Refining the Approach to Risk Stratification in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Elevated α-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase is associated with in-hospital mortality in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy

Background

Previous Study Found That Implantation of a Cardioverter-Defibrillator Likely Caused a Worse Prognosis in Older Patients With non-Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure. This Suggests That More Precise Risk Stratification Is Needed in Elderly Patients. We Conducted a Retrospective Study to Evaluate the Association of α-Hydroxybutyrate Dehydrogenase (α-HBDH) With Mortality During Hospitalization in Elderly Patients With non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy (NIDCM).

Methods

1,019 Elderly Patients (age ≥60 Years) Diagnosed With NIDCM Were Retrospectively Enrolled From January 2010 to December 2019. Univariate and Multivariate Analyses Were Showed to Explore the Relationship Between α-HBDH and in- Hospital Death.

Results

Patients in elevated α-HBDH group (>182 U/L) had a longer hospital stays and higher in-hospital mortality. Univariate logistics regression analysis showed that elevated α-HBDH was significantly related to mortality (OR: 7.004, 95% CI: 3.583–13.693, p < 0.001). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis reflected that α-HBDH levels had excellent predictive power for in-hospital death (AUC = 0.810, 95% CI: 0.745–0.876, p < 0.001). After adjustment of age, serum creatine, albumin and LVEF, multivariate regression analysis validated the association of elevated α-HBDH with increased risk of in-hospital death (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Elevated α-HBDH level is significantly related to in-hospital mortality in older patients with NIDCM.

ECG as a risk stratification tool in patients with wearable cardioverter-defibrillator

BACKGROUND

The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is increasingly used in patients at elevated risk for ventricular arrhythmias but not fulfilling the indications for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Currently, there is an insufficient risk prediction of fatal arrhythmias in patients at risk. In this study, we assessed the prognostic role of baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) in WCD patients.

METHODS

WCD patients from diverse clinical institutions in Germany (n = 227) were retrospectively enrolled and investigated for the incidences of death or ventricular arrhythmias during WCD wearing. In addition, the widely accepted ECG predictors of adverse outcome were analyzed in patients with arrhythmic events.

RESULTS

Life-threatening arrhythmias occurred in 22 (9.7 %) patients, mostly in subjects with ischemic heart disease (15 of 22). There was no difference in baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in subjects with and without arrhythmic events (31.3 ± 7.9 % vs. 32.6 ± 8.3 %; p = 0,24). Patients with arrhythmia exhibited significantly longer QRS duration (109.5 ± 23.1 ms vs. 100.6 ± 22.3 ms, p = 0,04), Tpeak-Tend (Tp-e) (103.1 ± 15.6 ms vs. 93.2 ± 19.2 ms, p = 0,01) and QTc (475.0 ± 60.0 ms vs. 429.6 ± 59.4 ms, p < 0,001) intervals. In contrast, no significant differences were found for incidences of fragmented QRS (27.3 % vs. 24 %, p = 0.79) and inverted/biphasic T-waves (16.6 % vs. 22.7 %, p = 0,55). In multivariate regression analysis both Tp-e (HR 1.03; 95 % CI 1.001-1.057; p = 0.02) and QTc (HR 1.02; 95 % CI 1.006-1.026; p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors of ventricular arrhythmias. After WCD use, the prophylactic ICD was indicated in 76 patients (33 %) with uneventful clinical course but persistent LVEF ≤35 %. The ECG analysis in these subjects did not reveal any relevant changes in arrhythmogenesis markers.

CONCLUSIONS

ECG repolarization markers Tp-e and QTc are associated with malignant arrhythmias in WCD patients and may be used - in addition to other established risk markers - to identify appropriate patients for ICD implantation.