rEgistry), which spans 2015 to 2019. A major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was defined as cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and non-fatal stroke. For assessing bleeding events, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 was used. MACE plus BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding were considered as composite events. The clinical outcomes were followed for 1 year.

RESULTS

The total of 5059 patients included 531 patients with AF (10.5%) and 4528 patients with sinus rhythm (SR; 89.5%). AF patients were significantly older and tended to have more comorbidities than SR patients. Oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) was used in 44% of AF patients while single antiplatelet therapy was selected for 52% of patients with OAC. Crude in-hospital mortality was significantly greater in AF patients than in SR patients (10.4%, 5.0%, respectively, p < 0.01). The multivariate analysis was adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, hemodialysis, smoking, previous MI, body mass index, Killip classification, out of hospital cardiac arrest, and OAC. In-hospital mortality was still significantly greater in AF patients than in SR patients in the logistic regression analysis [adjusted odds ratio 2.02 (1.31-3.14)]. AF was an independent risk factor for MACE and composite events in the Cox proportional hazards model [adjusted risk ratio (ARR) 1.91 (1.36-2.69), p < 0.01; ARR 1.72 (1.25-2.36), p < 0.01]. In contrast, AF was not an independent risk factor for bleeding [ARR 1.71 (0.79-3.71), p = 0.18].

CONCLUSION

In Japanese AMI patients, AF was often observed and was associated with worse MACE but not worse bleeding.

Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease: A Long-Term Perspective on the Need for Combined Antithrombotic Therapy

BACKGROUND

Older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) are often treated with the shortest possible duration of antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to concern for bleeding. However, the risk of recurrent MI or PCI prompting antiplatelet therapy extension is unknown in this population.

METHODS

Using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry linked to Medicare claims, we described the cumulative incidence of recurrent MI or PCI over a median of 7-year follow-up for patients ≥65 years old with AF discharged alive after acute MI between 2008 and 2017. We used pharmacy fill data to describe the proportion of patients filling prescriptions for both oral anticoagulants and P2Y₁₂ inhibitors for ≥50% of the indicated duration after MI or PCI.

RESULTS

Of 187 622 older patients discharged alive after MI, 50 539 (26.9%) had AF. Over a median of 7-year follow-up in patients with AF, the cumulative incidence was 14.5% for recurrent MI, 12.1% for PCI, 7.9% for stroke, and 9.5% for bleeding hospitalization. Among 7998 patients with AF and recurrent MI or PCI, 1668 (20.9%) had >1 MI or PCI during follow-up. Assuming each MI or PCI should be followed by 6 months of P2Y₁₂ inhibitor therapy, patients with AF who had a recurrent MI/PCI had a median estimated indication for antiplatelet/anticoagulant treatment of 287 days (194, 358), but filled both P2Y₁₂ inhibitor and oral anticoagulant for a median of 0 days (0, 21). In this cohort, 12.2% of patients filled prescriptions for both a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor and oral anticoagulant for ≥50% of the indicated duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Older adults with AF and MI have high incidences of downstream recurrent MI or PCI requiring extended antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy durations, yet many appear to be under-treated. These results highlight the need for better thrombosis prevention strategies in this group of patients.

The role of triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus clopidogrel forms the backbone of secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), oral anticoagulation (OAC) is superior to antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. Patients with AF who undergo PCI or have an ACS event therefore have an indication for both OAC and DAPT, so-called triple antithrombotic therapy. However, observational analyses have shown that the annual rate of major bleeding on triple therapy exceeds 10%. For this reason, five major randomized clinical trials have compared double antithrombotic therapy with OAC and a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor versus triple therapy in patients with AF who underwent PCI or had an ACS event. Each of the trials showed that double antithrombotic therapy reduced the rate of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared with triple therapy and was non-inferior for prevention of ischemic events, including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. In the one trial that directly compared warfarin with a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC), apixaban reduced the rate of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared with warfarin and was non-inferior with respect to prevention of ischemic events. As a result of these trials, consensus guidelines recommend that patients with AF who undergo PCI or have an ACS event should be treated with triple antithrombotic therapy (OAC + P2Y₁₂ inhibitor + aspirin) for 7 days or less, followed by double antithrombotic therapy (OAC + P2Y₁₂ inhibitor) for 6 to 12 months.

Long term risk and costs of bleeding in men and women treated with triple antithrombotic therapy-An observational study

OBJECTIVES

Bleeding is the most common non-ischemic complication in patients with coronary revascularisation procedures, associated with prolonged hospitalisation and increased mortality. Many factors predispose for bleeds in these patients, among those sex. Anyhow, few studies have characterised the population receiving triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) as well as long term bleeds from a sex perspective. We investigated the one year rate of bleeds in patients receiving TAT, potential sex disparities and premature discontinuation of TAT. We also assessed health care costs in bleeders vs non-bleeders.

SETTING

Three hospitals in the County of Östergötland, Sweden during 2009-2015.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients discharged with TAT registered in the SWEDEHEART registry.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

All bleeds receiving medical attention during one-year follow-up were collected by retrieving relevant information about each patient from medical records. Resource use associated with bleeds was assigned unit cost to estimate the health care costs associated with bleeding episodes.

RESULTS

Among 272 patients, 156 bleeds occurred post-discharge, of which 28.8% were gastrointestinal. In total 54.4% had at least one bleed during or after the index event and 40.1% bled post discharge of whom 28.7% experienced a TIMI major or minor bleeding. Women discontinued TAT prematurely more often than men (52.9 vs 36.1%, p = 0.01) and bled more (48.6 vs. 37.1%, p = 0.09). One-year mean health care costs were EUR 575 and EUR 5787 in non-bleeding and bleeding patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The high bleeding incidence in patients with TAT, especially in women, is a cause of concern. There is a need for an adequately sized randomised, controlled trial to determine a safe but still effective treatment for these patients.

Comparison of effects of triple antithrombotic therapy and dual antiplatelet therapy on long-term outcomes of acute myocardial infarction

Warfarin is an alternate choice for patients who are not eligible for non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to compare the long-term outcome of triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) with that of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after AMI. This was a nationwide, propensity score-matched, case-control study of 186,112 first AMI patients, of whom 2,825 received TAT comprising aspirin, clopidogrel, and warfarin. Propensity score matching in a ratio of 1:4 by age, sex, comorbidities, and treatment was adopted, Finally, 2,813 AMI patients and 11,252 matched controls that were administered TAT and DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel), respectively, were included in our analysis. The 12-year overall survival rate did not differ between both strategies (P = .3167). TAT was beneficial in old age (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.92), female sex (HR = 0.86), atrial fibrillation (AF) (HR = 0.80), hypertension (HR = 0.92), cerebrovascular accident (HR = 0.90), and in the absence of percutaneous coronary intervention (HR = 0.79). TAT reduced the rate of recurrent myocardial infarction (P = .0108) but did not affect the rate of stroke (P = .4867), gastrointestinal bleeding (P = .3889), or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (P = .3449). TAT reduces the incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction and does not increase the risk of major bleeding, while compared to DAPT.

Incidence, predictors and prognostic impact of intracranial bleeding within the first year after an acute coronary syndrome in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention

Background:

The rate of intracranial haemorrhage after an acute coronary syndrome has been studied in detail in the era of thrombolysis; however, in the contemporary era of percutaneous coronary intervention, most of the data have been derived from clinical trials. With this background, we aim to analyse the incidence, timing, predictors and prognostic impact of post-discharge intracranial haemorrhage in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Methods:

We analysed data from the BleeMACS registry (patients discharged for acute coronary syndrome and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from Europe, Asia and America, 2003–2014). Analyses were conducted using a competing risk framework. Uni and multivariate predictors of intracranial haemorrhage were assessed using the Fine–Gray proportional hazards regression analysis. The endpoint was 1-year post-discharge intracranial haemorrhage.

Results:

Of 11,136 patients, 30 presented with intracranial haemorrhage during the first year (0.27%). The median time to intracranial haemorrhage was 150 days (interquartile range 55.7–319.5). The fatality rate of intracranial haemorrhage was very high (30%). After multivariate analysis, only age (subhazard ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.01–1.07) and prior stroke/transient ischaemic attack (hazard ratio 3.29, 95% confidence interval 1.36–8.00) were independently associated with a higher risk of intracranial haemorrhage. Hypertension showed a trend to associate with higher intracranial haemorrhage rate. The combination of older age (⩾75 years), prior stroke/transient ischaemic attack, and/or hypertension allowed us to identify most of the patients with intracranial haemorrhage (86.7%). The annual rate of intracranial haemorrhage was 0.1% in patients with no risk factors, 0.2% in those with one factor, 0.6% in those with two factors and 1.3% in those with three factors.

Conclusion:

The incidence of intracranial haemorrhage in the first year after an acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention is low. Advanced age, previous stroke/transient ischaemic attack, and hypertension are the main predictors of increased intracranial haemorrhage risk.

Intracranial Hemorrhage Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: An 18-Year National Study of Temporal Trends, Predictors, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of contemporary data on the burden of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study sought to evaluate the temporal trends, predictors, and outcomes of ICH in AMI.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample (2000-2017) was used to identify adult (>18 years) AMI admissions with ICH. In-hospital mortality, hospitalization costs, length of stay, and measure of functional ability were the outcomes of interest. The discharge destination along with use of tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy were used to estimate functional burden.

RESULTS

Of a total 11,622,528 AMI admissions, 23,422 (0.2%) had concomitant ICH. Compared to those without, the ICH cohort was on average older, female, of non-White race, had greater comorbidities, and had higher rates of arrhythmias (all p < 0.001). Female sex, non-White race, ST-segment elevation AMI presentation, use of fibrinolytics, mechanical circulatory support, and invasive mechanical ventilation were identified as individual predictors of ICH. The AMI admissions with ICH received less frequent coronary angiography (46.9% vs. 63.8%), percutaneous coronary intervention (22.7% vs. 41.8%), and coronary artery bypass grafting (5.4% vs. 9.2%), as compared to those without (p < 0.001). ICH was associated with a significantly higher in-hospital mortality (41.4% vs. 6.1%; adjusted OR 5.65 (95% CI 5.47-5.84); p < 0.001), longer hospital length of stay, higher hospitalization costs, and greater use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (all p < 0.001). Among ICH survivors (N = 13, 689), 81.3% had a poor functional outcome at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

ICH causes a substantial burden in AMI due to associated higher in-hospital mortality and poor functional outcomes.

Optimal Antithrombotic Treatment of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Early after an Acute Coronary Syndrome-Triple Therapy, Dual Antithrombotic Therapy with an Anticoagulant… Or, Rather, Temporary Dual Antiplatelet Therapy?

The combination of atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a complex situation in which a three-dimensional risk-cardioembolic, coronary, and hemorrhagic-has to be carefully managed. Triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) is burdened with a high risk of serious bleeding, while dual antithrombotic therapy with an anticoagulant (DAT) likely provides only suboptimal coronary protection early after stent implantation. Moreover, TAT precludes the advantages provided by the use of the latest and more potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitors in ACS patients. Here, we aimed to simulate and compare the expected coronary, cardioembolic, and hemorrhagic outcomes offered by DAT, TAT, or modern dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus one of the latest P2Y₁₂ inhibitors in AF patients early after an ACS. The comparison of numbers needed to treat to prevent major adverse events with the various antithrombotic regimens suggests that AF-ACS patients at high ischemic and hemorrhagic risk and at moderately low embolic risk (CHA₂DS₂VASc score 2-4) might safely withhold anticoagulation after revascularization for one month taking advantage of a modern DAPT, with a favorable risk-to-benefit ratio. In conclusion, this strategy, not sufficiently addressed in recent European and North American guidelines or consensus documents, adds to the spectrum of treatment options in these difficult patients; it might be the best choice in a substantial number of patients; and should be prospectively tested in a randomized controlled trial.

Antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary angioplasty: rational convincement and supporting evidence

BACKGROUND

The management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with an indication for long-term oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) is still a matter of debate. We aim to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of dual therapy (DT) compared to triple therapy (TT) in this clinical setting.

METHODS

A study level meta-analysis and a review of randomized trials selected using PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, Cochrane database of systematic reviews, Web of Science, and abstract from major cardiology congresses. Six randomized trials with 12,156 patients evaluating the strategy of DT vs. TT in patients treated with PCI with indication for long-term OAT were included.

RESULTS

Patients treated with DT demonstrated a 45% relative reduction in the risk of TIMI major bleeding (1.71% vs. 2.99%; OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.71; P<0.0001) and TIMI minor bleeding compared to TT arm (4.67% vs 7.83%, OR 0.55 95% CI 0.39-0.78, P = 0.0007). All-cause mortality was similar in two arms (3.95% vs 3.77%, P = 0.92), as well as cardiovascular mortality (2.21% vs 2.19%, P = 0.97). DT was associated with a borderline increase of ST (1.02% vs 0.67%, P = 0.07). No significant differences were observed in occurrence of MI and stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that DT is safer than TT with regard to occurrence of major bleeding. DT with a direct oral anticoagulant plus clopidogrel at discharge could be effective in most patients, maintaining aspirin in periprocedural phase and as longer "tailored" treatment for patients at higher ischemic risk.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

AIM

The objective of this article is to review the contemporary literature on the use of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease after undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Special consideration was given to the type and duration of therapy, treatment strategies for the elderly (≥65 years of age), and strategies to reduce bleeding.

METHODS

Relevant studies were searched through MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar. Of the 236 publications retrieved, 76 were considered relevant including 35 randomized controlled trials, 17 meta-analyses, 16 observational studies, and 8 published major guidelines.

RESULTS

Most trials, meta-analyses, and guidelines support 1 month of triple therapy (TT) with an oral anticoagulant (OAC), dual antiplatelet agents (DAPT) with aspirin (ASA)/clopidogrel, and, afterward, dual therapy (DT) with OAC and single antiplatelet agent for an additional 11 months, or alternatively DT alone for 12 months after PCI. Individual consideration is given to the risk and impact of stent thrombosis (ST), thromboembolism, and bleeding. Several trials and meta-analyses have also suggested that shorter DAPT duration (≤6 months) may be safer than longer therapy (≥6 months) when weighing the risk of bleeding with ischemic outcomes, especially with newer generation drug-eluting stents. The selective use of proton-pump inhibitors in patients prone to gastrointestinal bleeding who are subjected to prolonged exposure with TT or DT may be beneficial. In the elderly, the risk of bleeding from TT, compared with DT, outweighs the benefit of reducing ischemic events.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, tailoring therapy to the individual patient is recommended considering the ischemic and bleeding risk as well as the risk of thromboembolism. For most patients with AF, 1 month of TT and subsequently DT for additional 11 months are recommended.

Combination of Oral Anticoagulants and Single Antiplatelets versus Triple Therapy in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome: Stroke Prevention among Asians

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most prevalent arrhythmic disease, tends to foster thrombus formation due to hemodynamic disturbances, leading to severe disabling and even fatal thromboembolic diseases. Meanwhile, patients with AF may also present with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring stenting, which creates a clinical dilemma considering that majority of such patients will likely receive oral anticoagulants (OACs) for stroke prevention and require additional double antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) to reduce recurrent cardiac events and in-stent thrombosis. In such cases, the gentle balance between bleeding risk and atherothromboembolic events needs to be carefully considered. Studies have shown that congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years (doubled), diabetes mellitus, and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA; doubled)-vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, sex category (female; CHA ₂ DS ₂ -VASc) scores outperform other scoring systems in Asian populations and that the hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function (1 point each), stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile international normalized ratio (INR), elderly (>65 years), drugs/alcohol concomitantly (1 point each; HAS-BLED) score, a simple clinical score that predicts bleeding risk in patients with AF, particularly among Asians, performs better than other bleeding scores. A high HAS-BLED score should not be used to rule out OAC treatment but should instead prompt clinicians to address correctable risk factors. Therefore, the current review attempted to analyze available data from patients with nonvalvular AF who underwent stenting for ACS or CAD and elaborate on the direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and antiplatelet management among such patients. For majority of the patients, "triple therapy" comprising OAC, aspirin, and clopidogrel should be considered for 1 to 6 months following ACS. However, the optimal duration for "triple therapy" would depend on the patient's ischemic and bleeding risks, with DOACs being obviously safer than vitamin-K antagonists.

Outcomes of Cardiac Catheterization in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Anticoagulation in Contemporary in Practice: An Analysis of the ORBIT II Registry

BACKGROUND

Patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing cardiac catheterization face risks for embolic and bleeding events, yet information on strategies to mitigate these risks in contemporary practice is lacking.

METHODS

We aimed to describe the clinical/procedural characteristics of a contemporary cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation on OAC who underwent cardiac catheterization. Use of bleeding avoidance strategies and bridging therapy were described and outcomes including death, stroke, and major bleeding at 30 days and 1 year were compared by OAC type.

RESULTS

Of 13 404 patients in the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II Registry from 2013 to 2016, 741 underwent cardiac catheterization (139 with percutaneous coronary intervention) in the setting of OAC. The patients' median age was 71, 61.8% were male, white (87.2%), had hypertension (83.7%), hyperlipidemia (72.1%), diabetes mellitus (31.6%), and chronic kidney disease (28.2%); 20.2% received warfarin while 79.8% received direct acting oral anticoagulant. One third of patients underwent radial artery access, and bivalirudin was used in 4.6%. Bridging therapy was used more often in patients on warfarin versus direct acting oral anticoagulant (16.7% versus10.0%). OAC was interrupted in 93.8% of patients. Patients on warfarin versus direct acting oral anticoagulant were equally likely to restart OAC (58.0% versus 60.7%), had similar use of antiplatelet therapy (44.0% versus 41.3%) after catheterization, and had similar rates of myocardial infarction and death at 1 year, but higher rates of major bleeding (43.3 versus 12.9 events/100 patient years) and stroke (4.9 versus 1.9 events/100 patient years).

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world registry of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac catheterization, most cases are elective, performed by femoral access, with interruption of OAC. Bleeding avoidance strategies such as radial artery access and bivalirudin were used infrequently and use of bridging therapy was uncommon. Nearly 40% of patients did not restart OAC postprocedure, exposing patients to risk for stroke. Further research is necessary to optimize the management of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Is dual therapy the correct strategy in frail elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a very common arrhythmia in clinical practice. Its incidence and prevalence are age-related and are growing in the last years. Age is a risk factor also for coronary artery disease (CAD), and with the evolution of preventive care, the first event (acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) takes place at a later age. If elderly patients with AF and CAD undergo ACS or PCI, they have indication to assume triple therapy. Triple therapy (oral anticoagulation (OAC) plus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)) exposes patients to high bleeding risk. In the last 10 years, several clinical trials have tested dual therapy (OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy) in AF patients who undergo ACS or elective PCI. WOEST trial has tested warfarin + clopidogrel against triple therapy. PIONEER AF-PCI trial has tested low-dose rivaroxaban + P2Y12 inhibitor or very low-dose rivaroxaban + DAPT against standard triple therapy with warfarin. RE-DUAL PCI trial has tested two doses of dabigatran + P2Y12 inhibitor against standard triple therapy with Warfarin. AUGUSTUS trial has tested apixaban against warfarin both in dual therapy with P2Y12 inhibitor and in triple therapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin. ENTRUST-AF PCI, last published study, has tested edoxaban + P2Y12 inhibitor against triple therapy. All these trials show dual therapy reduces significantly bleeding risk than triple therapy. In this paper, we analyze these clinical trials to understand if dual therapy results can be applied to elderly patients and what is probably the better approach in elderly AF patients undergo to ACS or PCI.

Antithrombotic therapy in acute coronary syndrome and stable coronary artery disease patients with atrial fibrillation: a 3-year retrospective cohort study

Aim: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) occur frequently in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the optimal antithrombotic therapy is still debated. Methods & results: We analyzed 976 coronary artery disease patients with AF from 2013 to 2014. ACS+AF patients tend to take dual antiplatelet therapy (p < 0.001), whereas SCAD+AF patients prefer anticoagulation therapy (warfarin: p < 0.001, dabigatran: p < 0.05). Ventricular arrhythmia, congestive heart failure and ACS were the top three reasons for SCAD group patients' readmission, while reinfarction and congestive heart failure were two major factors in readmission of ACS group. Conclusion: ACS+AF group patients more likely choose dual antiplatelet therapy, whereas SCAD+AF group patients prefer anticoagulation therapy. Compared with ACS group, SCAD group had a higher rate of readmission.

Warfarin therapy in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: a 5 year follow-up retrospective cohort study

Objective: To evaluate warfarin use in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by investigating the stroke and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCEs) and bleeding events. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of the 5 year follow-up of 1134 patients with AF who underwent PCI. The patients were grouped according to whether they received warfarin or not. Baseline characteristics and the occurrence of MACCEs and bleeding events were compared between the two groups using the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scoring. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors related to the occurrence of MACCEs and bleeding. Results: Overall MACCE (p = .008) and mortality (p = .004) rates were significantly lower in the warfarin group compared with the non-warfarin group. Major bleeding, minor bleeding and overall bleeding were comparable in the two groups. Recurrent myocardial infarction (HR = 10.129, 95% CI = 4.737-21.655; p < .001) and a baseline CHA2DS2-VASc score >4 (HR = 2.035, 95% CI = 1.121-3.692; p = .019) were independent predictors of MACCEs in the warfarin group. A baseline HAS-BLED score ≥3 (HR = 5.498, 95% CI = 3.773-8.013; p < .001) and previous bleeding (HR = 3.058, 95% CI = 1.319-7.088; p = .009) were independent predictors of bleeding. Conclusions: Warfarin reduces the incidence of MACCEs but does not increase bleeding events in Chinese patients with AF who underwent PCI. For patients taking warfarin, recurrent myocardial infarction and a baseline CHA2DS2-VASc score >4 were related to MACCE occurrence.

From WOEST to AUGUSTUS: a review of safety and efficacy of triple versus dual antithrombotic regimens in patients with atrial fibrillation requiring percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome

For patients with atrial fibrillation with concomitant acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the increased risk of bleeding associated with the use triple therapy is well established. However, there is question whether it is a necessary risk for patients to prevent stroke and stent thrombosis. The purpose of this article is to highlight the findings of prior studies evaluating the comparative safety and efficacy of dual and triple antithrombotic regimens in the subgroup of atrial fibrillation patients requiring PCI for ACS. Trials that evaluated dual versus triple antithrombotic therapy demonstrated post-PCI treatment with a P2Y12 inhibitor alone was safer than aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor in patients also taking an anticoagulant for atrial fibrillation. Data regarding ischemic outcomes have not suggested harm with the omission of aspirin, but these studies have not been powered to assess efficacy outcomes, especially in ACS patients. These studies also demonstrate a significant reduction in bleeding events when aspirin is excluded from the post-PCI regimen in the ACS subgroup of atrial fibrillation patients. Further studies, with added focus on the ACS subgroup, are needed to potentially confirm that dual therapy may be as efficacious as triple therapy in ACS patients with atrial fibrillation.

Racial differences in long-term outcomes among black and white patients with drug-eluting stents

BACKGROUND

Some studies suggest that black patients may have worse outcomes after drug-eluting stent (DES) placement. There are limited data characterizing long-term outcomes by race. The objective was to compare long-term outcomes between black and white patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES implantation.

METHODS

We analyzed 915 black and 3,559 white (n = 4,474) consecutive patients who underwent DES placement at Duke University Medical Center from 2005 through 2013. Over 6-year follow up, we compared rates of myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, revascularization, and major bleeding between black and white patients. A multivariable Cox regression model was fit to adjust for potentially confounding variables. Dual-antiplatelet therapy use over time was determined by patient follow-up surveys and compared by race.

RESULTS

Black patients were younger; were more often female; had higher body mass indexes; had more diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and renal disease; and had lower median household incomes than white patients (P < .001). At 6 years after DES placement, black relative to white patients had higher unadjusted rates of MI (12.1% vs 10.1%, hazard ratio 1.25, 95% CI 1.00-1.57, P = .05) and major bleeding (17.8% vs 14.3%, hazard ratio 1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.54, P = .01), but there were no significant differences in other outcomes. After multivariable adjustment, there were no statistically significant racial differences in any of these outcomes at 6 years. Similarly, dual-antiplatelet therapy use was comparable between racial groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Unadjusted rates of MI and major bleeding over long-term follow up were higher among black patients compared to white patients, but these differences may be explained by racial differences in comorbid disease.

Prevention of Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Stenting

Background and Purpose- The optimal antithrombotic strategy to balance thromboembolic and bleeding events, especially acute stroke, for patients with atrial fibrillation following coronary stenting remains a matter of debate. We conducted a network meta-analysis to identify the antithrombotic regimen associated with the lowest rate of bleeding and thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation after coronary stenting. Methods- PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central were searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies of patients with atrial fibrillation after coronary stenting. The outcomes of interest were stroke, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiac events, mortality, and major bleeding. A network meta-analysis was performed comparing the available antithrombotic regimens in the literature. Results- Three randomized and 15 observational studies were included, with a total of 23 478 participants. Median follow-up was 2 years. Network meta-analysis demonstrated that vitamin K antagonist plus single antiplatelet therapy or direct-acting oral anticoagulant plus single antiplatelet therapy were the most effective regimens in preventing stroke. Direct-acting oral anticoagulant regimens were associated with lower major bleeding rates than vitamin K antagonist regimens. Regimens with dual antiplatelet therapy were associated with lower rates of myocardial infarction. Vitamin K antagonist plus dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with a lower mortality and low-dose direct-acting oral anticoagulants with decreased major cardiovascular adverse events. Conclusions- Direct-acting oral anticoagulant regimens were associated with less major bleeding and major cardiovascular adverse events, but vitamin K antagonists were associated with decreased mortality and stroke. These results suggest that the decision of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation after percutaneous coronary intervention needs to be individualized.

Anti-thrombotic therapy strategies with long-term anticoagulation after percutaneous coronary intervention - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Long-term oral anticoagulants (OAC) increases bleeding risk after the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with Aspirin and P2Y₁₂ inhibitors. We hypothesize that dual anti-thrombotic therapy (DATT) reduces bleeding without increased cardiovascular events.

Objectives: DATT does not increase adverse cardiovascular events compared to triple anti-thrombotic therapy (TATT).

Method: We searched MEDLINE, PUBMED, Google Scholar, Cochrane and EMBASE from inception to 6 April 2019 for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing DATT to TATT after PCI.

Results: We identified 641 citations (411 after excluding duplicates). Four RCTs with 5,317 patients (3,039 on DATT vs 2,278 on TATT) were included. DATT arm showed significantly reduced [total bleeding, 731 vs. 784, odds ratio [OR] = 0.51, Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.39–0.67, p < 0.00001, I² = 71% (I² = 0% without WOEST study)], [TIIMI major bleeding 60 vs. 80, OR = 0.56, CI = 0.4–0.79, p = 0.0009, I² = 0%], and [TIIMI minor bleeding, 70 vs 126, OR = 0.43, CI = 0.32–0.59, p < 0.00001, I² = 0%]. There was no difference in subsequent strokes, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and mortality. A trend towards decreased non-cardiac deaths with DATT was observed, 14 vs 26, OR = 0.55, CI = 0.27–1.10, p = 0.09, I² = 6%.

Conclusions: DATT is associated with significantly reduced bleeding and a trend towards reduced non-cardiac death with no difference in adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Bleeding and ischaemic outcomes in patients treated with dual or triple antithrombotic therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

The combination of oral anticoagulation with a P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a high bleeding risk. Dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) with omission of aspirin is a promising option to reduce bleedings, but carries a yet unknown risk of ischaemic events. We therefore sought to systematically review and analyse randomized controlled trials investigating DAT vs. triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) in patients with AF following PCI and/or acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Methods and results

We included four trials with overall 9317 patients (5039 DAT, 4278 TAT) in our analysis. Dual antithrombotic therapy was associated with a significant reduction in thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding [hazard ratio (HR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42–0.65; P = 0.0001], while the composite trial-defined ischaemic endpoint did not differ significantly between DAT and TAT (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.79–1.22; P = 0.88). There was also no difference regarding the occurrence of myocardial infarction (MI; HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.92–1.46; P = 0.21) or stent thrombosis (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.69–2.26; P = 0.46). Absolute numbers for MI were 131/4278 (3.1%) with TAT and 182/5039 (3.6%) with DAT, and for stent thrombosis 32/4278 (0.75%) and 52/5039 (1%), respectively. A post hoc power calculation based on the size and event rate of this meta-analysis revealed 80% power to detect a 37% and 100% increase in MI and stent thrombosis, respectively.

Conclusion

Dual antithrombotic therapy significantly reduces bleedings compared with TAT and seems to have a similar effect in preventing ischaemic endpoints in AF patients post-PCI or ACS. Future investigations are needed to determine its applicability specifically in patients at high risk of ischaemic outcomes.

Dual Anti-Thrombotic Therapy With Dabigatran After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation - Japanese and East-Asian Subgroup Analysis of the RE-DUAL PCI Trial

BACKGROUND

In the RE-DUAL PCI trial, dual anti-thrombotic therapy with dabigatran and a P2Y₁₂inhibitor had a lower risk of bleeding and similar risk reduction of thromboembolic events, compared with warfarin triple therapy, in patients with NVAF undergoing PCI. This subanalysis investigated whether the efficacy and safety of dabigatran dual therapy in Japanese and East-Asian patients enrolled in the RE-DUAL PCI trial were similar to those of the overall patient population of the trial. Methods and Results: RE-DUAL PCI was a multicenter, randomized trial. The primary endpoint was the time to first International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding events. Of the East-Asian patients (n=240) enrolled in the RE-DUAL PCI trial, 111 were Japanese and received dabigatran 110 mg (n=50) or 150 mg (n=13) dual therapy, or warfarin triple therapy (n=48). The incidence of the primary endpoint in Japanese patients was 26.0% and 29.2% with dabigatran 110-mg dual therapy and the corresponding warfarin triple therapy, and 23.1% and 30.8% with dabigatran 150-mg dual therapy and the corresponding warfarin triple therapy, respectively. Similar results were observed in the East-Asian population.

CONCLUSIONS

This subanalysis of the RE-DUAL PCI trial demonstrated that, like in the overall patient population, dabigatran dual therapy may offer physicians additional options for managing Japanese and East-Asian patients with NVAF receiving PCI.

[Oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation]

Anti-thrombotic management of percutaneous coronary intervention and atrial fibrillation relies on dual antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation respectively. Because of people ageing, the coexistence of coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation is increasing. This coexistence raises concerns about the anti-thrombotic strategy, particularly about the association of dual antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation, known as triple therapy. This triple therapy is responsible for a dramatic increase in bleeding risk (3-4 fold) especially in elderlies. However, older patients are also at increased risk of ischemic events. In this setting, dual anti-thrombotic strategies combining non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants and a P2Y12 inhibitor have been developed. These strategies provide a net benefit by reducing bleeding events. Therefore, they are becoming an attractive alternative, especially for frailer patient. This article reviews the rational, risks and strategies of anti-thrombotic therapy in elderly people with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation.

Antithromboembolic Strategies for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

We set out to synthesize available data on antithrombotic strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with a focus on triple antithrombotic therapy (triple therapy [TT]; dual antiplatelet therapy plus an anticoagulant) versus dual therapy (DT; one antiplatelet agent and an anticoagulant). We searched OVID MEDLINE and PubMed from January 2005 to September 2017 using the search terms oral anticoagulant, triple therapy, dual therapy, acute coronary syndrome, percutaneous coronary intervention, and atrial fibrillation (limited to randomized controlled trials, observational studies, English language, minimum 6-12 months of follow-up, minimum 100 human patients). We excluded surveys, literature reviews, articles not directly related to TT versus DT, incomplete studies, and short-term in-hospital studies. All eligible studies were reviewed to evaluate possible antithrombotic management strategies for patients with AF undergoing PCI. Extracted studies were categorized according to the specific anticoagulant (vitamin K antagonist vs. direct-acting oral anticoagulant) and P2Y₁₂ inhibitor used. Each category review was followed by a discussion providing insight into the quality of evidence and implications for practice. We found that the risk of bleeding with TT was higher than with DT, without demonstrated added benefit of reducing major adverse cardiovascular events. TT use should be minimized in patients with high bleeding risk, and patient-specific factors should be critically analyzed to select appropriate antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents.

Antithrombotic Regimens in Patients With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Whom an Anticoagulant Is Indicated: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who require anticoagulant therapy are at increased risk of bleeding. The optimal regimen for these patients is uncertain. This study aimed to compare safety and efficacy of antithrombotic regimens used in patients undergoing PCI with concomitant anticoagulant therapy. Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed among studies comparing antithrombotic regimens for anticoagulated patients undergoing PCI. The primary outcome of interest was major bleeding. The secondary outcomes were coronary events. The reference intervention was classic triple therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel plus VKA). Cluster rank incorporating risk (major bleeding) and benefit (all-cause death) was performed to identify the most appropriate regimen(s). Results: There were 3 RCTs (6 interventions) and 29 non-RCTs (8 interventions) that met the inclusion criteria with 22,179 patients. Network meta-analysis of RCTs indicated that dual therapy (DT), either with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or direct anticoagulant (DOAC) plus an antiplatelet, significantly reduced the risk of major bleeding compared to triple therapy (TT) [pooled RR of 0.51 (0.30-0.87) and 0.68 (0.49-0.94), respectively]. In addition, VKA-DT significantly reduced the risk of all-cause death compared to TT [pooled RR of 0.40 (0.17-0.93)]. Results from network meta-analysis of non-RCT paralleled that of RCTs. No significant differences of coronary events were found. Conclusions: In conclusion, for anticoagulated patients undergoing PCI, dual therapy, either with warfarin or DOAC plus an antiplatelet, should be considered due to its optimal balance on efficacy and safety.

Triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI: current evidence and practice

INTRODUCTION

Patients with atrial fibrillation taking oral anticoagulation and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent insertion are recommended to receive antithrombotic therapy with aspirin and P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist. This combinatory regime encompasses triple therapy (TT). Although TT reduces the risk of ischemic events such as stroke and stent thrombosis, it is associated with an increased bleeding risk. Areas covered: The efficacy and safety profile of TT is uncertain with undetermined optimal duration and therapeutic combination. This review summarizes relevant trials evaluating TTs application and introduces exploration of duration and dosage in addition to other contributory factors including stent type and choice of antithrombotic agents. Expert commentary: TT has shown to be effective for reduction of ischemic risk. However, trials have failed to demonstrate the regime's superiority in efficacy over alternatives such as dual therapy (single antiplatelet plus anticoagulant) and continue to denote an increased bleeding risk. Further research driven by a balance between thromboembolic and bleeding end points is required to demonstrate TTs potential beneficence, along with optimal duration identification and antithrombotic choice. Individualized patient risk stratification, along with risk factor optimization should also be incorporated.

Antithrombotic Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation: The Triple Trouble

One of the most common conundrums in all cardiovascular medicine pertains to the care of patients with atrial fibrillation after percutaneous coronary intervention, because of both dual antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulant therapy would seem to be necessary to reduce risks of stent thrombosis and thromboembolism, respectively, but also with an inevitable trade-off of more bleeding. Patients who require triple therapy are at high risk of both ischaemia and bleeding; therefore, defining a personalised secondary prevention strategy aimed at achieving the best net clinical benefit is essential. The good news is that we have entered an era of increased perceived and tangible safety that applies to both non-vitamin K-antagonist oral anticoagulants and newer drug-eluting stents. Even if the consistency across the major trials and the significantly lower risk of bleeding with dual therapy make it hard to argue that triple therapy should be used routinely, the aggregate evidence suggests that the net clinical benefit of dual therapy should give cardiologists confidence to drop aspirin when they are using a contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention strategy with drug-eluting stents. Waiting for more randomised trials and meta-analyses, for the time being, in patients not in clinical trials, full-dose oral triple therapy with dual antiplatelet agents and full-dose anticoagulation should be avoided as a routine practice, and the choice of the proper, that is, safer, oral anticoagulant, namely a non-vitamin K-antagonist oral anticoagulant, may be regarded by now as an additional bleeding avoiding strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

The Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Despite contemporary management, patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remain at high risk for thrombotic events. Several randomized controlled trials have evaluated the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with CAD, including in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and stable CAD, and in patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation. Trials of apixaban and dabigatran in patients with ACS demonstrate no benefit with an increased risk of bleeding. Conversely, rivaroxaban at a reduced dose of 2.5 mg twice daily reduced thrombotic events and all-cause mortality when added to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with ACS. Similarly, the addition of low-dose rivaroxaban to acetylsalicylic acid reduced the risk of thrombotic events in patients with stable CAD. However, the addition of a DOAC to antiplatelet therapy increased the risk of major bleeding. In patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, dual-pathway or low-dose triple therapy regimens including dabigatran or rivaroxaban reduced bleeding risk compared to traditional warfarin-based triple therapy, although it remains unclear whether these regimens preserve antithrombotic efficacy. DOAC-based antithrombotic regimens prove useful in patients with CAD in various settings; however, careful selection of patients and regimens per trial protocols are critical to achieving net benefit.

The Management of Combined Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Particularly Complex Challenge, Especially in the Elderly

Anticoagulation is superior to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), otherwise the prevention of ischemic risk and stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is warranted by DAPT. The coexistence of conditions requiring combined antithrombotic therapies is becoming an increasing relevant clinical problem, whose therapeutic management has long been found in the medical experience rather than in guidelines and consensus. Recently, updates in guidelines and relevant studies have been published in order to better clarify the best management of combined antithrombotic therapy. In the present review, we have analyzed the recent literature, underlining the progresses and the residual limits of the most up-to-date evidence on the management of patients requiring dual or triple antithrombotic therapy, due to coexisting AF and coronary artery disease. An in-depth overview is also focused on the management of antithrombotic therapy in the elderly patient, which represents an even more complex challenge for the clinician. This is due to the high prevalence, among over 65 years aged people, of conditions requiring association of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs, the numerous comorbidities, the higher risk of complications, such as bleedings, and the lack of specific evidence, especially for the frail elderly. Nowadays, triple therapy [oral anticoagulation (OAC) plus dual antiplatelet agents] for the shortest possible time should be the treatment for AF patients undergoing PCI, whereas dual therapy (single antiplatelet plus OAC) may be preferred for patients at high bleeding risk.

Efficacy and safety of triple therapy versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary stenting: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing coronary stenting is unknown. The present meta-analysis sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of triple therapy (TT; warfarin, clopidogrel and aspirin) vs dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; clopidogrel plus aspirin) in those patients.

METHODS

PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched for studies enrolling AF patients undergoing coronary stenting on TT and DAPT up to September 2016, and fourteen studies were included. Efficacy outcomes included ischemic stroke, stent thrombosis, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI); safety outcome was major bleeding. We conducted meta-analysis and used odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to compare TT and DAPT. Meta-regression, sensitivity and subgroup analysis were taken to investigate the source of heterogeneity in the outcome of major bleeding.

RESULTS

14 eligible observational studies with 11,697 subjects were identified. Compared with DAPT, TT had decreased the risk of ischemic stroke [OR = 0.74, 95% CI (0.59, 0.93), P = 0.009] and stent thrombosis [OR = 0.40, 95% CI (0.18, 0.93), P = 0.033]. While, there was an increased risk of major bleeding [OR = 1.55, 95% CI (1.16, 2.09), P = 0.004] associated with TT. The risk of MACE, all-cause mortality and MI had no significant statistical difference between TT and DAPT. Furthermore, the results of univariate and multivariate meta-regression analysis implicated that there were no obvious correlations between certain baseline characteristics (age, gender, race, hypertension, study design) and risk of major bleeding. Also of major bleeding, the findings of sensitivity analysis were generally robust, and a prespecified subgroup analysis of race demonstrated that the source of heterogeneity might attribute to Asian studies mostly.

CONCLUSIONS

TT reduced the risk of ischemic stroke and stent thrombosis with an acceptable major bleeding risk compared with DAPT, and TT was considered as a valid alternative in AF patients undergoing coronary stenting. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to ensure the reliability of these data and find the optimal therapeutic strategy in this setting of patients.

The Therapeutic Efficacy of Danhong Injection Combined With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is widely used in treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) clinically. It is believed that Danhong injection (DHI) extracted from salviae miltiorrhizae and flos carthami combined with PCI could increase the therapeutic efficacy on ACS. We provide an updated meta-analysis with detailed information on combination of DHI and PCI therapy.

Materials and Methods: Electronic databases were searched for appropriate articles without language limitations on key words before October 22, 2017. All trails were screened according to certain criteria. Quality of eligible studies was also assessed. We made a detailed record of outcome measurements. RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform the meta-analysis.

Results: 14 articles involving 1533 patients with ACS were selected. Compared to PCI treatment alone, total efficacy rate (TER) was enhanced and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were reduced significantly for the combination of DHI and PCI (P < 0.00001). Vascular endothelial function was improved by significantly decreasing the contents of ET-1, vWF and increasing the levels of NO and FMD (P < 0.00001). The serum levels of IL-1, IL-6, IL-18, TNF-α, LpPLA2, MMP-9, and pentraxin-3 were significantly decreased (P < 0.00001), whereas IL-10 in serum was increased (P < 0.00001), indicating a stronger anti-inflammatory effect of the combination. The combination therapy decreased the serum levels of CD62P, PAGT, PADT, FIB-C significantly (P < 0.05), which was beneficial for preventing coagulation of platelets. Blood lipid was also affected by regulating TC, TG, LDL, and HDL, but the results were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Cardiac function was improved by increasing LEVF (P = 0.006) but not LVED (P = 0.08). The combination treatment was associated with an improvement in antioxidant effect by decreasing MDA and increasing SOD significantly (P < 0.00001).

Conclusion: Combination of DHI and PCI in treatment of ACS could improve TER and reduce incidence of MACE after PCI therapy. These effects may be mediated by combined actions of several mechanisms. However, these results of this study should be handled cautiously due to the limitations of this research. Several rigorous RCTs are in need to confirm these findings.

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with coronary artery disease on antithrombotics and subsequent mortality risk

BACKGROUND

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a common complication for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) due to the use of antithrombotic medications. Limited data exist describing which patients are at increased risk for mortality.

AIM

This study aims to (i) determine whether patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or triple therapy are at higher risk of 90-day and 6-month mortality compared with patients on aspirin alone and (ii) evaluate risk factors for mortality in patients with CAD on antithrombotics hospitalized with LGIB.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with LGIB and CAD while on aspirin at a single academic medical center from 2007 to 2015. Patients were identified using a validated, machine-learning algorithm and classified by use of aspirin, DAPT, or triple therapy. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards were used to determine mortality associated risk factors.

RESULTS

Seven hundred sixteen patients were identified with LGIB and CAD. Four hundred seventy-two (65.9%) patients were on aspirin monotherapy, 179 (25%) on aspirin and thienopyridine (DAPT), and 65 (9.1%) on aspirin, thienopyridine, and systemic anticoagulant (triple therapy). On univariate analysis, triple therapy use was associated with increased risk of 90-day (hazard ratio [HR] 3.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52-5.92, P = 0.003) and 6-month (HR 2.46, 95%CI 1.29-4.35, P = 0.008) mortality. Holding anticoagulation was associated with higher mortality at 90 days (HR 2.30, 95%CI 1.27-4.07, P = 0.007). On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for confounding variables, the use of triple therapy remained associated with higher 90-day mortality (HR 3.23, 95%CI 1.56-6.16, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Triple therapy is associated with mortality at 90 days and at 6 months post discharge.

Optimal antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary stents: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The optimal antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still debated. This review is an update of a previous review and aims to summarize new published data regarding the management of this group of atrial fibrillation patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent data report an underuse of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI while indicated. However, tools for risk assessment and thus better guidance for decision-making are lacking, especially for elderly atrial fibrillation patients. New evidence suggests that the combination of oral anticoagulation and clopidogrel without aspirin may improve clinical outcomes in comparison with triple therapy; however, there is little data regarding the role of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants and newer P2Y12 inhibitors in these regimens.

SUMMARY

Despite accumulating data on the assessment of bleeding and thrombotic risk, the management of elderly atrial fibrillation patients, new treatment regimens, and the role of more potent antithrombotic agents, the optimal antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation after PCI is still unclear. In the meantime, careful assessment of both thrombotic and bleeding risk and individualized decision-making are paramount to ensure the best patient outcomes.

Meta-Analysis Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Dual Versus Triple Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

In patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the effectiveness and safety of dual compared with triple antithrombotic therapy are a matter of debate, especially when considering the prevention of end points at low incidence, such as myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, or mortality. This study-level meta-analysis included 4 controlled randomized trials and 6,036 patients with a clinical indication to chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC) after PCI, mainly for atrial fibrillation. Patients receiving dual therapy with a single antiplatelet agent, essentially a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor, plus OAC were compared with those treated with triple therapy (aspirin, a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor, and OAC). The incidence of the following outcomes was evaluated: Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major and minor bleeding, MI, stent thrombosis, stroke, cardiovascular, and all-cause death. Occurrence of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding was significantly lower in patients treated with dual therapy: 1.97% versus 3.53% in those on triple therapy (odds ratios 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.78, p = 0.0007); rates of minor bleeding were also decreased in the former (57% relative reduction). With dual therapy, there was not a statistically significant difference in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (3.81% vs 4.01%, p = 0.37 and 1.62% vs 2.02%, p = 0.42, respectively). Incidence of MI (3.25% vs 2.78%, p = 0.61), definite stent thrombosis (0.92% vs 0.66%, p = 0.46), and stroke (1.28% vs 1.32%, p = 0.85) was similar in the 2 treatment strategies. In patients with long-term indication to OAC after PCI, compared with triple therapy, dual antithrombotic therapy reduces bleeding, without an excess in thromboembolic and ischemic cardiac events.

Optimal antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation following percutaneous coronary intervention: A systemic review and meta-analysis

A challenge for antithrombotic treatment is patients who present with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome, particularly in patients who have undergone coronary percutaneous intervention with stenting (PCIS). In the present study, a total of nine observational trials published prior to July 2017 that investigated the effects of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; aspirin + clopidogrel) and triple oral antithrombotic therapy (TOAT; DAPT + warfarin) among patients with AF concurrent to PCIS were collected from the Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases and conference proceedings of cardiology, gastroenterology and neurology meetings. A meta-analysis was performed using fixed- or random-effect models according to heterogeneity. The subgroups were also analyzed on the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), stroke and bleeding events in the two treatment groups. Analysis of baseline characteristics indicated that there was no significant difference in the history of coexistent disease or conventional therapies between the DAPT and TOAT groups. The primary end point incidence was 2,588 patients in the DAPT group (n=13,773) and 871 patients in the TOAT group (n=5,262) following pooling of all nine trials. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of primary end points between the DAPT and TOAT groups. Odds ratio (OR)=0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.73-1.27, P=0.79, with heterogeneity between trials (I2=82%, P<0.00001). Subsequently, on subgroup analysis, the results indicated no increased risk of major bleeding or ischemic stroke in the DAPT or TOAT group. However, compared with the TOAT group, there was an apparent increased risk of MACE plus ischemic stroke in the DAPT group (OR=1.62, 95% CI=1.43-1.83, P<0.00001) with heterogeneity between trials (I2=70%, P=0.01). In conclusion, the present meta-analysis suggests that TOAT (aspirin + clopidogrel + warfarin) therapy for patients with AF concurrent to PCIS significantly reduced the risk of MACE and stroke compared with DAPT (aspirin + clopidogrel) therapy. Further randomized controlled clinical trials are required to confirm the efficacy of the optimal antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF following PCIS.

Contemporary Reflections on the Safety of Long-Term Aspirin Treatment for the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

Aspirin has been the cornerstone of therapy for the secondary prevention treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease since landmark trials were completed in the late 1970s and early 1980s that demonstrated the efficacy of aspirin for reducing the risk of ischemic events. Notwithstanding the consistent benefits demonstrated with aspirin for both acute and chronic cardiovascular disease, there are a number of toxicities associated with aspirin that have been showcased by recent long-term clinical trials that have included an aspirin monotherapy arm. As an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase (COX), aspirin impairs gastric mucosal protective mechanisms. Previous trials have shown that up to 15-20 % of patients developed gastrointestinal symptoms with aspirin monotherapy, and approximately 1 % of patients per year had a clinically significant bleeding event, including 1 in 1000 patients who suffered an intracranial or fatal bleed. These risks have been shown to be compounded for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are also treated with other antithrombotic agents during the acute care/procedural period, as well as for an extended time period afterwards. Given observations of substantial increases in bleeding rates from many prior long-term clinical trials that have evaluated aspirin together with other oral platelet inhibitors or oral anticoagulants, the focus of contemporary research has pivoted towards tailored antithrombotic regimens that attempt to either shorten the duration of exposure to aspirin or replace aspirin with an alternative antithrombotic agent. While these shifts are occurring, the safety profile of aspirin when used for the secondary prevention treatment of patients with established cardiovascular disease deserves further consideration.

Antithrombotic therapy strategies for atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective

The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet agents, vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify clinical trials comparing antiplatelet drugs with VKA and NOACs or their combination in AF patients undergoing PCI with a mean/median follow-up of at least 12 months. A network meta-analysis was conducted to directly and indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of competitive antithrombotic regimens with a Bayesian random-effects model. Results were presented as relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

A total of 15 studies enrolling 13,104 patients were included. Among 5 regimens, rivaroxaban 15 mg daily plus P2Y₁₂ inhibitor treatment demonstrated significant superiority over dual- and triple-antiplatelet therapies (DAPT, TT) in reducing thromboembolic events (0.64 [0.38, 0.95] and 0.68 [0.43, 0.98], respectively) but showed the maximum possibility of major bleeding risk, while VKA plus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) seemed the safest. Significantly less risk of major bleeding was seen in DAPT group than that in TT group (0.63 [0.39, 0.99]).

Conclusions

The present study suggests that combination of VKA and SAPT is the best choice for AF patients undergoing PCI considering both efficacy and safety. Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus DAPT treatment owns the highest probability to be the optimal alternative to VKA plus SAPT for these patients.