TCT-744 New generation devices for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (Boston Scientific Lotus Valve and Edwards Sapien 3) are superior compared with last generation devices (Edwards XT and Medtronic Corevalve) with respect to VARC-2 outcome

Comparison of 1-Year Survival and Frequency of Paravalvular Leakage Using the Sapien 3 Versus the Sapien XT for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation shortcomings such as relevant paravalvular leakage (PVL) have been shown to negatively impact survival. The Sapien 3 prosthesis has added features to address these problems. We compared the functional performance of the Sapien 3 (S3) and its predecessor Sapien XT (XT), with a particular focus on PVL. We analyzed 601 patients presenting with severe native aortic valve stenosis treated with either Sapien XT (n = 405, 2011 to 2014, mean STS-PROM [Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality] 11.0%) or Sapien 3 prosthesis (n = 196, 2014 to 2016, mean STS-PROM 9.2%). Beside a propensity score-based comparison, we modeled the likelihood of PVL as a function of oversizing and prosthesis. Primary end points were 1-year survival, degree of oversizing, and occurrence of PVL. One-year survival (stratified log-rank p = 1.00) and 30-day mortality (S3: 10 of 126 vs XT: 10 of 126, p = 1.00) did not differ. In the matched cohort, oversizing was less common in the S3 group (absolute median difference of 7% in oversizing, interquartile range 1.1% to 12.7%, p = 0.025). PVL > = 1° was similar in both groups (S3: 13 of 126 vs XT: 20 of 126, p = 0.296). Mean gradients were lower in the XT group (median difference 1.0 mm Hg, interquartile range 0.3 to 1.8 mm Hg, p = 0.005). Rate of postdilatation, implantation of a second valve (valve-in-valve), annular rupture, and new pacemaker implantation were similar (all p = 1.00). In conclusion, compared with the Sapien XT, the redesigned Sapien 3 prosthesis offers effective sealing against PVL without grossly compromising hemodynamic performance or increasing the necessity for new pacemaker implantation.

Repositionable self-expanding aortic bioprosthesis

INTRODUCTION

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation/replacement (TAVI or TAVR) has been established as a first line therapy in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) at high or prohibitive surgical risk and as an alternative in elderly patients with intermediate surgical risk. Since its first-in-human procedure in 2002, the past 15-years have shown rapid developments in TAVI technology with the introduction and further improvement of new transcatheter heart valves (THV). Areas covered: There are currently several THV systems available, based on balloon-expandable, self-expandable or other technologies. Some of these are repositionable and retrievable even after partial or full deployment, potentially reducing the risk of malpositioning. The aim of this review is to describe such repositionable self-expandable THV systems. Expert commentary: Repositionability potentially represents a crucial step towards higher safety and efficacy of TAVI. It is unclear if full self-expandability or a combination of self and mechanical expansion will be more advantageous.